Archbishop Rembert Weakland, Former Catholic Bishop Of Milwaukee, Says He's Gay

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Archbishop Rembert Weakland, Former Catholic Bishop Of Milwaukee, Says He's Gay stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

RACHEL ZOLL | 05/12/09 07:12 AM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
FILE - This Aug, 28, 2002 file photo shows retired Archbishop Rembert Weakland, at the Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist in Milwaukee, Wis. (AP Photo/Dale Guldan, Pool, File)

NEW YORK — A Roman Catholic archbishop who resigned in 2002 over a sex and financial scandal involving a man describes his struggles with being gay in an upcoming memoir about his decades serving the church.

Archbishop Rembert Weakland, former head of the Milwaukee archdiocese, said in an interview Monday that he wrote about his sexual orientation because he wanted to be candid about "how this came to life in my own self, how I suppressed it, how it resurrected again."

Called "A Pilgrim in a Pilgrim Church: Memoirs of a Catholic Archbishop," the book is set to be released in June.

"I was very careful and concerned that the book not become a Jerry Springer, to satisfy people's prurient curiosity or anything of this sort," Weakland told The Associated Press. "At the same time, I tried to be as honest as I can."

Weakland stepped down soon after Paul Marcoux, a former Marquette University theology student, revealed in May 2002 that he was paid $450,000 to settle a sexual assault claim he made against the archbishop more than two decades earlier. The money came from the archdiocese.

Marcoux went public at the height of anger over the clergy sex abuse crisis, when Catholics and others were demanding that dioceses reveal the extent of molestation by clergy and how much had been confidentially spent to settle claims.

Weakland denied ever assaulting anyone. He apologized for concealing the payment. The Vatican says that men with "deep-seated" attraction to other men should not be ordained.

In an August 1980 letter that was obtained by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, Weakland said he was in emotional turmoil over Marcoux and that he had "come back to the importance of celibacy in my life." He signed the letter, "I love you."

Story continues below
advertisement

The revelations rocked the Milwaukee archdiocese, which Weakland had led since 1977. He was a hero for liberal Catholics nationwide because of his work on social justice and other issues,

The archbishop, now 82, said he seriously considered the potential pain for the archdiocese of renewing attention to the scandal and thought about waiting "until I was dead" to have it published. But he decided to move ahead with the project.

"What I felt was that people who loved me as bishop here, when they read the book will continue to love me. The people who found it difficult, I hope will be helped a little bit by the book," he said.

In a sign of the deep emotions still surrounding Weakland and his departure, the Archdiocese of Milwaukee has released a public statement alerting local Catholics to the upcoming book.

"Some people will be angry about the book, others will support it," the archdiocese said.

Weakland also writes about his failures to stop sexually abusive priests. In a videotaped deposition released last November, Weakland admitted returning guilty priests to active ministry without alerting parishioners or police.

"Any deposition is just a part of a whole picture and that picture has not been painted yet. And anybody can take out of that any sentence they want," Weakland said in the interview.

"I try to deal with this, I hope in an honest way, admitting my weaknesses in not being able to see this earlier, but at the same time doing what I could confront it."

Advocates for abuse victims said that Weakland's cover-up of his own sexual activity was part of a pattern of secrecy that included concealing the criminal behavior of child molesters.

Weakland, a Benedictine monk, served in Rome as leader of the International Benedictine Confederation and also worked on a liturgy commission for the Second Vatican Council, which made reforms in the 1960s meant to modernize the church.

Weakland said he wrote in the memoir that he was unprepared for "how lonely it is" to be a bishop and how difficult it can be to get the "feedback and support you need."

U.S. Catholics have long debated whether the priesthood had become a predominantly gay vocation. Estimates vary from 25 percent to 50 percent, according to a review of research on the issue by the Rev. Donald Cozzens, author of "The Changing Face of the Priesthood."

Weakland said Christians needed to speak more openly about gays in the priesthood without the "hysteria" that often characterizes the debate.

The archbishop has been living in a retirement community near the Milwaukee archdiocese and plans to move to St. Mary's Abbey in Morristown, N.J., this summer. He said he was not bitter about how the scandal had eclipsed his decades of work in the church.

"I refused to let myself become a victim and refused to let myself become angry," he said. "I want to take responsibility but I want to move on."

NEW YORK — A Roman Catholic archbishop who resigned in 2002 over a sex and financial scandal involving a man describes his struggles with being gay in an upcoming memoir about his decades servin...
NEW YORK — A Roman Catholic archbishop who resigned in 2002 over a sex and financial scandal involving a man describes his struggles with being gay in an upcoming memoir about his decades servin...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
457
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)

He is a disgrace to my Catholic Faith! It is sickening and disgusting.
He is sticking the knife in and twisting it one last time!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

Let me translate happycruiser's comment for you all:

Je$u$ wants you to help the sick and the poor and the outcasts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 AM on 06/02/2009

arent they all ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 PM on 05/19/2009
- mydwyf I'm a Fan of mydwyf 20 fans permalink

I am wondering about Weakland's "failures to stop sexually abusive priests".
If he was raised as a Catholic then he could very well be a product of that self-perpetuating system.

It is naive to think that priests who seduce altar boys are not also in relationships with other men,
which sort of blurs the line between homosexuality and pedophilia.

Even tho it's not Politically Correct to say so.

My husband was in a man boy 'love' relationship with a family friend who was also in a relationship with my husband's father. This was an extraordinarily diabolical situation. Not religious in his case, but it has opened my eyes to how this sort of dynamic would function in settings like the Roman Catholic church. It is a time-tested way to initiate the boy into the 'secret society' of male homosexual behavior.

If Weakland is in good health, he should not be in a 'retirement home' with all his needs taken care of.
He should be working with disadvantaged, abused and damaged youth to stop this predatory cycle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 AM on 05/17/2009
- Jimmy121 I'm a Fan of Jimmy121 2 fans permalink

Human rights under Article 19
> "I have been poor my whole life, Now the midclass
> & rich can see how the poor & homeless live. You
> walk down the side walk thinking you're a lot better off
> than the poor & homeless are. You are saying to yourself
> that will not happen to me. I have a good job, nice home.
> People are one pay check from being homeless. I can't go
> to church & feel welcome churchs is a business love is real religion is not, I have been turned away from churches, Read the
> outlaw preyer on google.com by Johnny Paycheck its a true
> story in a song it happened in Ft Worth Tx. You midclass
> & rich have turned your back on us for years. Now you
> can see how it feels. Go live in the woods tell the city
> council, tells the police go out & run you out of town
> like it happens to a lot of us poor & homeless. The city
> council are the ones who hire the police to do their dirty
> work."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 05/13/2009
- WongChin I'm a Fan of WongChin 2 fans permalink

Dear Bishop,

Everybody deserves forgiveness for their misdemeanors if they repented, but it doesn't seem you have repented.

On being ordained priest, you took a vow of celibacy. You broke this vow, and the church rewarded you by elevating you to higher office while hypocritically marginalizing OTHER gays. You did not speak out all those years for gay rights until you were caught, disgraced for breaking your vow, and cashiered from priesthood.

Your book is worthless. The only interesting thing a Catholic priest--gay or straight--who broke the vow of celibacy they deliberately walked into, can write is "A Portrait of a Quintessential Hypocrite: How I Broke My Vow of Celibacy."

That is the issue; it is not whether you are gay or not. If you wanted to have sex to your heart's delight, you should have stayed away from the priesthood like millions of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 AM on 05/13/2009

The same can be said for virtually all organized religions. Religion is a thing created by man. Spirituality from God.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 05/13/2009
photo

I heard that water is wet, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 05/12/2009
- DumbDad I'm a Fan of DumbDad 32 fans permalink
photo

W. H. Auden
Rembert Weakland
Oscar Wilde
John Maynard Keynes

how can being gay be something to be ashamed of?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 PM on 05/12/2009
- SiberianRat I'm a Fan of SiberianRat 139 fans permalink
photo

Plato was too. And Gomer Pyle! :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 05/12/2009
- WongChin I'm a Fan of WongChin 2 fans permalink

I think he is rather ashamed of breaking his vow of celibacy, while perhaps helping the church advance its anti-gay cause. Instead of talking about these hypocritical issues, he is seeking to gloss over the main issue by associating himself with a marginalized group, in this case gays.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 AM on 05/13/2009
- rf dude I'm a Fan of rf dude 27 fans permalink
photo

Liberace - just adding some sparkle to your list, DD...
--

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 05/14/2009
- DumbDad I'm a Fan of DumbDad 32 fans permalink
photo

in an unprecedentedly mobile culture, the exclusive Catholic insistence upon a celibate and male clergy made the priesthood disproportionately attractive to two VERY DIFFERENT kinds of men: gays and pedophiles. A priesthood open to married priests would have been a lot less attractive as camouflage. How much did closeted gay priests have to do with the clergy's and the Vatican's united front against marriage of priests and against women? We won't know, but wait for this: married gay priests!!! That'll rock the Vatican for sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 05/12/2009
photo

Benin your logic is sooooo flawed. lol Your acting like the church can and wants to weed out perverts 100% all of the time and then assume God must call gays to the priesthood. lol You seem to forget the molesting teachers in the seminary and others in high offices who gladly pass these perverts on to the priesthood after they`re done with them. You`re logic would only be true if the church was 100% infallible................. which it is not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 05/12/2009

no, it's quite logical. I didn't say anytthing that the church has not said itself. Any priest will affirm it. the Pope himself is infallible in matters of faith and morals-- unlike any other human being on the planet.

and if you are oging to say the church is not infallible, then you are agreeing with me.

Unless you are saying that they are infallible when they agree iwth you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 05/12/2009
- wordvarc I'm a Fan of wordvarc 32 fans permalink

10-20% of all that attend seminary are gay...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 05/12/2009
- Clarabell I'm a Fan of Clarabell 65 fans permalink
photo

And aren't 10% of those on the "outside" also gay?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 05/12/2009
photo

No, most stats show that around 4-5% of people ID as gay. The 10% figure was due to some rearranging of Kinsey's figures (but he also showed around 4% of men being predominantly gay over their lifetimes).

There are higher numbers of gay men entering religious institutions compared to the general population. Not because they're automatically paedophiles (although there are undoubtedly paedophiles choosing that work for those reasons), but probably because it's a majority-male environment, and they can enter a "caring" line of work. Not to perpetrate any stereotypes about gay men being more caring, but they are possibly less likely to worry about appearing "unmacho".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 05/12/2009

Puleeze. This is nothing new. Many view the Catholic church as a haven for pedophiles or gay priests. That's why their flock are leaving and seeking other denominations. You can only hide for so long.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 05/12/2009

A man does not become a priest merely because he wants to. He must have a vocation, literally a calling to God, which is a charisma, a gift from God. Without this, he CANNOT be a priest. The church goes through a lengthy process to ascertain that candidates do have a genuine vocation, because many do not. The candidate must go through a tremendous amount of religious and psychological evaluation. And only after that may he be ordained.

We must conclude then that God is calling gay men to the priesthood, men considered by the church to have “an inherent tendency towards moral evil.” God does not apparently share the church’s view on homosexuality, as the Church itself is certifying that these people have the calling from God. To then condemn gay people as “intrinsically, morally disordered”, not worthy to receive the sacrament of marriage to another of God’s children, let alone be free of the Church’s disapproval and animosity, is either rank hypocrisy or stupefying blindness.

Probably both.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 05/12/2009

When you go into Christianity to pastor, you know the Word and beliefs of that church. Why take a job in the pulpit knowing full well what the Bible says? Don't become ordained then all of a sudden you announce you have committed an egregious sin against the teachings of that faith. No one's perfect, but I draw the line here.

Why would I join *I*sl*am knowing I could never be treated as a second class citizen as a female? Knowing that I have no voice before I ever join? That's ludicrous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 05/12/2009

I meant never being treated as a first class citizen but rather a second class one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 05/12/2009
- Clarabell I'm a Fan of Clarabell 65 fans permalink
photo

Look at the age of this man. If gays had been accepted in the prime of his life, he might have chosen another path.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 05/12/2009

In the Catholic Church it is not a sin to merely be a gay man. Rather, the Catholic Church believes it is a sin to act on those feelings. Since priests are supposed to be celibate, then by your logic, God must be calling them in order to remove their desire to sin. Since all humans (and therefore all priests) are tempted to sin, it is normal for a man with sinful desires to be called to the priesthood. Therefore, we must conclude that God is calling gay men to the priesthood, specifically becuase He considers it a sin. We must also conclude that, because of this, the Church is correct in its refusal to not marry gay men to each other.

Ok, enough of the false logic like yours. The reality is that the Church tries to weed out those who they feel are trying to "escape into the cloth". They are also not perfect in doing so. However, the Church does not preclude that these people could be called by God. The Church believes that God loves everyone. Contrary to your statements, there is no animosity for gays in Catholic teaching. A man who is oriented gay is just as worthy as a straight man.

However, the Catholic Church has the duty and the right to sanctify marriages as they see fit. That does not mean they get to set our country's definition of marriage, but they do get to define what a "Catholic marriage" is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 05/13/2009
- DrBillo1 I'm a Fan of DrBillo1 7 fans permalink
photo

poor catholics every time they turn around another scandal--but God made me do it!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 05/12/2009
- Democrab I'm a Fan of Democrab 19 fans permalink
photo

Right now, the church isn't wasting its time on accusations of child molestation and criminal coverups funded by the Sunday collection basket and faithful parishioners. The church has recently concerned itself with much more important matters, like President Obama's address at Notre Dame. The diocese dumps money into settlement payoffs that would ordinarily have gone to the needy and underprivileged children of the world. They're going to dictate morality and make the rules while they're covering up heinous acts committed by their clergy. The church continues to play republican politics along with the other Christian right control freaks in their 20 percent bracket of conservatism, and slowly sink into the mire of hypocrisy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 05/12/2009

The Catholic Church continues to pay republican politics ? The stance of the church predates the republican party by centuries. Further, you pass over the fact that the church has and continues to funnel billions of dollars to the needy and underprivileged of the world - you'd rather focus on the negative, which is your choice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 05/12/2009
- Democrab I'm a Fan of Democrab 19 fans permalink
photo

The church has used government as far back as the Inquisition and continues to do so. The negatives are their choice, I'm just venting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 PM on 05/12/2009

'The stance of the church predates the republican party by centuries.'

The hypocrisy, mayhem, and blind ignorance of the catholic church predates oh so many parties, by centuries.

No offense to personal spirituality and the well meaning acts of kind hearted individuals, but the negative, destructive, and traditional spasms of the church are not to be so easily dismissed by the paltry % of its gargantuan wealth that it shells out to proselytize the weak and ignorant, as it salves its cankered, rotting, and jewel encrusted carcass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 05/12/2009

The stance of the church used to be about Jesus - they've shifted - they emphasize topics that Jesus never said word one about, they are silent on Jesus's main themes - love, charity, judge not. They play Republican politics, focus on Republican's themes, rather than Jesus's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 05/12/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect