iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Souter Replacements: Obama's Five Likely Picks (SLIDESHOW)

David Souter Retires

First Posted: 05/31/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:20 PM ET

News of Justice David Souter's plan to retire at the end of the Supreme Court's current term immediately set off one of Washington D.C.'s most cherished parlor games: speculating who will take his place.

Long before Souter's decision was known, legal eagles and political observers were taking stabs as to who would be an ideal fit for a Barack Obama Court. Observers believe the Obama is likely to choose a woman, with only one currently serving on the bench. The president's thoughts on judicial philosophy, developed during his years as a law review editor and professor, will also shape his thinking. With that in mind, law blogs, speculative reporters, and (in private) elected officials had already begun bandying names about.

Among those most often mentioned:

Sonia Sotomayor: An Hispanic with 16 years of court experience who currently sits on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, Sotomayor is a graduate of Yale Law and considered a legal liberal. She also shares a biographical footnote with Souter: they both were appointed by George H. W. Bush -- Sotomayor to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 1992.

In a recent Columbia Law School Magazine, Professor Jamal Greene and legal affairs reporter Joseph Goldstein had the following exchange about her prospects.

Greene: I think we all agree it's fairly likely that [Obama's] first appointment will be female. And given the additional qualification that he might want a [racial] minority, there is one female, Hispanic Court of Appeals judge, who is a Democrat, [likely to be considered].


Goldstein: Sonia Sotomayor.

Greene: She's probably on the short list.

Elena Kagan: The first woman to serve in the post of Solicitor General, she arrived at the Department of Justice from her post as Dean of the Harvard Law School. She served as Associate Counsel to President Bill Clinton and as a clerk to Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. Should Obama choose her, it would mean his White House would have to fill another vacancy. But her academic and judicial pedigree seem almost better suited for the Court than as a lawyer arguing before it. Plus, she's already been through the confirmation process.

Seth Waxman: The 41st Solicitor General of the United States, Waxmnan is 58-years old and a graduate of Yale Law School. Perhaps his greatest claim to legal fame was arguing Boumediene v. Bush before the Supreme Court, which upheld habeas corpus rights for detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

Diane Wood: Wood, a 58-year-old Chicagoan, has served for 14 years on the city's 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. She has made a reputation as a strong liberal voice on an otherwise conservative bench and her name was decidedly in the mix when speculation first arose that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would retire due to medical issues. The one downside: her position on abortion rights has already sparked the ire of conservatives and pro-life groups, portending a potentially contentious confirmation process.

Harold Koh: The Dean of Yale Law School, Koh is perhaps the highest-profile Asian-American legal mind in the country. He clerked for Associate Justice Harry Blackmun on the Supreme Court, and worked for the Office of Legal Counsel in the Reagan Justice Department. But if Obama wants a smooth confirmation battle, Koh might not be the pick. Nominated to be the State Department's legal adviser, he has attacked by conservatives who claimed that he values foreign law over the U.S. Constitution.

Dark horses: Some names offered by legal observers who have followed Supreme Court politics a bit more closely:

Teresa Wynn Roseborough: A legal scholar, in an email to the Huffington Post, described the Clinton-era Deputy Assistant Attorney General as such: "She's late 40s, super smart and kind, decent, moderate; and was Editor in Chief of UNC law review. She clerked on the 4th Circuit and for Justice Stevens; worked in Department of Justice, was a partner at a private Atlanta firm; and now at a private counsel for MetLife. And, she's African-American. A perfect choice. Unimpeachable and perfect."

Leah Ward Sears: Chief Justice of the Georgia Supreme Court.

Kathleen Sullivan: Former Dean of Stanford Law and a protege of Harvard's famed professor, Laurence Tribe.

William Fletcher: A U.S. federal appeals court judge on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the same circuit as one Jay Bybee, who will definitely not be an Obama Supreme Court nominee).


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

News of Justice David Souter's plan to retire at the end of the Supreme Court's current term immediately set off one of Washington D.C.'s most cherished parlor games: speculating who will take his pla...
News of Justice David Souter's plan to retire at the end of the Supreme Court's current term immediately set off one of Washington D.C.'s most cherished parlor games: speculating who will take his pla...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,484
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
10:25 AM on 05/09/2009
Long Shot???
Why has Sec Salazar been featured over the past two days-both in favorable light for conservatives?
Positives: He is hispanic, not a former judge.
Negatives: Male, Catholic
03:32 PM on 05/04/2009
Why is everyone obsessing over putting a woman on the court? How about a disabled person? Such a person could bring personal experience to the court.
09:29 AM on 05/04/2009
I would add Governor Jennifer Granholm to this list.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yves Papa
12:24 AM on 05/04/2009
I'm from Waxman. Someone that has the balls to take up a case against what was politically correct, and directly challenging the finaglings of the past administration to deny their rights to these "enemy combatants", deserves a spot in the highest Court. I understand the women/minority thing, but what's important is the record.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yves Papa
12:30 AM on 05/04/2009
oops - I meant "I'm _for_ Waxman...."
11:59 PM on 05/03/2009
What about Rev. Wright?
01:06 PM on 05/06/2009
Rev. Wright doesn't know much about the Bible, let alone the law.
11:10 PM on 05/03/2009
sonia or harold.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rf dude
Just an average Man of Bronze - now in Steel!
11:04 PM on 05/03/2009
I propose that Obama's next 6 appointments to SCOTUS

be given 2x Voting Power over current Justicii

due to WAY higher coolness-factor...
--
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dubois651
09:33 PM on 05/03/2009
Justice Deval Patrick sounds good...;)
04:14 PM on 05/04/2009
Not if you live in Massachusetts. He's been a thumping failure here -- pushing for casino gambling and hiring a friend to fill a $175,000 / year job that had been vacant for seven years. All that will come out if his nominated.
08:34 PM on 05/03/2009
White males who make statements about race and gender not being important clearly have not experienced discrimination based on these characteristics, obviously, so it's easy to make such statements.

I'm always amazed at how someone could be enslaved, lynched, disenfranchised, and underpaid because of his/her race and/or gender, but somehow those same people can't be nominated, hired, admitted, etc, PARTLY, because of those characteristics.

When America is mostly race-neutral, then we can make such statements like these about these characteristics not mattering, but the U.S. is not yet at that point.
11:37 PM on 05/03/2009
If race characteristics matter, than they matter for whites, too. What aspect of their whiteness made Brennan and Rehnquist vote differently so often? What aspect of their blackness made Marshall and Thomas see things differently? What aspect of their sexuality made O'Connor and Ginsberg come to different conclusions. It's ridiculous. EVERYONE accepts that white people can see things differently irrespective of both being white. That's why it's false to suggest that ALL black people see things the same way - they don't. When you no longer assume being black is a political philosophy or a school of legal interpretation, you will have made the world a better place.
02:49 PM on 05/04/2009
I did not write that ALL whites think a certain way. I was responding to the white person who made the original comments and to many others who think like him.

Being Black is not a political philosophy, but being fair and equitable to all citizens is a political philosophy, and if Blacks aren't going to look out for their own interests, then who will?

But thanks for the advice. In my career I believe that I make the world a better place everyday... and I'm sure that many African Americans have done their share to make America and the world a better place through the centuries.
12:01 AM on 05/04/2009
Nobody in America is currently being "enslaved, lynched, disenfranchised", although the liberals on SCOTUS have decided the govt can take our land when ever they want. Thanks liberals.
03:10 PM on 05/04/2009
It was an analogy about how race could be considered in the mistreatment of Blacks, but why now can't it be considered for favorable treatment of Blacks?

I did not necessarily agree with the Court's decision in that land case, but it's dicey because you have many instances when the need to take land does benefit the greater good, but it should not be to benefit business or other private interests.
05:53 PM on 05/04/2009
barbarica wrote:
["Nobody in America is currently being "enslaved, lynched, disenfranchised"] ...

Not in the literal sense.
But economically, socially and politically? Of course!
08:13 PM on 05/03/2009
Is attending either Yale or Harvard law school a requirement for being on the Supreme Court? Why doesn't Mr. Obama choose someone who did not attend those schools? I'm sure that there are other quality legal minds from other law schools (I know that law school attendance is not required, but it's not likely that a non-lawyer would be selected).

The great thing about this whole process is that there will likely be more opportunities for Mr. Obama to appoint more judges. I hope that he does not pick judges who turn out to be "disappointments". Hopefully, more people will pay attention to the Supreme Court and its importance to the functioning of this country.

Lastly, "minority" and "capable" are not mutually exclusive. Some act as if the president can't find a nominee with both qualities.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yves Papa
12:29 AM on 05/04/2009
No, In my mind, having attended a ivy league school where you can relax after being admitted is a negative in a candidate's reputation. I prefer some one who comes from a school where the spring break is used to catch up on the studies, papers, etc..
08:13 PM on 05/03/2009
I'm black and Its so time that a hispanic makes the high court. I truly reject identity politics but the court should represent the population. Two more women, I dont care about their race and then a black man.
07:47 PM on 05/03/2009
While I've been mostly pleased with Mr. Obama's performance in the White House, so far, I've been disappointed when it comes to addressing the needs of and satisfying the demands of ethnic minorities because, of course, the world is now post-racial, right?

I think Obama's advisers don't serve him well on these sorts of issues because not many are people of color. Okay they helped get him elected, but no matter how liberal they claim to be, there is still a limit to their understanding of the significance of issues important to people of color.

I just don't want people to be surprised if he appoints a white male conservative, uh, moderate. The president has shown his willingness to disappoint progressives because, as he knows, to whom else are they going turn; what can they really do about it?
disgusted48
when someone shows you who they are, believe them.
08:32 PM on 05/03/2009
he has many african americans and women in his inner circle. he will probably appoint a woman. he really seems to like, admire and respect women.
10:04 PM on 05/03/2009
I know this (Valerie Jarrett, Reggie Love), but I'm thinking of individuals in influential positions with whom he consults on a regular basis, not just dark faces (well, not so dark) in positions like the social secretary, though that and all positions in the White House are important, but not when it comes to picking a Supreme Court justice. The A.G. might be a helpful voice of color, but I don't know how much he can participate in the process.

Greg Craig seems to be the influential voice here, and I don't think that he's of a radical mindset when it comes to identity politics.
11:12 PM on 05/03/2009
it's not about living in a post-racial world. it's about representing the population of this country by race and gender.
03:21 PM on 05/04/2009
I concur. That's my point. Tell everybody else who thinks that race and gender representation don't matter.
07:03 PM on 05/03/2009
Obama's choice should be an experienced woman at least as liberal as Souter, no older than about 54 or 55. A Hispanic Woman like Sotomayer would be a very smart pick.

NO MODERATES! That's how stealth candidates like Souter get choosen.
03:19 PM on 05/04/2009
Way more stealthier would be to pick Republican moderates serving in the senate whose states have Democratic governors like Specter. His replacement would be picked by Ed Rendell. How bad could that be? Specter would vote like Sandra Day O'Conner and the Senate would have one more Democrat! We have 28 Democratic governors. Just think about it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftbehind2000
If money = speech, then no speech is free.
04:30 PM on 05/04/2009
How bad would that be? Really bad.
01:14 PM on 05/06/2009
A guy almost 80 with cancer. Real smart. Not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftbehind2000
If money = speech, then no speech is free.
05:38 PM on 05/03/2009
I have no problem at all with Obama picking a woman, or a gay, or a person of color. I just hope that quality trumps the perceived need to fill a certain niche. We need a very strong liberal voice on the court. Obama said in an interview while he was a candidate that he would pick someone in the mold of Earl Warren. That to me says liberal, fair, strong-willed and persuasive.

I hope he meant it.
03:02 PM on 05/03/2009
Please stay for four more years Justice Souter. We are really going to need you for a while longer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftbehind2000
If money = speech, then no speech is free.
05:34 PM on 05/03/2009
Given the above alternatives, I'm definitely hoping Souter reconsiders.

Although we all know he won't.