iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fiat CEO: Chrysler Makes Cuts Or Deal Is Dead

TOM KRISHER and COLLEEN BARRY   04/15/09 07:05 PM ET   AP

Fiat Chrysler Deal

DETROIT — With just 15 days left before the U.S. government pulls the plug on Chrysler, the only man who appears able to save the struggling automaker is casting doubt on whether a deal can be worked out. Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne, in an interview published Wednesday, said the Italian automaker will walk away from a nonbinding agreement to take a 20 percent stake in Chrysler and share its small car technology unless the U.S. automaker's unions agree to major cost cuts.

A Fiat spokesman confirmed Marchionne's statements.

Chrysler, which is living on $4 billion in loans from the U.S. government, has to take on a partner and gain concessions from unions and debtholders by April 30, or the Obama administration will stop lending it money. No other suitors have emerged, and it's likely that no bankruptcy financing will be available, so Chrysler would have little choice but to be auctioned off in pieces.

Marchionne's comments, made in an interview with the Toronto Globe and Mail, could be designed to pressure unions to give further concessions.

The United Auto Workers union already has agreed to cost reductions, but the Obama administration has said it must agree to further cuts to make Chrysler more competitive with foreign automakers.

The Canadian Auto Workers union reached a deal with General Motors Corp., but Chrysler says the pact doesn't go far enough, and the company has threatened to pull out of Canada without further cuts from the union.

The uncertainty adds to worries for Chrysler's 54,000 employees as well as thousands more who work for parts suppliers and dealers across North America.

"There's definitely some worry and concern about what's going on," said Brett Ward, 35, a 15-year Chrysler worker who drives a forklift at an assembly plant in the Detroit suburb of Sterling Heights. "We haven't been asked to vote on the contract changes yet."

Ward, who is far too young to retire, just started classes to become a nurse in case Chrysler goes under. His factory, which makes the midsize Chrysler Sebring and Dodge Avenger, is in the third week of a four-week shutdown due to slow sales.

No one is entirely sure just how much the unions have to give to satisfy the U.S. government, which said only that unions must make concessions that are deeper than those the Bush administration outlined when it approved government loans last year.

Shortly after Marchionne's comments were published, CAW President Ken Lewenza said the union would return to the bargaining table with Chrysler on Monday after a two-week hiatus. But he later said the union won't stray from the GM deal. The UAW declined comment.

Chrysler would not comment beyond a statement that said the company has a goal of reaching a conclusion by the April 30 deadline.

Marchionne's statements surprised some of Michigan's lawmakers who had been told that talks with the unions were proceeding well.

Democratic U.S. Rep. Gary Peters, whose district includes Chrysler's 15-story headquarters building in Auburn Hills, said he met with CEO Robert Nardelli and other Chrysler officials Tuesday and was told that debtholders were the big trouble spot.

Chrysler owes a group of banks and hedge funds $6.9 billion, and the Treasury Department, which oversees the Obama administration's auto task force, wants them to erase the debt for 15 cents on the dollar. The creditors rejected that offer and are readying a counteroffer, according to a person briefed on their plans.

"The focus of our discussion yesterday was about the challenges that they're having with their creditors right now," Peters said Wednesday. "The UAW has made concessions already to Chrysler. As far as making further concessions, they have made it fairly clear that they don't want to be the only party at the table."

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said she talks almost daily with the auto task force and was told progress is being made, including talk of a new board structure for Chrysler that involves Fiat.

"I would question if this is a negotiating tactic, because I know that they have been moving along on a number of fronts," Stabenow said.

If Chrysler reaches a deal with Fiat, President Barack Obama has said the government is willing to lend up to $6 billion to the automaker on top of the $4 billion it already has received. The government has determined Chrysler cannot survive independently.

Obama spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki said Wednesday that "the president remains hopeful that all stakeholders will come together and overcome the hurdles necessary to make this deal a success."

But Marchionne said in the interview that without labor cost concessions, the Fiat deal will not happen.

"Absolutely we are prepared to walk. There is no doubt in my mind," he said. "We cannot commit to this organization unless we see light at the end of the tunnel."

___

AP Business Writer Colleen Barry reported from Milan. AP Auto Writers Dan Strumpf in New York and Kimberly S. Johnson in Detroit, and AP Business Writer Stephen Manning in Washington also contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

DETROIT — With just 15 days left before the U.S. government pulls the plug on Chrysler, the only man who appears able to save the struggling automaker is casting doubt on whether a deal can be w...
DETROIT — With just 15 days left before the U.S. government pulls the plug on Chrysler, the only man who appears able to save the struggling automaker is casting doubt on whether a deal can be w...
Filed by Julie Satow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 164
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mcamp52
12:01 PM on 04/16/2009
Dear Fiat, Turn and start running. You have no brand equity in the USA. Chrysler makes lousy, fuel guzzling cars with images of Hemi and Ram and all this other pseudo macho crap. Even the great Daimler Benz couldn't own Chrysler and make money. Run.
07:28 PM on 04/15/2009
Great to know that FIAT believes in Union Busting like every other European company. Nice. Too bad no one remember just what the h*** we got from unions - like 40 hour weeks, like vacations, like sick pay, like personal days, like 8 HOUR days. No - bitch and moan about the bottom line, everyone - isn't that what got us here? Keep smacking down the blue collar workers so you can buy your fracking yachts and jets? So no one can afford to buy your products? Maybe that is why Ford is avoiding the bail out money - Ford said not to build something their own workers couldn't buy.

What a crock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
funkalicious
06:07 PM on 04/15/2009
Obama and his car czar idiot in chief dictated that Chrysler would merge with Fiat.

Fiat is just turning the knife.. with out competitive bidding Chrysler and their workers don't stand a chance.

Fiat has always been an also ran. Now the American worker is forced to pasta fasul..with out the pasta.
06:04 PM on 04/15/2009
translation---- chrysler sucks --we dont want the deal-lets save face and blame the union workers.
05:34 PM on 04/15/2009
In December of 1979 Chrysler on the verge of bankruptcy received its first bailout from the US government. Chrysler then cut wages and invented the highly successful minivan and K-cars and was able to pay back the government ahead of schedule. For Chrysler and GM I see no reforms in management ond product innovations that make the current government loans repayment probable in the foreseeable future.
06:27 PM on 04/15/2009
K-cars were the ugliest cars back then.
11:36 AM on 04/16/2009
Ugly or not, they sold nearly 3 million of them, and they were part of an effective, company-wide restructuring strategy that quite literally kept the company from going under. Now, they are refusing to learn from their past, and resisting any kind of serious change at almost all levels. Yes, maybe they're being forced to eat a crap taco with the Fiat deal, but you know what... they really don't have much choice in the matter. No one else wants to help them, and thus far they've pretty much refused to help themselves.
05:31 PM on 04/15/2009
Hey, ifBarryandtheboys can restri ct C E ospay, why not allow thecontrolof the wor kers pay?

Oh wait, that was theplan all along and we warned youthis was coming. So let'ssee if Obiwanbelieves all men are cre atedequ al
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teapartydude
04:26 PM on 04/15/2009
How about some cuts from upper mgt? They're the ones who created the debacle.
05:56 PM on 04/15/2009
Indeed ... the Malibu is being recalled; who was reviewing the whole thing?

Fire the whole bunch of overpaid, overated and overfed in upper management.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mazzetta
03:40 PM on 04/15/2009
Americans should not expect FIAT operating like an alien

As FIAT's owning family is so close to mr Kissinger, Rotschild and Rockefeller families, you can trust them as if they were true American elite, they come becouse they've been invited and everybody around (them) will earn

then you can think on wether this is positive or not for Crysler and its people, or wether FIAT's technology will help american car industry, but remember that FIAT has never been workers-friendly in its history
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
03:36 PM on 04/15/2009
Doesnt Ohmar Kadafi own a large portion of Fiat? I know he use to.
03:04 PM on 04/15/2009
Fiat is not offering anything but wants it all. Fiat is a piece-of-junk car company that wants it all to try and sell their crap to Americans without much risk.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com
03:07 PM on 04/15/2009
I don't blame them. After the way the banking industry has been handled, why not get in line for some goodies?
03:14 PM on 04/15/2009
Say, Jerry, what did Daimler get for all the money they paid for Chrysler? Anything but grief?

:-)
03:55 PM on 04/15/2009
You are right about the grief, but Daimler did have an existing network of U. S. dealers. It would seem fair for the government loans to at least remain secured before Fiat gets in for no new cash.
03:03 PM on 04/15/2009
But don't the unions have a contract that is legally binding like the AIG bonus contracts?

I would think Chrysler should tell FIAT there is not much they can do about the contracts in the same way AIG told the government.
03:16 PM on 04/15/2009
Yes, they do. These contracts are binding up to the day of the bankruptcy. After that they can roll them up and smoke them.

:-)
10:43 PM on 04/15/2009
Thanks for the comment.

So the next question would be why wasn't AIG placed in "surgical" bankruptcy?
03:50 PM on 04/15/2009
Not so. The UAW would not be terminated in any bankrupcy situation. Consider what the air lines went through and their unions are still there. The problem lies with convincing the greedy shareholders to take a cut but then again if bankrupcy occurs, they the share holders will get paid pennies on the dollar so their better off making a deal. Fiat need to realize that Chrysler is owned by Cebreaus, therefore they better get used to dealing with the real owners, who by the way have all the money in the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josefhiggins
02:33 PM on 04/15/2009
What? Did Chrysler not see this coming? I mean really? Fiat only wanted in becasue the Govenment was handing out Billions of Dollars like Nino Brown, baby. Now the Government stopped handing out the free cheese, Fiat is looking to an exit strategy; the only thing they could come up with was, cut 20% or we are out. Chrysler, chalk it up ... any way you play this, Fiat is out unless the Government give more money and afterwhich watch Fiat take it's share of the loot and run.

Chrysler can't be this gullable, thinking any company would want in on it's business knowing they are flat broke and have a failing business model of useless, unattractive automobiles. Maybe its time to call a bankruptcy attorney. Better yet, how about turning things around on your own good will. Start looking for billable, private equity investors. Do what HSBC did. Take a design que' from one of those Italian or German automakers and mimic some of those attractive designs; without the high price. Then maybe, just maybe we would consider buying a car from you.

It's a cold day in hell when Americans are buying Hyundai's and Kia's over American cars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TrekBear
This space is intentionally left blank
02:23 PM on 04/15/2009
Doesn't Chrysler have its own "500" in the form of its treciento (300)? ;>)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheHandyman
Death...the last new experience you will ever have
02:11 PM on 04/15/2009
I love all the anti-union comments as if all this was their fault. The rise of unions in the country is what got us the 40 hour week, 8 hour day, health benefits, sick pay, safe working conditions and now because business had to offer there workers the same thing workers think that unions are bad. of course they are, to the owners.

The big three would love to go bankrupt and divest themselves of all the pensions, health benefits, and dealer costs. They already are manufacturing overseas and would love to import their cars as there would be more profit in it.

Americans have bought into the unions are bad movement without stopping to realize that unions allow a group of people to do what a single person cannot do and that is their strength. They never stop to ask, who says that a guy who makes something that makes the profit should make less money than some CEO who doesn't do crap with regards to to product. The Japanese have known this since WWII when an American efficency expert whose name I can't recall taught them how to get things done. But in this country the worker is exploited and are willing to be exploited even more by having their tax dollars spent to give the Owners more of their money in the guise of a bailout!
06:30 PM on 04/15/2009
Don't forget. The unions invented the pay us more or we will strike even though you are not making a profit type of negotiations..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Solex
01:32 PM on 05/06/2009
Please stop talking bullcrap-the unions only wanted what is part of every human being by human right. Stop believing the neocon anti-union nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edwardf56
02:05 PM on 04/15/2009
Dont bother making any deals with Fiat. They are worse than the CEO they have now.