Cleopatra's Tomb Believed To Be At 1 Of 3 Egyptian Archaeological Sites

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Cleopatra's Tomb Believed To Be At 1 Of 3 Egyptian Archaeological Sites stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

REBECCA SANTANA | April 15, 2009 07:42 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

CAIRO — Archaeologists will begin excavating sites in Egypt next week in an attempt to solve a mystery that has stymied historians for hundreds of years: Where is the final resting place of doomed lovers Cleopatra and Mark Antony?

Archaeologists looking for the tombs of the celebrated queen of Egypt and the Roman general will begin excavating three sites at a temple where tombs may be located, Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities said in a statement Wednesday.

Cleopatra and Mark Antony, whose relationship was later immortalized by William Shakespeare and then in a movie with Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton, could have been buried in a deep shaft in a temple near the Mediterranean Sea, the council said.

Archaeologists last year unearthed the alabaster head of a Cleopatra statue, 22 coins bearing Cleopatra's image and a mask believed to belong to Mark Antony at the temple.

The three sites were identified last month during a radar survey of the temple of Taposiris Magna, the council's statement said. The temple is located near the northern coastal city of Alexandria and was built during the reign of King Ptolemy II (282-246 B.C.)

Teams from Egypt and the Dominican Republic have been excavating the temple for the last three years. They found a number of deep shafts inside the temple, three of which were possibly used for burials. The lovers could be buried in a similar shaft, the statement said.

The lovers committed suicide in 30 B.C. after being defeated in the battle of Actium. Mark Antony is said to have killed himself with his sword, while Cleopatra is believed to have clutched a poisonous asp to her chest.

However, John Baines, an Egyptologist with Oxford University in England questioned why Augustus, who defeated Antony, would have chosen such a distinguished burial place.

Story continues below
advertisement

"I don't really see why there should be a particular connection between that site and Antony and Cleopatra," Baines said.

Zahi Hawass, Egypt's top archaeologist, said the Cleopatra statue and coins _ which show an attractive face _ debunk a recent theory that the queen was "quite ugly."

"The finds from Taposiris reflect a charm ... and indicate that Cleopatra was in no way unattractive," said Hawass, according to the statement.

Academics at Britain's University of Newcastle concluded in 2007 that the queen was not especially attractive. Their conclusion was based on Cleopatra's depiction on a Roman coin that shows her as a sharp-nosed, thin-lipped woman with a protruding chin.

Excavators at the site near Alexandria have already discovered a large previously unknown cemetery outside the temple enclosure. They have also discovered 27 tombs _ including a total of 10 mummies.

According to the statement, the style of the tombs indicates they were built during the Greco-Roman period. The presence of the cemetery also indicates that an important person _ possibly royalty _ could be buried inside the temple.

(This version CORRECTS Corrects date of suicide to 30 B.C.)

CAIRO — Archaeologists will begin excavating sites in Egypt next week in an attempt to solve a mystery that has stymied historians for hundreds of years: Where is the final resting place of doom...
CAIRO — Archaeologists will begin excavating sites in Egypt next week in an attempt to solve a mystery that has stymied historians for hundreds of years: Where is the final resting place of doom...
 
Comments
31
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- ThomasMc I'm a Fan of ThomasMc 10 fans permalink

Zahi Hawass is a flake.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 04/16/2009
photo

Why do we feel that it is okay to disturb the resting places of the deceased?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 04/16/2009
- alsm9 I'm a Fan of alsm9 13 fans permalink

...because that's how we learn. sheesh! They're dead, they don't care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 04/16/2009
photo

How would ya know if they cared or not? Evidently, they did care, that's why most of them are hidden, and we think it's a big deal when we find them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 04/16/2009
- Macready I'm a Fan of Macready 60 fans permalink

I hope they discover Alexander's tomb . . . that would be even more spectacular than Cleopatra's . . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 04/16/2009
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 52 fans permalink
photo

This all fascinating.

As to the speculation about her looks it can been interpreted in two ways: one, she was probably much better looking than the Roman coin might suggest; after all, which Roman depiction doesn't have a crooked nose, thin lips and protuding chin? They all seem to follow more or less the same template.

On the other hand, she might have been indeed not very pretty, as the 22 coins might have issued with an "airbrushed" image of their Queen. I once saw a fascinating (and extensive) make-up exhibition from Ancient Egypt at the Louvre; so appearance obviously mattered.

Whichever way, all we know is that she was definitely sexually very attractive, and that played a huge part in shaping the history of those times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 04/16/2009
photo

From what I've seen of Zahi Hawass on TV, he seems like the best thing that could have happened for Egyptian antiquities ! I love his passion and enthusiasm for his country's phenomenal heritage, and the way he is treated as somewhat of a celebrity.
As for Cleopatra, the last ruler of the Ptolemy dynasty, I think it is entirely relevant to history for us to know what she may really have looked like. How did such a person manage to seduce two powerful Roman figures if not for her beauty ? We might learn a little more about the dynamics of her relationships if we know about her appearance. Her "legendary beauty" ranks with that of Helen in terms of its impact on her time, so why not seek to know the truth ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 AM on 04/16/2009
- xsm941f I'm a Fan of xsm941f 4 fans permalink

The unattractiveness only applies to images of her face. Sorry but I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks it misses a huge point......HER BODY. If she had a smokin' hot body the face may have meant that much! Cue, Ellen Barkin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 PM on 04/15/2009
- RepugsOut08 I'm a Fan of RepugsOut08 106 fans permalink

I notice they still claim Cleo died from the bite of an asp. I saw a cold case files episode that make a strong argument that Octavian murdered her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 04/15/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 497 fans permalink
photo

This was reported on a great History Channel documentary recently. Can't wait!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 04/15/2009

This is interesting stuff! Hope thye find her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 04/15/2009

Sanctioned archaeology by a State or Nation is not grave robbing; illicit digging by treasure hunters for profit and the illicit antiquities trade is grave robbing. As an archaeologist, I see these folks as having a theory they are trying to prove; quite frankly, any archaeological finds are important - whether or not they are linked to Cleopatra, Antony, or an un-named personage - and must be protected for all to learn from. Someone's attractiveness is a "whatever" consideration; proper scholarship, documentation, and excavation are what are important here and I look forward to the site report - historical associationism not withstanding.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 04/15/2009

I second your comments. As for recent trends, my favorite is how archaeologists no longer view an object, such as a ceramic pot, as the sole source of key info. Rather, it's the pollens, residue of whatever the pot held and microscopic particles within the surrounding soil that tell a more expansive tale. That's why anyone stumbling on an artifact should leave it in situ so that it and its surroundings may be examined by a professional. Once an object is removed it threatens to erase its context. Archaeologists can reconstruct a far better picture of life contemporaneous to the find if these sites are left intact.

As for Mr. Hawaas, I admire how he returned primacy over Egyptian archaeology to Egypt itself. I feel the same about Walter Alva with regard to Peru. Almost singlehandedly, Alva saved the story of the Moche from its inevitable fate as trophies in a Beverly Hills home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 04/15/2009
photo

Amen, brother, amen.

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 04/16/2009
- getalong I'm a Fan of getalong 5 fans permalink
photo

The way the article presents the case, it seems almost as if they are just digger her up to see if she was hot or not.

"At long last! We will finally know if Cleopatra was an 8 or 10!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 04/15/2009
- Dram5780 I'm a Fan of Dram5780 2 fans permalink

Powerful men (or any man) are attracted to powerful women for other than physical reasons, and vice-versa. Why is it so hard to believe she wasn't 'beautiful' by our shallow standards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 04/15/2009
- kreoth I'm a Fan of kreoth 4 fans permalink

Cleopatra was famously hot (notoriouly, even), seductive and cunnning, and a Roman coin depicting her as ugly makes total sense. With Julius Caesar AND Mark Anthony having both fallen under her spell, the patrician elite regarded her as a threat, hence an unflatering Roman depiction of her makes absolute sense. Your 21st century politically-correct hypothesizing is a tiny tiny tiny little bit out of place here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 04/15/2009
- Dram5780 I'm a Fan of Dram5780 2 fans permalink

Thanks for the context, but I'm pretty sure I called her ugly. While my comment may be myopic, revisionist and maybe wrong -- I hardly think it's a politically-correct hypothesis to call any woman ugly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 04/18/2009
- Dram5780 I'm a Fan of Dram5780 2 fans permalink

FYI from a CNN.com article:
Plutarch wrote in his "Life of Antony" that "for her beauty was in itself not altogether incomparable, nor such as to strike those who saw her." In other words, she was plain. Plutarch goes on to write, however, that she was intelligent, charming and has "sweetness in the tones of her voice."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 04/19/2009
- MAragon I'm a Fan of MAragon 17 fans permalink
photo

I am curious to see what they do find.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 04/15/2009
- KayWrites I'm a Fan of KayWrites 6 fans permalink
photo

Gotta say, I'm with the Oxford guy. They fought and lost to Caesar, a man not known for his respect for those he conquered. Anthony and Cleopatra were not together when they died. Would arrogant Caesar have had the tenderness to bury them together? In a nice tomb? Not likely. Great PR for Hawass though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 04/15/2009
- poster1122 I'm a Fan of poster1122 26 fans permalink

It wasn't Caesar they fought against. It was Octavian, later Caesar Augustus. Cleopatra was Caesar's consort until he got assassinated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 04/15/2009

Future archeologists are welcome to dig me up in 5000 years - I might finally have something interesting to say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 04/15/2009
- rjohns3 I'm a Fan of rjohns3 4 fans permalink

/winner

/end thread

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 04/15/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect