New York Times Price Hike: Daily, Sunday Edition Prices Both Go Up

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - New York Times Price Hike: Daily, Sunday Edition Prices Both Go Up stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL LIEDTKE | 05/ 5/09 06:28 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

The New York Times is raising its newsstand prices for the third time in less than two years as a severe advertising slump forces readers to shoulder more of the costs of producing newspapers.

With the latest changes announced Tuesday, individual copies of The New York Times on Mondays through Saturdays will have doubled to $2 since July 2007.

The upcoming increase, effective June 1, will boost the Times' weekday price by 50 cents, or 33 percent, from the current price of $1.50. The Times, which has the third-highest U.S. circulation on weekdays, increased the weekday price by 25 cents during each of the previous two summers.

The New York Times also is raising the price for its Sunday edition, which is the nation's top-selling newspaper on that day. Sunday's national and Northeast editions will cost $6, an increase of $1. In the New York area, it will cost $5, also a dollar more.

Home delivery rates aren't changing for now. That means most of the Times' readers won't be affected by the June 1 increases because home delivery accounts for nearly two-thirds of the newspaper's weekday circulation and more than 70 percent of the Sunday circulation.

But the Times isn't ruling out an increase later this year, newspaper spokeswoman Diane McNulty said. The Times had raised its home delivery prices around the same time it increased newsstand prices in 2007 and 2008.

Raising the prices of newspapers is risky because it threatens to drive away readers, particularly as the Times and most other newspapers give away their stories on the Internet. The recession also has made many consumers more frugal.

But many newspapers have shown willingness to see circulation fall as long as they keep the readers most coveted by advertisers.

Story continues below
advertisement

Among other things, the Times and other newspapers have been cutting back on discounted and third-party sales. The thinking is that readers willing to pay higher prices could end up being more valuable to advertisers because they are presumably more affluent and more engaged with newspapers.

The average sales of 395 daily U.S. newspapers, including the Times, tracked by the Audit Bureau of Circulations fell 7.1 percent from last year during the six months ending in March, the biggest decline on record.

The New York Times' weekday circulation averaged 1.04 million during the six months ending in March, a drop of more than 3 percent from last year. Before the 2007 price increase, the Times' weekday circulation stood at 1.12 million.

Although many factors are behind the circulation drop, both USA Today, the nation's largest weekday newspaper, and The New York Post have blamed higher prices for recent declines in their circulation.

Despite the erosion, the circulation revenue of the Times and other newspapers is still higher that a year ago because the remaining readers are paying more. Higher prices helped lift the first-quarter circulation revenue at The New York Times Co. and McClatchy Co., which owns The Miami Herald and 29 other daily newspapers.

The flurry of price increases underscores just how much the shifting financial landscape has shaken newspaper publishers.

For decades, newspapers were able to rely on steady increases in their ad revenue to cover most of the cost for gathering the news, printing the information and then distributing the copies. A reliable flow of advertising is one reason the Times was able to go from 1999 to 2007 with just one increase in the cover price of its weekday edition.

But ad revenue has been crumbling throughout the newspaper industry for the past three years, forcing newspapers to lay off workers, reduce wages and look for new ways to make money.

So far the revenue gains from higher prices haven't been nearly enough to overcome the advertising drought.

The New York Times Co., which also owns The Boston Globe and 16 other daily newspapers besides its flagship publication, lost $74 million during the first three months of the year as its ad revenue plunged 27 percent from last year. Circulation revenue edged up by 1 percent.

With its newspaper prices rising and ad sales sagging, circulation accounted for 38 percent of the Times Co.'s first-quarter revenue. Most newspaper publishers still rely more heavily on advertising.

The advertising downturn has sent seven publishers with daily newspapers into bankruptcy protection since December and triggered the closure of the Rocky Mountain News in Denver.

The New York Times is raising its newsstand prices for the third time in less than two years as a severe advertising slump forces readers to shoulder more of the costs of producing newspapers. With t...
The New York Times is raising its newsstand prices for the third time in less than two years as a severe advertising slump forces readers to shoulder more of the costs of producing newspapers. With t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
107
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- eahce I'm a Fan of eahce 11 fans permalink

NO THANK YOU



NYT R.I.P.



Thanks Judith Miller for opening my eyes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 05/06/2009
photo

I'll just go online and ready the NYtimes

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 05/06/2009

I ouldn't afford it at $3.00 and now you're hiking it to $6.00? Great marketing strategy! Whoever is in charge should be fired!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 05/06/2009

The Sunday NTY is worth every penny!! Reading online is not, and could never be the same!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 05/06/2009

So true, you read the Sunday NYT and you feel caught up with all the news that happened on Friday.

Getting news online is entirely too progressive and convenient. Not to mention free. Besides, you might make jokes about current events that your newspaper reading friends might not get for a few days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 05/06/2009

Sadly, it's the LEAST up-to-date issue of the week. The fact that you can buy the NATIONAL edition at any Starbucks in Atlanta on a Saturday at around noon should tell you that there is NOTHING in that newspaper that is current! It wasn't worth $5 and it certainly is not worth $6. It is most definitely not worth every penny!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 05/06/2009
photo

now there is a good recession pricing strategy

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 05/06/2009
- dagnome27 I'm a Fan of dagnome27 8 fans permalink
photo

These guys just don't get it - I stopped buying it at $3.00 Why would I buy it at $6.00??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 05/06/2009
photo

I appreciate that the Times has a nearly legendary history as a source of information and influence. But I have never found it particularly readable - writing dense to the extreme and full of self-importance. I laugh at the TV commercials for the weekend edition out here hundreds of miles from NYC. We don't need to read what the Times has to say. There is plenty of information available from alternate sources. And I guess I'm just not vain enough that I need to visit the coffee shop Saturday morning with the TImes tucked under my arm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 05/06/2009
- GerryS I'm a Fan of GerryS 54 fans permalink
photo

OUCH---

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 05/06/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

I'll NEVER pay that much for any paper unless it has a $5 dollar bill stuck in it :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 05/06/2009
photo

The most expensive bird cage liner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 05/06/2009

What is the point of paying this kind of money for a daily paper, when the sunday edition is filled with nothing but full page ads? I will stay will the internet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 05/06/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

Thank you. At least I can pass up all the ads like I want to. I hate ads anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 05/06/2009
- BOin08 I'm a Fan of BOin08 7 fans permalink

Objective journalism died during the early 80's when journalism schools were flooded by left wingers looking to radicalize the industry and bring down another sitting President like Washington Post did over Watergate. I was in one of the few accredited Schools of Journalism during that time and every student , egged on by professors so left of center that they couldn't keep main stream media jobs, wanted to be the next Bob Woodward, but not for the love of gathering news and information, but for the power they would enjoy to shape and influence opinions that match their liberal agendas. Those same students are now in their late 40's-50's and running the likes of MSNBC, NBC, NY Times, LA Times, Newsweek, Time, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 05/06/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

And we are PROUD to have every last one of them. The rest turned out to be the losing repugs I suppose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 05/06/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

And we are PROUD OF every last one of them!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 05/06/2009

These people quit reporting the news a while back.They are Bias like the Media.That is also why MSNBC and Mainstream news have lost viewers.Look at the Obama Press Conference 13 questions from 13 Liberals.That is not reporting.I guess someone asked a ENCHANTED Question to further the disgust.Questions like (What was up with the 320 thousand dollar photo shoot) or( I don't think the Obama Budget or GDP Growth projection will even come close,what are you going to do) or (Cap and Trade will raise energy costs by $1000.00 a year,how will the poor pay for it.) or (How will our manufacturing survive with the highest corporate tax in the world,not to mention EPA standards,and energy policy). These are questions to be answered.The entire media should be waterboarded.FOX news is the only station reporting the news,and we people cannot rely on just one channel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 05/06/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

Everything can seem weird when you're looking out of crooked eyes. Bless MSNBC!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 05/06/2009

That is hilarious! Talking about crooked eyes while praising a news source that has crooked eyes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 05/06/2009

F-MSNBC!

THEY KIL-LED GORE AND ELECTED BUSH

0BOTTS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE REALITY OF RECENT YEARS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 05/06/2009
photo

Goo goo g'joob g'goo goo g'joob.
Goo goo g'joob g'goo goo g'joob g'goo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 05/06/2009
photo

Today's dollar is truly worthless. No wonder the Chinese don't want to be stuck with them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 05/06/2009
photo

They need to take a decidedly conservative view on things and they will become profitable in 6 months.

Guaranteed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 AM on 05/06/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

They would surely be flushed down the toilet if they did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 05/06/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect