More

'Nuclear Day': Iran, Ahmadinejad Inaugurate New Nuclear Facility

NASSER KARIMI   04/ 9/09 02:29 PM ET   AP

Iran Us Ahmadinejad

ISFAHAN, Iran — Iran's president said Thursday his country is open to talks with the U.S. and other countries over its nuclear program. But he insisted the talks must be based on respect for Iran's rights, suggesting the West should not try to force Tehran to stop uranium enrichment.

Hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran would present a new proposal for negotiations, saying "conditions have changed" _ an apparent reference to President Barack Obama's election and Iran's own progress in its nuclear program since previous talks with Iran were held last year. He did not elaborate on the proposal.

Iran has been tepid in its response to Obama's offers of dialogue, but in recent days Ahmadinejad has appeared to warm up. Earlier this week, he said he was ready for dialogue if Obama was "honest" in his intentions. Ahmadinejad's speech Thursday made clear he saw a difference between Obama and former President George W. Bush, who took a tough stance on Iran.

Ahmadinejad spoke during celebrations for Iran's Nuclear Day, in which a number of nuclear advances were announced.

Among them, officials said the number of centrifuges at Iran's enrichment facility has increased to 7,000 _ up from 6,000 announced in February _ and that a new, more advanced type of centrifuge has been tested. Ahmadinejad also inaugurated a new plant for developing uranium fuel for a planned hard-water reactor.

The United States announced Wednesday that it would join direct talks with Iran that Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia are seeking to convene. The talks aim to break a long deadlock over Iran's nuclear program, which the U.S. and its allies fear aims to build a nuclear weapon. Iran denies the charge.

The Bush administration generally shunned such nuclear talks with Iran, though it sent a diplomat to the last round of talks last year.

Ahmadinejad said past negotiations failed because "they were insisting on stopping our peaceful activities, they were trying to impose that."

"The Iranian nation has always been for talks," Ahmadinejad said. But, he said, "dialogue has to be based on justice and respecting rights ... Justice means both sides are treated equally and bilateral rights are respected."

The United Nations has demanded Iran halt uranium enrichment, a process that can produce nuclear fuel but also the material for a warhead. Iran has refused, saying it has a right to develop peaceful nuclear technology.

In past talks, European nations backed by Washington offered a package of economic incentives for Tehran to suspend enrichment. Iran rejected it and countered with its own "package," but U.S. and European officials said its proposals were unclear.

On Thursday, Ahmadinejad said Iran would adapt its proposals. "Today conditions have changed. We had presented a package. Given new world developments, new subjects need to be added to the package," he said, without elaborating.

Thursday's ceremony celebrated the National Day of Nuclear Technology, the day in 2006 when Iran first enriched uranium at its facility in the town of Natanz. Since then, it is believed to have enriched enough uranium to build a bomb _ though first the uranium would have to be more highly enriched, and it is not known if Iran has perfected such techniques. Iran says the enriched uranium is for its first domestically produced nuclear plant, due to open in several years.

In the enrichment process, uranium gas is pumped into a series of thousands of centrifuges, which spin it at super-sonic speeds to remove impurities. Uranium enriched to a low degree is used to fuel a light-water nuclear reactor, but when enriched to a high degree it produces the basis of a warhead.

Vice President Gholam Reza Aghazadeh, who is also the nuclear chief, announced to the gathering the increased number of centrifuges and the new, more advanced version.

Ahmadinejad said the new centrifuge has been tested, and has several times more capacity more than the P-1 centrifuges currently used at Natanz. Neither gave details or said when it might be brought into use.

Ahmadinejad also said the country has inaugurated a new facility producing uranium fuel for a heavy-water nuclear reactor that is under construction in the town of Arak and is expected to be completed in 2009 or 2010.

Heavy-water reactors use a different process than light-water ones, but have their own nuclear proliferation concerns. The West fears Iran could eventually reprocess spent fuel from the heavy-water reactor to produce plutonium for a warhead.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISFAHAN, Iran — Iran's president said Thursday his country is open to talks with the U.S. and other countries over its nuclear program. But he insisted the talks must be based on respect for Ira...
ISFAHAN, Iran — Iran's president said Thursday his country is open to talks with the U.S. and other countries over its nuclear program. But he insisted the talks must be based on respect for Ira...
Filed by Stuart Whatley  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
01:17 AM on 04/10/2009
Get use to it neos, Obama wants a policy of diplomacy with Iran and he no longer considers enrichment off the table.

Now you can go back to gnashing your teeth.
04:37 PM on 04/09/2009
Why don't we try to be consistant. Do we like nuclear power or are we oppsesd to it? Or are we just trying to find a way to talk ourselves out of this problem? You must stand for something.
photo
aOsO
That's my real face.
02:59 PM on 04/09/2009
Propaganda.
06:52 PM on 04/09/2009
Really?

1)- The Islamist approach to the P_alestinian crisis is Apocalyptic:
"The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of a w a r of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of w a r will be defined in P_alestinian land"
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

2)- I_ran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: "There is only one solution to the Middle East problem, namely THE ANNIHILATION AND DESTRUCTION OF THE J_EWISH STATE."

3)- I_ran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for Isreal to be "wiped off the map."

4)- December 12,2008, at an anti-Israeli rally in Tehran, I_ran's President Ahmadinejad said that Israel no longer possesses the essential motive, integrity and philosophy to PROLONG ITS EXISTENCE.

5)- I_ran has denied that the term anti_semitic applies to Tehran arguing that anti_semitism is solely a European phenomenon.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
01:05 AM on 04/10/2009
False, false and false again.

First, he was referring to the erradication of Z_ionism which many people worldwide see as a racist, destructive cult.

Secondly, Israelis are masters of their own self-destructive destiny as they are conjuring up wars based on their need to control everyone and everything around them and sooner or later they will go too far and regret the consequences.

Thirdly, until you provide an accurate translation to his words...it's just fabrication and hyperbole.

Fourth, if Mir Hossein Mousavi the Reformist candidate who says he will reach out to the U.S. but "no way will they give up their nuclear program" under his Presidency, wins in June, what excuses will you have then for your hostility towards Iran???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
08:12 AM on 04/10/2009
I would have to think you cannot understand the difference between the people of Iran, and the Iranian government and clergy. Have you heard what our AM radio hosts say we should do to some nations around the globe?
02:34 PM on 04/09/2009
Will Obama bow to this guy too?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SDunn
03:03 PM on 04/09/2009
Can you be more original? Are you part of the same talking point cult? You all would follow Rush off a cliff.
03:18 PM on 04/09/2009
just a joke. calm down.

but really, has there been 1 story on the HP about that? or do lib's just ignore anything that makes obama look bad?
02:18 PM on 04/09/2009
What's wrong with Iran having a nuke anyway?.
09:31 PM on 04/09/2009
Considering it was only 20 years ago that they were using chemical weapons against Iraq, I don't think anyone would feel safe with them having one.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
01:07 AM on 04/10/2009
I like the way you reverse the story. Seven years ago you and your ilk were saying the same things about Iraq!
02:14 PM on 04/09/2009
"can we talk please?.....pretty please?....I will beg"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
01:22 PM on 04/09/2009
Cheap power scares the h e l l out of western capitalists and middle-eastern oil tycoons.

We can, and should allow countries to seek out cheap, safe power. We should also make sure they do not build nuclear bombs. However both of these goals have to be achieved through global solutions, with all countries in on the talks. We do not need rhetoric, fear mongering or hate dictating policy here.

If keeping oil propped up is not the end-goal for the middle-east and the west, why don't we have a plan to mass produce safe nuclear power world wide? Can you imagine the improvements in the basic quality of life for billions of people?
01:54 PM on 04/09/2009
Unfortunately, there are still a lot of people who believe that there is no such thing as safe nuclear power. While we were running scared from nuclear power, Europe has been making great strides in meltdown-proof designs and fuel reprocessing which drastically shortens the half-life of waste. Nuclear is the cleanest and most efficient energy option available to us, and it probably will be for many years to come. I just wish that many members of green movement would update their opinions of nuclear to coincide with the realities of 21st century technology. The days of Three Mile Island and near-eternal radioactive waste are past us.
02:04 PM on 04/09/2009
"Europe has been making great strides in meltdown-proof designs and fuel reprocessing which drastically shortens the half-life of waste."

What's it down to now? Twenty-five thousand years?
04:05 PM on 04/09/2009
All this talk of centrifuges and enrichment, mining and gasification takes ENERGY to accomplish. No matter how you argue for nuclear power, IT IS WASTEFUL. A nuke plant must operate for an average 17 years in order to offset the energy used to harvest raw uranium, process it, ship it, build a reactor and maintain it. Only then does it produce its first watt of emission-free power. Clean? Balderdash. Cheap? Oh sure, so long as you consider tens of billions cheap. No matter how you slice it, a nuclear reactor is a mindbogglingly expensive way to boil water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
persianadvocate
01:21 PM on 04/09/2009
This plant would supply maybe 2 bombs per year if the fuel was fully diverted for that purpose. Iran's fuel enrichment is under constant monitoring by the UN Non-Proliferation teams. Iran has no death wish for Israelis or Americans -- and most majorly, itself.

Let's remember that this generation of Iranians is still hurting from the memories of Saddam Hussein using chemical weapons on 1,000,000 Iranians. They don't even want a bloody revolution against their own dictators -- why would they want a bloody war with Israel?

Israel has yet to produce evidence to back its claims. Let's see it.
06:55 PM on 04/09/2009
really? Is that so?

1)- The Islamist approach to the P_alestinian crisis is Apocalyptic:
"The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of a w a r of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of w a r will be defined in P_alestinian land"
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

2)- I_ran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: "There is only one solution to the Middle East problem, namely THE ANNIHILATION AND DESTRUCTION OF THE J_EWISH STATE."

3)- I_ran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map."

4)- December 12,2008, at an anti-Israeli rally in Tehran, I_ran's President Ahmadinejad said that Isreal no longer possesses the essential motive, integrity and philosophy to PROLONG ITS EXISTENCE.

5)- I_ran has denied that the term anti_semitic applies to Tehran arguing that anti_semitism is solely a European phenomenon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
persianadvocate
12:36 AM on 04/10/2009
Your Evidence:
1) "The Islamist approach to the P_alestinian crisis is Apocalyptic"
You obviously have no clue what apocalyptic means because in the triumph of the Palestinian people you see only Israeli loss.

2)- "I_ran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: "There is only one solution to the Middle East problem, namely THE ANNIHILATION AND DESTRUCTION OF THE J_EWISH STATE."
Of the Israeli Regime. Read the Farsi.

3)- I_ran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map."
Read the Farsi, this is an abhorrent mistranslation.

4)- "December 12,2008, at an anti-Israeli rally in Tehran, I_ran's President Ahmadinejad said that Isreal no longer possesses the essential motive, integrity and philosophy to PROLONG ITS EXISTENCE."
Right because the demographics of Israeli citizens indicates that amongst Jews, most are not native to the land -- at least not until for many, many generations. These people terrorized, bombed, massacred and did whatever they could to starve off the Palestinian ability to live on the land. Now NYC has a street called Golda Meir square. What a shame to name a street after a racist.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CeeCee
Salta prima di inacidire
01:18 PM on 04/09/2009
Well, that's one holiday I would NOT be proud of.....
01:14 PM on 04/09/2009
Where DID Israel get its nukes? How did America aid in that process? Were there "helpers" like the loyalty challenged “American” Jonathon Pollard providing information and materials? I'll bet you there were, and also bet it was and remains a non-story in the corrupted mainstream American media, just like the attack on the USS Liberty. Control the press and you've go a long way toward controlling a people. Just a reminder.
02:41 PM on 04/09/2009
Isr ael got its nukes from France and south Africa.

America was not involved in any of it.

For that matter, Einsenhauer was furious.
03:20 PM on 04/09/2009
No Pollards? I really doubt that.

Where'd the enriched ore come from to make the bomb?

Were there any members of the Manhattan Project involved in the Israeli bomb?

Start there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joeinvt
the human being and fish can coexist
07:29 PM on 04/09/2009
Where did Israel get its nukes? It's not like Jews don't know from nuclear physics. Where did Iran get its nuclear know how?
01:01 PM on 04/09/2009
I don't know why, but this guy does not scare me as much as the current leaders in Isreal
02:26 PM on 04/09/2009
Are you kidding me? Ahmadinejad has been reported as saying that Israel should be wiped off the face of the earth. I don't blame Israel for their level of hostility.
photo
peterg76
Freelance medical transcriptionist
03:01 PM on 04/09/2009
What Ahmadinejad said was "regime change."
03:13 PM on 04/09/2009
No, he didn't say that, but that's what the corrupted mainstream American media would have you believe. Just like the disinformation hit pieces on Charles Freeman. You'd have thought Charlie's provocative words regarding Israel would have generated some investigative journalism, but nope, the Lobby had their way, Charlie resigned, and the American media dropped the story pronto, as with any story that might reflect badly on the “special” American, Israeli relationship. Like I say, control a nation’s media and you've gone a long way in controlling how many of its people think about various issues - leastways the less curious ones - and that's not a good idea for the health of any free, informed and independent nation.
12:33 PM on 04/09/2009
Good for them!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
12:32 PM on 04/09/2009
Google comics: Note google ad for Sexy Iranian Photos under the "Nuke Day" story from Iran. Betcha there’s not one shot of Ahmadinejad in a speedo?
12:30 PM on 04/09/2009
Iran has a basic right to protect itself from the US and it's puppet, Israel
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Proud to be an American
12:40 PM on 04/09/2009
And the US and Israel have a basic right to protect the world from a nuclear-armed Iran.
01:23 PM on 04/09/2009
Stop tying America and Israel together. Your almost as bad as the mainstream American media. And stop trying to get us in another war. What's in Israel's best interests and whats in America's best interests are quite obviously two different things.
04:14 PM on 04/09/2009
Who's gonna protect us from a nuclear-armed Israel? Who's gonna protect either of them from a nuclear-armed America? Fallout knows no friends. Any nuclear-armed country can spark a great winter worldwide, and this is the very reason why NO country, ourselves very much included, has shown the responsibility necessary to wield such a gross existential threat. The amount of power concentrated in any individual who possesses launch codes is too great, whether its Khamenei, Jong Il, Obama, or Sarkozy.
12:47 PM on 04/09/2009
I think you got that backwards. Very backwards.