More

US Asked Binyam Mohamed To Drop Torture Claim In Exchange For Freedom: British Court

DAVID STRINGER   03/23/09 01:32 PM ET   AP

Binyam Mohamed

LONDON — U.S. authorities asked a Guantanamo Bay detainee to drop allegations of torture and agree not to speak publicly about his ordeal in exchange for his freedom, according to British court documents.

A ruling by two British High Court judges, issued in October but released only on Monday, said the U.S. offered former detainee Binyam Mohamed a plea bargain last year _ six years after he was first detained as an enemy combatant.

It was the first time details of the plea bargain offer were made public. The ruling said U.S. military prosecutors also asked that Mohamed plead guilty to two charges, accept a three-year sentence and agree to testify against other suspected terrorists.

Mohamed, an Ethiopian who moved to Britain as a teenager, was arrested in Pakistan in 2002. He claims he was tortured both there and in Morocco, before he was transferred to Guantanamo in 2004.

He was freed in February after months of negotiation between the U.S. and Britain. All charges against him were dropped last year.

Mohamed refused to agree to any deal that prevented him from discussing his treatment, Lord Justice John Thomas and Mr. Justice David Lloyd Jones said in the ruling.

"He wanted it to be made clear to the world what had happened and how he has been treated by the United States government since April 2002," Thomas said in the ruling.

The British judges had ordered that their written ruling be withheld from the public until after Mohamed was released.

The judges considered the plea bargain issue during an appeal to the High Court by Mohamed's lawyers demanding the British government release documents they claim would prove he was tortured.

Issuing a judgment on the case in February, Thomas said there was evidence to show Mohamed was tortured, but that the documents could not be made public because of the British government's national security concerns.

He said Britain's government had said releasing the documents could undermine intelligence-sharing with the United States.

Mohamed claims British intelligence officers supplied questions to his interrogators and were complicit in his torture _ a claim Prime Minister Gordon Brown has rejected.

In investigating Mohamed's claims, the British court reviewed the draft plea bargain and correspondence between military prosecutors and Mohamed's lawyers.

The ruling quoted testimony from Mohamed's lawyer about the offer.

"Mr. Mohamed must sign a statement saying he has not been tortured, which would be false. And he must agree not to make any public statement about what he has been through," Clive Stafford Smith told the court in October, according to the ruling.

The ruling also quotes then-U.S. military prosecutor Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld as saying Mohamed would be given a date for his release if he agreed to the terms.

Vandeveld _ who has since quit his post _ had said Mohamed would need to plead guilty to two charges in exchange for a three-year sentence and to testify against other suspects, according to the court documents.

The ruling discloses that, had Mohamed agreed to the plea bargain, the British government told the U.S. it would not allow him to serve the three-year sentence in a U.K. jail.

Since February, Mohamed has given interviews to the BBC and a British newspaper.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LONDON — U.S. authorities asked a Guantanamo Bay detainee to drop allegations of torture and agree not to speak publicly about his ordeal in exchange for his freedom, according to British court ...
LONDON — U.S. authorities asked a Guantanamo Bay detainee to drop allegations of torture and agree not to speak publicly about his ordeal in exchange for his freedom, according to British court ...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quindy
quindy
05:01 PM on 03/23/2009
Must be some terrorists if they want to release him after three years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Markopoulos
03:47 PM on 03/23/2009
It is shameful to even imagine what happens in the so-called "black sites" when our law-abiding officials act as morally-bankrupt monsters in our back yard (Cuba). By the way, as long as they are acting in the name of the USA and we can do something about it, we are all morally complicit. Hold that thought.

JM
06:52 PM on 03/23/2009
You want complicit?

School of the Americas founded 1947
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Markopoulos
08:46 PM on 03/25/2009
You are preaching to the choir.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brandnewstuff
03:43 PM on 03/23/2009
the agent who did the torture and the ones who procured they need Punished under the war criems act- not silence a war crime under international law.
03:36 PM on 03/23/2009
Since I have it on the highest authority we don't torture (or pretty damn close considering former President Pan's close personal relationship with the Divinity), is a logical inference from the fact that we offered to release him if he withdrew allegations of torture, that he wasn't a terrorist?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LeftLeanWing
RightKickFoot
03:07 PM on 03/23/2009
Even if agreed to NOT speak of his torture.....

What were THEY going to do when he does ?...

show a piece of paper with his signature stating:

"I will not discuss how I've been tortured"

THEY should have offered a big big house, a boat, free gas for life, a new Bentley every year for life, some cash, 72 slightly used virgins ..... etc.
12:29 PM on 03/24/2009
This 72 Vigrins myth is a myth. Please do some research on the subject before comenting. This tells me how much you know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RationalRadioJack
Sexiest Man Alive
02:03 PM on 03/23/2009
I wonder how many thousands of stories like this exist.
photo
Bitsko
He of the smoldering eyes
12:56 PM on 03/23/2009
The government should try this in our own country.
03:24 PM on 03/23/2009
Padilla