FDA to allow Plan B birth control for 17-year-olds

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   04/22/09 10:15 PM ET   AP

Morningafter

WASHINGTON — Seventeen-year-olds will be able to buy the "morning-after" emergency contraceptive without a doctor's prescription, a decision that conservatives denounced as a blow to parental supervision of teens but that women's groups said represents sound science.

The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday it would accept, not appeal, a federal judge's order that lifts Bush administration restrictions limiting over-the-counter sales of "Plan B" to women 18 and older. U.S. District Judge Edward Korman ruled last month in a lawsuit filed in New York that President George W. Bush's appointees let politics, not science, drive their decision to restrict over-the-counter access.

Women's groups said the FDA's action was long overdue, since the agency's own medical reviewers had initially recommended that the contraceptive be made available without any age restrictions.

Korman ordered the FDA to let 17-year-olds get the birth control pills. He also directed the agency to evaluate clinical data to determine whether all age restrictions should be lifted.

The FDA's latest action does not mean that Plan B will be immediately available to 17-year-olds.The manufacturer must first submit a request.

"It's a good indication that the agency will move expeditiously to ensure its policy on Plan B is based solely on science," said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which filed the lawsuit.

Conservatives said politics drove the decision.

"Parents should be furious at the FDA's complete disregard of parental rights and the safety of minors," said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America.

Plan B is emergency contraception that contains a high dose of birth control drugs and will not interfere with an established pregnancy. It works by preventing ovulation or fertilization. In medical terms, pregnancy begins when a fertilized egg attaches itself to the wall of the uterus.

If taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, it can reduce a woman's chances of pregnancy by as much as 89 percent.

Critics of the contraceptive say Plan B is the equivalent of an abortion pill because it can prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus. Recent research suggests that's possible but not likely.

The battle over access to Plan B has dragged on for the better part of a decade, through the terms of three FDA commissioners. Among many in the medical community, it came to symbolize the decline of science at the agency because top FDA managers refused to go along with the recommendations of scientific staff and outside advisers that the drug be made available with no age restrictions.

"The FDA got caught up in a saga, it got caught up in a drama," said Susan Wood, who served as the agency's top women's health official and resigned in 2005 over delays in issuing a decision. "This issue served as a clear example of the agency being taken off track, and it highlighted the problems FDA was facing in many other areas."

The treatment consists of two pills and sells for $35 to $60. Women must ask for Plan B at the pharmacy counter and show identification with their date of birth. The drug is made by a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, an Israeli company. It does not prevent sexually transmitted infections, such as HIV/AIDS.

Supporters of broader access argued that Plan B is safe and effective in preventing unwanted pregnancy and could help reduce the number of abortions.

Opponents, including prominent conservatives, counter that it would encourage promiscuity and might even become a tool for criminals running prostitution rings, as well as for sexual predators.

Early in the Bush administration, more than 60 organizations petitioned the FDA to allow sales without a prescription. But according to court documents, the issue quickly became politicized.

In 2003, a panel of outside advisers voted 23-4 to recommend over-the-counter sales without age restrictions. But top FDA officials told their subordinates that no approval could be issued at the time, and the decision would be made at a higher level. That's considered highly unusual, since the FDA usually has the last word on drug decisions.

In his ruling, Korman said that FDA staffers were told the White House had been involved in the decision on Plan B. The government said in court papers that politics played no role.

In 2005, the Center for Reproductive Rights and other organizations sued in federal court to force an FDA decision.

The following year, the FDA allowed Plan B to be sold without a prescription to adults. But the controversy raged on over access for teens.

___

AP Medical Writer Lauran Neergaard contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

FDA's Plan B page: http://tinyurl.com/ch3ys6

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

WASHINGTON — Seventeen-year-olds will be able to buy the "morning-after" emergency contraceptive without a doctor's prescription, a decision that conservatives denounced as a blow to parental su...
WASHINGTON — Seventeen-year-olds will be able to buy the "morning-after" emergency contraceptive without a doctor's prescription, a decision that conservatives denounced as a blow to parental su...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:55 AM on 04/23/2009
YIKES! I'm glad my daughter is all grown up, and I feel for parents of teenaged girls. The world just seems to get more and more complicated. I would not want my child (still underage) taking a drug that requires him/her to show their ID to the pharmacist and my not knowing anything about it. Can someone under 18 get a tattoo in most states without parental permission? Can they play organized sports without parental permission?

17 is a difficult age, and this issue of the pill is yet one more contentious issue parents will have. I understand that people have good intentions concerning this ruling, but sometimes even your idea of what's right -- may not be.

If they're going to make this the law of the land, then why not offer them free to 17-year-old children? Make it a "Public Health" issue and take the profit incentive out. Make them available in public health clinics and the schools. The article above says a treatment can cost up to $60. That cost may preclude certain youngsters -- who don't want parents involved -- to purchase the pill. OH WAIT -- I guess that WILL be the next step. (Sorry...couldn't resist!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Montanagrl
11:08 PM on 04/22/2009
YESSSSSSSSSS.
10:35 PM on 04/22/2009
Hooray, and Hallelujah each day women are achieving full status as citizens of the United States. Viagra, Cialis,Invetra, etc., etc., users beware, you've had full access to whatever you desired to maintain your rights to determine what you will do with your bodies without interference. Women never had the privilege or right even though they had equal protection under the Constitution because some religious group, or legislative body or private organization was at the ready to deny them full decision making on what was their prerogative in matters relating to their personal health or interests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BurtR
10:00 PM on 04/22/2009
my grandaughter's 16 yr old half sister was raped on prom nite. she had enuf sense to tell her mom.
she needs full access to a pill
09:58 PM on 04/22/2009
Why no prescription required for this contraceptive?

Regular contraceptives require a prescription, right?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CR46
spay/neuter and adopt
10:03 PM on 04/22/2009
Some contraceptives, like the pill or morning after pill require a Dr.' script. others like condoms and spermicides don't.
10:20 PM on 04/22/2009
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was asking why this orally ingested medicament contraceptive does not require a prescription, whereas all other orally ingested medicament contraceptives do.
09:53 PM on 04/22/2009
I don't agree wit this.

I think the appropriate age for this pill is 18.
09:59 PM on 04/22/2009
But 17 year olds are having sex. Should they have babies or abortions instead?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
levelshot
I hate instant meals
09:53 PM on 04/22/2009
Repugs will benefit more from this pill than any other group.
09:49 PM on 04/22/2009
Sounds great. Holding a Bible firmly between the knees obviously has not been working.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terramartom
People for the people. Revolution.
09:42 PM on 04/22/2009
Excellant!
Intelligence, and common sense over ignorance, fear and stupidity ( religion).
But don't feel bad republicans you can still worship and pray for the Death penalty right?
09:34 PM on 04/22/2009
This will reduce unwanted pregnencys and abortions and will no doubt be ridiculed by the right to life crowd.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CR46
spay/neuter and adopt
09:29 PM on 04/22/2009
Safe, effective birth control should be available to everyone of the age of consent. Example:: in Alaska the age of consent is 16, birth control should be made available at that age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snowspot
Weary Apocalyte
09:21 PM on 04/22/2009
*laughs at conservatives*
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheJibreelaMonsters
the library is one of the best places to find me
09:05 PM on 04/22/2009
17 year olds can chose to buy birth control w/o parental consent however to vote to unionize in the work place must go to a "Open Ballot" or "Card Check" or "The Tony Soprano EFCA bill"

So my kid sister can chose to buy birth control however I can't vote in a closed ballot?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snowspot
Weary Apocalyte
09:22 PM on 04/22/2009
Would you rather her not be able to get birth control? lol..
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CR46
spay/neuter and adopt
09:30 PM on 04/22/2009
No he and his family will preach abstinence to her until the pregnancy announcement.
09:49 PM on 04/22/2009
Go read the Bill !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mag68
08:55 PM on 04/22/2009
Are we getting sanity back in public policy? An improvement would be to make it available to everyone who would benefit from avoiding an unwanted pregnancy, regardless of age or socio-economics. It's a nice start, regardless.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
msjimmied
08:43 PM on 04/22/2009
Why 17? if it's medically safe, then let anyone get it. There are, I am sure, younger worried girls somewhere...
08:52 PM on 04/22/2009
Bristol palin
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snowspot
Weary Apocalyte
09:22 PM on 04/22/2009
gunna put the nail in, the media elite