How Hillary Clinton Got Specter To Switch

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - How Hillary Clinton Got Specter To Switch stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

04/28/09 04:55 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Clinton

Credit Hillary Clinton's relentlessness for the decision Arlen Specter made Tuesday to abandon the Republican Party and become a Democrat. It wasn't her immediate goal, of course, but when Clinton decided to carry the primary to Pennsylvania despite incredibly high odds, the resulting statewide campaign led to hundreds of thousands of Republicans registering as Democrats so that they could vote in the April 22nd contest.

In terms of the delegate count, the primary campaign was effectively over in February, when Obama ran the caucus table. But Clinton soldiered on. A massive voter registration drive by both candidates ran up to the deadline of March 24th in Pennsylvania and was extremely successful.

Specter twice cited the voter-registration shift in explaining his decision to leave the party, saying that he didn't want his congressional career to be judged only by the right wing voters who had remained in the Republican Party.

An internal poll that Specter received on Friday showed his chances of winning a primary in the drained Republican pool to be "bleak," he said.

"The party has shifted very far to the right. It was pretty far to the right in 2004, but to take away a couple hundred thousand Republicans who wanted to vote in the Democratic primary--they're dissatisfied with the Republican Party is the pretty obvious conclusion. So if you review the numbers and you add the math, the stimulus vote, that's why I ended up saying the prospects were bleak," he said. Republican primary voters have pilloried Specter for his yes vote on the stimulus.

"When you take a look at the Pennsylvania Republican electorate, several hundred thousand Republicans shifted last year and it has a bleak picture. We do not have a dominant voice there," Specter said.

It had become clear to Specter, he added, that the Republican Party would not come to his defense against the far-right elements remaining in Pennsylvania. A reporter unleashed a tirade when she asked what his decision said about Republicans on Capitol Hill.

"The Republicans didn't rally to Wayne Gilchrest in Maryland who was beaten by the Club for Growth and the far right [in the GOP primary] and [the Club's candidate then] lost the general election. Republicans didn't rally to the banner of Joe Schwartz of Michigan and he was beaten by a conservative and the Club for Growth and they lost the general election," said Specter, adding to the list Heather Wilson, another moderate beaten by a Club for Growth candidate who lost the general election. The Club's founder, Pat Toomey, had declared his bid against Specter in the 2010 primary.

Story continues below

His biggest beef with the Club, however, was over Lincoln Chafee, the moderate Rhode Island senator. Chafee won his primary in 2006 against a Club candidate but was so weakened and drained of cash he lost the general election.

"And had Linc Chafee been elected in 2006 the Republicans would have controlled the Senate in 2007 and 2008 and I would have been chairman of the [Judiciary] committee and President Bush nominated 13 circuit judges. They were all left on the table for President Obama. And President Bush nominated 21 district court judges and they were all left on the table for President Obama. Now take the social conservatives in America and how they prize circuit judges," said Specter.

"And for people who are Republicans to sit by and allow them to continue to dominate the party, after they beat Chafee, cost us Republican control of the Senate and lost us 34 federal judges, there oughta be a rebellion. There oughta be an uprising. So thanks for asking me the question about what are the Republicans like here," he said.

Ryan Grim is the author of the forthcoming book This Is Your Country On Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America

Become a fan of HuffPost Politics on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Credit Hillary Clinton's relentlessness for the decision Arlen Specter made Tuesday to abandon the Republican Party and become a Democrat. It wasn't her immediate goal, of course, but when Clinton dec...
Credit Hillary Clinton's relentlessness for the decision Arlen Specter made Tuesday to abandon the Republican Party and become a Democrat. It wasn't her immediate goal, of course, but when Clinton dec...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
410
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
- fayemac I'm a Fan of fayemac 7 fans permalink

The only problem for the people of Penn is that he has swtched parties before, from a dem to repub thirty years ago when he saw the writting on the wall. Whats to stop him from doing it again to fit his political agenda? He has already stated that he did it to keep his post in the senate. Wont take much for him to switch again when the weather clears. What does he stand for again? Win at all costs? Still sounds like a repub to me. Instead of standing up to the bullies in the repub party, he ran away, but he said he will stand up to the dems if he doesnt like what they do. Very very fishy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 05/06/2009
- benne I'm a Fan of benne 10 fans permalink

Very incisive article. Thanks for the analysis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 05/02/2009
- Madison007 I'm a Fan of Madison007 7 fans permalink

Specter is an opportunist - not a genuine switch however I do beleive the Republican Party is self-destructing.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 04/29/2009

Err...uhm...Huffington, did you forget to attach the correct article to the headline?

What does this have to do with Hillary again?

Must be a HRC sympathizer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 04/29/2009
- fausto412 I'm a Fan of fausto412 7 fans permalink
photo

Hillary's push through the whole primary season forced people in penn state to switch parties which left Specter at the Mercy of crazy right wingers which is all that is left there. all the moderates got sick of Bush and the republican agenda. if it wasn't because of Hillary and her push last year, specter would have never known that all his moderates left him and went democrat for Obama.

he virtually guarrantees reelection now. i like specter, he's not as looney as Bachmann and Cantor...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 04/29/2009
- StillIRise I'm a Fan of StillIRise 609 fans permalink
photo

I'm with you on this one. I respect and support SOS Clinton, but this is a bit of a stretch! You may as well credit Bush for Specter's defection or Rush Limbaugh or better still, Sarah Palin. They've had as much - if not more - impact on Republicans changing to the Democratic Party as Hillary.

In fact, you can even credit Barack Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 04/29/2009
- fayemac I'm a Fan of fayemac 7 fans permalink

They were talking about the primaries. The republicans liked Hillary, over all of the other candidates there, and were willing to switch parties to elect her. Obama was beaten badly in Penn because they were more conservitive there weather they were dem or repub. Her ability to get people to switch parties and to get them to vote for Obama was amazing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 05/06/2009
- felisa11 I'm a Fan of felisa11 23 fans permalink

brt929 writes, "wonder why he didn't just declare himself an Independent- like the guy from Vermont and Lieberman. That might have been his best bet."

There is a rule in Penn that if you lose a primary, you CANNOT run as an independent in the general. It is called the spoiled sport rule.

This is the real reason why Specter had no choice but become a Democrat. He would have disqualified himself for the general election. I personally don't trust the guy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 04/29/2009

Actually, if he would have simply get on the ballot as an independent for the primary, he could avoid that. To me, the real reason is that running against a progressive and a far right winger, his votes would get split up and he'd have little chance of winning. Yes, that's a bit opportunistic, but he will fit in among the Fiscal Conservatives of the Democrat Party. And this is good for the party too. It further solidifies their current image of bipartisanship and fairness as opposed to the increasingly obstructionist GOP. I've always felt favorably towards the man, because it appeared that he actually maintained some independence from the GOP leadership. And I don't expect him to kowtow to the Democratic leadership either, but it is nice to see a D in front of the last few respectable congressmen/women the GOP has.

Says a lot, IMO.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 04/29/2009
- Rojellio I'm a Fan of Rojellio 2 fans permalink

He has had 5 terms too many, IMHO. This is precisely why there should be term limits. Every move he makes is self serving, its all about having a career. He should have went to the party that least believes in term limits long ago.

This move proves that he is nothing more than a vile creature. Any Democrat Politician who validates, welcomes or approves of this, is just as lowlife'ted as he is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 04/29/2009
photo

Politics makes strange bedfellows. Hold your nose, get along and let him in. He is a sitting Senator with a vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 04/29/2009

I disagree. With term limits, you have the problem of people thinking more about their careers AFTER congress, most likely in the private sector, which just leads to even more potential corruption.
Not to mention it's just not a good idea to punish experience, why would you want a freshman senator chairing the Foreign Relations Committee, for instance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 04/29/2009
- felisa11 I'm a Fan of felisa11 23 fans permalink

I meant to say, i am NOT very happy that Specter only turned democrat to get re-elected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 AM on 04/29/2009
- Madison007 I'm a Fan of Madison007 7 fans permalink

I completely agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 04/29/2009
- felisa11 I'm a Fan of felisa11 23 fans permalink

I have a real problem with this. Specter isn't a Dem, he's just becoming one to win an election."

I agree with this assessment of the situation. While I am thrilled that the repugs are pi$$ing, moaning, whining and gnashing their teeth, I am particularly happy that Specter changed so he can possibly get re-elected. I think we need a real democrat to give him a run for his money, maybe Chris Matthews?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 04/29/2009

Wouldn't you by this logic also thank Rush Limbaugh for his
"operation chaos"?

Warmly,

Paulie Sabol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 04/29/2009
- erathwomen I'm a Fan of erathwomen 6 fans permalink
photo

I have a real problem with this. Specter isn't a Dem, he's just becoming one to win an election. I think that when politicians switch parties like this, there should be a special election and they should have to be re-elected by the members of the new party--or not. I'm a lifelong Dem and do not like this at all, despite the #60.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 04/29/2009
- Wilbur I'm a Fan of Wilbur 25 fans permalink

Did anyone understand what ol' "Magic Bullet Theory" Specter was intimating when he lamented the loss by Lincoln Chafee in the '06 elections of that R.I. GOP Senate seat? Specter was upset by Chafee's loss because DUBYA COULDN"T THEN GET 13 MORE RIGHT-WING CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES APPROVED! And we're supposed to think that Specter now is a DEMOCRAT? Pardon me if I don't stand up and applaud.

Wilbur

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 04/29/2009

In the 60s Spector was a democrat but he ran as a Republican because he had a better chance to win his race which he did. Now he can help obama and pelosi spend taxpayer money and their grandchildrens money and be a big babysitter for the lazy and support them with taxpayer money and he wont have to make excuses for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 AM on 04/29/2009
photo

You have an odd way of describing social responsibility. Babysitting? Are you in a position that is so safe from economic pressures that you'll never be at risk? I would say good for you but the policies you defend are hurtful to so many that I can't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 04/29/2009

I have no problem with helping people who need help and I am happy to do it but not to give money to people who refuse to work because its an interruption to their lifestyle or to bank executives who screwed up or to pay mortgages for people who feel entitled to own a home even though they never saved for one.I work hard as do my friends and family and we are sick of doling out money to people who dont need it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 04/29/2009

From David Waldman at Daily Kos:

Seat Al Franken and give him his committee assignments now, or we'll block a new organizing resolution that would let you reassign Specter's previously Republican committee seats to one of your own.
In other words, the GOP just lost a seat on every committee that Specter sat on. They can't reassign Specter's seat to another GOP Senator without a new organizing resolution, something we can block.

Come on Democrats, show some backbone and do this!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 AM on 04/29/2009
- cgoodie I'm a Fan of cgoodie 11 fans permalink

Wow! Great information. That's why I love reading these comments. I always learn something new.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 04/29/2009

You big government democrats can HAVE Specter. But don't kid yourself. He switched for ONE reason. He saw that he was going to lose the republican primary next year. It's no more complicated than that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 AM on 04/29/2009

That's another big cuss huh??
Big government is better than Cheney's big Shadow government
You throw those terms around like they mean something
Government is only big to repubs when they aren't running it
Besides which, how little is the goverments defense spending?
Answer: it ain't little it's big, real big.
So get a grip on the adjectives

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 AM on 04/29/2009

and another thing
you can cuss-out big government all you want, complain about socialism and socialised medicine but anytime there's a problem like hum let me think, uh hurricanes, or swine flu you want and need a government program to protect the people. Because even if you don't believe in 'being your brother's keeper' an all that you can't help but breath the same air as we all do it is axiomatic.
So despite the sacred teachings of a rather short-sighted interpretation of capitalism ( 'what's mine is mine so don't come near me') collective security on issues as diverse as health and environment are solved by collective solutions.
Do the math...I won't hold my breath

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 04/29/2009

cf-homeland security
this homeland is my homeland this homeland is your homeland from the redwood forest to the gulfstream waters
and thanks to the previous hoods in the whitehouse we can add to this song "to the guantanamo gulag" however such comic interlude distracts from my point which is that homeland security is a collective activity achieved on our behalf by bigGov and I am real glad that they is doin' it big.
So once more with feeling- This homeland is my homeland this homeland is your homeland-
It don't just belong to the military industrial complex and bigPharma

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 AM on 04/29/2009
photo

If that helps you sleep at night.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 AM on 04/29/2009

yeah can't wait for the real genuine republicans to step forward, then we're in for a real treat

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 AM on 04/29/2009

Here we see the left and the right not fully appreciating the significance of Arlen Specters switch.Extreminism in the GOP!Specter has been a GOP stalwart since 1965.DA of Philadelphia.Candidate for Mayor.Colleuge of the late John Heinz,friend of Barry Goldwater, Gerald Ford endorsed by Ronald Reagan.Specter,like the aformentioned gentleman belived in governance,the art of the possible. Not todays GOP.Ruled by a Neoconservative/Religeousfundementilist cabal.They put ideoligical purity over results.Faith over reality.Very ftting for ex-Marxists,and ZealotsSpecters couragous move highligts this.All moderate concearned people should embrace him enthusiastically for showcasing this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 AM on 04/29/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect