PhRMA CEO Urges GOP To Work With Obama On Health Care, But Won't Compromise Himself

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - PhRMA CEO Urges GOP To Work With Obama On Health Care, But Won't Compromise Himself stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03-24-09 05:02 PM   |   Updated: 04-24-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Pills

A key industry official in the health care debate praised the Obama administration on Tuesday for taking an "us"-oriented approach when it came to revamping the system, avoiding the pitfalls of exclusiveness that plagued prior efforts.

But while PhRMA President and CEO Billy Tauzin continually underscored the importance of a health care reform process based on collaboration and compromise during a conference call with online reporters he refused to cede much ground on organizational objectives.

Tauzin used the term "deal breaker" and "hotspot" to describe any aspect of health care reform that would make the system drastically more government-run. In particular, he said that the pharmaceutical industry would oppose any efforts at creating a public plan for insurance, saying it would effectively wipe away the private market.

"Governments set prices," he said. "That's what governments do. And when they set prices they can drive out any competitor who can't compete with government-set prices."

At one point he said he did not "know if there is a model outside of this country that we admire greatly." Later he praised the current system in this country as one that "works pretty well."

"America's hybrid system, where we have some public programs for those who obviously have to depend upon public programs and nevertheless a robust private system working alongside of it, that works pretty well," he said. "We are not complaining about that model. In fact we think there are holes in the public system that we can fill. We don't like that gap in Part D. We could help fill it. We believe that there are people at the bottom who could be eligible for some of the public programs that we ought to embrace. But mandating everybody to have insurance without helping people who can't afford it will never work."

The pharmaceutical industry played important and ultimately destructive roles during Hillary Clinton's health care reform efforts in the 1990s, spending millions to demonize the proposal. Cognizant of this political powder keg, the Obama administration has brought Tauzin and other industry players to the table, including invitations to the recently completed White House health care summit. And while Tauzi, at times,n struck a reluctant-to-compromise pose during the Tuesday call, he urged Republicans in Congress to work with the president.

"You asked me what is different about 1990?" he told one caller. "Let me paint a picture for you in 1993. The administration wrote the bill, brought it down in the House chamber and brought it to Mr. Gingrich and said: 'What about it? Can you support it? And he said, 'no.' And they said, 'well, do you have a plan?' and he said, 'yep... my plan is to beat your plan and then to beat you.' And he did. That is essentially what happened in the 90s. This year is quite different. The president very clearly laid out an invitation to Republicans in the House and the Senate to come to the table and make their suggestions and contributions and told us to have a plan instead of just them... If Republicans are smart, in my opinion they will take the invitation."

A key industry official in the health care debate praised the Obama administration on Tuesday for taking an "us"-oriented approach when it came to revamping the system, avoiding the pitfalls of exclus...
A key industry official in the health care debate praised the Obama administration on Tuesday for taking an "us"-oriented approach when it came to revamping the system, avoiding the pitfalls of exclus...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
38
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

Here is information on the recall of Digoxin: http://www.newsinferno.com/archives/5386

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 AM on 04/01/2009

I've devoted my career to pharmaceutical and biotechnology research. Billy Tauzin exemplifies the reason why our industry is villified throughout the world. The fact that he cannot point to one country outside of the US with a better healthcare system says it all. What planet is he from? The US is ranked as one of the worst developed countries in terms of health --that is delivery, access and overall population health. France, on the contrary, is ranked at the top. Prescription drugs are affordable (and I might add, freely prescribed--France consumes the highest rate of prescriptions in Europe).

The idea that drug companies will be less competitive and new drugs will not be brought to market if the government sets prices is simply ridiculous. What price restrictions will do is force the sales and marketing groups to curtail their expenditures, stop pedaling drugs on American TV, and hopefully, put an end to all of the "me too" drugs in development. The US does not need yet another statin drug. It needs a diet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 AM on 03/25/2009
- MsMcgee I'm a Fan of MsMcgee 4 fans permalink
photo

Yes, and what about the truckloads of money spent by the pharmaceutical companies on buying lunches and dinners on a daily basis for offices? Their high-pressure sales reps line up every day in medical offices around the country and compete for the chance to take full fancy lunches for the entire staff, sweets, and coffee, anything they can think of to get in and try and persuade the providers to write for their new and improved much more expensive product, that is of course either not covered by insurances yet, or if it is it carries a high copay and even then not until the provider pays someone to sit on the phone for 45 minutes to an hour and a half with the insurance company to preauthorize it. Then there is the money spent on marketing all sorts of really stupid stuff for these reps to give out. Like the Levitra ink pen that is folded in half and pressing a button it slowly becomes “erect”. Or the nasal spray that had a little rubber nose on a key chain that when squeezed snot came out. There’s a good use of money for you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 AM on 03/25/2009
photo

They have an army of pharma reps visiting docs weekly to push their drugs - what do you think that has cost them (us)? Tons of perks for the MDs to push their latest prescription. Recently, they've started laying them off. Pharma got a Trillion dollar deal when Medicare Part D passed in the middle of the night without even notifying the Dems they were voting. We pay for the research here and they sell the drugs everyplace else for less than we're charged. The American public has subsidized them for years, it's time to stop. Last time I was in Mexico, you could buy a bottle of 100 tablets of ampecillin for $7 over the counter. I'm sure it's not much more than that now. The health care system is broken and must be fixed. France currently has one of the best plans going as far as I can tell and is rated the best overall. Docs are paid a good salary and their education is free. France charges a tax for the premium and everybody (including anyone visiting) is covered.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 AM on 03/25/2009

You are correct---I live in France (left the US when Bush was appointed) and we enjoy the best healthcare system in the world. Everyone is insured and it is a combination of private/public. The systems, however, cannot be compared however. The French believe that access to health care is a basic human right. Unfortunately, in the US, healthcare is seen as yet another way to make a dollar, at the expense of society.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 AM on 03/25/2009
photo

In several years, I hope the only unemployed person left in america is Billy T.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 03/25/2009
- taddles I'm a Fan of taddles 28 fans permalink

Tauzin is a crook, he is robing us all blind, string him up along side the AIG crooks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 AM on 03/25/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 217 fans permalink
photo

After he pushed through the prescription drug bill that actually cost seniors more, he quit congress and took a job as CEO of PhRma. Pretty sweet gig for supposedly looking out for the public's best interests!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 03/25/2009
- Layman23 I'm a Fan of Layman23 14 fans permalink

His name is Tauzin ? That sounds like a drug !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 AM on 03/25/2009
- Xavieer I'm a Fan of Xavieer 90 fans permalink
photo

Rush!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!! here ya go........got ya giddy up right here....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 AM on 03/25/2009
- chronic I'm a Fan of chronic 71 fans permalink
photo

These BIG PHARMA guys are crooks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 03/25/2009

The dirty little secret of the drug industry is that Americans have been paying for the research while the rest of the world gets a free ride. We can't afford it any more. Everybody who uses drugs should pay for part of the research not just Americans.

Billy Tauzin and his lobbyists will spend what ever it takes to stop Obama's health plan. If they have to spend a million dollars or 2 million dollars per member of congress, they'll do it and pass the cost on to us.

This is big money. Money like AIG big. Tens of billions. What ever it takes.

This is war. All out hand to hand combat with no survivors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 03/24/2009

Not sure where you have been in the last, say 30 years, but the pharma industry has waged this war against Americans for decades. Pharma companies have donated a LOT of money to the republicans. When I worked at a big pharma they put signs up around the company strongly encouraging employees to cast heir vote against any provisions for affordable drugs.

Like the AIG executives, the CEOs of Pfizer, Merck (and whatever companies are left after all of the maga-mergers going on) should be brought in front of congress and asked to explain their salaries.

Americans do not finance R & D---they finance the marketing and sales representatives and physicians to take long holidays on a beach in exchange for your doctor to prescribe a drug you probably don't need.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 AM on 03/25/2009
- irisda I'm a Fan of irisda 6 fans permalink
photo

You're misguided. Medical research is not exclusively done in the US to begin with.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 AM on 03/25/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 217 fans permalink
photo

True, but American's pay the most.
We are marketed to, told we have bogus disorders and conditions, told to "Tell your doctor to prescribe" these drugs!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 03/25/2009
photo

Drug prices in America should be no higher than what they fetch in Europe. the European governments negotiate a fair price and it certainly isn't the job of the American public to subsidize these companies at an even higher level.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 03/24/2009
- SOLERSO68 I'm a Fan of SOLERSO68 36 fans permalink
photo

OH NO ! not price controls! Big Pharma likes the way it is now, where they find the maximum level of payment, then charge 50% over that. how about we start importing all our drugs? These CEO's all love "free markets" and "global economies" right? i

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 03/24/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 217 fans permalink
photo

They all support the Free Market if the profit and market are theirs!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 AM on 03/25/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

PhRMA CEA urges his puppet GOP senators to make sure he can continue to rake in the obscene profits and to make sure any healthcare reform is neither reform nor healthy (except for his wallet).

Wouldn't that be a more accurate title?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 03/24/2009
- Tim303 I'm a Fan of Tim303 86 fans permalink
photo

"Governments set prices," he said. "That's what governments do. And when they set prices they can drive out any competitor who can't compete with government-set prices."

Remember these words and who said them. Obvious, isn't it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 03/24/2009
- blues101 I'm a Fan of blues101 37 fans permalink
photo

Makes sense to me, so what's wrong with that? I don't get to pay 100 dollars for a 50 cent pill? I don't get charged for services cloaked in some kind of pigeon-English that i was never provided, i'm good with all that. And those who cannot compete with the prices the government says i should be paying, someone else out there will. Right now, I have no choice. Despite what the chicken littles say, i'll have way more choice with this plan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 03/24/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 217 fans permalink
photo

No. Please share your complete thought!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 03/25/2009
photo

It's always funny how the Pharma industry tries to cry about how controls will kill it's tiny profit, but if you look at their financials, you will note a ROI that is better than most any other American industry. ROI is calculated after all expenses, including research and development and marketing and law suites. But to hear them tell it, they're poverty stricken. And then they go to Congress and ask for changes in the laws regarding patents so they can continue to soak people on cash-cow products, rather than letting them go into public domain and people being able to get generic versions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 03/24/2009

Check out Canada and Great Britain. National Health works.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 03/24/2009

Please don't ask Americans to check out the UK and Canada as models for healthcare. Both countries have SERIOUS problems with health care delivery and standards. Instead, Americans should look to France, the Netherlands and Switzerland--all of whom have private/public models that could much better suit America. The problem with this debate is that everyone labels this as "socialist" without having any idea of what they are talking about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 AM on 03/25/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 217 fans permalink
photo

The big problem in the UK is preventative care. Emergency care is top rate, while getting in line to get your cough checked out could take some time, and diagnostic tests like non emergency MRIs can be scheduled weeks in advance!

Although here in the US, my wife who has Lupus, was scheduled to see a neurologist for partial paralysis 7 weeks in advance. So except for costs and quality of preventive care, I see no reason not to use UK as an example.

France, Sweden and Switzerland are exceptional examples of national health systems!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 03/25/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect