Hatch: Kagan And Sotomayor Would Present "Real Dilemma" To Oppose

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Hatch: Kagan And Sotomayor Would Present "Real Dilemma" To Oppose stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

05/ 8/09 10:35 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Stevens Trial

A top Republican Senator on the Judiciary committee suggested on Thursday that two of the people widely believed to be under consideration for a Supreme Court appointment would present "a real dilemma" for his party to oppose.

During an interview with Scott Hennen, a conservative North Dakota radio host, former Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Orrin Hatch praised Solicitor General Elena Kagan for having a "brilliant" legal mind, and called Sonia Sotomayor, a judge on the second circuit Court of Appeals, a liberal but "tough prospect."

"You have to admit Elena Kagan is a brilliant woman," said the Utah Republican. "She is a brilliant lawyer. If he picks her, it is a real dilemma for people. And she will undoubtedly say that she will abide by the rule of law. Sonia Sotomayor probably the same thing."

On Sotomayor, he added: "She is very liberal... she is a tough prospect. She is not only female but she is a Latino. She grew up in the housing projects. She understands human hardship but she is extremely liberal, no question about it."

As for another potential Obama nominee, Diane Wood of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Hatch was not so kind.

"She is so sympathetic to issues like abortion rights that she even applied it in racketeering laws," he said.

The remarks provide new clues into how the Republican Party will approach some of key potential candidates for David Souter's soon-to-be-open seat on the Supreme Court. Hatch, who will play an influential role in the Supreme Court nomination fight, pledged to give "deference to whoever" President Obama chooses for the Court. But he also said he would oppose a nominee who stood outside the confines of mainstream jurisprudence or would use the post to pursue legislative goals.

"That's the way [liberals] can enact their loopy federal agenda that they could never get through the elected representatives of the people," he said.

The Senator again raised concerns that Obama had said empathy would be a qualification for a potential Supreme Court appointee. And when asked what he thought of the president's pledge to consider qualifications beyond traditional legal experience, the Utah Republican warned that "those are code words for putting somebody on the bench who doesn't understand the limited power of the role of judges in our system of government."

Hatch also whacked Obama for opposing Justices Alito and Roberts - a subtle sign that the president's votes on those Supreme Court nominees will be used against him this time around.

"When he voted against Chief Justice John Roberts back in '05, he said the judges decided cases based on their personal values," he said. "Well, no matter what are your personal values, that is opposite of the rule of law. He also voted against Judge Alito, now Justice Alito. You can't find two better people than Roberts and Alito. They may be conservative but they certainly were highly qualified."


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

A top Republican Senator on the Judiciary committee suggested on Thursday that two of the people widely believed to be under consideration for a Supreme Court appointment would present "a real dilemma...
A top Republican Senator on the Judiciary committee suggested on Thursday that two of the people widely believed to be under consideration for a Supreme Court appointment would present "a real dilemma...
 
Comments
130
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- Arvid0823 I'm a Fan of Arvid0823 2 fans permalink

Republican "opposition" to empathy means they will oppose any judge who supports A) choice; B) Gay marriage, c) Immigration. Any support of those three positions is "judicial activism". John Marshall was the first Judicial "activist" , when he staked out turf w Marbury. Roger Taney displayed republican "strict constructionism" with Dred Scott.

Seat Franken, then appoint Sotomayor (Sullivan or Karlan would be fine as well for the FIRST appointment -- Obama should have 3 -- maybe 5).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 05/11/2009
- Arvid0823 I'm a Fan of Arvid0823 2 fans permalink

I think Obama is truly astute for allowing the Republican wingnuts to rail against a non - existant nominee. /// Dan Quayle did himself no favors for criticizing Murphy Brown --- critics kept reminding Quayle that Brown was not a real journalist.
Obama is allowing the Repubs to cement themselves as the party of NO, waiting for Franken to be seated, then moving ahead.

I am sure the "expert short lists" (Sotamayor, Sullivan, Karlan, Kagan, Wardlaw, Sears et al) are competent justices (not a Miers Carswell, or Haynesworth in the bunch).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 05/11/2009
- openhand I'm a Fan of openhand 27 fans permalink
photo

Dilemmas dilemmas, every week a new set of dilemmas...sigh....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 05/10/2009
- floridafun I'm a Fan of floridafun 27 fans permalink
photo

orrin is no different than any other neocon religious zealot--thinks the courts should legislate "sin" according to/in favor of his own personal faith beliefs. uh...and isnt that the group the worthwhile republicans are saying its time to quit letting control the party?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 05/10/2009
- ranchero42 I'm a Fan of ranchero42 25 fans permalink
photo

Didn't they tell you he's a member of the LDS church? Sin isn't something they seem to worry about much, whatever the topic. What Hatch is doing is more of a party line kinda thing. Could be personal, but that would be like legislating against people having more fun than you (with a sour puss like his, it's an easy case to make).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 05/10/2009
- jinsei I'm a Fan of jinsei 21 fans permalink

"outside the confines of mainstream jurisprudence"

Well, Stare Decisis says that the Court cannot over turn Roe v. Wade unless there is a compelling and critically new reasons on which to overturn a precedent. It's very rare.

What's with these "code words." He acts like we're a civil law country, not common law, where judges must give meaning to laws where there is no meaning or the meaning is unclear. So the very nature of a judge's job is to JUDGE. God I hate these people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 05/09/2009
- WowJones I'm a Fan of WowJones 79 fans permalink
photo

The real problem for Republicans with these two picks are the demographics they hit, women and Hispanics, two groups they are already losing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 05/09/2009
photo

No one has any idea who the scotus is going to be, yet the right wing in their weakened state were able to get way ahead on this issue...Leaving Obama looking a bit amateurish.

Hope he can recover!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 05/09/2009
- obamagal I'm a Fan of obamagal 50 fans permalink
photo

That's an odd way of looking at it.
From where I'm sitting, the exact opposite is the case. The GOP look like a pack of wolves, making up arguments, looking very foolish and irrational. They are concocting flimsy arguments based on suppositions. Once again they are clearly demonstrating they have nothing to offer exception obstruction.... how well they deserve their title as the Party of No. True GOoPers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 05/09/2009
- obamagal I'm a Fan of obamagal 50 fans permalink
photo

Typo. Should read "nothing to offer except obstruction."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 05/09/2009
- WowJones I'm a Fan of WowJones 79 fans permalink
photo

You know what they got ahead of, a runaway freight train. They look like obstructionists without a cause.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 05/09/2009
photo

The Obama team can and should outFOX the Republican naysayers by "leaking" their "consideration" of the name of a conservative constitutional lawyer who has been highly critical of the Bush administration's arrogation of executive power, and openly called for Bush's and Cheney's impeachment, ridiculed the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court and sharply criticized Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez.. He has even criticized Obama for not prosecuting the authors of the torture memos.

No space here for details: you can read more on my blog at
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/profco/2009/05/outfoxing-the-republicans-on-u.php .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 05/09/2009
- Rog49Thomas I'm a Fan of Rog49Thomas 191 fans permalink

Orrin, I'm sure that if you reach a bit deeper into your delusional ideology, you'll be able to find a way.

It's times like these to reach out to a higher power than yourself for guidance.

Yes, I am referring to Rush.

Get on your knees Orrin and ask him. He will guide you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 05/09/2009

Why did Hatch had to mention that Sotomayor was raised in a pulbic housing and by the way "projects" is a derogatory word. Did they ever mentioned any background of the non-whites that have been nominated to the SC? He kept given the neocons the clue to oppose her too. He kept saying she is 'liberal". The GOP will be livid if Sotomayor gets nominated. An Arican American president and now a SC justice. The world will come close to the end for some of the GOP hate mongers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 AM on 05/09/2009
- plooger I'm a Fan of plooger 14 fans permalink

> "She understands human hardship but she is extremely liberal"

Hey, Orrin, these aren't mutually exclusive characteristics. In fact, they are complementary more often than not. Empathy and understanding human hardship are core characteristics of liberalism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 05/09/2009
photo

The GOP will oppose any non-conservative, especially if they are pro-choice and/or pro-LGBT. Being a liberal, for them, instantly means they're unqualified for the position because they'll be "activist" judges. Aren't Alito and Roberts activist judges for the right? Do they not base their positions on ideology first before the law? Just admit it GOP. Your party does't like liberal judges because it will destroy your remaining seats of power in the US government.

You are the party that is afraid of change. And apparently, a merciless, discriminatory, and cruel party too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 05/08/2009
- eleutheros I'm a Fan of eleutheros 5 fans permalink

Roberts is a corporate shill .... he only has "empathy" for everything his corporate masters desire. Alito ... he's a Catholic, ergo, no empathy for anything or anybody.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 05/08/2009
- avocats I'm a Fan of avocats 7 fans permalink

Interesting but not surprising that the Republican analysis begins with, "how hard will it be to oppose this nominee?" Not how accomplished is this nominee, how highly rgearded is this nominee, but how the heck can we block him or her?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 05/08/2009

If the GOP had any sense ....and I haven't evidence they do so far......they'll just support the nominee period instead of continuing to give the impression they oppose this or that "just cause"
.....there isn't a Republican in the White House.

Their poll numbers are down for a lot of reasons and I'm thinking not least that they continue to balk at every idea and act of Obama's, a democratically elected and generally popular president.

Guys...everytime you scream about Obama..by proxy...you're screaming at everybody who voted for him and people get tired of being opposed and screamed at.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 05/09/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect