More

NATO Leaders Focus On Afghanistan, But Most Reject Obama's Plea For Troops (SLIDESHOW)

First Posted: 05/04/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:10 PM ET

STRASBOURG, France — On the eve of the NATO summit, President Barack Obama didn't get what he wanted most from U.S. allies: significant new commitments of combat troops for Afghanistan.

Faced with stiff public opposition to war, reluctant European leaders on Friday offered only limited aid for civilians and some troops to help train Afghan police and soldiers.
Afghanistan was the theme to which a frustrated Obama returned over and over throughout the day. "This is a joint problem, and it requires a joint effort," he said.

The summit's co-hosts, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, both were quick to offer support for Obama's new Afghan strategy of sending American reinforcements and bolstering Afghan forces. But they went no further.

"We totally endorse and support America's new strategy in Afghanistan," Sarkozy said a joint news conference with Obama after they met.

After her own talks with the president later in the afternoon, Merkel said: "We have a great responsibility here. We want to carry our share of the responsibility militarily _ in the area of civil reconstruction and in police training."

Afghanistan was a key issue at a working dinner of all NATO leaders. "This is our No. 1 operational priority," NATO spokesman James Appathurai said.

As the leaders talked, protesters clashed for a second day with French police, injuring two officers. With more protests to come, the efforts to disrupt the summit signaled the unhappiness of many Europeans for the faraway war, especially at a time of global economic crisis.

Backing from Sarkozy and Merkel is vital for Obama, as he seeks to convince NATO that a greater effort by all is the only way to defeat the escalating Taliban insurgency. U.S. diplomats said the administration was aware of the domestic pressures on their allies and would not press the issue.

What the Europeans had to offer concretely fell short of Obama's expectations, in part because many of their citizens believe that what is needed is a political solution and civilian aid to rebuild Afghanistan _ not more combat troops.

Obama plans to add 21,000 U.S. soldiers and Marines to the 38,000 Americans already fighting militants. His strategy also calls for increased focus on boosting the capabilities of Afghanistan's police and army and improving the effectiveness of the government in Kabul.

The president was to brief his fellow leaders about the new strategy at a formal dinner Friday in the German spa resort of Baden-Baden.

NATO officials said they expected the Europeans to pledge four more infantry battalions to provide security in the run-up to Afghanistan's general elections in August.

NATO has a force of about 58,000 soldiers in Afghanistan, of which about 26,000 are Americans. The other 12,000 U.S. troops operate under a separate command.

British officials traveling to the summit with Prime Minister Gordon Brown told reporters he would offer to send more troops to Afghanistan _ but the offer depended upon other NATO members sending additional forces, Britain's Press Association said. Officials said the number would likely be in the "mid- to high hundreds." Britain now has 8,000 soldiers in Afghanistan.

Spain, too, said it would increase the force it has in Afghanistan _ currently numbering about 770 soldiers _ with a small contingent to help train Afghan army officers.

Belgium said it would add some 65 soldiers to the 500 it has in Afghanistan and send two more F-16 jet fighters. It also plans to double its financial aid to an annual euro12 million ($14.5 million).

In addition to Afghanistan, the summit will look at repairing the alliance's relations with Russia, which were frozen after last year's Russo-Georgian war.

Russia has become increasingly important as an alternate supply route for NATO forces in Afghanistan since insurgents stepped up attacks on the main logistics route through Pakistan. Moscow has offered NATO the use of its railways and roads to move supplies from Europe to Central Asia.

NATO also wants Russia to provide the Afghan government with airlift support as well as equipment and spare parts for its Soviet-era weaponry.

There was agreement among NATO leaders "that Russia is a great European power, a partner with which NATO must cooperate and wants to cooperate," Appathurai, the alliance spokesman, said.

He said that the NATO-Russia Council _ a joint body whose work was suspended after the war in Georgia _ would hold its first meeting in coming weeks and that a meeting between NATO's and Russia's foreign ministers was expected in May.

In internal matters, the alliance planned discussions on a major leadership change, with Dutch diplomat Jaap de Hoop Scheffer's term as NATO secretary-general running out Aug. 1.

Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen has emerged as the top candidate despite opposition from Turkey. Fogh Rasmussen infuriated many Muslims by speaking out in favor of freedom of speech during an uproar over Danish newspapers' publication of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad in 2006.

Appathurai said the leaders discussed the succession issue, but made no decision.

___

Associated Press writer Deborah Seward contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

STRASBOURG, France — On the eve of the NATO summit, President Barack Obama didn't get what he wanted most from U.S. allies: significant new commitments of combat troops for Afghanistan. Faced w...
STRASBOURG, France — On the eve of the NATO summit, President Barack Obama didn't get what he wanted most from U.S. allies: significant new commitments of combat troops for Afghanistan. Faced w...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,820
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
12:50 PM on 04/06/2009
Check out the news @ http://www.thomaspeep.com/
11:59 PM on 04/05/2009
Wow..Sarkozy really has his hand on his wife's bottom. Kudos.
03:18 AM on 04/05/2009
Would it be better if we gave and lost, after all, so many people complained that Bush should have finished the job in Afghanistan and not go into Iraq.
05:49 PM on 04/04/2009
More people die in war than in terrorist attacks, and since by nature a terrorist is invisible, all you are doing is killing people for them by even participating.

Did you know that soldiers who died *from wounds* in Iraq, but not on actual soil; rather in the air on the way to or at the hospital on the base in Germany are not counted on the "official" a.k.a. artificially low public roster.

So while the "official" number is now well over 5,000.. the actual number is much higher. And let's not forget the million+ Iraqis that have been murdered and mutilated.
04:08 PM on 04/04/2009
Been there,
done that!

Europe is well aware of the history of quagmires begun by nations trying to control Afghanistan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:33 PM on 04/04/2009
Still, that's much more European support than we have have since the Downing Street Memo was published. Across the pond, the voters read such things and decide for _themselves_ which sources are believable; "low-information voters" are not as common in Europe, although they do have the occasional outbreak of xenophobic "conservative" movements.
02:35 PM on 04/04/2009
Obama will fail in Afghanistan for the same resons he is failing in his handling of the Wall Street/ world economic crises:
He will not repudiate the failed, false polices of Bush/Cheney era, just try to modify them.

The Afghan government installed by Bush/Cheney is terminally incompetent and corrupt and no amount of money or troops will fix it, just as the rulers of Wall Street are terminally incompetent and corrupt and no amount of money or government guarantees will fix it
03:32 PM on 04/04/2009
The Bush economic era was a very profitable one for all Americans until the financial mess with Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac hit in Sept. These programs were totally run by Democrats and over-seen by Democrats in Congress, ie, Sen. Dodd and Cong. Frank. The GOP demanded an accounting of all the toxic mortgages Fannie & Freddie were dispersing but these Democrats said...NO, all is fine, case closed. 5 attempts were made and each time the Dems said accounting was in order. If you ever wanted to know where all of the flunkies from the Clinton Admin ended up...they have been running Wall ST since 2000. The greed and corruption they were involved in in Washington turned out to be SO much more profitable on Wall ST. Now we all suffer since Dems run Congress and their president took millions from these funds for his campaign. Dems have no desire to investigate themselves and any attempts by the GOP to do it...well, a cold day in hell when they accomplish THAT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsprags
No Pets but like Animals
04:22 PM on 04/04/2009
I read you all websites months ago and the repurg congress talking points, so, this post was copy/ paste straight from the taling point daily pag. It is great with all that group think and you haven't figured out that no one believe this but YOU repurg clow**. You think if you go all over the web posting it here and there, folks will eventually believe it. If we were uneducated and brain dead maybe we would believe it. Unfortunately, for the repurg the American middle class, the rich, and the elites as you all call us- WOKE up over the last 8 years and we really know what happened with the economy and the 2 wars have nothing to do with President Obama, Demo Congress including Dodd and Barney Franks, Freddie and Fannie, and list of talking points go on and on and on! You all are so afraid that President Obama is going to be successful with turning around the economy, getting our troops out of Iraq, having a integrated global effort in AFG, regulating and turning Wall Street, assisting Mexico with their drug and immigrant issues, and worst of all building relationships with other countries that are not based on threats and military bulling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsprags
No Pets but like Animals
04:32 PM on 04/04/2009
Previous President and VP made sure Profits went to the Banking liars and the vendors in Iraq and the Oil companies. It is not something to brag on - fake & false riches. This is why the economy and the banking systems went down so fast.
The majority of the American people and the world like President Obama's approach to the economy, administration's agenda, and policies. Even North Korea feel left out of all the negotiation and they want the President to engage with them as he is during with Iran. It is going to be okay for you repur** and will not be until dea**, You will live and learn to appreciate the President's efforts.
Finally, I would not encourage investigations if I was you, it would be a shame for previous President and his team to go to jail. You should be thanking President Obama for discouraging the demo congress from investigated previous teams, however, with the DOJ scandal related to the ALASKA Senator- it's going to be out of his hands. Many of the foreign governments have decided to arrest the previous president and VP for war crimes if they come into their territory. Got to love democracy. I laugh every time you hypocrists say Demos are corrupt. LOL to ya with that one! Repeating a lie many times does not make it real or the truth
02:33 PM on 04/04/2009
Maybe Obama should ask America's partner in crime Israel for some troops.
02:00 PM on 04/04/2009
President not impressed with Europe? It is hard to impress the supreme leader. Ptotestors unkind?
Speaking of protests.
http://allanerickson.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/2000-cities-plan-tax-day-protest-april-15/
01:40 PM on 04/04/2009
o/t but is anyone else wondering why O bama won't let the banks pay back the TARP funds? Shouldn't he be trying to get the taxpayers money back ASAP?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rcozad
Manufacturers Representative Electronics Industry
01:22 PM on 04/04/2009
This presents president Obama with the perfect exit strategy for removing our troops out of Italy, France, Germany and Japan as we no longer can finance troops to strut around endless parade grounds and polish boots and no nothing to bolster the security of the US nor of thier host countries. 60 Years of occupation is more than enough!
12:17 PM on 04/04/2009
"French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, both were quick to offer support for Obama's new Afghan strategy of sending American reinforcements and bolstering Afghan forces. But they went no further."

So they agree with Pres. Obama's strategy BUT they'll leave the combat and dieing to the US. I don't know if we give these chicken sh$$'s any money, if we do I'd be cutting it off. Perhaps Pres. Obama should consider bringing home the troops stationed in Germany and France. Why are they there anyway? We could use those troops here at home to rebuild our National Guard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LandOfPinot
In vino veritas
01:00 PM on 04/04/2009
Do your homework before you write stupid things! Far from receiving any money from the US, France and Germany contribute more to international organizations (in percentage) than the US does. Second, there are no US troops in France whatsoever. Third, Germany would love to see the US troops stationed there get the heck out (that would save the US a good chunk of money). Fourth, France and Germany contribute resources to Afghanistan as much as any other nation does. The US has established its role as the cop of the world, then the onus is on the US to provide whatever troops are necessary to fill that role. Travel abroad a bit more, Seattlelite, see the world and then make comments!
photo
iRob08
I find your lack of faith...comforting.
01:16 PM on 04/04/2009
Yeah, there are far cheaper and safer ways to combat extremism and keep Afghanistan from becoming a launching pad for future attacks. We have all this technology, drones, spy planes and the ability to communicate with intelligence agencies and police forces around the world to do surveillance on the bad guys--but we chose unilateral military action, which does nothing but calls extremists to arms to fight and resist any occupation of their countries.

Solving the root causes of extremism will eradicate the desire to launch such attacks against any country.
01:32 PM on 04/04/2009
"Travel abroad a bit more, Seattlelite, see the world and then make comments!" I appreciate your "corrections to my post". As for you suggestion that I travel more, I think living in 3 different countries and traveling to most of countries in Europe and parts of Africa I've done my share.
11:49 AM on 04/04/2009
No takers on continuing to support our miserable results in Afghanistan. Who would have thought that would be the result?

A coalition of the stupid is a hard sell and President Obama had to ask.

Now that he has his answer, we need to complete the task we set out to do without them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Watch out! He carries a big stick!
11:55 AM on 04/04/2009
"Barack Obama today won agreement for substantial Nato troop reinforcements in Afghanistan, when at least seven European nations, including Britain, said they would send extra troops and logistical help ahead of the presidential elections there in August."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/04/europe-troops-afghanistan-nato-obama
12:14 PM on 04/04/2009
give me a break eden. the headline and body both said France and Germany will not sacrifice more citizens for the oil/gas/opium trade. America has disposable heros.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Palmz
Well done is better than well said.
11:33 AM on 04/04/2009
This report is so false.

The president to to rest the notion that he did not get what he wanted at the G-20 summit. He said the media had advanced that story about America's demands and there was no truth to it.

5000 troops is 5000 troops. Not all troops in Iraq were "combat" troops.

What's the issue?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:13 AM on 04/04/2009
It seems the Europeans are content to let us fight their battles for them...AGAIN. And they're our allies?? Thanks for nothing you effete snobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Watch out! He carries a big stick!
11:56 AM on 04/04/2009
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25291811-23109,00.html

"THE White House says its NATO allies will send up to 5000 more troops to Afghanistan, in response to President Barack Obama's call for a greater alliance role."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:11 PM on 04/04/2009
Exactly. I hope we keep this in mind in considering how we deploy our troops in reaction to their needs in the future.