iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Shoot First: How Columbine Tragedy Radically Transformed Police Tactics

P. SOLOMON BANDA   04/18/09 02:30 PM ET   AP

Columbine

GOLDEN, Colo. — The first officers on the scene had never trained for what they found at Columbine High School: No hostages. No demands. Just killing.

In the hours that followed, the nation watched in horror as the standard police procedure for dealing with shooting rampages in the U.S. proved tragically, heartbreakingly flawed on April 20, 1999.

Two officers exchanged fire with one of the teenage gunmen just outside the school door, then stopped _ as they had been trained to do _ to wait for a SWAT team. During the 45 minutes it took for the SWAT team to assemble and go in, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot 10 of the 13 people they killed that day.

The killers committed suicide around the time the makeshift SWAT team finally entered. But the SWAT officers took several hours more to secure the place, moving methodically from room by room. One of the wounded, teacher Dave Sanders, slowly bled to death.

"It was really frustrating," said Marjorie Lindholm, a grief counselor and speaker at police training seminars. Lindholm was a 16-year-old student in a science classroom where two classmates used their T-shirts to try to stanch Sanders' bleeding. "We were told 'They're on their way, they're coming.'"

Ten years later, Columbine has transformed the way police in the U.S. deal with shooting rampages.

After the tragedy, police across the country developed "active-shooter" training. It calls for responding officers to rush toward gunfire and step over bodies and bleeding victims, if necessary, to stop the gunman _ the active shooter _ first.

Sgt. A.J. DeAndrea, a patrol officer in the Denver suburb of Arvada, and now-retired sheriff's Sgt. Grant Whitus, two of the SWAT team members who searched Columbine High that day, now train police with the idea that a gunman, in a mass shooting, kills a person every 15 seconds.

"Based on what we had been through, we had decided that day that we would prepare, and that the lives lost at Columbine were not going to be in vain," said DeAndrea, team leader of the Jefferson County Regional SWAT.

Around the country, police say the strategy has saved lives time and again.

In North Carolina, active-shooter training became part of the state's law enforcement academy curriculum in 2001. Last month, a rampage at a Carthage, N.C., nursing home that killed a nurse and seven helpless patients was cut short when 25-year-old Officer Justin Garner entered the place alone and wounded the gunman with a single shot. Garner had undergone active-shooter training.

"Fifteen years ago, if I heard about what that officer in North Carolina did, I would have said `What a fool, he violated every procedure that we knew about,'" said Steve Mitchell, program manager with the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies in Fairfax, Va. "It's been a complete turnaround."

For three decades before Columbine, law enforcement had followed a contain-and-wait strategy calculated to prevent officers and bystanders from getting killed: The first ordinary cops at the scene would set up a perimeter to contain the situation, and then wait for the experts _ SWAT team members trained in military tactics and equipped with special protective gear and assault weapons _ to go in and bring down the gunman.

That strategy and the creation of SWAT teams were prompted by the 1966 sniper attack at the University of Texas at Austin, in which Charles Whitman climbed a clock tower and opened fire with a high-powered rifle, killing 14 people.

Columbine prompted the most sweeping changes in police tactics since then.

Police around the country now employ so-called contact teams, in which patrol officers from any jurisdiction band together to enter a building in formation to confront the gunman and shoot it out with him if necessary.

"Once we can turn his focus and change his thought plan, whatever his plan was to go in there, he can no longer just kill indiscriminately," DeAndrea said. "He can't actively continue to kill. He has to deal with law enforcement."

SWAT teams go in after that, usually to make sure there are no other gunmen or to rescue hostages.

During the 2007 massacre that left 33 people dead at Virginia Tech, three of the first five officers who entered the classroom building where most of the victims died were patrol officers trained to deal with an active shooter, according to an official report on the tragedy.

The gunman, Seung-Hui Cho, had chained the three main entrances to the building but killed himself about a minute after officers used a shotgun to blast a deadbolt to get in, the report said.

Earlier this month, police tactics came under scrutiny after a gunman killed 13 people and committed suicide at an immigrant center in Binghamton, N.Y. Police arrived within three minutes of the first call but held back. It took 43 minutes for a SWAT team to enter.

Police defended their handling of the tragedy, saying that by the time they arrived the gunfire had stopped, and because they believed there was no active shooter in the building, they decided to wait for the SWAT team.

"We definitively can say nobody was shot after police arrival, and nobody who had been shot could have been saved even if the police had walked in the door within the first minute," said District Attorney Gerald F. Mollen.

In another change prompted by Columbine, SWAT teams across the country have armed medics and rescue teams trained to drag the wounded out under fire.

There was no such regular training before Columbine. It took SWAT team members 2 1/2 hours after entering the building to reach Sanders, the wounded teacher. Whitus and other SWAT officers tried to wheel Sanders out of the classroom on an office chair. Whitus was holding bandages to Sanders' wounds when he died.

"We would have given up everything to change the course of events inside that school that day," Whitus said. "What America doesn't understand is that everything we could do and find them that day and save lives was done. Law enforcement as a whole has just gotten much better at it today."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:06 PM on 04/20/2009
While a change in police tactics is certainly in order in the light of what happened, it's not the ONLY change that should take place. We put fire extinguishers in schools, even though when a fire breaks out, we also call the professional fire fighters. This is a time-proven tactic to avert or minimize disaster by fire. So why don't we have trained, licensed faculty and staff who are armed? When a shooting happens, we call men with guns. Whether or not you are a firearms fan or not, most sane people agree that police need to be armed to do their job. But this incident, as well as Virginia Tech, graphically and horribly shows that we need guns IN the schools! No, I'm not suggesting arming kids or anything haphazard. A well-trained teacher / faculty member could've made all the difference. Allow trained, CCW license holders to carry on the job. Another option would be to have armed security staff on the premises, although that's a much more expensive option. (The beauty of CCW license holders is that they pay for their own training, pay for their FBI background check and pay for their own weapons and ammunition.) Seriously; it's time. We put men with guns around our money, our jewelry and other valuable things, but we balk at putting them around our MOST valuable things -- our kids? That is simply not rational.
01:35 PM on 04/21/2009
Your suggested model of an armed and trained staff works very well in Isreal, too bad the teachers unions would rather see dead students than take responsibility for helping to protect their students.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ivoteforsmartpeople
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch!
10:41 AM on 04/20/2009
EVERY school shooter in the US has been the product of abuse by BULLIES!

And MUCH of the bullying was focused on the Perceived Sexuality of the shooter! (FA**OT!)

I remember hearing one of the survivors of Columbine telling a reporter that he and some of his classmates had beat up on one of the shooters EVERY DAY SINCE 2nd GRADE!!!!

I have been in the high schools and have heard these hateful names being called out in the halls and elsewhere and the teachers have done NOTHING about it. They just have turned a deaf ear and a blind eye....often because they have Agreed that the person being bullied deserved it for being one of "those people"!

ENOUGH!!!! We must have Zero Tolerance of Bullying in our schools. Parents should DEMAND IT - and school boards and administrators must Enforce It!
11:59 PM on 04/19/2009
Again about the bullying...

Yes pull the parents in but also....

Convict the lame brained, idiot stupid teachers and staff who..

DO NOTHING TO STOP OR PUNISH!

No child should ever have to go through being bullied period!

Get rid of the guns OR start telling the NRA that if they want "their gun rights" they better do everything they can to PREVENT GUN DEATHS!

These kids might have been helped..but we will never know ..shows you how much we really do care about our kids ...

BECAUSE THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ADEQUATE MENTAL HEALTH CARE IN THIS COUNTRY...
AND WE NEED THE EDUCATION FOR EVERYONE...
07:56 AM on 04/20/2009
Let me say it again - it was not about the bullying - read Dave Cullen's book Columbine, read the Slate article from 2003 or 04 and quit repeating this mythology. IT was not about bullying!
01:28 PM on 04/20/2009
The NICS changes passed last year BECAUSE OF NRA SUPPORT. Also--something else the NRA advocates is Project Exile---namely any felon caught carrying a gun or in the same vehicle/building with a gun goes to prison for 5 years PER FIREARM FOUND as well as any prohibited person found filling out a 4473 goes to prison for 5 years--PERIOD
11:23 PM on 04/19/2009
It's crazy how school employees are left defenseless until the police arrive. Has anybody wondered if the Columbine shootings would've happened if law-abiding school employees were allowed to carry their own guns?

If law-abiding police officers are allowed to carry a gun, shouldn't a law-abiding school employee also be allowed?

So many acts of terror would've been averted if people were allowed to protect themselves.

9/11 also probably wouldn't have happened if pilots were allowed to carry their own guns.
The boats that are also being hijacked by those Somali pirates could also be averted if only the ship owners were allowed to carry their own protection.

This entire situation doesn't make any sense. Law-abiding citizens should be allowed to protect themselves from the crazy people with guns.
07:54 AM on 04/20/2009
You must be right, the reason the USA has the most violent gun culture, with far more deaths from guns than any other Western nation, is because guns are too regulated. There are too few of them on the streets, not too many. Of course. Right.
01:38 PM on 04/21/2009
Sorry to inform you--the areas with the strictest gun control tend to have the worst violent crime
11:40 AM on 04/20/2009
As a public high-school teacher myself, can I just say that that is insane.

In other situations, maybe it's not AS insane an idea, but I don't want guns anwhere NEAR these kids. Not brought in by me, or anyone else. We have ONE gun, unloaded, in this building, carried by a police officer liason. Never used once in the 11 years this school's been open. (and no, we're not inner city, but we're not exactly Beverly Hills, either)
01:29 PM on 04/20/2009
Armed school staff has been exceedingly successful in Isreal--try looking up the stats
02:08 PM on 04/20/2009
Schools are soft targets. Students are sitting ducks. Our children have less protection than adults, because of the idiot no-guns rules.
10:21 PM on 04/19/2009
We had an armed-intruder in Montreal a couple of years ago who shot his way into a college, but was followed immediately into the building by Montreal police and was quickly tied up in a shootout with them. He was killed in the shootout before anyome innocents could be murdered.
These cowardly mass killers, whose only courage is in their guns, will think twice if they know police will storm in before they can kill enough people to become famous.
01:30 PM on 04/20/2009
Armed civilians have been just as successful in the US as well as in Isreal
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:41 PM on 04/19/2009
The problem with schools is that nobody bothers to check in with thier students. Its become a business, not an envionment to enrich a child, teach them, allow them to grow. Teachers are too over loaded with paper work to do thier jobs properly, principles don't want to be sued, lose funds or be seen as rocking the boat. Hello, you can no longer play games, ignoring students that are timebombs waiting to go off. Yes, the red flags are all over the place and instead of playing it nice and safe, you have to go nuclear and do what is needed to help those students at risk, before they take out entire student bodies as we have seen. All of the attacks on campuses, at Collumbine, universities are totally avoidable. Instead of worrying about damn map tests, worry about how mentally your kids are doing, what is going on at home and how they are dealing with stress and pressures of acadamia. That is what really matters, not the rest of the garbage.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BearsLeft
They were just here a minute ago...
09:40 PM on 04/19/2009
As a Jefferson County taxpayer who asked some of the tough questions of our Sheriff's Department after Columbine, I'm glad to see that lessons were learned. It was so frustrating to find that all the money and training that went into SWAT teams, weapons, armor, and various other equipment ended up not saving a single life at Columbine and indeed cost Dave Sanders his life as he bled to death in a classroom for hours after the killers were dead (I never say their names as notoriety was part of what they wanted.) I realize that police officers have a tough balancing act, but that much caution from heavily armed and armored professionals proved disastrous.
09:00 PM on 04/19/2009
What a tortured story line. Police departments routinely hold back not merely as a matter of "containment" policy, but because they don't want to risk their officers' lives to protect and serve. Wait until SWAT arrives or the gunfire ends.
08:20 PM on 04/19/2009
One of the forgotten aspects of the UT sniper incident is that it would've been worse if students and other citizen hadn't grabbed their deer rifles and returned fire. They kept Whitman pinned down so that he could only fire through the drain pipes, and that kept him occupied so the police could sneak up on him and k ill him.
10:59 PM on 04/19/2009
Yeah but what if we could have kept the gun out of the madmans hands in the first place? Wouldn't that have helped the situation? I live in Texas. I remember growing up and driving down the road and the pick-up in front of us had a couple of guns in the gun rack. I believe in hunting, and I even believe in handguns for protection. But I think we need to stop gunshows. We need to really inforce mandatory testing before someone can buy a gun. And why would anyone but police and the military need assault rifles? You can't hunt with one. It is designed to kill people. I'm not against guns. But I'm also not against common sense.
08:07 PM on 04/19/2009
Thank you for the article. I appreciate knowing that the police are learning from the tragedy. It sounds like changes that make a real difference. Not just feel good rules that don't help anyone.
05:45 PM on 04/19/2009
First about the bullying, blame the parents and not the school. That crap starts at home. Same with our testing, blame the parents.

I am LEO, we do train like this, and as a father with kids in school i can say this, my life will gladly go in to face and stop ANYONE, with deadly force if needed, killing innocents, man woman or child, to end ANY threat to save our children.
10:44 PM on 04/19/2009
I blame Clinton, it happened on his watch.
05:11 PM on 04/19/2009
Yes, the new post-Columbine strategy was to be the faster the police got in, the quicker the carnage stopped. But this lesson was lost on Virginia Tech; where the live coverage showed quite a long wait to get in; and the Binghamton responders completely disregarded the wounded survivors, who must have gone through both physical and mental agony during that time. It takes a special kind of courage to run into a burning building or a building where a shooter is, but if you don't have that courage, then don't take that job.
11:53 PM on 04/19/2009
The VA Tech shooter also chained the doors shut, which slowed down the response.

If one professor had had a gun, he or she could've stopped it sooner. It went on for quite a while, and all people could do was jump out the windows, or try to block the classroom doors, which didn't work. They were helpless as the shooter took his time..
11:48 AM on 04/20/2009
Why would a professor have a gun?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:45 PM on 04/19/2009
A collateral problem here is that the police tend now to overreact to relatively minor situations. Last summer, a guy with a BB gun went into an office suite in my building to confront a massage parlor prostitute who had ripped him off. Four hours, 36 cop cars, helicopters, and an entire SWAT team secured the scene, even though the guy offered to give up about 15 minutes after he had entered the suite. He also told the police that he was unarmed except for the BB gun. Their excuse, after the fact, was that it was good training.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:18 AM on 04/20/2009
Exactly. How many times have we heard the refrain "It was our training" when a cop explains another cop's out-of-control behavior, either in a police shooting or a beating?

The problem is that police work attracts authority-freak personalities, and the study of psychology has yet to figure out a way to screen the drunk-with-power types out of the hiring process.

These are doubtless the same type of officers that get involved in a police overreaction. And by "overreaction" I mean a shooting or beating at one extreme and the Columbine behavior at the other extreme, where the SWAT's were getting off ordering people around while some poor guy bled to death.
photo
GEM-592
Edit your micro-bio.
04:38 PM on 04/19/2009
I think it's clear that the police are ineffective when it comes to stopping the mass shootings, unless perhaps we agree to arm them as we do the military, then station one or more in every public building. While I'm sure they'd be OK with that and the necessary influx of funding, that's a world I don't want to live in. In some criminal situations, the police are largely powerless and funding for more arms and training would be better spent elsewhere. For example, if the police made more of an effort to stop white collar crime on both a local and national level, we might have avoided the current economic mess that arguably has since driven some of the crazies to carry out these violent acts.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SusanStoHelit
10:27 PM on 04/19/2009
If you read the whole article, you'd see how they've been effective in halting the mass shootings. Nothing can stop them from happening, but being able to respond quickly and cut the death toll - that is all we can hope for, and that is what does seem to be happening.

These crazies have been around always - in good economic times and bad. We'll have a few more in bad times, a bit more in good - but crazy is crazy.
photo
GEM-592
Edit your micro-bio.
02:24 PM on 05/09/2009
I don't think this type of thing really has "always been around", and there are better ways to combat it than turning our local police forces into commando units.
04:15 PM on 04/19/2009
Well gee. A decade later and now they've developed lots of training on how to deal with a shooter.

But NOTHING on how to put an end to the bullying and stupid school administrations that CAUSE this sort of misery that it forces some people to think that going out in a blaze of violence is their ONLY option, however.

And people still wonder why Columbine happened. What morons!
06:58 PM on 04/19/2009
Read David Cullen's new book "Columbine". He explodes all the myths regarding the shooting. It was a case of a flat out psychopath Harris and an oaf sidekick Kleibold.
They did not hunt down bullies. Harris WAS a bully. Two adults saw how violent this kid was, one parent and one cop, and they were both ignored. This was covered up after the fact as revealed in the book.

They were building bombs in the basement. Lots of bombs. To kill everyone in that school. And there is your metaphor. Harris hated everyone and got a clinically depressed Kleibold to go along.
09:06 PM on 04/19/2009
The idea that the shootings happened because of bullying and poor school administration is a myth. You should read Dave Cullen's book Columbine. Eric Harris was a psychopath, and that had nothing to do with the mythology of the bullying and the trenchcoat mafia that has grown around this shooting.

Get educated.
12:03 AM on 04/20/2009
But the bullying is a horrible problem that is still with us.