Roundabout Bailout: Fed To Pump Foreign Currency Into U.S. Banks

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Roundabout Bailout: Fed To Pump Foreign Currency Into U.S. Banks stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 04-10-09 09:32 AM   |   Updated: 05-13-09 10:04 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Currency

The Fed is already printing trillions of U.S. dollars and pumping them into the global economy in an effort to stave off a financial collapse. Now it plans to start injecting foreign currency, too, according to minutes recently released from its March meeting.

How the hell can the U.S. Fed do that? Glad you asked.

The Federal Reserve engages in so-called swaps with foreign countries, which we first reported here. It uses these swaps to pump hundreds of billions of dollars into foreign central banks while taking foreign currency in exchange.

The foreign central banks pass their new U.S. dollars to their foreign financial institutions, while the Fed has kept the foreign currency on its balance sheet and not injected it into the money supply.

Now, however, the Fed will be able to take the foreign currency it acquires in these swaps, and rather than hold it on its balance sheet, pass it on to U.S. banks, according to minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee's March meeting. These U.S. banks can then use that foreign currency to cover their foreign debts.

The Fed governors said, according to the meeting notes, that the measure was only precautionary: "There was no evidence that these institutions were encountering difficulty in meeting foreign currency obligations at this time, but these facilities would be available should pressures develop in the future."

The expanded effort is part of a Fed project that has been injecting hundreds of billions of dollars into foreign central banks over the last several months.

The committee notes say that the new program will "augment the existing network of central bank liquidity swap lines."

Story continues below
advertisement

The Fed also announced in its minutes that it was approving "additional temporary reciprocal currency arrangements (swap lines) with the Bank of England, the European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of Japan, and the Swiss National Bank." Extending additional swaps to these central banks raises the question of whether those banks are facing difficulties repaying previous swaps. The European and Japanese economies have been collapsing at a faster rate than the United States' has.

"It is basically either an extension or increase of the existing lines, and raises suspicion that massive losses have been incurred in the previous round of supposedly 'temporary' swaps, as the return to dollar-supply-normalcy that these geniuses pretended to expect would have happened by now, did not," ventures economist James Galbraith.

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), after reading the minutes, describes the Fed plan as "a massive transfer of wealth from the American people to who knows where," calling it a "round-about bailout."

Beyond that, he notes, it's hard to know what to make of the Fed action because of the obscurity of the institution. "The Fed is out of control. If the president tried to do this, Republicans would be calling for his impeachment. But because it's done by the man behind the curtain they call the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, it's supposedly okay," he says, arguing that the founding fathers never intended one man to have so much unchecked power. The obscurity has led economists to wonder about the Fed's true motives.

The expansion of Fed power comes amid increasing calls for transparency into the workings of the organization. If the Fed does send foreign currency to U.S. banks, it will be under no requirement to disclose which banks or how much.

On Wednesday, Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) called for the GAO to have more authority to investigate the Fed. Grayson says Frank has told him on numerous occasions that Congress needs a better idea of what it is that the Fed is doing.

On Wednesday night, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called on the Fed to post its financial transactions online during a conversation with the Daily Show's John Stewart. She plans to address "Fed authority" when Congress returns.

From the minutes:

The Committee also took up a proposal to augment the existing network of central bank liquidity swap lines by adding several temporary swap lines that could provide foreign currency liquidity to U.S. institutions, analogous to the arrangements that currently provide U.S. dollar liquidity abroad. There was no evidence that these institutions were encountering difficulty in meeting foreign currency obligations at this time, but these facilities would be available should pressures develop in the future. The Committee unanimously approved the following resolution:


"The Federal Open Market Committee authorizes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to enter into additional temporary reciprocal currency arrangements (swap lines) with the Bank of England, the European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of Japan, and the Swiss National Bank to support the provision of liquidity in British pounds, euros, Japanese yen, and Swiss francs. The swap arrangements with each foreign central bank shall be subject to the following limits: an aggregate amount of up to £30 billion with the Bank of England; an aggregate amount of up to €80 billion with the ECB; an aggregate amount of up to ¥10 trillion with the Bank of Japan; and an aggregate amount of up to SwF 40 billion with the Swiss National Bank. These arrangements shall terminate no later than October 30, 2009, unless extended by mutual agreement of the Committee and the respective foreign central banks. The Committee also authorizes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to provide the foreign currencies obtained under the arrangements to U.S. financial institutions by means of swap transactions to assist such institutions in meeting short-term liquidity needs in their foreign operations. Requests for drawings on the central bank swap lines and distribution of the foreign currency proceeds to U.S. financial institutions shall be initiated by the appropriate Reserve Bank and approved by the Foreign Currency Subcommittee."


The Fed is already printing trillions of U.S. dollars and pumping them into the global economy in an effort to stave off a financial collapse. Now it plans to start injecting foreign currency, too, ac...
The Fed is already printing trillions of U.S. dollars and pumping them into the global economy in an effort to stave off a financial collapse. Now it plans to start injecting foreign currency, too, ac...
 
Comments
343
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- jeremiahos I'm a Fan of jeremiahos 9 fans permalink
photo

The dollar is no longer backed by gold.
It's backed by the global community's trust in the United States.

Lately -- that trust isn't very strong.
Eight years of cronies and criminals didn't help that.
So naturally -- they have to pump something sturdy into the LARGEST economy in the world.

Eventually, the dollar will rebound.
But as for right now -- we have to work to get it back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 AM on 04/13/2009
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 111 fans permalink
photo

Unreal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 AM on 04/13/2009
- yappnmutt I'm a Fan of yappnmutt 70 fans permalink

a dog chasing its tail. the world is doomed. no wonder china is hollering. its the end of the dollar(and the usa) in time lapsed photography.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 04/12/2009
- mbaty I'm a Fan of mbaty 20 fans permalink

What is money? This is what we need to remember. Money is a symbolic tool of exchanging goods or services conveniently. What is government? Government is a tool of organization for the people.
Why should our government borrow money from a non-governmental agency at interest?
Our currency is backed by...our currency ? And there's always more debt than money? Does this make sense? What is the solution to this insolvency? I think we have to remember what is important, what will remain. We have learned that the value of compassion is greater than the value of war, and the value of gratitude is greater than greed. We have learned that abundance exists in this rich nation, and that we have more than enough resources for everyone to thrive, but how can we make that happen given where we are now? How do we transform this economy intentionally rather than allowing it to collapse?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 04/12/2009

Very good post. I wish I could answer your questions. I would like to reformulate them as goals. We need to recognize that compassion is more valuable than war, and that gratitude is better than greed. I don't know how to institutionalize such concepts. The entire premise rests on the "how". I think it's time to dust off a copy of Keynes' General Theory.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 04/12/2009
photo

The Fed purchases U.S. notes to control the money supply, adding more money into the system by buying notes when needed and pulling money out by selling bonds when less money is needed in circulation. The treasury pays interest to individuals who own its notes, but the idea of the treasury paying interest to the Fed is mostly an accounting fiction. 98% of the "profits" of the Fed are moved from the Fed's books onto the treasury's books. The rest goes to pay operating expenses and interest payments to the member banks who are required to keep deposits in the Fed's accounts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 04/13/2009
- VivaZapata I'm a Fan of VivaZapata 63 fans permalink
photo

does anyone know exactly how interconnected are the federal reserve bankers with those of the bank of england, the bank of europe? what exactly is the world dealing with?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 04/12/2009
- Stokes I'm a Fan of Stokes 7 fans permalink

Owners of The Federal Reserve
Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 04/12/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

Bingo....It is no accident that the main street in Tel Aviv is Rothschild Ave. You have pointed out what Americans are not allowed to see or discuss or even think about.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 04/12/2009

Foreign banks don't own the Fed. Member banks are all US banks, and state-chartered banks. You are spreading misinformation. If we all panic we are not directing our resources in such a way as to get out of the mess we're in. If you want the Fed to be your punching bag, fine, let the Fed be your punching bag. But get some real information that is actually factual.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 04/12/2009
photo

hey guys. here is a simple idea. Speed up the printing presses. Remember when the govt sent $300 to each American as a stimulus?. This time, send one million dollars to every american. Just imagine, people could pay off their mortgage, go shopping, invest in new businesses. They could buy stocks, bonds treasuries, houses in Detroit, you name it.

oh wait a second, you're saying that it wouldn't work because printng money just leads to inflation.

Exactly.

The bailouts are doomed and we are nowhere near the bottom. Not even close.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 04/12/2009

The problem is the disparity of wealth. The rich have all the money but they aren't spending it. The middle class is shrinking. We can't ALL be employed building yachts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 04/12/2009
- RRG64 I'm a Fan of RRG64 51 fans permalink
photo

"For many months, the chairman was asking 'how can we escalate?' " said William C. Dudley, president of the New York Fed. "There was a general consensus that we were getting to the point where traditional monetary policy tools might not be sufficient."

"In a crisis, the task a chairman assigns is 'Find a way to do this.' It's not a question of 'Can we do this?' " said Vincent Reinhart, who was a senior Fed staffer until 2007 and is now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

Nowhere does the article point out that Bernanke and the Fed are responsible for this problem. Bernanke did not dissent one time with Greenspan or his policies. Bernanke was late to see every problem we now face, even to the point of frequently cheerleading right along with the housing buffoons that subprime would be contained. Of course nothing was contained. And it was the Fed's policy of bailing out banks and throwing money at every problem that led to this crisis.

Eventually, throwing money at problems stops working. Moreover, Bernanke along with Geithner want banks to increase lending, right now, when it was reckless lending and Fed sponsorship that is causing bank failures right now.

Rather than praising Bernanke for stretching legal authority, the Washington Post ought to be scared to death by it.

http://marketoracle.co.uk/Article9988.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 AM on 04/12/2009

Lending does need to increase, but it needs to go back to the "responsible" lending model pre-deregulation. Right now you can't get a loan to buy a house or a car or whatever no matter how good your credit score is. The banks have swung full pendulum. A year ago they would have made a loan to a ham sandwich, now they won't even loan to each other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 04/12/2009
photo

How broke is the Fed if they have to start pumping other countries' money into the system?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 AM on 04/12/2009
photo

Choose ONE:

1. Bailout Banks - vast criminal layered schemes
2. Bailout Households - victims of trickery and treachery

Yes 2: bail out the banks, But don’t do it directly, do it indirectly, instead, via the American borrowers. Maybe the banks will take slightly more losses that way and so will banks’ creditors.

But at least it will be ordinary Americans getting the government bailout, rather than multi-bill­ion-dollar corporations who utterly failed at their primary job of managing risk and taking profits from their own banks.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/130459-why-it-s-better-to-bail-out-borrowers-than-banks?source=article_lb_articles

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 AM on 04/12/2009

For all those who complain about the Fed, they are in much better shape than most other counties' central banks. We also had depression after depression before we settled on the Federal Reserve. We will not have hyperinflation because inflation can be controlled through monetary policy. With interest rates near bottom now we may see 10-11% interest rates in coming years, but it is a small price to pay since deflation would cost us much more in the long run. There's no good option, but one in considerably worse than the other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 AM on 04/12/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 360 fans permalink
photo

The bankers caused the depressions so they could consolidate power, strip the population of its assets, and eventually argue for the need for a central bank. Actually the argument against a central bank raged throughout our nation's history.

http://www.michaeljournal.org/plenty49.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 AM on 04/12/2009
photo

Wall Street MUST Downsize at least 75% to return to its support role in a production and service WEALTH Building Economy similar to 1985. Downsize from 40% to 10-15% of our Economy.

Those "talented" people can retrain for other jobs NOT INVOLVING FAKE Toxic Paper Assets and Waste!

We need "talent" to design and Build our Future Economy on a SOLID Foundation!

FED has done its JOB of Harvesting Americans' Wealth for the Elites that you support at least once and sometimes twice a decade for the last 90+ years!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 AM on 04/12/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 360 fans permalink
photo

Why It's Better to Bail Out Borrowers than Banks

Politically, it’s extremely difficult to pass a bill giving hundreds of billions of dollars to people who borrowed money and now find themselves incapable of repaying it. But then again, it’s politically just as difficult to give that money to the banks who lent it, too. And as Steve Waldman notes, the alternative to not bailing people out is basically to force “prudent” investors and savers to take losses instead:

We are bailing out a banking system that served as a vast criminal conspiracy built around plausible deniability and limited liability. But households and firms in debt are by far the most sympathetic villain in this horror show we wake up to every day.

So maybe we should be spending less time on the banks and more time on the borrowers. Yes, bail out the banks — but don’t do it directly; do it indirectly, instead, via the borrowers. Maybe the banks will take slightly more losses that way. Fine. That just means the banks' creditors will be more bailed in than they have been to date, and the current market price of the debts will be justified. And at least it will be ordinary Americans getting the government bailout, rather than multi-bill­ion-dollar corporations who utterly failed at their primary job of managing risk.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/130459-why-it-s-better-to-bail-out-borrowers-than-banks?source=article_lb_articles

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 04/12/2009
photo

Depression after depression? Really? When?

Your analysis on hyperinflation is entirely false; central banks CAUSE hyperinflation by increasing the money supply. Who is responsible for the 50 trillion Zimbabwean dollar note or the 4 million Mark loaf of bread?

The Federal Reserve will create $1.25T backed partially by Treasuries but mostly with mortgage backed securities, and will start lending it out at 0% interest. A spade is a spade. Unless interest rates jump >20% there will be no way to stop >20% inflation.

The deflationary risk is over because the bear rally on dollars is over. China is already realizing the folly of buying more American debt, more foreigners will stop buying T-Bills, and then the fun begins.

Of course, you could be right, because CNBC, the Fed, and Treasury all say the exact same thing you're saying, and they did such an amazing job at predicting and managing our current situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 AM on 04/12/2009
- Ravyn I'm a Fan of Ravyn 4 fans permalink

Nothing really new about this. Everyone knows, for example, that the Chinese have been investing billions in US Treasury notes. And then the government uses that money for everything from bailouts to running the government. And investing in foreign currency is something many countries do to hedge their bets in case their own currency devalues. It's a smart move especially now when we could be facing some inflation a few years down the line. This is all part of international banking. It's not a bad thing. This is why many foreign countries invest billions buying the dollar or euros or some other major currency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 AM on 04/12/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 360 fans permalink
photo

There is plenty new about this. This is an unprecedented expansion of the Fed's assets and use of currency swaps. They are in essence replacing the Japanese carry trade.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 AM on 04/12/2009
- ptarantino I'm a Fan of ptarantino 8 fans permalink

Criminal alert:

This should be the lead story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 04/11/2009
photo

WALL STREET/FED Continue to CONSOLIDATE POWER OVER OUR GOVERNMENT and ECONOMY!

Every Main Street Bank that goes out of Business helps WALL STREET CONSOLIDATE MORE POWER!

Yea for Wall Street! Yea for Wall Street Increasing Control of our Government!

$5 Billion FUNDING of Congress to Buy their VOTES!
$7.5 Million per Senator on average every four Years!
$1.86 Million per House Members on average every four Years!

My Heart Cries for MAIN STREET!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 04/11/2009
photo

THE FED IN PERSPECTIVE:

1. Geithner's plan = Paulson's PLAN on Illegal STEROIDS = Orders of The Bank of England

2. After G20 Bank of England and ECB helped FED's "quantitative easing" by swapping currencies?

3. Who Owns The FED, The Bank of England, and The ECB: All privately owned by Elites.
http://www.nolanchart.com/article5976.html

4. Congress has absolutely no idea what's on FED’s books so Rep. Paul and Senator Sanders want an AUDIT! Congress and President have NO Control over FED Decisions!

5. Richard C. Cook: Credit as a Public Utility: Constitution: only Government can Print Money NOT FED.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12932

6. Fascinating paper on how bankers, their friends, family and "investors" initiated the bank runs in 1929 and that happened in 2008 as Rep. Kanjorski revealed on C-Span with "someone" pulling out $550B in a few hours on September 15. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xKPcyvlfnc

7. Loans the FED creates by “quantitative easing” are no more inflationary than the credit created daily on a computer screen by private banks.

8. FED’s credit facility has advantages over private banks’ (a) not subject to lending freeze, and (b) profits are rebated to the government, which serves taxpayers’ interests.

9. Nationalizing the FED is ideal solution; but while waiting government can tap into very cheap credit provided by its own central bank.
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/bernanke.php

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 04/11/2009
photo

Thank you for the links. I see the part where it says,

"Congress chartered the Federal Reserve Banks for a public purpose. The Reserve Banks are the operating arms of the central banking system, and they combine both public and private elements in their makeup and organization. As part of the Federal Reserve System, the Banks are subject to oversight by Congress."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 04/11/2009
- noesis I'm a Fan of noesis 65 fans permalink
photo

Lets get real about the dysfunctional global financial system.

Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world -- Professor Nassim Taleb

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/08-8

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 04/11/2009
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 140 fans permalink

It's positively amazing what kind of "transactions" digital computers can manage to do. I had no idea that financiers could put so many shells on the table, nor that they could shuffle a little rubber ball between them at such a rapid pace.

However... until that table is cleared-away of those shells that are utterly worthless, a great deal of time and energy is simply being wasted, and the illusion that "all is well" is being needlessly prolonged.

It actually does not take a degree in Finance to understand that a security can be worthless, and that a country's government can be a direct participant in enabling those worthless pieces of paper to be issued in the trillions. It also does not take a PhD to know what one must do. "If it's worthless, get rid of it. Then, see what's left." You have to do that everywhere, with all of these "too big to fail" (sic...) mega-banks.

What's left? "The end of the world as we know it (TM)?" Hardly. Just the truth, and with it, the sober realization by people who now count themselves "richer than kings" that they are fools, and that their institutions occupy a large crater in the ground. Oh yes... and a strong(!) national economy that is much better-off without them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 04/11/2009

Sundial, you still have no clue what any of this is about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 04/11/2009
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 140 fans permalink

"Au contraire, mon puddytat."

It isn't hard to understand a worthless security. It isn't hard to understand, also, the notion of selling "guarantees" against default when you in fact have no means to honor your obligation should you actually be forced to do it. None of these things are difficult.

Finance can be extraordinarily complex, but it's built on very simple principles. So, a bright line rule that carries everywhere is: "look for the simple." If you can't see simple underneath all that complexity (i.e. the complexity is in the details), then someone's trying to cheat you.

I hear various Fed and Treasury officials talking about "confidence in the system." Well, another word for "confidence" is "trust." If someone discovers that you have deliberately cheated them, then needless to say their trust is broken. But if your response is first to own-up to the cheating and then to deal decisively and transparently with it, trust can be regained. (After all, world-wide, we NEED TO trade.) There can be no trust, though, if you respond by exercising ever-more elaborate money shuffling and you do it "in the dark." A country that does that -- even the USA -- will be walled-off from any position it had at one time earned.

We must not take another man's trust for granted. We must come-clean of these crimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 04/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect