Top Health Care Industry Reps To Offer $2 Trillion In Savings In Bid To Help Pass Obama's Overhaul: AP

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR and PHILIP ELLIOTT | May 10, 2009 09:00 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's plan to provide medical insurance for all Americans took a big step toward becoming reality Sunday after leaders of the health care industry offered $2 trillion in spending reductions over 10 years to help pay for the program.

Hospitals, insurance companies, drug makers and doctors planned to tell Obama on Monday they'll voluntarily slow their rate increases in coming years in a move that government economists say would create breathing room to help provide health insurance to an estimated 50 million Americans who now go without it.

With this move, Obama picks up key private-sector allies that fought former President Bill Clinton's effort to overhaul health care. Although the offer from the industry groups doesn't resolve thorny details of a new health care system, it does offer the prospect of freeing a large chunk of money to help pay for coverage. And it puts the private-sector groups in a good position to influence the bill Congress is writing.

Six major groups plan to deliver a letter to Obama and pledge to cut the growth rate for health care by 1.5 percentage points each year, senior administration officials said Sunday. They spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to sketch the offer before full details are revealed at a White House event scheduled for Monday.

Obama has offered an outline for overhauling the health care system, and he wants Congress to work out the details and pass legislation this year. His plan would build on the current system in which employers, government and individuals share responsibility for paying the cost and care is delivered privately. The government would play a stronger role by subsidizing coverage for many more people and spelling out stronger consumer protections.

"We cannot continue down the same dangerous road we've been traveling for so many years, with costs that are out of control, because reform is not a luxury that can be postponed, but a necessity that cannot wait," Obama said in prepared remarks the White House released Sunday. "That is why these groups are voluntarily coming together to make an unprecedented commitment."

The industry groups are trying to get on the administration bandwagon for expanded coverage now in the hope they can steer Congress away from legislation that would restrict their profitability in future years.

Insurers, for example, want to avoid the creation of a government health plan that would directly compete with them to enroll middle-class workers and their families. Drug makers worry that in the future, new medications might have to pass a cost-benefit test before they can win approval. And hospitals and doctors are concerned the government could dictate what they get paid to care for any patient, not only the elderly and the poor.

Story continues below
advertisement

Obama has courted industry and provider groups, inviting their representatives to the White House. There's a sense among some of the groups that now may be the best time to act before public opinion, fueled by anger over costs, turns against them.

It's unclear whether the proposed savings will prove decisive in pushing a health care overhaul through Congress. There's no detail on how the savings pledge would be enforced. And, critically, the promised savings in private health care costs would accrue to society as a whole, not just the federal government. That's a crucial distinction because specific federal savings are needed to help pay for the cost of expanding coverage.

Indeed, costs have emerged as the most serious obstacle to Obama's plan. The estimated federal costs range from $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion over 10 years, and so far Obama has only spelled out how to get about half of that. Administration officials would not say Sunday how much they think Obama's plan will ultimately cost, but they indicated they were confident it can be paid for.

A reduction of 1.5 percentage points a year in the rate of increase in costs may not sound like much, but administration officials said it amounts to slowing the current 7 percent annual increase in costs by about one-fifth. That's significant when health care spending keeps running far ahead of inflation year after year.

They estimated, for instance, that five years from now, such private cost curbs could save a family of four an average of $2,500 a year in health care costs.

Administration officials said they didn't expect all the saving strategies to be announced Monday, nor did they have access to specifics on how the groups reached their estimates and analysis.

But the initial reaction was positive.

"While serious questions remain about the details, AARP believes the agreement of providers to slow the skyrocketing cost of health care is critical for the health reform we are all working toward," said John Rother, policy director for the seniors' lobby. "Reducing the skyrocketing cost of health care is the only way to create a health care system that works for all Americans; after all, what good is access to a system that we can't afford?"

Ron Pollack, director of Families USA, a liberal group that supports coverage for all, said the health insurance industry came up with the target of a 1.5-percentage-point reduction. Karen Ignagni, president of the insurers trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans, took the idea to other major interest groups, said Pollack, who was familiar with the talks among the industry groups.

"If these cost savings are truly achievable, this may be the most significant development on the road to health care reform," said Pollack. "It would cut costs for families and businesses and enable subsidies to be offered so everyone has access to quality, affordable health care."

The groups include the American Medical Association, the American Hospital Association, the Service Employees International Union, the California Hospital Association and the Greater New York Hospital Association, which represents facilities in four states.

Obama's plan envisions that people would be able to keep the coverage they now have. Those working for big companies probably would not see major changes.

But the self-employed and those working for small businesses would be able to get coverage through a new kind of insurance purchasing pool. Called an "exchange," the pool would offer stable rates and predictable benefits. Plans in the exchange wouldn't be able to deny coverage to those who are sick and would have to follow other new consumer protection rules.

Lawmakers in Congress are generally following Obama's outline, but the Senate plan is likely to go further by requiring all Americans to carry health insurance, much as states now require motorists to carry auto coverage. Democrats hope to get legislation to the floor this summer.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's plan to provide medical insurance for all Americans took a big step toward becoming reality Sunday after leaders of the health care industry offered $2 tril...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's plan to provide medical insurance for all Americans took a big step toward becoming reality Sunday after leaders of the health care industry offered $2 tril...
Filed by Nick Graham
 
Comments
11
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- jpinsatx I'm a Fan of jpinsatx 3 fans permalink
photo

Hmmm… Health Care for ALL Americans is Simple!

By Utilizing Existing Systems...

1) MERGE Medicare with Medicaide into one single "Income Based" system for poor and elderly citizens.

2) REQUIRE insurance companies to provide the same basic coverage for ALL Non-Medica­re/Medicai­de citizens, regardless of health status, at affordable rates.

3) ALLOW insurance companies to "Profit" by offering additional benefits and options to those who qualify and are willing to pay the difference.

As for Funding…

1) Changing from an "Emergency Treatment" to a "Preventive Care" system will save local communities billions, maybe even trillions of taxpayer dollars!

2) Small business will be able to compete globally and hire additional taxpaying employees!

3) Wealthy seniors will pay their fair share!

4) The tremendous burden on future generations will be greatly reduced!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 05/25/2009
- RightsGuy I'm a Fan of RightsGuy 20 fans permalink

Top 15 Big Pharma Paychecks of 2008

1. Bill Weldon - Johnson &... - $29.4M
2. Miles White - Abbott La... - $28.3M
3. Bernard Poussot - Wyeth - $25M
4. Jim Cornelius - Bristol... - $25M
5. Richard Clark - Merck - $19.9M
6. Robert Parkinson - Baxt... - $16M
7. David Vasella - Novartis - $15.1M
8. Jeffrey Kindler - Pfizer - $14.8M
9. Frank Baldino - Cephalon - $14.5M
10. John Lechleiter - Eli Lilly - $13M
11. Fred Hassan - Schering-... $12.9M
12. Robert Coury - Mylan $12.5M
13. Werner Wenning - Bayer - $4.8M
14. David Brennan - AstraZeneca - $4.7M
15. Severin Schwan - Roche - $4.5M
Honorable mentions :
Gerard Le Fur - Sanofi-... - $3.3M
Andrew Witty - GlaxoSmi... - $2.7M

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 05/12/2009
- DrVeruju I'm a Fan of DrVeruju 4 fans permalink

Another con - another sell-out if it gets legs.

Check out http://ni4d.us/ for a way for citizens to influence legislation (a total waste writing to anyone in congress)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 AM on 05/11/2009
- Kalel I'm a Fan of Kalel 3 fans permalink
photo

If you're in the healthcare industry it's better to join in and have some influence than it is to have the inevitable change shoved down their throats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 05/10/2009
- Keo I'm a Fan of Keo 24 fans permalink

I am a doctor, in private practice.
Insurance companies pay me about 50% more now than when I opened my practice--27 years ago.
That's about a 1.5% increase per year. That's less than the rate of inflation. Less than the COLA rates the government pays certain of its employees. Less than the interest rates payed by banks. And WAY less than the increases we've seen in the costs of health insurance and hospitalization.
And the situation is no different for nurse practitioners, psychologists, or any other kind of provider.

Sure, I can often collect higher fees than what the insurance carriers determine is "fair" and "eligible," but my point is this: insurance rates have gone up 400% while the fees the insurance companies pay providers has gone up 50%. The raw costs of research and technology have NOT increased anywhere near 400%. Wonder where the 350% that they're NOT paying your doctors is going? Insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies are making OBSCENE profits. THAT's where it's going.

The obscene profits of insurance carriers and big pharma are what has been fueling the cries for a nationalized healthcare system. If people do not want socialized medicine, government absolutely needs to reign in and more tightly regulate the financial practices of these corporate hogs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 05/10/2009
- Hank007 I'm a Fan of Hank007 75 fans permalink

There was NO WAY the insurance companies were going to let Americans get better health care at the cost of their profits. Having a middle man who profits from people paying for coverage they do not get, corrupts the whole process. Why should citizens have a gun to their head, forcing them to buy a product from a company who's profits come from not delivering that product? These health company CEOs became billionaires by denying payment for medical services their customers paid for, and they do it because the fines they get charged with are a drop in the bucket. As long as there is no alternative to the insurance oligarchs, America will always have horrible second rate health care. I recommend everyone rent and watch Michael Moore's 'Sicko'. Having worked in health care around the world, I can say first hand, Americans are being duped yet again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 05/10/2009
photo

"Change comes slowly in D.C." -- Oh, really, Mr. President. Couldn't you pace it along a TAD more, pretty please? Why let the neoliberal corruption go on like this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 05/10/2009
- Waltfl I'm a Fan of Waltfl 46 fans permalink
photo

That's just a move to derail what everybody in the health care industry sees coming: Change. Do what most other countries do. Governmental health care with a governmental fee-schedule for rx and medical services. If a doctor, a hospital, or a pharmaceutical company doesn't want to participate in the governmental system, oh well, they don't have to, they still can treat the upper 1%, where money doesn't matter. Why do Americans have to pay $ 100 for a pack of pills that cost $ 20 in Canada $ 15 Europe, and $ 5 in the rest of the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 05/10/2009
- ncmom54 I'm a Fan of ncmom54 56 fans permalink
photo

NO! DONT DO IT! They could have done this years ago... how many people have died or gone bankrupt while 'the industry' raked it in. NO they had their chance, I don't care if they go under... a lot if working people have because of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 05/10/2009

Sorry. This is not anywhere close to Single Payer health care in which government and healthcare providers negotiate a reasonable price for services and costs are controlled. This is not non-profit health care in which only doctors and hospitals and drug companies negotiate for fair compensation. This retains the insurance company model in which 30% of what the consumer pays goes to profit and administrative costs. Those insurance companies must be getting desperate to set up a Massachusetts like plan with an "exchange" in which they all line up to accept new customers who are mandated to pay for their fees.

No way. Let's go for something like Medicare with a 3% overhead cost to administer the program. Let anyone buy a policy and help those who cannot pay the whole premium. If private insurance is so great, let anyone who wants to keep theirs, keep it. Health care for everyone! It is a right and not a privilege just for the affluent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 05/10/2009

What what happened to single payee National health care ? Why are we getting this water down crap again ? What happened to the employee free choice act ? watered down to nothing I feel like I just got kicked in the teeth

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 05/10/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect