Bernanke more optimistic, sees growth in 2009

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bernanke more optimistic, sees growth in 2009 stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JEANNINE AVERSA | May 5, 2009 06:03 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before the Joint Economic Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, May 5, 2009. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gave his most optimistic prediction yet Tuesday about the end of the recession, saying he expects the economy to start growing again this year _ although the comeback could be weak and more jobs will disappear even after a recovery takes hold.

The Fed chief told Congress' Joint Economic Committee that he saw hopeful signs, including firmer home sales, a revival in consumer spending and some improvement in lending conditions for banks, businesses and individual borrowers.

"We continue to expect economic activity to bottom out, then to turn up later this year," Bernanke said.

Previously, Bernanke has suggested the recession could end this year if the government managed to stabilize the financial markets. This time, he said not only that he expects an end to the recession this year end but also a return to growth.

For that to happen, he said, the banking system must continue to stabilize.

"A relapse in financial conditions would be a significant drag on economic activity and could cause the incipient recovery to stall," Bernanke said.

Barring such a setback, Bernanke suggested the worst of the recession _ for lost economic activity _ has passed. Economists say the recession started in December 2007, then hit with force in the fall of last year when the financial crisis intensified.

He suggested that even in a recovery, economic activity would probably still be below normal, which some economists say is around a 2.5 percent growth, and "only gradually gain momentum."

Story continues below
advertisement

More than 5 million jobs have vanished in the recession, and the Fed chief predicted "further sizable job losses" in the coming months. The unemployment rate stood at 8.5 percent in March, a quarter-century high.

By year's end, some economists believe the jobless rate could hit 10 percent, but the Fed stops short of that figure. Bernanke said the unemployment rate would probably climb somewhere in the 9 percent range.

Among signs cited by Bernanke that the recession may be loosening its grip: The housing market has shown some signs of bottoming, and consumer spending, which collapsed in the second half of last year, came back to life in the first quarter.

While tax cuts from the economic stimulus plan and a sense that the economy is no longer in free fall may help people feel freer to spend, rising unemployment and shattered nest eggs may give them second thoughts.

"Bernanke is sending the message that things are looking better," said Brian Bethune, economist at IHS Global Insight. "At the same time that he's saying, `We're coming out of this,' he also is cautioning, `Let's not make the mistake of being too optimistic that we lose momentum on efforts to stabilize the financial system.'"

Bernanke took heat before Congress for the Fed's decision not to hasten the implementation of new rules to protect Americans from abusive credit card practices, as some lawmakers had requested. The Fed's rules take effect in July 2010.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said many Americans burned by the recession have watched banks and other companies get bailed out and feel like: "Hey, we're on fire, too. What about us?"

In the latest sign the downturn could be easing, activity in the services sector contracted at a slower pace in April, the Institute for Supply Management reported Tuesday.

Meanwhile, business investment remains "extremely weak," and conditions in the commercial real estate market are "poor," the Fed chief said.

There have been tentative signs that the declines in other world economies are moderating, which could help sales of U.S. exports. They have been falling sharply, a key factor behind the drag on U.S. manufacturing, he said.

In the U.S., the economy shrank at faster than a 6 percent annual rate late last year and early this year, the worst six-month performance since the late 1950s. Analysts think it is still shrinking and could start growing in the third or fourth quarter.

Bernanke provided no details about how the 19 large banks forced to undergo government "stress tests" have fared. The results, due out Thursday, will detail which banks could need more government help if the recession gets even worse.

Once the results are released, banks will have to develop plans for how to raise enough capital to meet higher government requirements for bank reserves, perhaps by selling assets. They will have six months to carry them out.

Responding to concerns about secrecy in the government's lending and bailout programs, Bernanke said the Fed will start providing information on the number of borrowers under each plan and details on loans and collateral. But he did not say the Fed would disclose who is borrowing, as lawmakers have suggested.

Striking a lighthearted note, Bernanke said that after the economic crisis has ended, "I look forward to a long period of boredom."

WASHINGTON — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gave his most optimistic prediction yet Tuesday about the end of the recession, saying he expects the economy to start growing again this year ...
WASHINGTON — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gave his most optimistic prediction yet Tuesday about the end of the recession, saying he expects the economy to start growing again this year ...
Filed by Julie Satow
 
Comments
92
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

President Obama’s top antitrust official this week plans to restore an aggressive enforcement policy against corporations that use their market dominance to elbow out competitors or to keep them from gaining market share.

Investigate the FED who helped Mega-Banks become SUPER Mega-Banks!

The FED must be STOPPED: It is near ruining America + #1 Debtor Nation=America (Graph)

http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/8/saupload_purchasing_power.png

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 AM on 05/11/2009
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 163 fans permalink
photo

It is that time of the year to see "green shoots" all around us. ;-)

Read Martin Wolf's piece in today's FT:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/34f7848e-39a7-11de-b82d-00144feabdc0.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 05/06/2009
- sueinmn I'm a Fan of sueinmn 101 fans permalink
photo

You can't have a recovery with out jobs! The banks recovery at our expense and its a false recovery. Bernanke gives a crap about us or he would immediately take steps to end consumer rap.a.ge through higher rates (CC) and his arrogance came through quite well in the Congressional hearings.
America recover with continued loss of jobs?? I dont think so!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 05/06/2009
photo

During the Great Depression unemployment, as then calculated, reached 25%. The economy recovered long before unemployment dropped back to reasonable levels. That is just the way it works. You cant just snap your fingers and get single-digit unemployment from 25%.

Obama and Geithner and Summers went for the solution that saved the highest number of jobs from being lost; otherwise, jobs would not be recovering from 10 to 12% unemployment, they would be recovering from 20 to 40% unemployment.

The reason unemployment from the situation that confronted the nation last fall could have exceeded the 25% of the great depression is the comparatively low number of jobs in agriculture. During the Great Depression well upwards of 50% of the population worked in the "people have to eat" profession. Now it's around 3%, so modern unemployment potential has far less resistance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 05/06/2009
photo

This chump is acting like he is a personality. He needs a good swift kik in the arse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 05/06/2009
photo

As citizens we should demand a complete audit of the Fed and complete transparency in every move they make. They have always been more secretive than the IRS. I would especially like to see the audits for the last eight years-when Cheney was chief economic advisor and pretty much dictating economic policy. I bet he and his pal Greenspan got pretty creative.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 05/05/2009
photo

Audit the Federal Reserve.

Support HR1207, The Federal Reserve Transparency Act

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/

Sign the online petition, spread the word.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 05/06/2009

Most bloggers have the concept right. What Congress giveth, Congrss can take away. The Fed was created by Congress. It has failed in the past quarter century. It is party to a cover up of fraud by CEOs . It refuses to open the banks up for inspection. There is much toxicity and fraud to hide.
Nobody is being investigated in the big banks. They are receiving the overwhelming percentage of the stimulus monies. We have no clue where it is going. When we ask, Geithner, Obama, Summers say that it is too COMPLEX for simple American minds. They claim to be in the dark as well. But not to worry. The banks know what is best. Such is the alibi of criminal coverup.
Obama must clean house and bring in law enforcement investigators to bring these fraudulent CEOs to justice. Then we must break up this dangerous center of unbriddled financial tyranny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 05/05/2009
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 18 fans permalink

Failed in the last quarter century? How do you figure that? There were high real interest rates in the US from the late 70s until the mid 90s. There were lower real interest rates in the late 90s but negative real interest rates in the 2000s, which was obviously bad. Also BTW there were low real interest rates in the 1970s until the last year os of the decade under Volker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 05/05/2009
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 18 fans permalink

There were also very high nominal interest rates throughout the 1980s and early 1990s.

http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/data.exe/feddal/rmgnb10m

The US didn't see low rates until about 1996. In late 99 and 2000 they went back up a bit, but from 2001 until now they've been low, very low at certain intervals. This has been a problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 05/05/2009
- nah415 I'm a Fan of nah415 7 fans permalink

And how do you account for all of the Option ARMS that are currently beginning to reset? If you look at the Credit Suisse charts, there's a bit of an ARMaggedon due beginning in October of 2009 and continuing on for more than a year. And approximately 140,000 NOD's were sent out in March with foreclosures usually following about months later, which suggests that in September the already-flooded real estate market will be adding a new wave of foreclosures to the current inventory. And unemployment is at record highs with no sign of change in the near future, which means many potential homebuyers won't have jobs or be able to afford all of those foreclosures, regardless of price, mortgage rate or tax refund.

By my own admission, I'm not good at math. However I don't see how the aforementioned FACTS add up to "recovery."

If anybody cares to enlighten me, I'm all ears...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 05/05/2009

When a loaf of bread costs a wheel barrow of dollars, then the GDP will look real good on paper. Ben made it clear he was talking about a recovery on paper only.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 05/05/2009
- veracity I'm a Fan of veracity 67 fans permalink

the post-Revolution ELITES (led by Alexander Hamilton & President Washington himself) ENFORCING the WHISKEY TAX, vs the Whiskey rebellion farmers & settlers Western PA, illustrates that there was ANOTHER force behind the Revolution besides mere 'taxes."
That Ben Franklin quote (below) about "we are responsible stewards creating our own money" should be far more well known than it is now.

HOWEVER, the supply of precious metals simply CAN NOT KEEP UP with an expanding human population - & thank god for that!
WHY SHOULD the measure of all human success be measured by some damn metal torn from the ground?
"Money" after all, is nothing but a medium of exchange for items people need - food, water, shelter, health-care, energy, & "luxury" consumables.

The reason the public tends to SUPPORT the FED RESERVE SYSTEM is that, when functioning correctly, it really CAN provide for an EXPLOSION in the production of goods & services - especially when enabled by technology.
(There was NO Microsoft corp. 20+ years ago!)
HOWEVER, as Thom Hartmann says, you can't have a LINEAR, growth-based system in a CLOSED CYCLE (circular environment).
There MUST be CONSTRAINTS on growth, but our "GREED IS GOOD!" political system DESPISES constraints. (We Americans are, after all, people who devoured an entire continent in just over 200 years.)
This was especially true at the height of the boom, when EVERYONE LOVED CHEAP IMMIGRANT LABOR, CHEAP IMPORTED GOODS, & ARTIFICIALLY PUMPED UP markets & bank balances.

THE PROBLEM is OVERSIGHT - & Mr.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 05/05/2009
- iamvalid I'm a Fan of iamvalid 8 fans permalink
photo

I only have one question for Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

Is this the legacy that you wish to leave for your family.

I was one of the largest financial sc.u.mn ba.g.s of the 21st century.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 05/05/2009

The Fed was created in the early 1900's by some very powerful banks. since that time we have had one "great world wide depression" in 1929, and now we are facing another more horrendous then you and I can imagine. Why are they still here? Why can't the Fed be dismantled? How powerful are these banks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 05/05/2009

also, prior to the creation of the Fed, the US had economic ups and downs, but never on the scale of 1929 or now, both being world wide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 05/05/2009
- Mikeeee I'm a Fan of Mikeeee 62 fans permalink

Not world wide? Benjamin Franklin would disagree with you. As would most of the founding fathers.

"The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of the colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the PRIME reason for the Revolutionary War."
Benjamin Franklin

Read, understand, be wiser.

http://www.villagejournal.org.au/article_shell.php?page=f_m2c_historys_hand.htm&issue=227&group=3

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 05/05/2009
photo

Year-to-year there were ups and downs, but in the long run, prices stayed fairly constant until the 20th century. Since the Fed, the value of the dollar has decreased by over 90%.

http://oregonstate.edu/cla/polisci/faculty-research/sahr/sahr.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:02 PM on 05/05/2009
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 18 fans permalink

THere were many depressions in the US before 1929. All of those were worse in most ways than now in the current recession.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 05/05/2009

I read a book lately, its called "How To Lie With Statistics"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 05/05/2009

one of the great truths of debating is you can prove anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 05/05/2009
- krm1255 I'm a Fan of krm1255 3 fans permalink

How is this going to happen?

I hear the banks still need capital, so as long as they need to beef up their balance sheets, they won't be lending at the rate they were.

Without the lending, how can business or consumers buy things?

It doesn't make sense to me based on what we've been told so far.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 05/05/2009
- Mikeeee I'm a Fan of Mikeeee 62 fans permalink

This the same fraud that was done in '06, '29, all of a sudden no money to be lent, but banks are buying companies for pennies on the dollar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 05/05/2009
- Beernuts I'm a Fan of Beernuts 5 fans permalink

Rigghhhtttt!!! The (W)elcome (S)uckers (J)oyously just announced the creation of 6 million living wage jobs someplace by somebody---somehow. As soon as those first paychecks arrive, everything will be just peachy-keen in economyland---just down the road from fantasyland. Elsewhere----still trying to figure out what happened to that 600 trillion $$$ in CDOs, CDSs, CYAs, GTOs & BYOBs.
Piracy on the high seas has nothing on these guys. And.....we shoot pirates don't we??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 05/05/2009

The difference between Bernacke and the bankers of the 1920s is character. They did not intentionally try to mislead the American people. Bernacke has no credibility. He must be replaced. If not, Obama will be fused with his disastrous give-away and coverup. The President better change course quickly or it will be too late. He should forget trying to influence the markets. He should try doing the right thing to restart our manufacturing and economic levers. Let the banks wallow in their own fraud. He is going to be judged on the amount of opportunity he opens up for the vast generality of Americans. Popularity for short term easy decisions will lose our future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 05/05/2009
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
photo

"Bernacke has no credibility. He must be replaced. If not, Obama will be fused with his disastrous give-away and coverup."


Better worry about your own credibility posting comments like that. Obama CAN NOT replace Bernanke.

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----

"He should try doing the right thing to restart our manufacturing and economic levers. Let the banks wallow in their own fraud."


There's a brilliant comment: thinking that one can restart manufacturing and economic levers by letting the banks fail!

I guess you think small and medium size businesses can survive without a credit line? Really?

How do they make payroll without a bank? How do they pay for deliveries, cash on delivery?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 05/05/2009
- Mikeeee I'm a Fan of Mikeeee 62 fans permalink

Obama CAN NOT replace Bernanke.

If you really believe that, then you don't understand what the FED is and what a fraud the "fractional reserve" banking system is.

If O does not dissolve the FED, then all other measures he wants to get done will fail in the long term.

Of course it's only the founding fathers who warned of the FED and it's predecessors, but who are they, what would they know?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 05/05/2009

Any big company can do it through a captive bank, any small one through a credit union. Problem solved.

As for the Fed Chairman's term, that's up in four years from Feb '06. But he CAN be asked to resign, privately so as not to cause a fuss. William Simon served for about a year for example (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._William_Miller). Simon got the Treasury Secretary position for his trouble, but in his hands the Fed did not help Carter out at all.

As for Bernanke's credibility, he came in as an inflation hawk and look at what he actually did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 05/05/2009
- KIVPossum I'm a Fan of KIVPossum 43 fans permalink
photo

With Bernacke and Geitner Obama proved he is not fully committed to becoming an instrument of change. More of the same, trying to fix the problem they helped create.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 05/05/2009

Obama wants to be all things to all people. He is a conservative when it comes to actions on the economy and a progressive when it comes to our ideas and talk about the economy--get that? He can't get rid of Bernacke and the last time someone tried to put an end to the Banks control of our economy through the Fed (the print our money too, unbelieveable! thank Naomi Klien and others screaming out there for teaching us so much on this subject, including Huffington) at the turn of the century, he was shot and killed (look up on internet for historical).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 05/05/2009

"We continue to expect economic activity to bottom out, then to turn up later this year," he told lawmakers.

I suppose that means he has secured a position with a sovereign wealth fund from another nation or with the world bank which begins in the fall?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 05/05/2009

The government has done nothing to revive the Economy.I see 1-2%GDP growth for 2 years.The Obama Budget is such a farce its pitiful.Not to mention the other wealth destroying programs coming down the pike.Universal Health Care,Card Check,and Cap and Trade will be the last nails in the coffin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 05/05/2009
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
photo

Hey stupi.d, We've seen GDP decline by 6% for the past 2 quarters, and has been declining for the past 17 months, and you're complaining about GDP growth?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 05/05/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect