More

Bank Stress Test Results Delayed

JEANNINE AVERSA and DANIEL WAGNER   05/ 1/09 05:43 PM ET   AP

Bank Of America

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve will release results Thursday of "stress tests" for the 19 large banks at the center of the nation's financial crisis. The results will shed light on which banks may need government support to withstand a more severe recession.

The Fed will detail the health of individual banks and provide an overall snapshot, according to a government official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the matter. The information will be released Thursday afternoon, the official said.

Negotiations between banks and regulators about the test results pushed back the release date, which was expected to be earlier in the week.

The Fed will reveal the extra capital the banks will need to absorb possible future losses on investments and loans _ such as for commercial real estate and credit cards _ if the recession were to worsen.

Last week, Fed officials said all 19 banks that underwent stress tests will need to keep an extra buffer of capital reserves beyond what's now required, in case losses on these loans and other assets continue to mount. That means some banks will have to raise more cash.

Banks will have up to six months to raise money from private companies, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has said. If they can't, the government would provide aid.

One option for boosting capital would be to let the government increase its stakes in banks. That would be done by converting the government's stock in banks from preferred to common shares. It wouldn't require any further taxpayer money, though it would hurt existing shareholders and put taxpayer money at greater risk.

Another option would be for the government to inject more capital into a bank, using taxpayer money from the $700 billion financial bailout program. Treasury already has committed more than $580 billion of the money for programs aimed at strengthening banks, winding down a failed insurer, sustaining the auto industry, helping homeowners avoid foreclosure and spurring lending to small businesses and consumers.

The stress tests were done to help regulators decide whether the banks have sufficient capital _ and the right mix of it _ to withstand additional shocks to the economy over the next two years.

Regulators are trying to make information public without roiling financial markets. If they provide too much detail, banks singled out as needing more capital could be punished by investors. Too little detail could undermine the process' credibility, damaging efforts to shore up banks.

In the tests, the Fed put banks _ including Citigroup, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs _ through two hypothetical scenarios. The idea was to see how much of a financial hit banks would take on their loans and other assets.

One scenario looks at how banks would fare over the next two years based on how the economy was doing in February.

The second, more important scenario assumes the economy will sink into a deeper recession than analysts expect. It assumes that the overall economy, as gauged by the gross domestic product, will fall 3.3 percent this year and unemployment will reach 10.3 percent in 2010.

In that worsened scenario, consumers and businesses would have more trouble paying back the money banks have lent them for home mortgages, credit cards and commercial real estate. These loans and other assets would become less valuable. Regulators are forcing banks to set aside money to make sure they can survive those losses.

The exact format of the stress-test results will be revealed to bank executives in briefings with regulators Tuesday, said two industry sources who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not permitted to discuss the matter.

Initial test results indicated that Citigroup and Bank of America would need to raise more capital, sources told The Associated Press earlier this week. The banks have been negotiating with regulators over the initial findings.

The two banks already have received capital injections from the government's $700 billion bailout fund. They also have been given government guarantees on billions of dollars worth of loans.

Investors, meanwhile, have grown more concerned about regional banks with lots of risky loans on their books. If the recession were to worsen, defaults on those loans could soar. Banks that carry such loans, including KeyCorp and Fifth Third Financial, will likely be asked to boost their capital reserves, according to analysts.

Regional banks look riskier than some Wall Street firms, because they carry so many vulnerable loans for mortgages, credit cards and commercial real estate.

By contrast, investment banks like Goldman Sachs have larger portfolios of securities that already have lost much value. So the stress tests treated these securities as more durable than they did loans.

Fixing the banking system and restoring credit to people and businesses is necessary to lift the country out of the recession that's dragged on since December 2007.

Damage from the housing, credit and banking crises _ the worst since the 1930s _ has badly pounded banks. A growing number have failed. Others have suffered huge losses.

Last week, the International Monetary Fund estimated that total losses on loans and securities originating in the United States at $2.7 trillion from 2007 to 2010. It also estimated that $275 billion more in capital would be needed to cushion against further losses.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve will release results Thursday of "stress tests" for the 19 large banks at the center of the nation's financial crisis. The results will shed light on which banks...
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve will release results Thursday of "stress tests" for the 19 large banks at the center of the nation's financial crisis. The results will shed light on which banks...
Filed by Dave Burdick  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themodernleader
09:27 AM on 05/02/2009
The entire charade of bank stress tests smells of corruption and coverup of the regulators and regulated. We are being covered up with misleading knowledge about the nature of our financial-economic condition. Minus legitimate and reliable knowledge, the Congress must operate in a vacuum. Decision making breaks down. Self interest and criminality win over rational and redeeming policy. And the organization breaks into chaos and ruin.
Operating an Administration on self serving propaganda is a dangerous, disastrous repertoire.
07:32 AM on 05/02/2009
boo hoo hoo to you! When Timid Timmy G is done, all the bailout loans will have be converted into taxpayer donations to the same folks who brought you the deepest and longest recesssio since the 1930s. They also brought you record high housing rices, followed by the biggest plunge in housing priceson record, and are bringing you spreads on credit card rates that would make a Las Vegas casino operator blush. Note well: the Senate votes down bankruptcy court relief for homeowners in foreclosure, but will doubtless stand at the ready to shovel tens of billions more into Citi, BoA, and the rest of the overstressed banking titans. And don't expect much to come from Chris Doddering Dodds and Barney less-than-Frank's credit card bill of rights either: our bailout moey is being shoveled by the millions from the banks to theire lobbyists and into the campaign coffers of Washington's always for rent politicians.
CarmanK
democrat, retired tax acct
01:29 AM on 05/02/2009
"Repairing the nation's banking system and getting credit flowing more freely to people and businesses is a necessary ingredient for trying to lift the country out of a recession that has dragged on since December 2007."

Then tell me why the Senate defeated the new bankruptcy bills to help millions of American families and we the Taxpayers had our money used against us for lobbying?
03:12 AM on 05/02/2009
here here!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
10:29 PM on 05/01/2009
The best way the banks can increase their capital is to cut the CEO pay/bonuses! After all, job cuts (people being laid off) is what helped the cash flow and most CEO's get their pay. No harm in everyone suffering together. To the CEO's take it on the chin and keep smiling. Oh yeah, I went there.
09:48 PM on 05/01/2009
For what its worth, I would like to see a standardized credit score system for banks like the one forced on consumers.

Customers could do a "credit check" on banks to assess the risk of doing business with them.

Just sayin
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themodernleader
08:59 PM on 05/01/2009
William K. Black was right in his April 3, 2009, interview with Bill Moyers Journal of accusing the Administrations of Bush-Obama, the elite banksters and their key subordiantes of a massive coverup of the greatest fraud in the history of human organizing. The Geithner pretend, "We are putting the banks under the microscope" routine will show that the banks are solvent and in relatively healthy condition. These insiders know that they must chisel many trillions more out of the printing press of the Federal Reserve and borrowing of the Treasury to ever have a chance of survival.
The leaders of these despicable banks defrauded the world and the taxpayers are paying off their fraud. The "banksters" are still in power, thus able to continue the coverup. Fraud uncovered, covered up by two American Presidents tells outsiders about the low state of American integrity and honor---especially about the dishonesty and corruption of their elected officials.
If the CEOs of this gigantic fraud (and swindle) continue to be rewarded and never punished, the next meaningful fraud will be the operational destruction of our Constitution: then citizens at all levels of this degrading organization will stop asking questions for fear of their lives. That includes our present Senators and Representatives; Take responsibility for your job descriptions or prepare to perish.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WilliamProc
Black Atheist Monotreme.
07:06 PM on 05/01/2009
All this suspense to tell me that most of the banks are insolvent and need another capital injection?!
01:15 PM on 05/02/2009
No.... this thing tells you how much they need. At least for now...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hdaryl01
05:29 PM on 05/01/2009
As Gomer Pyle would say: "SURPRISE......SURPRISE...............!" You know its bad when the milque toast non-tests designed to favor the big banks and generate "confidence" are delayed in being released. Must not have enough lipstick for the pigs.............
05:23 PM on 05/01/2009
"The more serious issue to me is the comedy of errors that is brewing over the release of the stress test data and what to do about it. Why did Treasury announce a plan to stress test the banks if they didn’t know what their end game would be? For example, how could the plan possibly be that those financial institutions that need more capital will have 6 months to raise the capital in the private markets? No one will invest in a financial institution the government claims is under-capitalized based on a rosy stress test. How is it the Treasury doesn’t even know what information it will release about the stress tests? This only raises more questions then it answers.

It appears Treasury may not have a clear understanding of the depth of the problems the economy has and the solutions necessary to fix the credit markets. Or, equally troubling is the possibility Treasury does understand the depth of the problem but it believes the political will to implement the necessary solutions does not exist in Washington. Neither of these possible outcomes is comforting to me. I hope I’m wrong and Treasury knows what the problems are, knows how to fix them, and can gain the political support it needs to implement its plans. Heaven help us if my concerns are justified."


http://www.escapethenewgreatdepression.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:42 AM on 05/03/2009
Members of the Treasury have MUCH to lose if the banks are insolvent. Go from there...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
time4change2009
03:11 PM on 05/01/2009
The so called 'stress test' was actually the audit by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank which Bush dodged for years. The results are out and have been reported on through the IMF's World Economic Outlook report released earlier this month.

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/01/index.htm

The report concludes that the economic future of the largest countries in the world including the US looks grim...thus the need for delay of the 'stress test' results.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/22/global-economy-may-shrink_n_190165.html
02:55 PM on 05/01/2009
Guess they need to change the stress test component weightings in order to get the desired answer.

Nothing to see here folks..just move on down the road.
02:44 PM on 05/01/2009
Why in the world are they even bothering with stress tests? Whatever banks need more taxpayer money will get it. I don't understand. What the banks want the banks will get.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
02:28 PM on 05/01/2009
Let me guess, the results are not good even after Geithner, rigged the process as much as he could..!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:12 PM on 05/01/2009
The thing about a stress test is that it must be stressful. These tests are probably minimally stressful, and many banks that passed are still in danger of infarction, probably. The banks win win win all of the time.
01:36 PM on 05/01/2009
Delayed so they can cook the books some more!!! Release them now, so they can fail like they should have like all the rest of the American businesses. Like my business which has dried up because no one wants to spend money or has no money because of these banks...!!!!