iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme Court Nominee: All You Need To Know

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/01/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:20 PM ET

Obama Supreme Court

President Barack Obama has tapped federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court, making her the first Hispanic in history picked to wear the robes of a justice. Here are 10 things about her that you should know:

1. HER UPBRINGING: Judge Sonia Sotomayor has arguably lived the American dream. She was born to a Puerto Rican family and grew up in a public housing project in the South Bronx.

Her father was a factory worker with a third-grade education, and died when Sotomayor was nine years old. Her mother raised Sotomayor while working as a nurse. After her father's death, Sotomayor reportedly turned to books for solace, and she says it was her love of Nancy Drew books that ultimately led her to the law.

2. HER EDUCATION: Sotomayor graduated as valedictorian of her class at Blessed Sacrament and at Cardinal Spellman High School in New York. She won a scholarship to Princeton where she continued to excel, graduating summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. She was a co-recipient of the M. Taylor Pyne Prize, the highest honor Princeton awards to an undergraduate. At Yale Law School, Judge Sotomayor served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal and as managing editor of the Yale Studies in World Public Order.

3. HER WORK OFF THE BENCH: After law school, Sotomayor spent five years as Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan, trying dozens of criminal cases. Robert Morgenthau, who chose her for the position, described her as a "fearless and effective prosecutor." She entered private practice in 1984, working as an international corporate litigator handling cases involving everything from intellectual property to banking, real estate and contract law.

4. HER JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE: As Tom Goldstein of SCOTUSBlog writes, "Almost all of her career has been in public service -- as a prosecutor, trial judge, and now appellate judge. She has almost no money to her name." The White House notes:

If confirmed for the Supreme Court, Judge Sotomayor would bring more federal judicial experience to the Supreme Court than any justice in 100 years, and more overall judicial experience than anyone confirmed for the Court in the past 70 years. ...


In 1998, Judge Sotomayor became the first Latina to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, one of the most demanding circuits in the country. She has participated in over 3000 panel decisions and authored roughly 400 opinions, handling difficult issues of constitutional law, to complex procedural matters, to lawsuits involving complicated business organizations."

(The New York Times has summarized her most notable court opinions and articles.)

5. HER STRUGGLE WITH DIABETES: Sotomayor is a Type One diabetic. She has been open about her diabetes in the past, noting that when she was diagnosed at he age of eight, it foiled her hopes of becoming an investigative detective like her heroine, Nancy Drew. While hardly a debilitating disease -- indeed, recent medical advancements have made it quite manageable to live with -- there remain enough late-in-life health implications to have sparked debate in legal, political and medical circles over whether it should be a factor in her nomination.

6. SOTOMAYOR SUPPORTED BY REPUBLICANS: In 1992, Republican President George H. W. Bush appointed Sotomayor to the District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Later, in 1998, President Bill Clinton nominated her to the 2nd Circuit, and she was confirmed with bipartisan support in a 67-29 vote.

All Democrats voted in favor of Sotomayor (although three did not vote), while Republicans opposed her by a 29-25 majority. Among those Senators who are still in the chamber today, however, Sotomayor's margin of confirmation was a bit more comfortable: 35-11.

Indeed, five current Republican Senators voted in favor of her nomination then: Sens. Collins, Gregg, Hatch, Lugar, Snowe. Among the no votes were current Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, current Minority Whip John Kyl and Sen. Jeff Sessions, currently the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee.

Additionally, the White House points out, "Known as a moderate on the court, Sotomayor often forges consensus and agreeing with her more conservative nominees far more frequently than she disagrees with them. In cases where Sotomayor and at least one judge appointed by a Republican president were on the three-judge panel, Sotomayor and the Republican appointee(s) agreed on the outcome 95% of the time."

7. SOTOMAYOR ON ABORTION, GAY MARRIAGE: Sotomayor's record on two key hot button cultural issues is thin. But, quite notably, her sole opinion regarding abortion was in line with the anti-abortion movement's position. Some details from the anti-abortion site LifeNews.com:

"Despite 17 years on the bench, Judge Sotomayor has never directly decided whether a law regulating abortion was constitutional," the pro-life group Americans United for Life noted in a recent analysis of potential Supreme Court candidates.


Sotomayor participated in a decision concerning the Mexico City Policy, which President Obama recently overturned and which prohibits sending taxpayer dollars to groups that promote and perform abortions in other nations.

Writing for the Second Circuit, Judge Sotomayor upheld the Mexico City Policy, but AUL says the significance of the decision "may be minimal because the issue was largely controlled by the Second Circuit's earlier opinion in a similar challenge to the policy."

AUL notes that Judge Sotomayor also upheld the pro-life policy by rejecting claims from a pro-abortion legal group that it violated the Equal Protection Clause.

That said, pro-choice groups hailed her nomination, with Planned Parenthood declaring that she "understands the importance of ensuring that our Supreme Court justices respect precedent while also protecting our civil liberties."

Sotomayor has also not ruled on any cases involving gay civil rights, but gay legal activists described her positively:

Long-time gay legal activist Paula Ettelbrick said she met Sotomayor in about 1991 when they both served on then-New York Governor Mario Cuomo's advisory committee on fighting bias.


"Nobody wanted to talk to the queer person at that time," said Ettelbrick, who represented Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. "She was the only one [on the advisory committee] who made a point to come over and introduce herself. She was totally interested [in gay civil rights issues] and supportive."

"From everything I know, Judge Sotomayor is an outstanding choice - fair and aware, open and judicious," said Evan Wolfson, head of the national Freedom to Marry organization. "I believe she has the demonstrated commitment to principles of equal protection and inclusion that defines a good nominee to the Supreme Court. In choosing Judge Sotomayor, the first Latino candidate for the Supreme Court, President Obama has made a strong and appealing nomination that should and will receive the supportof those committed to equality for lesbians and gay men."

8. SOTOMAYOR WOULD BE FIRST HISPANIC JUSTICE: If confirmed, Sotomayor would be the first Hispanic to ever serve on the Supreme Court. Tom Goldstein notes:

To Hispanics, the nomination would be an absolutely historic landmark. It really is impossible to overstate its significance. The achievement of a lifetime appointment at the absolute highest levels of the government is a profound event for that community, which in turn is a vital electoral group now and in the future.

9. SOTOMAYOR "SAVED BASEBALL": "During a brief period in 1995," the New York Times reported, "Judge Sonia Sotomayor became revered, at least in those cities with major league baseball teams. She ended a long baseball strike that year, briskly ruling against the owners in favor of the players." A bit more:

The owners were trying to subvert the labor system, she said, and the strike had "placed the entire concept of collective bargaining on trial."


After play resumed, The Philadelphia Inquirer wrote that by saving the season, Judge Sotomayor joined forever the ranks of Joe DiMaggio, Willie Mays, Jackie Robinson and Ted Williams. The Chicago Sun-Times said she "delivered a wicked fastball" to baseball owners and emerged as one of the most inspiring figures in the history of the sport.

10. SOTOMAYOR ON THE CONSTITUTION AND "JUDICIAL ACTIVISM": The ubiquitous conservative attack on Sotomayor stems from a 2005 statement she made describing the role appellate justices have in forming policy, which they claim is akin to an endorsement of "judicial activism."

"All of the legal defense funds out there, they are looking for people with court of appeals experience because the court of appeals is where policy is made," she said, laughing a bit through the next part: "And I know this is on tape and I should never say that because we don't make law. I know. Okay, I know. I'm not promoting it. I'm not advocating it. I know."

But as legal scholars have noted, Sotomayor's statement is entirely factual:

"She's not wrong," said Jeffrey Segal, a professor of law at Stony Brook University. "Of course they make policy... You can, on one hand, say Congress makes the law and the court interprets it. But on the other hand the law is not always clear. And in clarifying those laws, the courts make policy."


Eric Freedman, a law professor at Hofstra University, was equally dismissive of this emerging conservative talking point. "She was saying something which is the absolute judicial equivalent of saying the sun rises each morning. It is not a controversial proposition at all that the overwhelming quantity of law making work in the federal system is done by the court of appeals... It is thoroughly uncontroversial to anyone other than a determined demagogue."

Indeed, during her 1997 confirmation hearing, Sotomayor spoke of her judicial philosophy, saying "I don't believe we should bend the Constitution under any circumstance. It says what it says. We should do honor to it."


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

President Barack Obama has tapped federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court, making her the first Hispanic in history picked to wear the robes of a justice. Here are 10 things about ...
President Barack Obama has tapped federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court, making her the first Hispanic in history picked to wear the robes of a justice. Here are 10 things about ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:46 PM on 05/29/2009
I am extremely proud to have a Latina of Puerto Rican descent nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court. There is so such much info out there, both positive and negative, and it's great to find a "just the facts, thanks" approach to share with people who strongly support Judge Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation to the U. S. Supreme Court.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
02:40 PM on 05/28/2009
I would like to know if Sonia Sotomayor”s Parents were legal residents.
Does she use the term illegal alien or undocumented?
Does she view being in the US without proper documents a crime?
What is her judicial record in such cases?
04:11 PM on 05/28/2009
Of course they were legal. Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens. Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory. It's amazing that anti-immigration people don't even know what they are talking about. Do some research before you attack her citizenship.
09:23 PM on 05/28/2009
Heh...Thank you so much "ronjo"..........Puertorequenos ARE Americans

My folks were from Massachusets......they just snuck into California so I could be born a citizen
tm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:15 AM on 05/28/2009
I'm a conservative American. I suppose that, playing by the script, I should be voicing all sorts of anger and outrage over Sotomayor (though I really don't know why). Frankly, the script is getting old. Yes, the Republicans should give her an appropriately "hard time" in the hearings - that's what hearings are for, after all. You get a "hard time" when you defend your doctoral dissertation, too, and nobody thinks that's inappropriate. It's called playing in the big leagues. But a "hard time" doesn't have to mean the kind of disgraceful, demagogic, cheap, cynical and contemptible witchhunt in which the Democratic party and their liberal supporters have engaged - like rabid sharks - every time a Republican president has made a Supreme Court nomination, at least since Robert Bork.
Republicans, be appropriately tough, as it's your job (and we can hardly expect any hardball questions from the Dems, who, frankly, WON'T do their job), but also be better than the Dems.
Which shouldn't be too hard.
04:13 PM on 05/28/2009
Toughen up, republicans. Using language ike "witchhunt" shows how weak you are. The republican nominees had to go through a confirmation hearing, not a witchunt. Sotomayor will have to do the same. Nobody was as ruthless to Harriet Meiers as other republicans were. Do your research and stop being such a big baby. This is important. It should be tough.
01:33 PM on 05/27/2009
I do not at all find this article by Nico Pitney "all I need to know". Discussions as to whether she is a liberal, moderate, etc., do not help either. Rachel Maddow's interview was of the latter sort and did not tell me more than Pitney did. That she is not the liberal counterweight to Scalia or Roberts also means little to me. That she will empathize with litigants and bring that empathy to bear on her reading of the merits of a case I find also an unhelpful characterization.

The greatest issues facing SCOTUS is the overweening power of the presidency and the failure of the elections system to generate political parties that give representation to ordinary citizens. The corruption of our government by campaign fund contributions from major corporations with interests in the industries of defense and finance and their control of mainstream media is destroying this republic and replacing it with an imperial, militarized tyranny. So long as SCOTUS does not act to restore government by consent of the governed, all of the other issues from abortion to discrimination are minor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:55 AM on 05/28/2009
I am full of sympathy for the feelings expressed in this post, but with respect it seems to me to be ultimately misguided. It is very simply not the task of the elections system to "generate political parties that give representation to ordinary citizens." As for "representation", it is the task of the (forgive the quasi-tautology) Constitutionally constituted branches of government to be the representatives of the ordinary citizens regardless of what parties the elected or appointed officials belong to. "Representation" is mandated by the form of government, not by the character of this or that political party. As for the "overweening power of the presidency", the president has precisely the same Constitutionally defined powers and duties that all presidents have had since George Washington.
I agree that there is failure and breakdown, but the failure and breakdown are to be found in the popular consciousness. Sadly, our "representatives" in D.C. are very WELL representing the mindlessness of a declining culture that lives and dies by the soundbyte. And by the latest news on who got tossed off of Dancing with the Stars. A Henry Waxman, for example, who responds to criticism for not reading legislation by summoning a speed-reader to jabber away in front of a Senate committee, thinking it's all about "a good laugh" is the perfect example of a perfect representative of a perfectly moribund society.
Probably, the jig is simply up.
12:12 AM on 05/27/2009
She seems qualified for the post but is she? Sotomayor should get the same courtesy as a nominee as republican nominees in the past. She should be asked those hardcore, high profile questions (abortion, etc.) and the press should treat her like any of them (... that will be the day ...). Will she try to officially remove the "illegal" from illegal immigrant just because she is hispanic?
I am hispanic, I immigrated leagally and I worked my way hard to a middle class citizen but that does not qualify me for a supreme court and neither should she be "qualified" for the post because of her upbringing.
I just hope we don't have another obamagasm with Sotomayor.
02:32 PM on 05/26/2009
Right here, vanity: ""I thought, what a wonderful occupation to have," Ms. Sotomayor said. "And I made the quantum leap: If that was the prosecutor's job, then the guy who made the decision to dismiss the case was the judge. That was what I was going to be.""

She took up law not because she believed in principles or justice, but because "it's a wonderful occupation to have," to be able to be the 'final word' on cases.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mari2JJ
VERY moderate Republican!
08:18 PM on 05/26/2009
Hmmm, so you are able to know what is in her head and KNOW what she is thinking. I think NOT!!! This woman is VERY qualified and obviously has been selected for a Court appointment by both Bush I and Obama. She really sounds well qualified and great to me. Let it be noted that if Republicans give this woman a bad time, they will reject not only an Obama nominee but also a Bush appointee just on the political basis that Obama selected her. As a Republican, I have always been impressed by the number of Hispanics that the party used to have. Obviously this racist tilt that is now in the party is why in the last election, Obama had won so many Hispanic votes. If Republicans give this nominee a bad time, everyone will note how the Republican Senators treat a Hispanic Judge that was first appointed by one of their own, President G. W. Bush. Their racism will truly show if they give this nomination a bad time and then, Republicans can expect a huge drop in Hispanic votes so they will welcome years and years out of power. So be it if they insist on these racist ideas. It is stuff like this that has chased so many of us out of the Republican Party.
02:12 PM on 05/26/2009
She appears to me, at first glance, to have some kind of a chip on her shoulder. She seems to feel overempowered because she is a minority and yet rose to a prominent position, and now she seems smug about it.

After seeing the list of Obama's contenders for the position on the SCOTUS at rawstory (5 women, 1 man named 'Carlos) it looks like Obama is trying to protect women's right to choose. (I haven't vetted this yet, of course.) However one topic alone does not a Supreme Court Justice make.

Also this may be another case of 'throw out the first candidate and see how the public/republicans react, to test the waters.'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruffmama
your ad here.....inquire within.
02:28 PM on 05/26/2009
keep drifting, Phil.
photo
somsoc
All humans are atheists at birth.
02:37 PM on 05/26/2009
Drifter, your observations of supposed smugness and 'overempowered' reveal a nasty bit of b!gotry. She rose from the poorest sections of NY city to succeed where you could not possibly imagine, as the editor of the Yale Law Review, and prior to that she graduated from Princeton as the outstanding graduate in her class. And you did what? I have my concerns about Judge Sotomayer because of her decision on a case regarding abortion counseling and the Bush administration, but overall, she is eminently qualified, and you are eminently a b!got.
photo
somsoc
All humans are atheists at birth.
12:48 PM on 05/26/2009
I am glad that President Obama has selected another woman and one from a distinct and proud background as his nominee for the Supreme Court. However, having reviewed her decision in Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush, I cannot support this woman, I am concerned she is the fifth vote the rethugs have been waiting for all these many years.
11:44 AM on 05/26/2009
This is truly an exciting nomination due to the fact she is a woman and Puerto Rican!
It is also worth noting the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare's major role in providing partial funding to Puerto Rico's sterilization program. Between the 1930s and the 1970s approximately one-third of Puerto Rico's female population of childbearing age had undergone massive sterilization of Puerto Rican females.

I wonder if she is pro-life?
photo
somsoc
All humans are atheists at birth.
12:50 PM on 05/26/2009
Let us hope she is pro-freedom, pro-liberty, pro-choice!!!!
02:24 PM on 05/26/2009
Pro-freedom of the government?
Pro-liberty of courts and politicians?
Pro-choice of government programs like the one shown above to exterminate Puerto Ricans due to income?
11:34 AM on 05/26/2009
Ex-Pavia & Harcourt Partner Sonia Sotomayor's corporate law firm represents the special interests of French and Italian governmental agencies and foreign European banks and media firms.

In addition, Sotomayor also apparently prosecuted African-American defendants in the courtrooms of Manhattan as an assistant district attorney to Robert Mogenthau and sat on the board of directors of the State of New York Mortgage Agency (Sonny Mae) that apparently encouraged low-income tenants to saddle themselves with mortgages and become "first-time homebuyers" instead of fighting for rent control laws.

So there seems to be a conflict-of-interest between the public interest and the special foreign and special domestic corporate interests that Supreme Court Justice-Designate Sotomayor has represented in her previous years of legal work.
12:04 PM on 05/26/2009
", Sotomayor also apparently prosecuted African-American defendants in the courtrooms of Manhattan as an assistant district attorney to Robert Mogenthau"

Sorry -- I believe in equality. Blacks are allowed to break the law, and to be prosecuted when they do so, just like anyone else. If you said she *refused* to prosecute African-Americans (or whites, or Latinos, or people with red hair) THEN I would be shocked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rain33
be bold & strong as a independent person
11:15 AM on 05/26/2009
vote on issues and principles which matters the most in our judicary system.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sherzie
Former Republican
10:41 AM on 05/26/2009
Excellent selection! This ends the speculation that Obama would select someone with no judicial record so that the Republicans in the Senate could not question the nominee's decisions and writings.

I love that Sotomayor was initially appointed by George HW Bush and then elevated to the Appellate division by Clinton.
10:26 AM on 05/26/2009
She's a social conservative. Picked by Bush I. Thats all I need to know about this fake Democrat President. Obama represents the final victory of presentation and celebrity over policy and reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rictracee
01:30 AM on 05/06/2009
YES YES YES !!! PICK HERE.. a latina!!! I am all for it
08:59 AM on 05/26/2009
I hope that being a Supreme Court Justice would have more qualifications than race... This is a joke to say it is all we need to know. All the pro's for her nomination are lawyer, judge, New Yorker born of Puerto Rican parents, I hope the nomination process disregards all this political correct crap and bases her nomination on experience and legal expertise especially where it concerns Constitutional issues.
photo
TomInJax
We cannot mistake absolutism for principle - BHO
09:39 AM on 05/26/2009
She's been an appellate court judge for 16 years. Is the most qualified pick in 70 years. Nuff said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ediva75
"Free Your Mind & The Rest Will Follow!" -Envogue
10:26 AM on 05/26/2009
Sorry Stan if race is a bothersome to you but you know what we needed a woman and for her to be of color. The history of the supreme court justices has been one of nothing but mostly white and male!! Get over it!!!

As long as her qualifications and understanding of the judicial system coincide with how I belief on major issues of importance (which I would like to research further) I have no objections to her!!