Sanders Resolution Calls For End To Fed Secrecy

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Sanders Resolution Calls For End To Fed Secrecy stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

April 1, 2009 03:20 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Sanders

The Federal Reserve System has doled out more than $2 trillion in an effort to stave off the financial crisis, pouring money into "hundreds and hundreds" of banks, according to Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke.

Which banks? On what terms? At what rates? Don't ask the Fed.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, intends to put the Senate on record opposed to such Fed secrecy.

"The contrast is pretty clear," Sanders tells the Huffington Post, "if you want to know who received the money under TARP, go to the website, it's there. If you want to know who received the money from the Fed, it ain't there."

Sanders opposed the initial TARP funds, but says that as long as money's being spent, taxpayers ought to know where it's going. This week, he will introduce a Sense of the Senate resolution calling on the Fed to release information to the public regarding what it's doing with its money.

"The argument is that it would hurt these companies if the public was made aware that they need the money. I just don't accept that. I just don't accept that," says Sanders.

Sanders attempted to introduce a similar amendment during a budget hearing, but parliamentary rules forced him to scale it down. So he's bringing it to the Senate floor.

"I think it would have won, to be honest, in the budget committee," he says. "I think most senators, most Americans, find it hard to believe that $2.2 trillion could be put at risk and you don't know who's getting it. It's pretty hard to defend."

Story continues below
advertisement

Sanders says he will follow with binding legislation, but wants to put senators on record first. "It puts the Senate on record -- and I think there is growing support from both the left and the right on this -- that we need transparency at the fed, which operates with more secrecy than any other institution," he says.

The full text of Sanders' resolution:

SEC. __. SENSE OF THE SENATE TO INCREASE TRANSPARENCY AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE.

(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--

(1) On January 28, 2009, Doug Elmendorf, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office, provided testimony to the Senate Budget Committee, that the Federal Reserve has committed nearly $2.3 trillion - more than three times the cost of the Troubled Asset Relief Program - to programs it created to deal with the financial crisis - with the potential for this taxpayer assistance to grow to at least $4.5 trillion.

(2) On March 7, 2009, Bloomberg News reported that "Government loans, spending or guarantees to rescue the country's financial system total more than $11.7 trillion since the international credit crisis began in August 2007."

(3) Unlike the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the American public does not know the names of the recipients of more than $2.2 trillion in taxpayer assistance provided by the Federal Reserve since the beginning of the current U.S. financial crisis.

(4) While Congress has spent numerous hours of debate on the merits of federal investments totaling less than $1 billion, not one significant debate has been held on the floor of the Senate or the House of Representatives in Congress on whether the Federal Reserve should be exposing American taxpayers to more than $2.2 trillion in risk.

(5) On March 3, 2009, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, told the Senate Budget Committee that since the start of the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve has provided assistance to "hundreds and hundreds of banks," but would not name the banks, how much assistance they have received, what they are doing with this taxpayer assistance, or what the specific terms of this assistance were.

(6) The American people have a right to know who the Fed is lending over $2.2 trillion taxpayer dollars to, how much they are receiving and what the Fed is asking in return for this money.

(7) Since the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, there has not been a single, comprehensive independent audit of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Reserve Banks.

(8) During the worst financial crisis in our nation's history since the Great Depression - a crisis which has led to the largest taxpayer bail-out ever -- the Federal Reserve has a responsibility to the American people to explain what the Federal Reserve is doing with their hard-earned taxpayer dollars.

(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that--

(1) the Comptroller General of the United States should be provided with the resources and authority necessary to conduct a comprehensive audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks; and

(2) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (in this Act referred to as the `Board') should publish on its website, with respect to all lending and financial assistance facilities it has created to address the financial crisis since March 24, 2008, the following:

(A) the identity of each business, individual, or entity to which the Board has provided such assistance;

(B) the type of financial assistance provided to that business, individual, or entity;

(C) the value or amount of that financial assistance;

(D) the date on which the financial assistance was provided;

(E) the specific terms of any repayment expected, including the repayment time period, interest charges, collateral, limitations on executive compensation or dividends, and other material terms; and

(F) the specific rationale for providing assistance in each instance; and

(G) what that business, individual, or entity is doing with this financial assistance.

The Federal Reserve System has doled out more than $2 trillion in an effort to stave off the financial crisis, pouring money into "hundreds and hundreds" of banks, according to Federal Reserve chief B...
The Federal Reserve System has doled out more than $2 trillion in an effort to stave off the financial crisis, pouring money into "hundreds and hundreds" of banks, according to Federal Reserve chief B...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
204
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

I consider I have ONE senator representing me, and I'm not from Vermont.

That's Sen. Sanders.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 04/03/2009

"PhilipTaylor", What a great idea. No more money from lobbyist. Raise you campaign money from constituents in your own district with a $200 cap. Every campaign would then be a low key affair (compared to now) and every congressman would then be truly accountable to his constituents.

The idea is simple, maybe too simple, but I'm sick to death of congress ripping off me, my kids, my grandkids, my great-grandkids, and my great-grea­t-grandkid­s.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 04/02/2009
photo

Thought of Alternative that lets the Lobbyists and Corporatist KEEP ON GIVING:

Setup a Federal CAMPAIGN FUND CLEARING and CLEANSING AGENCY:

1. Collect all Funds given by Lobbyists
2. Collect all Funds given by Corporatist
3. By strict formulas dole out the funds equitably to each Congress Member/Campaign

This prevents the need to eliminate such giving and removes the LOYALTY to Wall Street, Big OIL, Big Pharma, etc.

It also reduced the massive advantages incumbents have over newcomers during the elections.

Congress members can stop selling themselves to the highest bidder!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 04/02/2009

Here's an interesting thought. Tap Bernanke's phones and see who he really reports to? If it's Cheney or Rove then turn him or them over to American's unemployed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 04/02/2009

This is old news. Congressman Ron Paul has a similar bill that he introduced a week before the Senate bill and it has 50 co-sponsors already. It's called H.R. 1207. Why didn't HuffPo have an article on that? Because since he is a Republican and actually doing something good they couldn't publish that kind of news. So email your reps and tell them to get on board. Hey Rep. Stark is on board and he is one of the most progressive Reps in Congress.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR01207:@@@N

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 AM on 04/02/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 383 fans permalink
photo

This is not old news. This is Senate companion piece.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 AM on 04/02/2009

You are right. It is actually Great news. I was just annoyed that HuffPo didn't even bother to mention the original Audit bill from the the House that was written by Congressman Paul.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 AM on 04/03/2009
photo

In 2002 Bernanke said:

1. U.S. government printing press allows government to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost without paying interest.

2. Balancing the budget involves "servicing" debt with interest, but interest-free loans rolled over indefinitely are essentially debt-free legal tender reducing debt "servicing­."

3. Bernanke’s 2002 speech says government money can be used to cut taxes.

4. Bernanke wants taxes replaced with money that was simply printed up by government and spent into the economy on current goods and services or even acquire existing real or financial assets.

5. Government can reverse deflation by printing money and buying hard assets with it.

6. This is a "Greenback Proposal" for government self-funding used by American colonists, colonial Pennsylvania, Abraham Lincoln, endorsed by Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and William Jennings Bryan.

Source: Ellen Brown, Thanks CarolAB

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

Hey, I read that speech, which was an explanation to the fringe right wing when they first started arguing in favor of allowing monetary policy to return to a policy of deflation in the same way it allows inflation. Rather than trying to convince the nuts what was wrong with their theory, he simply pointed out the obvious: the US government would do anything to prevent deflation, and he set out the tools available to prevent deflation.

Funny how you never actually quoted the speech, and how unlike the speech your paraphrasing is.

And the source, of course, is not Ellen Brown, unless you are talking about the false reporting on what the speech said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 AM on 04/02/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 383 fans permalink
photo

The source of the summary Philip provided is Ellen Brown. Ellen does not falsely report on the speech; I myself read Bernanke's speech.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

Shortened Verbiage for you a few posts below!

http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/bernanke.php

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

Your argument is for a DEBT Currency!

Not a 0% interest Credit Currency like the Greenback!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 AM on 04/02/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 383 fans permalink
photo

Anyone who thinks Bernanke is an “inflation fighter” must not have read Bernanke’s most famous speech, “Deflation: Making Sure ‘It’ Doesn’t Happen Here.” Following are some “choice” snips from that famous speech:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/ben-bernanke-on-inflation/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 04/02/2009
photo

Sander's should also ask Bernake if this can help solve our CRISIS?

And WIPE OUT our historic National Debt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 AM on 04/02/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 383 fans permalink
photo

I just e-mailed Sanders to thank him for S 607, and asked him whether, since he is on Thom Hartmann's show every week, he is aware of Ellen's work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 AM on 04/02/2009

Investigate the FED! It seems a bit silly that while we've been raising such a hue over the bank and auto industry bailouts, the Fed has been handing out money like t-shirts at an end of summer sale. Why is the Fed receiving this special treatment?
Just between us....Bern­anke definitely looks like a kid with his hand in the cookie jar.
Fess up Bernanke..­..where'd the money go?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 AM on 04/02/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 383 fans permalink
photo

That's what Sanders and Paul, their co-sponsors, as well as Elizabeth Warren's oversight committee, would like to know: where'd the money go?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

Ellen Brown:

Bernanke says, “the U.S. government has technology called a printing press, that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.” Note he said government, not central bank, and that government could print money at essentially no cost. The implication is that government creates money without paying interest.

The federal debt has not been paid off since 1838, when Andrew Jackson shut down the Second U.S. Bank. “Balancing the budget” involves “servicing” debt with interest. But Money that comes from an interest-free loan that is rolled over indefinitely is essentially debt-free legal tender.
The infamous helicopter line in Bernanke’s 2002 speech referred to government money-creating power used to cut taxes saying, “A money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Mi1t0n
Fr!edman’s famous ‘he1ic0pter drop’ of money.” Bernanke wants taxes replaced with money that was simply printed up by government and spent into the economy. “In lieu of tax cuts, government could increase spending on current goods and services or even acquire existing real or financial assets.” The government could reverse deflation by printing money and buying hard assets with it – assets such as real estate or corporate stock, a pretty radical suggestion the Greenback proposal of government self-funding used by Abraham Lincoln to finance Civil War, endorsed by Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, William Jennings Bryan, and used by the American colonists and demonstrated to be particularly successful in colonial Pennsylvania.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

Bernanke said, in response to how the US would react to deflation, that deflation of a fiat currency is impossible unless the government allows it, if you were to read the entire speech, and not just out of context quotes.

It is impossible because deflation is a ratio of money to economy, specifically, that the money supply is growing more slowly than the economy, so that there is less money per portion of the economy tomorrow than there is today.

While this condition of deflation, devastating in effect as it may be, is quite a normal condition under a commodity currency, Bernanke was correct; under a fiat currency, deflation is impossible unless the government allows it.

Since the government (in the case of the United States, The Federal Reserve, a creature of the United States Congress, under article 1, section 8, clause 5 of the US Constitution) creates money in a fiat money system, and since deflation is a ratio, the government can always create enough money to defeat deflation, if it wants to.

The rest of your post is equally unrepresentative of the speech.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 AM on 04/02/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 383 fans permalink
photo

Bernanke said that "it can't happen here" (deflation) because our fiat currency system allows the Fed to print money ad infinitum. The greater danger, of course, in dropping money from a helicopter in huge dumps is knowing when to stop so as not to flip to the other side of hyperinflation.

Are you familiar with the work of GATA and of Summers' paper on Gibson's paradox and maintaining a strong dollar? GATA has documented evidence of suppression of gold to support the dollar.

The Federal Reserve is not a creation of the Constitution, but of the legislation, the Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913, which created it. No where in Article 1, Section 8, is a "central bank" let alone a private central bank, provided for. The argument Jefferson and Hamilton had was whether the Constitution provides for a central bank; Hamilton conceded that the Constitution was silent on banking.

Have you ever read the history of banking in the United States?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

Your argument is for a DEBT Currency!

Not a 0% interest Credit Currency like the Greenback!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 AM on 04/02/2009
- lena22 I'm a Fan of lena22 4 fans permalink
photo

If this problem does not make a strong case for world regulation, than shame on tax payers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 04/02/2009
- TheFobster I'm a Fan of TheFobster 10 fans permalink

The Fed should be audited by Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 AM on 04/02/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 383 fans permalink
photo

Senator Sanders, and Congressman Paul have proposed this; please support them (no matter how you may feel about Paul, he is right about the Fed).

Paul's bill now has 50 sponsors.

http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/audit-the-federal-reserve-hr-1207/

Information about Sanders companion bill, Resolution S-604, and how you can help is here:

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=14021

I await Congressman Kucinich's promised legislation to bring the Fed under the Treasury; however, given Geithner's new proposal to grant the Fed even more power over Treasury, the issue here should be to fully nationalize the Fed as Joseph Stigliz and others including William Greider and Ellen Brown, propose.

Henry Gonzales of Texas has introduced legislation every year. It's time we get behind these efforts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

If you bring the Fed under the Treasury, the world will switch from US Dollars to Euros faster than you can say boo!

But thanks for confirming that the bill is the first step in the funny money program; you know, destroy the fed, bring the central bank under political control (which will break the confidence of the world faster in the US dollar than you can say, boo! - nobody trusts central banks controlled by politicians, instead of central bankers), replace the US dollar, or, excuse me, the debt-backed fiat currency, with script issued by the Treasury, excuse me, debt-free currency issued by the people, and generally play Jim Jones to the American economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 AM on 04/02/2009

The GOP and the fed have long been in bed together one of their drinking songs goes like this "O print them up and pass them around and print them up and pass them around and print them up and pass them around and print them up gain!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 04/02/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 207 fans permalink
photo

Hint- this went into the same pockets as Donald Rumsfeld's "war" slush fund did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

The fed is the keeper of the currency and as such it makes Bernie Madoff's ponzie sceam look like childs play. The fed can loan money to anyone or any corporation who claim they are to big to fail and they did ; this is how the country's wealth is being tranferred to the investment class; truthfully do you believe that any individual on this planet is worth 15 to 30 million dollars a year for thier labor but if you do then you have your answer to why this country has been flush down the drain. These people has stole so much money until they have lost track of who stole what; ask yourselves how is it that the supposed richest country on the planet economy goes in the toilet in 6 to 8 months all because of the mortgage industry, in word BULLSHIT.T­hey knew that the republicians were going to loose the election and the democrates would come in with a vengence so they took the money and ran.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 04/02/2009
- DinSea I'm a Fan of DinSea 25 fans permalink

It's complicated.
If small businesses - through no fault of their own - hve paid taxes, played fair & now faces bankruptcy due to matters beyond their control, they should NOT be penalized by having their private business exploited in the press, or exposed to wary potential customers.
Punish the crooks - help the non-cheaters.
I understand AIG is too big to allow to fail; we would go down with them.
That's why Obama is changing the game. THANK GOD!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 04/01/2009
- Bcasey11 I'm a Fan of Bcasey11 13 fans permalink
photo

The federal reserve is an absurd joke, END THE FED!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 04/01/2009
photo

Exactly! But if we can NOT then at least don't let them charge the US Government 6% interest on Money they print for US. The FED is LOYAL to the Elite Bankers in at least FOUR Countries!

This is ONE MAJOR REASON THE USA is the LARGEST DEBTOR NATION IN HISTORY!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 04/01/2009
photo

Well, I think you'll be disappointed with an audit of the Fed - when you discover from the audit, just like everybody's been saying all along, the Fed does not print money, the mint does, will you finally admit that you are completely ignorant on this subject? The Fed does not charge any interest on money it prints, because it does not print money.

The Fed is a creature of Congress, governed by individuals directly appointed by the President, as mandated by Congress, and your references to mythic foreign banking gnomes are absurd paranoid claptrap. The Fed functions as a central bank, not as a treasury, not as a mint.

The USA is the richest nation in world history, and bad as its debt position is its debt position is still far better off than it has been in the past, when debt peaked decades ago, and much better off than many other countries today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 04/01/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 383 fans permalink
photo

PT, good new article from Ellen Brown:

THINKING POSITIVELY ABOUT MONETARY POLICY: HOW 'QUANTITATIVE EASING' COULD BE HARNESSED FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD

http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/bernanke.php

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 04/02/2009
photo

HONESTY CHALLENGE: Wall Street’s MONEYS are Strangle Hold on Congress:

GOAL: 0% Interest charged by FED for all US Government Debts and Newly Printed Paper Money!
__________­__________­__________­__________­__________­__________­____

Will Congress VOTE FOR THIS WHEN FOLLOWING IS NOW THE CASE?

Where are Republican Congress Member Loyalties? Wall Street PERHAPS?
Where are Democratic Congress Member Loyalties? Wall Street PERHAPS?

House Member = $1.86 Million/4 years = $1,860,000 every 4 Years
Senate Member = $7.50 Million/4 years = $7,500,000 every 4 Years

Of course, Wall Street Related Committee Members get FAR MORE!
(see analysis below)
__________­__________­__________­__________­_

FACT: Wall Street paid $5,000,000,000 over ten years to Congress Members

So $2,500,000,000 to 538 in the HOUSE and $2,500,000,000 to 100 in The SENATE!

Avg House Member = $4,646,840/10 years = $464,684/year = $1,858,736/4 Years

Avg Senate Member = $25,000,000/10 years = 2,500,000/year = $7,500,000/4 Years

House Member = $1.86 Million/4 years
Senate Member = $7.5 Million/4 years
__________­__________­__________­__________­_______

AND Main Street America HAS ZERO MONEY SAY IN CONGRESS!

That is what is WRONG with America! Limit Total Lobby Money for each Congress Member to $5,000 per year and force them to go on-line with their citizens to raise Money they serve to remove this corruption of Our Representative Form of Government!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 04/01/2009
photo

Why is this Not Displayed under NEWEST FIRST?

The ISSUE is VALID!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 04/01/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect