Dow jumps as Obama admin. moves on bad bank assets

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Dow jumps as Obama admin. moves on bad bank assets stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM | 03/23/09 09:51 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama speaks to reporters in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, Monday, March 23, 2009. From left are, National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers, Council of Economic Advisers Chair Christina Romer, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the president. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration aimed squarely at the crisis clogging the nation's credit system Monday with a plan to take over up to $1 trillion in sour mortgage securities with the help of private investors. For once, Wall Street cheered. The announcement, closely stage-managed throughout the day, filled in crucial blanks in the administration's financial rescue package and formed what President Barack Obama called "one more critical element in our recovery."

The coordinated effort by the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. relies on a mix of government and private money _ mostly from institutional investors such as hedge funds _ to help banks rid their balance sheets of real-estate related securities that are now extremely difficult to value.

The goal, said Obama, is to get banks lending again, so "families can get basic consumer loans, auto loans, student loans, (and so) that small businesses are able to finance themselves, and we can start getting this economy moving again."

It was a huge gambit and one that came like a tonic to Wall Street, which had panned an earlier outline of the program that lacked detail.

Stocks soared, the Dow Jones industrial average shooting up nearly 500 points, thanks to the bank-assets plan and a report showing an unexpected jump in home sales.

The introduction of the plan was closely choreographed so that the president _ rather than Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner _ would be the first administration official to appear on camera at midday to discuss it. Geithner met earlier in the day, before markets opened, with a group of reporters at the Treasury Department to go over specifics. But cameras and broadcast-quality audio recorders were barred.

It was the reverse of what happened Feb. 10. Then, after Obama had helped raise expectations toward Geithner and the plan, the treasury secretary went before cameras and bombed. The Dow plunged about 300 points amid investor confusion about details.

The fleshed-out plan is designed to help fix a value on damaged mortgage loans and other toxic securities.

Story continues below
advertisement

If the value of the securities goes up, the private investors and taxpayers would share in the gains. If the values go down, the government and private investors would incur losses.

"This will help banks clean up their balance sheets and make it easier for them to raise capital," Geithner said.

The plan will take $75 billion to $100 billion from the government's existing $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. The government will pair this with private investments and loans from the FDIC and the Fed to generate $500 billion in purchasing power.

Geithner said purchases eventually could grow to $1 trillion _ roughly half of the estimated $2 trillion of toxic assets on bank books now.

On the hot seat, Geithner has a lot personally tied to the success of the new program. His performance in the Cabinet, including his slowness in learning about multimillion dollar executive bonuses paid by insurance giant AIG after taking bailout money, has been severely criticized by some in Congress.

Geithner testifies on Tuesday before the House Financial Services Committee.

Under a typical transaction, for every $100 in soured mortgages being purchased from banks, the private sector would put up $7 and that would be matched by $7 from the government. The remaining $86 would be covered by a government loan.

The plan was introduced ahead of a summit next week in London of 20 major and developing economies struggling with the global recession.

Obama is trying to get other wealthy countries to do more to stimulate their economies with government spending, as the United States has done. However, other countries, particularly ones in Europe, are resisting U.S. calls for more stimulus and would prefer to see more internationally coordinated bank regulation.

The administration was expected to outline its plan for financial regulation overhaul later this week.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said she expects her agency will finance as much as $500 billion in purchases of residential and commercial real estate loans.

Bair said the program should help banks clean up their balance sheets and raise fresh capital, though she added that "there may be some banks beyond help." The agency has said before it expects more bank failures, she said.

A joint statement by the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department said the Fed should play a "central role" in preventing future financial crises. That implied a wish that Congress expand the Fed's authority in regulating all financial institutions, not just banks.

Geithner said taxpayers still could lose money on the deal to soak up bad assets but there was no fixing the system without risk.

Other options, such as having the government purchase the securities outright or letting them languish on bank balance sheets, would pose even greater vulnerabilities, he said, and it was important to find the right blend of risk versus reward.

"I am very confident this scheme dominates all the alternatives for trying to find that balance," he said.

The sentiment was echoed by congressional Democrats, who said risk seemed inevitable with any plan big enough to work.

But House Republican Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia called Obama's plan a "shell game" that hid the true cost.

He said he hoped the administration would consider instead an earlier Republican proposal to set up a government-sponsored insurance program for mortgage-related securities.

The administration plan "seems to offer little incentive for private investors to participate unless the subsidy is made so rich that it comes at the expense of the taxpayer," Cantor said in a statement.

The new program marks a return by the government to a strategy of acquiring toxic securities. Henry Paulson, who was treasury secretary in the final days of the Bush administration, abandoned plans to purchase these securities, largely because they were impossible to price.

The plan builds on earlier programs to pump money into banks, help some homeowners repay their mortgages and stimulate college, small business and other forms of lending.

"There's still great fragility in the financial systems, but we think that we are moving in the right direction," Obama said after meeting Geithner and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.

Obama said the plan will allow taxpayers to "share in the upside as well as the downside."

Treasury officials had no firm forecast on when the government would begin making the asset purchases although market expectations were that the process could begin within weeks.

___

AP writers Martin Crutsinger, Anne Flaherty, Christopher S. Rugaber and Jeannine Aversa contributed to this story.

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration aimed squarely at the crisis clogging the nation's credit system Monday with a plan to take over up to $1 trillion in sour mortgage securities with the help...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration aimed squarely at the crisis clogging the nation's credit system Monday with a plan to take over up to $1 trillion in sour mortgage securities with the help...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
16
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- foresight I'm a Fan of foresight 4 fans permalink

Here we go again "The Bobsey Twins" Giethner and Bernanke the two stooges playing "Rng around the Rosie" Ashes Ashes we all Fall Down. The Three card Monty game is on today Tim, Ben and Barney. What a joke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 03/24/2009
- sonomarc I'm a Fan of sonomarc 6 fans permalink
photo

the best thing about this is that a market is being created for the buying and selling of these financial products and that pricing will be identifiable. Before now nobody knew what they were worth, which caused bank balance sheets to be valued either too high or too low. This may not be the resolution others wanted, but it seems pretty good from my perspective.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 03/23/2009
- kj11 I'm a Fan of kj11 permalink

IF WALL STREET IS HAPPY THEN SOMETHING IS WRONG.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: GET RID OF GEITHNER AND SUMMERS.

THE PEOPLE ELECTED YOU...NOT WALL STREET.

YOUR MOTHER AND GRANDPARENTS ARE ROLLING OVER IN THEIR GRAVES.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 03/23/2009
- ohiomark I'm a Fan of ohiomark 123 fans permalink

This is the part where I, as a taxpayer, not only have to pay my own mortgage, but I also must now pay for the mortgages of people who should have never gotten a mortgage in the first place.

Thanks, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Janet Reno, Barney Fwank, Chris Dodd and ACORN.

By the way, there is a reason why they invented apartments. Look into it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 03/23/2009
- URDRWHO I'm a Fan of URDRWHO 2 fans permalink

Let me see if I understand this?

Banks incorrectly underwrite loans
Banks sell loans to wall street
Wall street bundles loans and sells to investors

Things go bad.............................

Banks cry to the government....get bailout?
Brokerage firms cry to the USA ..........get bailout?

Treasury has brilliant idea...............

Create an auction and have the private investors such as mutual fund companies like buy the bad loans.

Mutual fund companies bundle the bad loans and placed them into funds for sale
Wall street now gets the bad loans back and can sell them again to the investors
If it fails the FDIC will cover all involved

Wall street is happy today....yippee
People are happy today yippee......

The crap has gone full circle and Wall Street has it all to sell again. Everybody happy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 03/23/2009
- ohiomark I'm a Fan of ohiomark 123 fans permalink

You left out the fact that the banks were forced to make the "bad loans" because of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 and the strict enforcement of the act in the 1990's under Clinton and his Justice Dept.

This was caused by government and now government is coming in to "save the day"!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 03/24/2009
- robjh1 I'm a Fan of robjh1 23 fans permalink
photo

Can we and should we trust Geithner? He seems to be too closely tied to Wall Street. Not that that's a bad thing but I hope he can see beyond them in order to repair the broken economy. Scary stuff if he can't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 03/23/2009
photo

Oh, it's a bad thing...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 03/23/2009

Since the govt. is carrying toxic asset risk.....maybe WE deserve a peak in the toxic off shore accounts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 03/23/2009
- Trekie I'm a Fan of Trekie 7 fans permalink
photo

Fair enough. I agree. If we own it, we should see it all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 03/23/2009

Well, I woud take a different approach, which I have outlined on other posts.

But I still hope Geithner succeeds in getting this off the ground. If he doesn't it will seriously hurt Obama politically, and the alternative to Obama will inevitably be a resurgence in Republican popularity, if it happens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 03/23/2009
photo

"Geithner defended the decision to have the government carry so much of the risk. He said the alternative would have been to do nothing and risk a more prolonged recession or have the government carry all of the risk."

Oh my! The plan as it stands DOES involve government carrying "all of the risk." Does no one see the fatal flaw here? I'm betting Geithner and the banks do, which is why they like it so much. It's a SCAM, folks. Try to stay with me:

I'm a bank with $100 billion in toxic assets. I need a buyer, but I don't want to sell for a reduced price. So I find another bank in the SAME situation. I put up $7 billion, and buy his toxic assets at full value ($100 billion). He returns the favour. The whole thing goes bust and the government pays the $93 billion difference. In fact, we might just exchange the $100 billion in assets at an INFLATED price of $107 billion and make no loss whatsoever. Or we could inflate our purchase prices further and make a profit!

It's an end around. Geithner found a way to purchase every last worthless asset, at full value. It's a direct transfer from the American people directly to the banks, except it's better because that one extra step makes it difficult for most Americans to figure out where they are getting fleeced.

"Wall Street seemed to feel rejuvenated."

Ya think?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 03/23/2009
- DonKrieger I'm a Fan of DonKrieger 3 fans permalink
photo

Here are the Treasury Dept Fact Sheet and other docs in a single convenient fast form:

http://publicservice.evendon.com/TTIPM.htm

Don
http://publicservice.evendon.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 03/23/2009

If these "good guys" end up making money on this program, who is to say these very same Democrat Party leaders who are saying they are different won't turn on them and claim they're fleecing the taxpayer? Then there will be a tax to reclaim any profits accrued. Who is to say the government will honor the non-recourse nature of the loans, if the program goes ahead as described?

The political risk of this is simply too high. The only way a company avoids being vilified is by participating and then losing money. Participating and making money or participating and then walking away from the subsidized loans will end up with buses of Democrat Party activists protesting in front of the homes of employees and 90% taxes. It's not worth doing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 03/23/2009

This sounds more like a BUSH & Co Plan!
Hedge Funds & Insurance Companies get low interest loans from the taxpayer and then invest our money and reap any rewards while we pay for losses?
Of course, Wall Street is up sharply while Joe 6 pack is left paying the tab.
What a scam!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 03/23/2009

If Barak O'Bilderberg * doesn't start listening AND ACTING according to what the experts (KRUGMAN, for example) are suggesting, he will alienate every worker that contributed their hard earned money to his campaign before the first 100 days are finished. Every significant promise he made during his campaign has been broken : he has done the opposite in his first 60 days. WHY ? read the link below and you'll have greater insight. Perhaps we shouldn't have laughed and belittled Ralph Nader so readily...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=92700

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 03/23/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect