iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Elizabeth Warren Makes Jon Stewart Feel Better On "Daily Show" (VIDEO)

First Posted: 07/07/09 03:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:15 PM ET

Detailing the need for transparency, laying out a framework for bank recovery and making a clear and succinct case for a smart regulatory system, TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren did what few other "Daily Show" guests have done in the past year: instill confidence in its host, Jon Stewart.

In a relatively lengthy interview that aired on Wednesday night, Warren, ever the academic, managed to generate a few laughs, none more so when she stumped herself on what exactly the acronym PPIP meant (for the record: the Public-Private Investment Program). But it was her commentary on the economy, at once clear and forthright, that left Stewart soothed.

"[This] is probably the first time in probably six months to a year that I feel better," said the Daily Show host. "I don't know what it is you just did right there. But for a second that was like financial chicken soup for me."

Warren did not endorse liquidation of major banks or, for that matter, the particulars of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's plan; saying merely that "It is a bank by bank thing."

She called for transparency and painted her job as the protester banging the gates of the government institutions overseeing the whole recovery enterprise. It was her case for a new system of regulation, however, that left Stewart at ease.

We start[ed] pulling the threads out of the regulatory fabric and what's the first thing we get: we get S+L crisis," Warren said. "Seven hundred financial institutions fail. Ten years later what do we get? Long Term Capital Management, where we learn that when something collapses in one place in the world it collapses everywhere else. Early 2000s, we get Enron, which tells us the books are dirty. And what is our repeated response? We just keep pulling the threads out of the regulatory fabric.


So we have two choices -- we are going to make a big decision, probably over about the next six months. And the big decision we are going to make is going to go one way or another. We are going decide, basically, "Hey, we don't need regulation. You know, it is fine. Boom and bust, boom and bust, boom and bust, and good luck with your 401k." Or alternatively we are going to say, you know, "We are going to out with some smart regulation that is going to adapt to the fact that we have new products and what we are going to have going forward is we are going to have some stability and real prosperity for ordinary folks."

"And that," Stewart offered with a sarcastic tip of the tongue, "is socialism."

His economic acid-reflux momentarily alleviated, he added: "If they don't give you transparency, tell me, because I will keep talking about it on the same network after 'Mind of Mencia.'"

Part I:
The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c
Elizabeth Warren Pt. 1
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Economic CrisisPolitical Humor

Part II:

The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c
Elizabeth Warren Pt. 2
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Economic CrisisPolitical Humor

Become a fan of HuffPost Politics on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Detailing the need for transparency, laying out a framework for bank recovery and making a clear and succinct case for a smart regulatory system, TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren did what few other "Dai...
Detailing the need for transparency, laying out a framework for bank recovery and making a clear and succinct case for a smart regulatory system, TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren did what few other "Dai...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,212
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
11:40 AM on 05/07/2009
Elizabeth Warren is a very bright person, but I'm concerned that she is in her position to act as a buffer to the public for all the shenanigans that Obama and Congress are doing to the American people for the benefit of America's Super Wealthy. It is obvious that Elizabeth Warren understands that it is absolutely essential that bankruptcy reform must be implemented that will allow bankruptcy judges to mark mortgages to market (cramming down the principle or lower the principle amount owed to the bank) for people under water. Yet she shies away from naming names and demanding prosecution of criminals, like former FBI Director Louis Freeh when he lied to Congress about MBNA's Universal Default Policy where they raise your credit card interest rate to 30% for being one day late on your phone bill. In the end, she is just a mouthpiece for the Obama Administration as our country slides into a police state.
02:13 AM on 04/18/2009
Somebody please tell me why she isn't our Treasury Secretary?

Come on hit me with the truth....
10:59 PM on 04/16/2009
Wow, I was completely impressed with Elizabeth Warren ability to for lack of better words, use simple terms when explaining. Also I was completely blow away with her straight forward honestly.
09:16 PM on 04/16/2009
I want to marry this woman.
09:43 PM on 04/16/2009
Me too, since day one. I'm blown away by her intelligence, clarity, focus - she's an absolute gem. She's hot!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PBMac
12:21 AM on 04/17/2009
She is a tenured professor at Harvard. Only the creme de la creme gets tenure there. This speaks volumes for her abilities. Everyone takes Harvard's cast offs, i.e. those who didn't get tenure, which is most everyone.
photo
RRonin
Fortune favors the brave
10:43 PM on 04/16/2009
If I wasn't already married I'd want to be married to her. She is a GREAT LADY!
08:55 PM on 04/16/2009
If 33% of the original $235 billion TARP money is still hidden from Ms Warren & if institutions & hedge funds can receive about 1% fees for assets under management & the first 20% to 35% of the fund's profits each year, could it be possible that the institutions &/or the CEOs took the missing 33% as FEES in the transactions (similar to a casino taking a cut on each wager)?
In the investing world, a compliance department in a financial instituion can CANCEL a trade if it has irregularities. The world's largest compliance department, the U.S. government, could cancel the $235 billion purchase of preferreds & equities from these institutions at the 66 cents on the dollar we ended up with & re-calculate the preferreds & equities at the full dollar value. This would force the institutions to come clean as to where the missing 33% is hidden.

Additionally, why weren't the securities purchased on the open market through the NYSE & other institutions like honest investors do? This would surely revitalize the markets with a lot less money involved.
08:33 PM on 04/16/2009
After watching the show last night, I felt essentially what Stewart described. This woman is genuine, intelligent, honest, and maybe unintentionally funny. There's no rhetoric, no dodging question, and no sugar-coating. That instills real confidence.
08:00 PM on 04/16/2009
Haven't had time to read all the preceding posts. Huff is just getting to damn popular! But just to say that Warren is a national treasure and listening to her talk on complicated subjects is balm to the tired intellect. There is a Youtube clip of her giving a lengthy presentation on the pauperisation of the american middle class. Brilliant. I have seldom seen better use of statistics to illuminate a crucial social issue. Fat chance of her ever being Treasury secretary....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slowtono
07:18 PM on 04/16/2009
Thats bank regulation of peoples money, good good. But that is not regulation of airlines, railroads, car companies, home builders and farmers. But wait.... can you regulate money without regulating business? And if u regulate me why not you? Not so easy!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
KillgoreTrout43
08:00 PM on 04/16/2009
You can regulate how the banking industry operates. It's been done before, and quite successfully.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
09:48 PM on 04/16/2009
As Warren said, for 50 years it worked, and then it started to be unraveled -- first result S&L mess and then on and on.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
KillgoreTrout43
08:11 PM on 04/16/2009
All those businesses you mention have regulation.
06:51 PM on 04/16/2009
Mr. President, please give this woman authority to look at everything, to talk about everything. We the people need these clear explanations. (And "we the people" who happen to be investment bankers and treasury officials & advisers apparently need clear explanations too.)

She makes sense. We desperately NEED someone out front who makes sense.

Mr. President, if you did see these clips, and we know you did, you know this is exactly the kind of person you need as well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:24 PM on 04/16/2009
She was appointed to the oversight board by Congress during the Bush administration.

The President has nothing to do with congressional appointments. He has appointed an executive TARP administrator.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
10:06 PM on 04/16/2009
I agree with Lochmon. Elizabeth Warren was succinct and informative with her explanation of the financial crisis which is going to turn into THE Great Depression (the 1930's thing was a warmup) if something isn't done VERY SOON. She even impressed Jon Stewart, which is amazing as he don't care for the majority of people within our government. I feel that our President needs to ask both Geithner and Summers to resign and replace them with Elizabeth Warren and Paul Krugman. This new team can do it, yes they can.
05:46 PM on 04/16/2009
I love Elizabeth Warren. She is beautiful and smarter than those she is investigating. So, why isn't she our Treasury secretary. If she were, there would not be the Geithner scam.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com
06:26 PM on 04/16/2009
I h8 it that Obama is propping up the scu zzy banks, but it would be unimaginable destruction if he doesn't stabilize them first. Who else better to do that than the scu zzies that created the problem?

I honestly hope they succeed, only and that is ONLY because we have no other options.

Warren is great, but a theorist. I hope we created the world she has been talking about for several years. But we can't do it from here.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
KillgoreTrout43
08:04 PM on 04/16/2009
From where?
05:28 PM on 04/16/2009
Just saying that we need to bring back regulations is simply an obvious statement, and doesn't even touch the underlying system that will go on creating debt sla very, prodding consumption ad nau seam, and using "growth" as the only model for success.

A good 45 min.movie on the subject is 'Money as Debt" by Paul Grignon.

The best link I can find now is pieces of it on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVkFb26u9g8

But Google the thing and you'll get a great education in just what money has been throughout the history of civilization, and what it is now.

It's what they don't teach you in school, and what very few even think to ask about.

Required viewing at this time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeSchmuk
10:15 PM on 04/16/2009
Terrific vid - thanks for the link.

i'm from Canada, and i didn't know we had a nationalized bank, or at least, what that actually meant. I am impressed. Nice to know that we Canadians are not paying interest on the money we use, or at least, if we are, that it is going into our own pockets. Trouble is, we have a guy named Harper in charge, and he is a money guy if nothing else. He has to be in somebody's pocket. I haven't seen anything from him to convince me otherwise. He is our Bush, with a slicker vocabulary, and we haven't been able to get rid of him yet.

Now if we could just get out of the money for debt construct, i guess that would really mean something.

P.S. If the central banks control the money, and money (credit/debt) controls the government, then who's pocket is BObama in i wonder, if indeed he is in anyone's pocket.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitarsandmore
devoted father, community activist, musician, reti
05:16 PM on 04/16/2009
Maybe if enough closet economists come out for regulating the banks it will actually happen.

I did find disconcerting her allowing for new financial products right at the end. I personally disagree with new financial products. Banks should be making simple loans in a slow moving boring environment. Something easy enough they can't screw up.
05:58 PM on 04/16/2009
Cosign.

And get rid of banks issuing stock as if they're a manufacturer. They aren't and it's financial double-dipping -- creating zip customer loyalty.
06:12 PM on 04/16/2009
I'm sure they would find a way to screw things up - or at least screw people out of their life savings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fedupwiththis
05:11 PM on 04/16/2009
That was a great interview. I've seen Prof. Warren on Rachel's show and even as great an interviewer as Rachel is she could not match what Jon got from the professor. She was really stoked for this and it really showed. Congratulations to bot Elizabeth Warren and Jon Stewart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aaronr2000
Blogger, dad of autistic son,
04:12 PM on 04/16/2009
Very well explained. I also found her honesty of not knowing all the answers not so much concerning as refreshingly un-Washington. God speed ma'am. You're going to need it.
04:10 PM on 04/16/2009
Smartest person in the entire administration.

Elizabeth is Great.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HappyRabbit
04:17 PM on 04/16/2009
Yes, indeed. Too damn bad she is not in the administration. She is a congressional appointee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hawaii5-0
04:40 PM on 04/16/2009
Maybe there will be an opening in Treasury soon. Like the top job. She would be great there.
04:47 PM on 04/16/2009
This congress is part of this generic democratic "administration". but technically you are correct.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bitsko
He of the smoldering eyes
05:58 PM on 04/16/2009
Appointed by congress.