Top Bailed-Out Firms Have Money For Lobbying

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Top Bailed-Out Firms Have Money For Lobbying stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | April 21, 2009 09:11 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — The top 10 recipients of the government's $700 billion financial bailout spent about $9.5 million on federal lobbying during the first three months of the year.

The biggest spender was bailed-out automaker General Motors Corp., which devoted $2.8 million to lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. It has received $13.4 billion in government loans and could get $5 billion more, according to a government report released Tuesday.

Failed insurance giant American International Group Inc. and banks Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. each reported spending more than $1 million to influence the government as they lived off federal money this year. AIG has gotten some $70 billion from the bailout fund _ including a fresh $30 billion infusion the government reported on Tuesday _ while Citigroup has received $45 billion and JPMorgan $25 billion.

The lobbying activity was revealed publicly in reports required to be filed with Congress. This year's first quarterly report was due Monday.

Other major recipients of money from the so-called Troubled Assets Relief Program also had substantial lobbying costs in the first three months of this year, including:

_Bank of America Corp., which reported spending $660,000 lobbying while receiving its $45 billion in help;

_Wells Fargo & Company, with $700,000 in lobbying costs and $25 billion in bailout money;

_Goldman Sachs, which spent $670,000 while receiving its $10 billion;

Story continues below

_Morgan Stanley, which spent $540,000 while also getting $10 billion in assistance;

_PNC Financial Services Group, spent $135,000 _ nearly double what it did at the end of last year _ on lobbying while receiving a $7.8 billion lifeline;

_U.S. Bancorp spent $170,000 on lobbying and got $6.6 billion in government aid.

"They say they're not using public money for these purposes, but in effect these companies are steering taxpayer funds to lobbying and campaign contributions," said Craig Holman of the watchdog group Public Citizen. "It's completely unjustifiable."

The reports suggest that most of the bailed-out companies have beefed up their lobbying at least marginally since last year. Seven spent more to influence the government than they did in the last quarter of 2008.

The largest increases apart from PNC were by Goldman, which spent 34 percent more on lobbying than it did at the end of last year; Wells Fargo, which spent about 21 percent more, and JPMorgan, which lobbied 19 percent more. AIG also devoted some 16 percent more money to interacting with the government, despite the "no-lobbying" policy it adopted late last year after receiving repeated bailouts.

AIG said in its filing that it still had to spend considerable resources contacting officials during the first three months of the year. The communication was "in response to requests and to correct misinformation," the company reported. "Consistent with AIG's lobbying policy, the company did not engage in any lobbying with respect to federal legislation in the first quarter of 2009."

Still, Public Citizen's Holman noted that the lobbying disclosure law exempts expenditures made to comply with congressional hearings or to respond to requests by government officials for specific information. "What AIG's reporting is, in fact, influence peddling," he said.

The disclosures also show that AIG has fired several lobbyists since the beginning of the year, including from the powerhouse firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, the prominent Republican company DC Navigators and The Washington Tax Group.

Among the companies that reduced their lobbying activity were Bank of America, which slashed its costs about 20 percent, and GM, which spent 15 percent less than during the last quarter of 2008.

Filed by Marcus Baram
WASHINGTON — The top 10 recipients of the government's $700 billion financial bailout spent about $9.5 million on federal lobbying during the first three months of the year. The biggest spender...
WASHINGTON — The top 10 recipients of the government's $700 billion financial bailout spent about $9.5 million on federal lobbying during the first three months of the year. The biggest spender...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
111
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

Much ado about nothing.

Of course TARP banks, just like non-TARP banks, lobby - the larger ones directly, the smaller ones throught their trade organizations.

It's a First Amendment activity, which doesn't disappear just because the government handed them oodles of cash to help their balance sheets. Likewise, a college student receiving federal aid doesn't give up the right to contribute to a candidate money they earn working.

Sean Parnell
President
Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org
campaignfreedom.orgeedom.org

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 04/27/2009

There is nothing quite like these companies using our money to lobby against our interests. I wish all of these executives would commit suicide...the world would be all the better for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 04/22/2009
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 38 fans permalink

GM, a TARP recipient spent more 3 times the amount of money lobbying the government than any other company. Even AIG and Citibank! Comparing the "Banks" some broad-brush single entity monolith to GM a single company is disingenuous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 04/22/2009
- Zeebob I'm a Fan of Zeebob 2 fans permalink

1 million each, wow that a lot of tricks errr I mean lunches.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 04/22/2009
photo

Goldman Sachs seems to be the big winner in this. They had to spend the smallest reportable amount for the biggest bang...remember they received part of the AIG money and something is going right for them as they are the first to recover. They also seem to have the most insiders planted inside this administration and the last. We will never know the real expenditures or benefits from lobbying as most of it is back door.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 04/22/2009
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 04/22/2009
- Uptick I'm a Fan of Uptick 3 fans permalink

Journalists should start replacing the word โ€œLobbyโ€ with the word โ€œBribeโ€

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 04/22/2009
photo

Amen !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 04/22/2009
- guajiro I'm a Fan of guajiro 71 fans permalink

It is legal for corporations to "bribe" public officials........it's called "freedom of speech". That's why it is so important for corporations and their wealthy owners to be considered "persons" in the eyes of the law, instead of the "artificial persons" that they really are. Once considered "persons", corporations have access to constitutional rights, heretofore reserved for humans, and thus they invoke the first amendment.....freedom of speech when they bribe, excuse me, lobby, public officials. Is it any wonder public officials CANNOT afford to pay attention to citizens and instead pay attention to corporations? Already, the banking industry has paid $2.8 million dollars to lobbyists to get the attention of the politicians in their area. Read Thom Hartmann and his book; "Unequal Protection; The Theft of Human Rights and The Rise of Corporate Dominance". You'll be blasted out of your stupor on the realities of power, who's got it, and how they get it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 04/22/2009
- aliceinks I'm a Fan of aliceinks 3 fans permalink

This must be part of what the 'ta x party" revolts are about...everyone of them has had to get a bailout from us. How many trillons have we paid out? I have lost track.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 04/22/2009
photo

Guilty of Title 18 Chapter 31 Embezzlement and Theft

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 04/22/2009
- jdw1981 I'm a Fan of jdw1981 44 fans permalink
photo

See, they do know how to invest effectively when it involves their own financial well-being.

That $9.5 billion BOUGHT them a lot of Bailout. That's right, the Bush administration, the Obama administration, and most of the Democrats and Republicans in Congress are for sale.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 04/22/2009
- jdw1981 I'm a Fan of jdw1981 44 fans permalink
photo

Typo: $9.5 million. I don't type well when I'm PISSED OFF.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 04/22/2009

There is things that are so fundamentally wrong with our county and we need to start fighthing against these injustices. It is not just the market downturn and the banks and the layoffs concerning Americans, but consumers are also not very confident in the US governmentโ€™s ability to help.

What Congress needs is redesigning. In my opinion, that would help improve consumer confidence more than anything. For someone to be successful politician, they usually have to obtain the backing of either the Democrats or Republicans and/or have backing of lobbyist and other special interest groups. For the politician to remain in Congress he must please those that put him there. โ€œThe force of selfishness is as inevitable and as calculable as the force of gravitation.โ€ ~Haillard

I think all campaigns and votes should be held similar to reality shows. Every season we are presented with a new set of candidates, they are given challenges, their history is dug into, their past achievements clearly represented and every new season we vote candidates to Congress. No more Democrats, no more Republicans; just representatives of the people.

This would solve three major problems: 1) the cost of campaigning 2) the non bi-partanship currently in Congress and 3) problems with taking campaign funds from special interest groups. Different, definitely; but, hereโ€™s the Catch 22, guess who would have to make it law. Thatโ€™s right, our non-functioning government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 04/22/2009
photo

I want transparency...Its our money that these goons have and I want to know where its being spent and who is benefiting from it. If lobbyist are using our money is to pay politicians to sway there vote to what is deemed THEIR job of working for us and doing what is best for us, then it seems to me, the politicians arent really working for us...They are working for themselves and what benefits them...NOT US!

I WANT TRANSPARENCY OF ALL MONIES GOING TO POLITICIANS FROM LOBBYIST.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 04/22/2009
- guajiro I'm a Fan of guajiro 71 fans permalink

Politicians are working for the corporations, and not what benefits us. They spend a lot of their time PRETENDING to be concerned about citizen's needs, but only make laws that benefit corporations. Obama will make a huge difference from the past 30 years of conservative rule (yes, Clinton was a conservative and Hillary STILL is a corporate lapdog) depending on whom he appoints to which positions in Washington, but the best way to get control back from corporations is to get at their Achilles heel, and that is to have a new case presented to the United States Supreme Court and asking the question whether a corporation is indeed a real person or is it an artificial person. The questionable "person" ruling that corporations rely on today to control ALL political parties is discussed admirably in Thom Hartmann's book:
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/book_review/unequal_protection_hartmann.html



"If you wonder why and when giant corporations got the power to reign supreme over us, here's the story. Plus, Hartmann tell us what we need to do to regain our people's sovereignty." -- Jim Hightower"
http://www.ecobooks.com/books/unequalprotection.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 04/22/2009
- Earl I'm a Fan of Earl 109 fans permalink
photo

Every taxpayer is owed a refund from the credit card companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 04/22/2009
- rubinoff I'm a Fan of rubinoff 54 fans permalink

yup...for swindling

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 04/22/2009
photo

And they got a nice return on what has now exceeded TWELVE TRILLION.

http://solari.com/blog/?p=2258]

And what does a trillion dollars LOOK like?

http://www.pagetutor.com/trillion/index.html

It is enough to have written a check to every man, woman, and child in the United States for $40,000.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 04/22/2009
- DMEEPhD I'm a Fan of DMEEPhD 4 fans permalink

That second link certainly was an eye-opener!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 04/22/2009
- sueinmn I'm a Fan of sueinmn 101 fans permalink
photo

How do we find out how much went into Congress campaign funds? And who's???????????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 AM on 04/22/2009
- Mahi Joe I'm a Fan of Mahi Joe 49 fans permalink

Good question which I hope we can get answered.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 04/22/2009
photo

You can look them up in all their splendor here:
http://www.opensecrets.org/index.php

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 04/22/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect