DURBAN II: UN Chief Warns Economic Crisis Threatens More Racism

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - DURBAN II: UN Chief Warns Economic Crisis Threatens More Racism stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

FRANK JORDANS | April 20, 2009 09:29 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, left, delivers his speech in front of United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, right, during the Durban review Conference (Durban II) at the European headquarters of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, Monday, April 20, 2009. Ahmadinejad accused Israel of being the "most cruel and racist regime," sparking a walkout by angry Western diplomats at a U.N. racism conference and protests from others. (AP Photo/Keystone, Salvatore Di Nolfi)

GENEVA — Dozens of Western diplomats walked out of a U.N. conference and a pair of rainbow-wigged protesters threw clown noses at Iran's president Monday when the hard-line leader called Israel the "most cruel and repressive racist regime."

The United States decried the remarks by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as hateful _ reinjecting tension into a relationship that had been warming after President Barack Obama sought to engage Iran in talks on its nuclear program and other issues.

Ahmadinejad _ the first government official to take the floor at the weeklong event in Geneva _ delivered a rambling, half-hour speech that was by turns conciliatory and inflammatory. At one point he appealed for global unity in the fight against racism and then said the United States and Europe helped establish Israel after World War II at the expense of Palestinians.

"They resorted to military aggression to make an entire nation homeless under the pretext of Jewish suffering," he said.

Jewish groups had lobbied heavily for a boycott of the conference, warning it could descend into anti-Semitism or other anti-Israel rhetoric, which marred the last such conference eight years ago in South Africa.

The meeting turned chaotic almost from the start when the two wigged protesters tossed the red clown noses at Ahmadinejad as he began his speech with a Muslim prayer. A Jewish student group from France said it had been trying to convey "the masquerade that this conference represents."

One of the protesters shouted "You are a racist!" before he and the other demonstrator were taken away by security.

Ahmadinejad interjected: "I call on all distinguished guests to forgive these ignorant people. They don't have enough information."

Story continues below
advertisement

During his speech, he accused Israel of being the "most cruel and repressive racist regime" and blamed the U.S. invasion of Iraq on a Zionist conspiracy.

At the first mention of Israel, about 40 diplomats from Britain and France and other European Union countries exited the room.

Most of his remarks were not new but their timing and high profile could complicate U.S. efforts to improve ties with Iran. Alejandro Wolff, the U.S. deputy ambassador to the U.N., denounced what he called "the Ahmadinejad spectacle."

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, asked by reporters about Ahmadinejad's remarks, replied: "Obviously, the president disagrees vehemently with what was said, as, from some of the video I saw, so did many others."

Gibbs said it proved that the United States was right to boycott the conference. Germany, Italy and at least six other countries also refused to attend the event, which began on the eve of Israel's Holocaust Remembrance Day.

"We call on the Iranian leadership to show much more measured, moderate, honest and constructive rhetoric when dealing with issues in the region, and not this type of vile, hateful, inciteful speech that we all saw," Wolff said at the U.N. in New York.

Later, about 100 members of mainly pro-Israel and Jewish groups tried to block Ahmadinejad's entrance to a scheduled news conference.

In a milder protest, Jewish groups outside the venue read out some of the names of the 6 million who died in the Holocaust.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon met with Ahmadinejad before his speech and said he had counseled the Iranian leader to avoid dividing the conference. Ban later said he was disappointed the speech was used "to accuse, divide and even incite," directly opposing the aim of the meeting.

"It was a very troubling experience for me as a secretary-general," he said. "It was a totally unacceptable situation."

The Israeli Foreign Ministry condemned the speech and Ban's meeting with Ahmadinejad.

"It is unfortunate that U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon deemed it appropriate to meet with the greatest Holocaust denier of our time," the Foreign Ministry said. "This matter is especially severe, as it took place on the eve of Holocaust Memorial Day."

Ahmadinejad has been praised by some in the Muslim world for his attacks on Israel. The hard-liner has often used international forums to criticize Israel.

Most Muslim delegations in Geneva declined to comment, but Pakistan said the protesters were wrong to interrupt Ahmadinejad.

"If we actually believe in freedom of expression, then he has the right to say what he wants to say," Ambassador Zamir Akram told The Associated Press. "There were things in there that a lot of people in the Muslim world would be in agreement with, for example the situation in Palestine, in Iraq and in Afghanistan, even if they don't agree with the way he said it."

While the speech was interrupted several times by cheers from the large Iranian delegation, it may not be well-received among many others in Iran, which is suffering from high inflation and unemployment partly as a result of its global isolation. Many have criticized Ahmadinejad, who is up for re-election in June, for spending too much time on anti-Israel and anti-Western rhetoric and not enough on the country's economy.

___

Associated Press writers Bradley S. Klapper and Eliane Engeler in Geneva, and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

Filed by Hanna Ingber Win
GENEVA — Dozens of Western diplomats walked out of a U.N. conference and a pair of rainbow-wigged protesters threw clown noses at Iran's president Monday when the hard-line leader called Israel ...
GENEVA — Dozens of Western diplomats walked out of a U.N. conference and a pair of rainbow-wigged protesters threw clown noses at Iran's president Monday when the hard-line leader called Israel ...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
31
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I am very confused as to why 40 diplomats walked out at a conference dealing with racism when they do not agree with the Iranian President's views. Surely the conference is going to deal with different views and instead of walking out and abandoning something that seeks to benefit people, would it not be more beneficial to stay and counter the President's comments with their own views. When dealing with racism it is almost as bad as agreeing when the person acting racist is appeased. I think the diplomats would have better spent their time voicing their opinions on what they felt was wrong about the Iranian President's speech. Also I do not believe that all the comments made by him were void, maybe if funding into a war that is very one-sided was not being given it would be easier for the European diplomats to hear about these topics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 AM on 04/30/2009

I do not see how these supposedly professional diplomats give any help to the cause of addressing racisim by walking out of a conference they have agreed to attend.

I­f they find the Iranian Presidents speech "vile" or "hateful" then they should address that in their own speeches. 

While the president of Iran is a buffoon, and certainly his speech was a case of the pot calling the kettle black, the substance of his attack on Israeli racisim deserves to be addressed. Iran has not recently engaged in military action against a captive, civilian population. Israel has. The divide between Israel and the Palestinians, while ostensibly over land - has devolved into a base, racist hatred on both sides. If this is not addressed by the international community, then the conflict will continue to fester, the Palestinians will continue to suffer appallingly, the Israelis markedly less so - but suffering is suffering, and the world will continue to be destabilised by this running sore of a situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 04/21/2009
- max08 I'm a Fan of max08 48 fans permalink

What were Wiesel and Is. sympathizers doing at Durban ii? Leading the walk-out? Another event that smells to high heaven.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 AM on 04/21/2009
- Wozzeck I'm a Fan of Wozzeck 21 fans permalink
photo

Here is the speech given by Ahmadinejad at the conference :
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=92046

"Coercion and arrogance is the origin of oppression and wars. Although today many proponents of racism condemn racial discrimination in their words and their slogans, a number of powerful countries have been authorized to decide for other nations based on their own interests and at their own discretion and they can easily violate all laws and humanitarian values as they have done so."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 04/21/2009

Though whether Israel is the 'most' racist country is debatable, there is no doubt at all that Israel is racist as well as cruel (the 400 Gaza children did not die from kindness).

Even among jews in Israel, race is important - the ashkanazis (european jews) are at the top, sephardic jews come next, african and other dark-skinned jews are last - third class citizens. The Arabs are the fourth at the bottom. See http://www.colorlines.com/article.php?ID=215

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 PM on 04/20/2009
- GabeSmall I'm a Fan of GabeSmall 12 fans permalink
photo

To call a nation ra cist is nonsense. You can state that ra cism exists in Israel (as it does in every country--which is why we shouldn't be singling out one, and only one, nation at a rac ism conference) but to call the nation itself ra cist is absurd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 04/21/2009
- commarcos I'm a Fan of commarcos 5 fans permalink

I do not understand how these pro-Israeli lobbies could stand there and condemn racism yet elect and support leaders who publicly support stealing a people's land, killing their men women and children, as well as jail thousands without charge? Please do not mistake this comment as pro Hamas, Hizbollah, or Iran just merely pointing out the hypocrisy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 04/20/2009
- Fein I'm a Fan of Fein 19 fans permalink

The delegates didn't walk out, they slinked out because they knew they couldn't argue the facts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 04/20/2009
- GabeSmall I'm a Fan of GabeSmall 12 fans permalink
photo

Inflammatory tirades are rarely constructed with facts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 04/21/2009
- KPinSEA I'm a Fan of KPinSEA 11 fans permalink

Well, if stupid & hateful rhetoric were enough reason to cease diplomacy with someone, nobody in the world would be talking to us after the last decade ......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 PM on 04/20/2009

Its amazing how bad this makes both sides look.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 04/20/2009
- bbrecht I'm a Fan of bbrecht 18 fans permalink
photo

You are so right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 04/20/2009
- GabeSmall I'm a Fan of GabeSmall 12 fans permalink
photo

Who was the genius in charge of the agenda who slotted Ahmadinejad as the first speaker of this conference?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 04/20/2009
- Taxi I'm a Fan of Taxi 34 fans permalink

What about the other 'geniuses' who walked out rather than debate any inaccuracies in Ahmi's speech?

I just don't understand why any of our 'western' representatives don't ever want to stand face to face with people they disagree with and unblinkingly state their case on a major world issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 04/20/2009
- GabeSmall I'm a Fan of GabeSmall 12 fans permalink
photo

You mean like they did in 2001 at the farce that was DURBAN I? What is the point of a repeat performance? If the agenda is skewed to accommodate an Israel-bashing fest rather than to actually tackling the supposed charter of the conference, why should we legitimize it by participating?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

ALL theocracies suck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 04/20/2009
- shotei I'm a Fan of shotei 26 fans permalink

I can understand the argument that walking out might not be the best strategy, but so far it's working. Today is the first day of the Conference and fortunately, all eyes are on Ahmadinejad and the fullfilment of Western countries' fears that it is all an Israel-bashing circus.
By not participating, Western countries have made it clear that they will not condone to such vile singling out of one country and will always weaken such illegitimate international efforts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 04/20/2009
- bbrecht I'm a Fan of bbrecht 18 fans permalink
photo

Contraire, by not being involved there is no chance for a moderate conversation, one in which you do not have to choose between oppressions. We are siding with one side of a polarized shouting match. No progress is made.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 04/20/2009

Vile singling out of a country? Not that iran is ever singled out. Or threatened with attack by Israel or america.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 04/21/2009

Disagree with both of the posters. diplomats in Europe and US have tried, obviously without success, to get modifications of the language of the conference and its agenda and speakers. why stick around and legitimize this political lynching. Durban I was a disaster for this reason and folks have learned from that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 04/20/2009

he may be wrong on many things, but Israel WAS founded on the pretext of WWII I even called into cspan a few months ago when one Israeli official answered my question: what is the "special" relationship that the US has with Israel, and he responded that it CAME OUT OF THE HOLOCAUST. Now we have israeli leaders calling Rahm Emanuel to tell him to further Israeli Interests in spite of being an American and furthering American interest, and we have Jane Harmon trying to intervene on behalf of AIPAC in a probe of two Israeli spies. something does not smell right at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 04/20/2009
- WilliamL I'm a Fan of WilliamL 29 fans permalink

If the agenda was so offensive, so one sided, why not send a crew to point this out, use the conference to say so.

Walking out, not showing up are less impressive than taking the stand and making ones case.

"Protesting" by waling up and not showing up is lame.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 04/20/2009
- Gripen I'm a Fan of Gripen 14 fans permalink
photo

I agree, this only divde us up more to "us and them"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 AM on 04/20/2009
- nolalola26 I'm a Fan of nolalola26 2 fans permalink

I agree. They're not giving our administration a chance to show the new US image, one that is diplomatic AND proactive. And you're right also that this was the chance to debate face to face, rather than issuing public statements across seas.

Walking out, throwing your hands up, is the response you give to a toddler throwing a pointless temper tantrum. It is not the way to treat another nation, no matter how you disagree with the leader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 04/20/2009
- Macready I'm a Fan of Macready 60 fans permalink

totally agree with you WilliamL . . . it also shows that the peace talks in the Middle East are probably no more than that . . . just hot air . . . again . . . shame on all the countries who have boycotted this conference

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 04/20/2009
- -0013 I'm a Fan of -0013 10 fans permalink

There is no reason to remain at this conference to protest the nonsensical rantings of a lunatic. Doing so would only elevate Ahmedinejad and his views. They do not need to be refuted as they are baseless claims.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 04/20/2009

Tell me why you think the Iranian President is a "lunatic"?

What mental Illness would you ascribe to him?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 04/21/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect