Mark Halperin On Souter Replacement: "White Men Need Not Apply"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Mark Halperin On Souter Replacement: "White Men Need Not Apply" stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

05/ 1/09 02:28 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

With the announcement that Justice David Souter is planning on retiring from the Supreme Court to return to New Hampshire, President Barack Obama now has a momentous decision to make. But more importantly, the media has a SHINY NEW THING to get crazyfaced about, so it's time to CRY HAVOC and let slip the dogs of banality! Leading the pack, as usual, is Time Magazine internet ad pimp Mark Halperin, who frames the matter thusly:

I really couldn't put it better! Will Barack Obama do anything about the historical barrier to entry that has always stood in the way of white people who just want to serve on the highest court in the land? Just look at the picture Halperin found, of a pensive and expectant white dude from post-racial stock photo company istockphoto.com. Who's going to be that guy's Jackie Robinson? Besides David Souter, I mean?

Let's commence our "to be fair" paragraph by stipulating that Halperin, in actuality, is probably noting the possibility that Obama might choose to "play politics" with this pick, as opposed to Halperin attempting to make a judgment on the relative Caucasianness of rumored-to-be-on-the-shortlist Seth Waxman. Of course, this rather harsh tone Halperin is taking, toward the playing of politics, is unusual among the Beltway chatterers. When a President actively searches out the youngest possible SCOTUS picks, solely for the purpose of locking down an ideologue for the longest possible period of time, folks like Halperin clap and offer, "Huzzah, good sir, on the prowess you have demonstrated upon the field of politics this eventide!"

I know it seems just so terribly unlikely, but there remains an outside chance that someone like a Sonia Sotomayor might actually be a great candidate on the merits. Don't expect that notion to get probed too deeply, though! Halperin's already laid down his marker in terms of race and identity politics. And once Sotomayor gets tagged with the term "moderate," it'll be a repeat of The Great Veep Shortlist Panic of 2008 all over again in parts of the progressive blogosphere. And other people will just show up, and say incredibly dumb things about the process, like the Politico's Eamon Javers, who today made a game attempt to WIN THE MORNING on MSNBC through analysis:

JAVERS: Sonia Sotomayor is the one who's on the top of everybody's list at this point because she's from New York, Hispanic, got an interesting background having grown up, I guess, in the Bronx. She sort of relates to Obama in many ways.

Of course! Who better to relate to a New York-born Hispanic woman who grew up in the Bronx than a Hawaiian-born biracial guy who grew up in Honolulu? Maybe Javers will be able to answer that better once he nails down the guesswork involved in where Sotomayor grew up! Nevertheless, this is a pretty powerful indication of the high quality conversation we'll be having about the Supreme Court.

By the way, I'll answer Halperin's "eleven real Supreme Court nomination questions" so you don't have to. The answers are: yes, yes, no, yes, yes, no (Specter never holds his tongue, Ben Nelson probably eats sand with it), WTF?, they'll try but not succeed, Rahm, Plouffe, and, "Mark, just admit you could only come up with ten questions, Jesus."

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

With the announcement that Justice David Souter is planning on retiring from the Supreme Court to return to New Hampshire, President Barack Obama now has a momentous decision to make. But more import...
With the announcement that Justice David Souter is planning on retiring from the Supreme Court to return to New Hampshire, President Barack Obama now has a momentous decision to make. But more import...
 
Comments
243
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

all choices should look for gender equality but be race neutral.

sexism is our cultures unending dominate problem, not racism.

(ex. see 2008 Democratic Presidential Primaries)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 05/03/2009
- abmb I'm a Fan of abmb 2 fans permalink

No; sexism is not "our cultures (sic) unending dominate problem (sic)"....sadly, illiteracy is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 05/26/2009

This amazes me the 'majority' is always complaining about the 'minority' wanting this or wanting that. Once in history it seems that a 'white dude' will not get a job and whole world must be going crazy. I guess its never been about equality its just been about keep all powerful jobs in the family( aka white men only) -->I'm yawning now

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 05/02/2009
- magic3400 I'm a Fan of magic3400 9 fans permalink
photo

White males have sat atop the western world's empire, while people of color have slaved to build that empire.

Times have changed, my advice to Halperin --- Get over it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 05/02/2009
- AFAN I'm a Fan of AFAN 33 fans permalink

Well said. They always play the victim card.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 05/02/2009

who always play the victim card????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 05/03/2009

this oppression didn't happen to you.

get over it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 05/03/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 146 fans permalink

Mark Halperin seems to forget that for years and years of our great country the banner was that "only white men need apply" for positions on the highest court in the land and elsewhere. He should at least provide some historical context.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 05/02/2009
- valkyrie607 I'm a Fan of valkyrie607 106 fans permalink
photo

Dear White Guys:

Sucks, don't it?

Sincerely,

everybody else

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 05/02/2009

This is perfect! Pure comedy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 05/02/2009

Thats okay.

We Still Have All the Money,

Fabulous Jobs

and killer health care

with DENTAL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 PM on 05/02/2009
- valkyrie607 I'm a Fan of valkyrie607 106 fans permalink
photo

I know: why don't you continue gloating and lording it over everyone else? Wouldn't want that lovely expensive private health care plan to go to waste after all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 05/02/2009
photo

The traditional white reaction in these situations always tries to frame the issue as picking an UNQUALIFIED female or minority over a QUALIFIED white male.

This is trash and should be rejected.

There is NO ONE on Obama's short list who is not qualified to do the job.

Once the short list contains ONLY qualified people, how, oh wise tr0lls of the world, is a president to make a final selection?

Is it appropriate for a President to pick a person who shares the official party position on some key litmus test issue? That is how Bush made his picks...

Why is using an "issue litmus test" more appropriate than using the color of the skin or the gender of the person?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 05/02/2009

THATS SOOOO CONVENIENT FOR YOU.

AN EXCUSE FOR THE FAILURE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HIRES!

HILARIOUS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 05/02/2009
photo

Here is the way it works: any candidate for the job must pass a basic test of juridical competence. This was what Obama himself meant during the Rick Warren fiasco last fall when he pointed out that he would not have supported Thomas' nomination. Thomas is the one person on the SCOTUS who had questionable legal muscle for the job.
Once someone has "what it takes" to do the job, Obama - like Bush and any other president - has an absolute right to pick whoever he wants by any criteria he wants. I don't see what the big deal is. It isn't like Sotomayor or Kagan are not qualified. Sotomayor is perfectly qualified. Glenn Beck is not. Is it "reverse discrimination" if Obama nominates a qualified hispanic woman over an unqualified white man?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 05/02/2009
photo

At this level; all the criteria become extremely subjective. I am confident that former Con Law Prof Obama will not let scholarship languish in order to apply "affirmitive action " to SCOTUS.

Don't forget that until recent times, politicians were appointed; "friends" were more important than scholarship.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 05/02/2009

The beginning of the case against Sotomayor has already begun and it is based on her race -- putting for the notion she isn't qualified and has only been selected because she is Hispanic female. I'm sure Obama saw this coming, and will not sacrifice her selection if he thinks she is the right pick. If he think she isn't, I'm sure it will be because he thinks more highly of someone else. This is good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 05/04/2009
photo

Anectdotal "evidence" is only beneficial in legislative hearings; however I must say, that in almost 40 years in the justice system, I have never been interviewed by a woman, and only one AA man; these remainder of the decison makers have been white males. Further, only about a quater of their number believe that discrimination "still" exists in employment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 05/02/2009
photo

We expect oru representation , especially in the judiciary, to reflect both the cultural and intellectual diversity of our nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 05/02/2009
- inorbit I'm a Fan of inorbit 23 fans permalink
photo

"White guys" have gotten everything for centuries in this country. It's time to give someone else a chance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 05/02/2009

Give me a break. There are plenty of 'white guys' on the bench and always have been. If anything, this administration welcomes Jews for just about every imaginable post and rejects Hispanics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 05/02/2009
photo

Okay, liberal white guy judges who hope to be Obama's pick: take one for the team. True, it's not fair that you should be overlooked just because you had the misfortune to be born white and male. True, you might have turned out to be the most influential justice since Earl Warren. True, it's reverse discrimination at its most obvious.

But really. We need a woman of color on the bench. It doesn't even have to be a very dark color. A deep tan would do.

Take one for the liberal team this time. Thanks! My uterus, which needs to stay under my own control, thanks you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 AM on 05/02/2009
- Paulo1 I'm a Fan of Paulo1 41 fans permalink

Yellowdoggie,

My testicles, which do not need to be held hostage to your sense of feminist entitlement do not thank them for bowing to gender discrimination, reverse or not.

About the only social justice issue on the planet where I tend to agree with some conservatives is that you do not make people equal by practicing inequality. If you want to promote women to the court, as I CERTAINLY DO, then make damned sure you get every qualified womans name into the hat for consideration.. If you are latino, gay or anyone else who wants to be represented on the court you do the same and the process should pick the best qualified person.

If you pick a person because they have a uterus then you insult their credentials and reaffirm that they are NOT equal to men.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 05/02/2009
photo

Paulotr0ll: ALL candidates should be qualified to serve. That is fundamental. Can you please tell me which person on Obama's short list do you think IS NOT qualified to serve? Once you have a short list of qualified candidates, by what criteria should a final selection be made? Don't tell me "based on their Credentials" because I already pointed out to you that NO ONE on Obama's short list lacks credentials...
So what is it going to be? How would YOU pick one person from the short list?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 05/02/2009

Halperin suffers from the chronic ailment of lackoforig­inalideasi­tis. The "beaten down white guy" theme is sooooo Rush in the early and mid-90s.

Halperin wouldn't know a fundemental, post-racial, generational shift if it bit him in the arse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 PM on 05/01/2009
- DRaymond I'm a Fan of DRaymond 64 fans permalink
photo

As for Halperin's questions:

1. Republicans will definitly get drawn into trying a filibuster. It is their only way to avoid irrelevance.

2. I sincerely hope they will make no vetting mistakes, but Republicans will act like it anyway

3. They'll just tune in to what Rush says.

4. There will be no admission of a lithmus test, just like Bush (yeah right)

5. Yes, got to keep the news beast fed, even with red herrings

6. They won't filibuster.

7. Joe sure needs one.

8. Obama will make a big point of ignoring the left wing interest groups, publicly.

9. Doesn't really matter

10. That whole rags-to-riches is a Republican fantasy. Obama is into competence. Expect the public story to emphasize competence.

11. He will wait until the end of the current Supreme Court session to keep a lid on eveny decision being greeted with speculation about how it would have been different with the nominee instead of Souter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 05/01/2009
- DRaymond I'm a Fan of DRaymond 64 fans permalink
photo

When Bush decided to replace Sandra Day O'Connor with Really White Guy John Roberts he greatly increased the need for greater diversity on the court. And since everybody expected Ruth Bader Ginsbers to be the next justice to retire that the short list would include mostly women is hardly surprizing at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 PM on 05/01/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect