iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Lifting Cuba Travel Restrictions

ROBERT BURNS   04/13/09 09:52 PM ET   AP

Cuba

WASHINGTON — In a measured break with a half-century of U.S. policy toward communist Cuba, the Obama administration lifted restrictions Monday on Cuban-Americans who want to travel and send money to their island homeland.

In a further gesture of openness, U.S. telecommunications firms were freed to seek business there, too. But the broader U.S. trade embargo remained in place.

The White House portrayed its changes, which fulfilled one of President Barack Obama's campaign promises, as a path to promoting personal freedom in one of the few remaining communist nations. They also marked another major step away from the foreign policy priorities of the Bush administration.

But the moves fell far short of the more drastic policy adjustments that some _ including Republican Sen. Richard Lugar _ have argued are required to promote U.S. interests in Latin America and to bring about change in Cuba. For most Americans, Cuba remains the only country in the world their government prohibits them from visiting _ a barrier to potential travelers as well as to the Cuban tourist industry that would like to see them.

Cubans welcomed the changes but said more should be done.

"It's help that the people really need," Fermina Gonzalez, a 46-year-old housewife in the leafy Havana neighborhood of Vedado, said of the ending of limits on money sent by Cuban-Americans. "Right now, we have to work lots of jobs just to make ends meet."

But few Cubans expect Obama to end the trade embargo or allow American tourists to visit the island without limits.

"He should do more and lift travel restrictions for all Americans," said Alberto Sal, a 68-year-old retiree. "Until he does that, I don't think he's doing much."

Lifting or substantially easing the economic embargo, as set forth in the Cuban Assets Control Regulations and administered by the Treasury Department, would require legislative action by Congress. The White House made no mention of any intention to seek such changes; Obama said as a presidential candidate that the embargo was a form of leverage to press for democratic reforms in Cuba.

Julia Sweig, director of Latin studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, described Obama's changes as "teensy, weensy" and said they appear to be driven more by domestic political calculations that by foreign policy considerations.

"This is a cautious first step by a president whose political advisers are looking at the Florida electoral vote," she said in a telephone interview, "and who are not looking at this as a matter of foreign policy. That's the big problem with Cuba policy. We have a policy toward Miami and not toward Havana."

Sweig added, however, that Obama's decision to authorize more telecommunications links with Cuba was a "potentially significant opening," particularly if the Cuban government follows through and allows those connections.

Jose Miguel Vivanco of Human Rights Watch welcomed the Cuba announcement but said more should be done.

"If President Obama is serious about promoting change in Cuba, this executive order must be part of a larger shift away from the U.S.'s unilateral approach toward the Cuban government," Vivanco said.

Taking the other side, three Democratic lawmakers wrote in a letter to Obama on Monday that his decisions would have "devastating consequences."

They said the Cuban government takes 30 cents of every dollar in U.S. remittances that enters the country as a usury fee.

"This income facilitates the regime's finance of its repressive state security apparatus," they wrote. The letter was signed by Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida and Albio Sires and Robert Andrews of New Jersey. They recommended a more calibrated approach: doubling the amount of allowable money transfers to family members in Cuba rather than allowing unlimited transfers.

American policy toward Cuba has been frozen since 1962, when the Kennedy administration broadened a partial trade embargo imposed by the Eisenhower administration the previous year. The original aim was to bring down Fidel Castro's Marxist government at a time when U.S.-backed exiles mounted the failed Bay of Pigs invasion and Soviet missiles in Cuba pushed the world close to nuclear war.

Sporadic congressional efforts to end the embargo since then have failed, largely due to the political influence of powerful Cuban exiles, mostly in Florida, who are determined to isolate Cuba, strangle its economy and force Castro out.

Castro, now 82, ceded the presidency to his brother last year due to illness. Raul Castro, 77, shows no sign of making any fundamental changes.

The White House portrayed the lifting of travel restrictions and money transfers to family members in Cuba _ coupled with the telecommunications changes _ as steps to bridge the gap among divided Cuban families.

"All who embrace core democratic values long for a Cuba that respects the basic human, political and economic rights of all of its citizens," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in announcing the decision. "President Obama believes the measure he has taken today will help make that goal a reality."

It had been known for more than a week that the White House would announce the Cuba changes in advance of Obama's attendance this weekend at a Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago. Cuba is excluded from that gathering of 34 heads of government, but a number of participants are expected to use the session as an opportunity to press the U.S. to improve relations with Havana.

There has been a growing chorus of congressional advocates for change in U.S. policy toward Cuba. In February, Sen. Lugar, R-Ind., issued a report based on a Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff visit to Havana that called for a repeal of the family travel and money transfer restrictions.

Lugar's report also urged congressional action to remove all U.S. travel restrictions, not just those for Cuban-Americans. Further, it advocated lifting travel restrictions on Cuban diplomats in Washington, who are not allowed to journey outside the capital area. It said this would encourage a reciprocal lifting of Cuban restrictions on U.S. diplomats, improving the U.S. government's ability to understand more fully the conditions that exist on the entire island.

Separately on Monday, a U.S. religious freedom watchdog group said it had been forced to call off a fact-finding trip after the Cuban government did not issue visas to its delegation. The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom said the visas had been applied for weeks earlier and it had received no explanation for why they were not granted.

___

Associated Press writer Will Weissert contributed from Cuba.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — In a measured break with a half-century of U.S. policy toward communist Cuba, the Obama administration lifted restrictions Monday on Cuban-Americans who want to travel and send mone...
WASHINGTON — In a measured break with a half-century of U.S. policy toward communist Cuba, the Obama administration lifted restrictions Monday on Cuban-Americans who want to travel and send mone...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,786
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
01:40 PM on 04/29/2009
What's going on with the bill in Congress? Are the lawmakers on vacation as usual?
02:31 PM on 04/17/2009
We as civilized people forget that the Castro brothers have had a hold on the Cuban people for the last 50 years during which they have jailed, tortured and killed thousands of dissidents. I am all for opening up the dialog and free travel to Cuba and not just for Americans of Cuban descent; but let’s not forget to hold accountable for their atrocities those who are patently guilty of crimes against humanity and bring them to justice in the international courts. The Florida Strait is the largest cemetery in this hemisphere and those who have lost their lives there were not travelling to the Cuban paradise but coming across to our shores in search of freedom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patianneb
toothed night fury
10:17 AM on 04/16/2009
Hurry up and open it to the rest of us as well. I've wanted to go to Havana for a long time. It's easy enough regardless, but I'd prefer to have even the meager protection my passport provides.
07:51 AM on 04/16/2009
Personally I don't see a problem with it and the people in Cuba will get some money in their pockets. I've read that the embargo is a straw man argument anyhow because most Nations trade with Cuba.

I think once daddy Castro is gone, the son will make some changes and money flowing into the country will help loosen the reins on the people.

I read that USA taxpayers are behind in paying taxes. I wonder if the USA will be doing something as in the second paragraph below?

TAIPEI, Taiwan -- The Legislative Yuan passed yesterday the latest revisions of administrative enforcement regulations to lift the overseas travel ban on taxpayers who still owe tax payment under NT$100,000.

Lawmakers ratified the changes in taxation law last year to prohibit individual taxpayers owing more than NT$1 million in tax and business owners owing over NT$2 million in tax payment from going abroad.
ropadopa
Exposing the failed conservative experiment
10:54 PM on 04/15/2009
The move is so enormously popular It is causing pandemonium among the three Republican congressmen here in Miami because they have no idea how to spin it. Even those who thinly opposed it, welcomed the idea of traveling to see the old country again. The move has effectively disarmed them of one of their more potent political tools.
06:22 PM on 04/15/2009
Oh finnally America is getting there heads out of there asses and got rid of this idiotic foreign policy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coliwabl
03:35 PM on 04/15/2009
The ignorant obstructionist have had their way for far too long. Opening this thing up is way overdue!

We have done it with China, Viet Nam, and did it with the former Soviet Union before it collapsed.

The first thing to do along the route to solving problems is to open the door for dialogue.

Another Obama promise fulfilled!
01:11 PM on 04/15/2009
Obama is a coward! All he is trying to do is win humanitarian of the year... The lemming does what he's told...AND SO DO ALL HIS IGNORANT VOTERS!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:54 PM on 04/15/2009
Opening up Cuba to travel and vice versa may be the surest way to changing things in Cuba. In some ways, the political situation in Cuba reminds me in some ways of Franco's Spain. It's an oversimplification, but once Franco was gone, his successor (Juan Carlos) instituted democratic reforms and Franco's government was discarded. Perhaps something simlar could eventually occur in Cuba, who knows.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
12:59 AM on 04/15/2009
This is progressive change. This is the kind of change I voted for. For those of you who attack me personally for relaying information showing Obama to be more of the same as Bush, mark this post. It happens rarely and shows I am no partisan hack, unlike some of those who attack me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lam56
Sic gloria transit Monday.
07:13 PM on 04/14/2009
I have never understood how it was that we could now have a completely normal relationship with Vietnam (they have an embassy in Washington and Americans travel there freely) after a war in which over 58,000 American perished, and still not have a normal relationship with Cuba. Except for the Cuban Missile Crisis, nearly 50 years ago, in which the Soviets were the main perpetrators, Cuba has never been a threat to us. Too many cowardly American politicians were afraid of losing the Cuban vote in Miami to do what was right. Good for Obama, at last a President with some guts. One of the best ways to defeat Castro is to foster ties with a free-thinking U.S.
04:13 PM on 04/14/2009
As a child I remember our neighbors vacationing in Cuba every year and coming home with pictures of paradise. Their last trip when they came home with videos, you could hear gunfire in the background and they cryed every time they watched the film. They LOVED Cuba, the food, the people, the hospitality and the beautiful island.
I am so glad this embargo has ended and that a new generation of people will eventually see Cuba as they did. Now watch our college students go there and cause a rift between the two countries for entirely different reasons. So many of our youth are loud, vulgar and most who have all the money in the world to travel are disgusting drunks, and that makes me sad. I wish they could go there and enjoy the same love of Cuba that our friends did and go quietly back year after year and be welcome when they return. I can dream.
04:34 PM on 04/14/2009
It is not the embargo that made it what it is now, it's the comunism and dictatorship, for 50+ YEARS
07:57 PM on 04/14/2009
Really? Look what communism and dictatorship have done in China.
photo
Annieke
Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are.
09:58 AM on 04/15/2009
So you still buy that McCarthy-crap????

Gee, I thought the Darwin-theory of the survival of the fittest had gooten rid of all the McCarthy believers due to their total inability to adjust to a new situation.
01:34 PM on 04/14/2009
As a soldier who spent a long tour of duty in GITMO in the 1990's- I longed to see the rest of Cuba that was veiled by barbed wire and mine fields. Has the decades old embargo worked? I do not think so. The Cuban people are resourceful, hard working people who have "made do" with what they have. Honestly - what could it hurt to allow all American's to travel to and from Cuba? Lifting a pointless embargo on this tiny, beautiful island would only allow the Cuban citizens to have a taste of freedom that they long for. I believed in change at the last election - this "change" by allowing Cuban Americans to travel to Cuba is a step in the right direction - a baby step, but still a change for the better. Has the iron door all of the sudden cracked open, just a bit?
10:59 AM on 04/14/2009
Ooops: DECISION
10:57 AM on 04/14/2009
I left Cuba in 1968 [@ 6 years old]. For the last several years I have been longing to go back. It has taken me a long time to make the desicion, NOT because of the Castros but because I know that it will be an emotional and powerful moment in my life. Thank you Mr. President. I will be on a plane to Habana this October!