Chrysler Expected To Sell Assets To Fiat

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Chrysler Expected To Sell Assets To Fiat stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BREE FOWLER and VINNEE TONG | May 2, 2009 08:23 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
The main entrance to the Chrysler Stamping Plant is shown Thursday, April 30, 2009, in Twinsburg, Ohio. Documents in Chrysler's bankruptcy case reveal the automaker's plans to close five more of its plants by the end of 2010, including this plant. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

NEW YORK — Chrysler LLC is expected to file a motion Saturday to sell substantially all of its assets to Italian automaker Fiat Group SpA, but the ailing automaker must still deal with creditors who refused to come to a deal to erase the company's debt.

Attorneys for Chrysler say eight plants will not be affected by the sale, including five that the automaker revealed it will shutter by the end of next year.

While Chrysler faced its first hearing Friday in Manhattan bankruptcy court, court documents showed the Big Three automaker planned to close plants in Michigan, Missouri, Ohio and Wisconsin that employ about 4,800 people. Chrysler said they will be offered jobs at other plants.

The company also announced President and Vice Chairman Tom LaSorda is retiring effective immediately.

Judge Arthur Gonzalez approved a series of motions at Friday's hearing, launching a chain of events designed to ensure Chrysler's bankruptcy process is the quick and "surgical" one the company and the U.S. government have promised.

But what could prove to be the case's biggest challenge still lies ahead. Chrysler must eventually deal with creditors who defied government pressure to wipe out the automaker's debt and might have helped the company avoid a bankruptcy filing in the first place.

Another hearing was scheduled for Monday, where Chrysler attorneys will ask Gonzalez to let the company start using $4.5 billion in loans from the U.S. and Canadian governments to keep operating under bankruptcy protection.

Chrysler, the nation's third-largest car manufacturer, filed for bankruptcy protection Thursday. The company plans to emerge in as little as 30 days as a leaner, more nimble company, with Fiat potentially becoming the majority owner.

Story continues below

In return, the federal government agreed to give Chrysler up to $8 billion in additional financing, on top of the $4 billion the company already has received.

Chrysler attorney Corinne Ball said that lawyers on Monday would ask to set a date for the first hearing on the sale of its assets to the "new Chrysler." In bankruptcy, assets are sold in a two-part process during which the court asks for competing bids. None are expected in Chrysler's case, since documents show the company already tried to form alliances with dozens of companies, including Nissan-Renault, Toyota, Honda, Volkswagen and even rival General Motors Corp.

Heidi Sorvino, bankruptcy partner at Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP, said a sale could be completed in 30 to 60 days.

"I think the sale will happen quickly," she said. "The actual proceeding is going to take a long time."

Until the deal with Fiat closes, the automaker plans to idle all of its plants in the U.S. Chrysler's Canadian assembly plants also halted production Friday because of parts shortages stemming from the U.S. shutdown.

In court documents, Chrysler said it won't keep its Sterling Heights, Mich., plant that makes Chrysler Sebrings and Dodge Avengers, and the Conner Avenue plant in Detroit that makes Dodge Vipers. The St. Louis North plant that makes Dodge Ram pickups would also close.

Chrysler's Twinsburg, Ohio, parts stamping plant and Kenosha, Wis., engine plant will also be shuttered.

Two other plants that will be left out of the Fiat sale are the St. Louis South plant and an assembly plant in Newark, Del., that were idled last year. Another facility, Chrysler's Detroit Axle plant, is already scheduled to be replaced by a new factory near Port Huron, Mich.

The "new Chrysler" would lease the eight plants, then shutter them by December 2010.

"While some facilities may close, substantially all Chrysler employees will be offered employment with the new company," Chrysler spokeswoman Dianna Gutierrez said. "Employees currently located at a facility identified for disposition will be offered a position at one of the facilities sold to the new company."

Gonzalez approved Chrysler's motion to allow the automaker to pay $48.8 million in employee and contract worker pre-bankruptcy wages, benefits and businesses expenses. The motion also references an estimated $86 million in employee vacation benefits that it may not ultimately have to pay.

The judge also approved Chrysler's motions that will let it continue to honor its warranties and continue its current banking practices.

It's uncertain when Gonzalez will face objections from the creditors that hold $6.9 billion of the automaker's debt.

Four banks holding 70 percent of the debt agreed to a deal that would give the lenders 29 cents on the dollar. But a collection of hedge funds refused to budge, saying the deal was unfair because they deserve to recover more than other creditors like the United Auto Workers.

President Barack Obama on Thursday chastised the funds for seeking an "unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout" after Chrysler and his auto task force cleared the company's other hurdles, including the Fiat deal and a cost-cutting pact that the UAW ratified this week.

Chrysler's bankruptcy filing is the latest step in a drastic reordering of the American auto industry, which has been crushed by higher fuel prices, the recession and customer tastes that are moving away from the gas-guzzling SUVs that were once big money makers.

The government already has sunk about $25 billion in aid into Chrysler and GM.

GM faces its own day of reckoning on June 1, a date the administration has set for it to come up with its own restructuring plan. GM has announced thousands of job cuts, plans to idle factories for weeks this summer and has even offered the federal government a majority stake in the company as it races to meet the deadline.

Like at Chrysler, debt may be the stumbling block. GM has asked its unsecured bondholders to exchange $27 billion of debt for a 10 percent stake in the automaker. The creditors balked, saying that would leave them with just pennies on the dollar and that they deserve a majority stake if they give up their claims.

NEW YORK — Chrysler LLC is expected to file a motion Saturday to sell substantially all of its assets to Italian automaker Fiat Group SpA, but the ailing automaker must still deal with creditors...
NEW YORK — Chrysler LLC is expected to file a motion Saturday to sell substantially all of its assets to Italian automaker Fiat Group SpA, but the ailing automaker must still deal with creditors...
Filed by Nick Sabloff
 
Comments
43
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Now that Obama has guaranteed warranties,maybe ACORN can push cars on people without jobs.Who cares its only our tax money---------------Obama drones

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 05/03/2009
photo

Please go away

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 05/03/2009

anyone wanna bet

1) what the credit rating on the "re-emerged" GM/Chrysler is going to be when in the future they go to debt markets again (trust me they will, that's a given, and even if you dont believe that just for argument's sake).

2) Right now debt markets are frozen. when they eventually recover, what do you think will happen to any company that tries issue secured/unsecured bonds? what kind of payment of interest rates will be required to seal those deals? haha.

i know we all love to see our companies without debt but debt is not going away. its a part of the capital structure and even though it will shrink, its not going away for good.

now that we know that, what kind of punitive financing is going to afflict tomorrow's companies.

Any company sitting on a good pile of cash on its books is feeling pretty happy right now. any company that has huge amount of debt coming due that needs to be refinanced is shivering....:).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 05/02/2009
- notAMoron I'm a Fan of notAMoron 5 fans permalink

Credit ratings are based on the risk of a company going bankrupt before the debt obligation is due. Stepping over secured lenders introduces a whole new risk into the American system similar to the risk of doing business in a country like Venezuala.

This risk will close the spread between secured and unsecured debt especially for high profile businesses. I think rates will go up for all kinds of debts including US Bonds. I am waiting to see 10-14% T-Bills when China stops buying so many and Ben Bernanke stops printing money to buy them. England has already been rebuffed in the credit market, their last bond issue failed to sell out. California saw their debt shoot up to 6-7% which is a taxable equivelant of 11% for someone in the highest tax bracket.

I don't think many politicians realize the implications and reprecuticans of their current actions on our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 05/03/2009

There is a huge upside to bond interest rates going up though.

Huge interest rate on US debt - US govt. cant spend like a drunken sailer no more.

As a california resident, i have been hoping CA defaults on its debt. future debt obligations would become prohibitively expensive and therfore, the politicians wont be supporting all these hairbrained ideas that waste billions of $$.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 AM on 05/03/2009

This greatest capitalistic system in the world has destroyed the manufacturing system to so called free trade. The replaced financial system has now finished the job as our manufacturing goes bankrupt or purchased at fireside prices by foreigners. We are a ship of fools.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 05/02/2009
- jordan3189 I'm a Fan of jordan3189 20 fans permalink

Of course, massive union costs had nothing to do with it, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 AM on 05/03/2009
- Servility I'm a Fan of Servility 12 fans permalink

or government meddling

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 05/03/2009
photo

You expect them to work for nothing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 05/03/2009

medical insurance costs roughly $1000 per month for a mediocre policy. The same people crying about the union wages also have been holding the minimum wage at $6.50 per hour and are opposed to government sponsered health care.
At minimum wage a person would work 153 hours to pay for a health insurance policy. That would in a typical month leave 7 hours ($45.50) for the worker to live on.

bottom line republicans and "moderate" democrats will turn people back to unions because of their ridiculous policies supporting "free trade" and "free market" which ignore the realities of the average joe public.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 05/03/2009
- LeonBNJ I'm a Fan of LeonBNJ 23 fans permalink

I expect many and huge montions filed in the Bankruptcy courts challanging their being cut out of any avaialble monies before other debtors, the workers and the Government. If they lose there, then to Federal District court, Court of Appeals and maybe the Supreme Court. They will spend $100 million or more if necessary with the most expensive, biggest and baddest attorneys/law firms to fight the deal and to get their payments of Billions as the law has usually allowed.
I also expect many investment organizations and general corporations to lay a lot of money down on Republicans in the Senate and Congress to overule the Obama Administration of the deal done with Chrysler. In the end, the Bankruptcy may last years, not a few months, further crippling Chrylser, their workers, their suppliers and many others.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 05/02/2009

nah !! chrysler will do fine. I promise. and its backed by UAW warranty now :).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 PM on 05/02/2009
- Hailmaryyy I'm a Fan of Hailmaryyy 2 fans permalink

"Auto sales for April were very disappointing and indicate no upturn in economic activity. The WSJ reported “April sales totaled 819,540 cars and light trucks, a decline of 34% from a year earlier, according to market research firm Autodata Corp. The seasonally adjusted, annualized sales pace was 9.32 million vehicles, down from March's 9.86 million rate.” The ways in which the statistics are reported belie the severity of the situation. The downturn in auto sales has been going on now for over two years. In April of 2007 auto sales in the U.S. declined a worse than expected 8% from a year earlier. In April of 2008 auto sales declined a worse than expected 14% from a year earlier. Now auto sales are down another 34% in April of 2009. The last two years have seen April auto sales drop 8%, followed by a decline of 14%, followed by another decline of 34%. Auto sales in the U.S. are down almost 50% from 2006 levels. The media should be reporting April 2009 auto sales are down 34% from 2008 levels and a total of 48% from 2006 levels."


http://www.escapethenewgreatdepression.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/02/2009

We have more than enough cars already. No need to pollute the planet any more with new ones.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 05/02/2009

completely agree.

i keep hearing people blaming banks for no credit. Wouldnt it be great if the banks went back to the days of 20% downpayment for a home loan. Tell that to the libs :).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 05/02/2009

If only the management, shareholders or board of directors had stood up for the company and not short term goals. Instead they just worried about getting their options and dividends and hoped the stock price went up, even briefly, so they could sell shares.

The government stepped in to save US manufacturing jobs. As I read on www.Proudlymadeinamerica.com manufacturing jobs generate additional jobs in the economy then any other sector. Without the government, all of Chrysler would have been lost, or atleast more jobs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 05/02/2009

chrysler has long been a private company. How long have you been sleeping or drinking? jeez ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 05/02/2009

All of Chrysler is lost. Fiat is snatching up the corpse for naught.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 05/03/2009
photo

We were here in 1979. We were here in December, 2008. The precise reason for Chrysler's emergency government loan in December 2008 was to stop them from falling into bankruptcy. Smart people knew that it would fail, and it did. Some of the people who pressed for the bailout are running the government, including President Barack Obama. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/business/12auto.html Despite Congress saying no to an automotive bailout, Bush bailed them out anyway.

When incompetent companies can't operate profitably, they need to be allowed to fail. This bailout/stimulus mentality of our government only allows poor management to continue capital destruction. Of course, we should expect this from the government, given that bureaucracy is inherently inefficient; the government's solution to a problem is to throw more money at it, and if that doesn't work, to throw even more money at a problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 05/02/2009
- Chubbster I'm a Fan of Chubbster 36 fans permalink

Wierder and wierder. worse and worse. Give Chrysler to fiat while simultaneously the President is trying to abrogate contractual rights; if he will attack that contractual right, what right will he not attack?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 05/02/2009
- skyshoes I'm a Fan of skyshoes 3 fans permalink

Uh... the right to "give Chrysler to Fiat" or the right to contractual rights.. Are we quoting the bill of schmegege? Please explain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 05/02/2009

Yeas and billions too late. What a sad show.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 05/02/2009

whats really sad is that these things has changed forever.

1) Secured lending in the US. If the word "secured" is not worth the paper its printed on, it must carry a risk premium along with it. That means any company that goes back to debt market when it recovers, will be paying the premium for no fault of their own.

2) The home lending in the future will carry the similar premium in the future. when the talk is loud about "reworking" mortgages, a "secured loan" is in danger. so we will all pay for it (new potential homeowners that is, the existing ones will be all right who have fixed loans).

3) MOST IMPORTANTLY, the notion that debt is cheaper than equity is in question. Companies WILL / SHOULD / MUST pay a substantial premium to bondholders if their rights are in danger like this precedence in the future.

but hey i am just some capitalist that robs people !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 05/02/2009
photo

The Gettelfinger Motors restructuring plan put forward by the Administration completely abrogates private property rights. It's going to make private financing an impossibility in the future. By taking away legitimate equity claim from bondholders and giving it to labor and the government, private investors will be spurned by this de facto nationalization of industry and as a result the engine of innovation will die.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 05/02/2009

Higher interest would have been enough to completely avoid all the problems we are facing. Yes, risk has to be sold at a premium. And always has been. So we really don't have to do much but to return to the good old days when getting credit was hard and expensive. Same for all other investments. If it's hard to get money, people work harder to prove that the investment is really worth it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 05/02/2009
photo

The American taxpayer puts in $12 billion and then Fiat gets Chrysler?
What is Fiat going to pay? What happened to to making a profit on the "bridge" loans?
Those loans are cleared from the table just like the bondholders?
Looks like owning corporate bonds is a very "iffy" proposition going forward.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 05/02/2009

If Fiat is any smart, they will pay nothing. Taking over the plants means they have to take on the losses these plants will produce for years to come.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 05/02/2009

yes they will pay nothing, and they shouldnt pay anything at all. why should they? who would pick this dog with fleas if they had to put money at stake. i put this analogy before will do it again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 05/02/2009
- kelo I'm a Fan of kelo permalink

More bad govenment allowing another country to take over an American company. Now if they make a profit, except for operating expenses will go to Italy. That is one of the reasons the economy is dying. I wonder how much money is being sent to the country that brought the Budweiser beer. A lot of people were blaming the unions which were only trying to get their members a good quality of living. It was up to the company to build cars people wanted an at affordable price and to save money to take care of their workers, but the management faliled while pockiting millions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 05/02/2009

FIAT contributes zero cash and gets 20 to 35% ownership of Chrysler. Who came up with this? Rattner the car czar. Rattner is friends with FIAT insiders and this is a gift. Rattner expects something in return for this huge IOU. Rattner is known as the DNC's ATM machine. You can expect millions from FIAT owners/managers to be laundered via Rattner into re-election campaign donations for more corrupt politicians. Rattner is a Wall Street Gorden Gekko appointed car czar by Geithner (Wall street sycophant). He also has a vendetta against Cerberus (the owner of Chrysler) through bad blood litigation between Cerberus and Quadrangle (Rattner's company). Rattner knew NOTHING of the auto industry but was appointed car czar because he is known as NYC's DNC ATM machine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 05/02/2009

Fiat just pays what Chrysler is worth: nothing. Get used to it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 05/02/2009
photo

If someone had a stray dog that needed adoption but the dog had plenty of health and behavior problems, you wouldn't ask the person adopting the dog to pay a price for it, would you? The poor hound would never get adopted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 05/03/2009
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 418 fans permalink
photo

Never thought I'd see the day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 05/02/2009
- RobtBrock I'm a Fan of RobtBrock 6 fans permalink

Good-bye, Chrysler. You had a nice run but it is OVAH...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 05/02/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect