Obama Broke His Word On Detainee Photos: Chief ACLU Lawyer

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Broke His Word On Detainee Photos: Chief ACLU Lawyer stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-13-09 02:14 PM   |   Updated: 05-13-09 02:37 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Abuse

The lawyer pushing for the release of photographs showing the harsh treatment of suspected terrorist detainees said President Barack Obama was backtracking on his word and commitment to transparency by reversing course and objecting to the release of those photos.

Jameel Jaffer, a chief litigator for the American Civil Liberties Union National Security Project, described Obama's reversal as "very disappointing" during an interview with Fox News.

"It is inconsistent not only with commitments the Obama administration has made to us and to the courts but inconsistent with the promise of transparency that President Obama has repeated so many times," he said.

Jaffer, who has filed suit for the release of these photographs under concerns over civil liberty violations and possible detainee abuse, noted that the Obama White House still had a steep hill to climb in its efforts to suppress the release of the photos. Jaffer has won his case in the district court in New York as well as a three-judge appeals court. The Bush Administration, towards the end of its term, asked the full Second Circuit Appeals Court to review the matter. They refused to do so.

"At this point," Jaffer said, "the burden is on the government because there is a court order that requires them to release these photos. So they are either going to have to seek Supreme Court review or come up with some creative strategy to get yet another hearing below the lower courts."

"These photographs are critical to the historical record so it is very disappointing... that the administration is going to try and suppress them," he added.

The President announced that he would oppose the release of the detainee photos on Wednesday after what spokesman Robert Gibbs described as a long process of determining what was the best course of action. The president, he added, was concerned about the impact such photos could have on U.S. Armed Forces. A White House aide sent this explanation for the decision on condition of anonymity.

Last week, the President met with his legal team and told them that he did not feel comfortable with the release of the DOD photos because he believes their release would endanger our troops, and because he believes that the national security implications of such a release have not been fully presented to the court.


At the end of that meeting, the President directed his counsel to object to the immediate release of the photos on those grounds.

Yesterday, during a meeting at the White House, the President raised the issue of these photos with General Odierno and told him of his decision to argue against this release.

Through his actions from the first days of his administration, the President has made it clear that the United States will hold itself and all the men and women who serve our country to the highest standards of conduct.

The President would be the last to excuse the actions depicted in these photos. That is why the Department of Defense investigated these cases, and why individuals have been punished through prison sentences, discharges, and a range of other punitive measures. But the President strongly believes that the release of these photos, particularly at this time, would only serve the purpose of inflaming the theaters of war, jeopardizing US forces, and making our job more difficult in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

The lawyer pushing for the release of photographs showing the harsh treatment of suspected terrorist detainees said President Barack Obama was backtracking on his word and commitment to transparency b...
The lawyer pushing for the release of photographs showing the harsh treatment of suspected terrorist detainees said President Barack Obama was backtracking on his word and commitment to transparency b...
 
Comments
610
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
- DofG I'm a Fan of DofG 46 fans permalink
photo

It's unfortunate that too many citizens are not able to process these unlikable decisons in the context of Obama the man, his life story, convoluted with Obama the president. Obviously, our outrage, or lack of it, tends to revolve around "media speak"; the same media that found it convenient to ignore any idea that the "war on terror" was merely a pretext, given the history of the first Gulf War, and all that preceded it, and all that came after it. Where was all the scrutiny, and the outrage then?
Now we are left with not only with untempered Capitalism, but also an untempered news media, which mainly operates on behalf of its own self interest. Don't get me wrong. There is valid infomation to be gleaned from the news media. But unfortunately, it's like picking around some distasteful ingredients while eating a bowl of soup.
Look at this present avalanche of press coverage on Nancy Pelosi, who is as culpable to these war crimes as the Aflac Duck. But the media, egged on by the "republican'ts", will continue to suck on this story until they burp "bone marrow". But at the end of the day, all this mess will be up to Eric Holder to prosecute these crimes, not the media!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 05/15/2009
- AN2009 I'm a Fan of AN2009 4 fans permalink

That's a pretty lame excuse. For example, as a member of Congress, these war crimes occurred under Nancy Pelosi's watch. Since 2007, she has been the Speaker of the House of Representatives, which controls the expenditure of federal funds. In other words, the Democrats could have ended the Iraq War if they wanted to by refusing to pay for it. Both parties are guilty of wrongdoing, which is why neither side will do anything about it because if it does, then it would be implicated as well.

"That is why the Department of Defense investigated these cases, and why individuals have been punished through prison sentences, discharges, and a range of other punitive measures." Can we have more detailed information about this? I suppose the answer is no, huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 05/29/2009
- American50 I'm a Fan of American50 7 fans permalink
photo

Must be Bush's fault

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 05/15/2009

I can't totally see a reason for the release of more photos, but that's just at the present, i'm sure that down the line it would prove to be cathartic to have more photos released, however at this juncture I do not see how releasing these photos would best serve American foreign policy in the Middle East.

I think that the harangueing from the left is justified but yet not practical or pragmatic at this point. Will the release of more photos actually lead to convictions of high level officials? Will the release of more photos improve America's foreign policy attempts with the East? I think there are times when we have to take a step back and evaluate the outcome and how it would affect the standing of the U.S. foreign policy team and it's soldiers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 05/14/2009

I don't think the photos should be released to the public because the safety of our troops comes first. But they should be used to prosecute Cheney, Rumsfield, Bush and the rest of that crew.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 05/14/2009
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 125 fans permalink
photo

That is what Petraeus and some other top brass say, but with all due respect to their military expertise I'm not sure they know enough about psychology and geopolitics to be considered "experts" on the effect on foreign citizens of the release of evidence via government channels. The rationale I heard cited a 200% increase in violence in Iraq in the days after the Abu Ghraib photos were released -- directly by the press, answered by strong objection from the Bush White House, if I recall correctly. So we cannot simply assume a similar response to the willing release of different photos, even with similar content, by a *deliberately open government*. The analysis which concluded that release of these photos would put soldiers in even greater danger than they are already, omitted very important contextual differences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 05/14/2009

The main point for me is procecuting the Bush/Cheney crew. Everyone knows we tortured. Everyone has seen photos. If even ONE of our soldiers could be harmed because of additional photos being released, then don't release them. The terrorist will use new photos in their propoganda. I say don't move your eye from the real issue. It's a distractions that the repubs are loving.

The DOJ should use the photos to convict Bush/Cheney. Our troops have been screwed over enough. No more putting them in danger so people can see some pictures. I think their lives are worth more and with the prosecutions the truth comes out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 05/14/2009
- beachrose I'm a Fan of beachrose 2 fans permalink

You obviously know NOTHING about "terrorism" let alone psychology. Who are you to undermine the intelligence of the CIA AND General Petraeus? You would be willing to risk the safety of our troops AND our country just to provea point? Do you know anything about the real world? Have YOU ever had to make a sacrafice in your life for the welfare of others? I seriously doubt it! Your point is pointless in comparison. You need to get off your high horse, suck it up, AND GET OVER IT !!!. There are far more IMPORTANT ISSUES that should be taking precedent right now and that this administration needs to be addressing. I am pleased to see the President do the right thing and that he is finally listening to the right people. Otherwise, the CIA would have absolutely NO CREDIBILITY and neither would the President - and that would be far more damaging to our troops and our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 05/15/2009
- gcallaghan I'm a Fan of gcallaghan 52 fans permalink
photo

I half-suspect that this stance by Obama is a step towards a surprise for us and the world. Releasing the memos provided a great deal of evidence to prosecutors in Spain and other countries who want to investigate if the US chooses not to or can't due to political wranglings. The photos won't shed any new light on Bushco's crimes; they'll only become a rallying point for the rebubes.

I say just continue with the systematic forensic-delayering of who authorized what, when and how in sworn testimony. Justice won't be denied.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 05/14/2009
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 125 fans permalink
photo

It's *possible* that the release of more "photos won't shed any new light on Bushco's crimes" but you can't know that without knowing their exact content and number. Executive Director of the ACLU Anthony Romero explained last night on Hardball that the release of the photos *is* important because of information he's received from somebody in the military who has clearance to see them: there are over 2000 and they are *not* less horrific than those from Abu Ghraib already released to the public.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 05/14/2009
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 125 fans permalink
photo

What I suspect about President Obama's strategy is that he is slowing down the release of information, and every other process having to do with prosecution for Cheney and Bush's torture programs, so that more of the populace will know the true story before prosecution begins, and the "right wing" starts its inevitable disinformation campaign in earnest. The GOP currently has about 20% support of Americans for their party and their policies in general, but I guess a large number of former/recent Republicans just blame them for wrecking the economy but don't yet understand how they have wrecked our national security, because about 40% of Americans still oppose prosecution of torture, and nearly 50% believe torture is effective at getting the truth, not just at coercing the victim to say whatever the torturer wants.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/118006/Slim-Majority-Wants-Bush-Era-Interrogations-Investigated.aspx
But that is how water boarding really "works" according to every professional interrogator, and every thinking person who has experienced water board torture.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/12/jesse-ventura-coleman-a-h_n_202629.html
So, if the President's strategy is to maximize the number of citizens who know the basic truth before the Cheney/Bush war crimes trials begin, thereby maximizing public support for prosecution of their war crimes, I can understand and support that decision. We must prosecute Cheney and Bush, but averting a civil war is worth a couple extra months of procedural crap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 05/14/2009
- Diogenes08 I'm a Fan of Diogenes08 28 fans permalink
photo

Yes, the ACLU is necessary. Yes we need to find out if anything worse than what we've seen so far exists. But I do not need, nor would I particularly want, to see them personally. And I emphatically agree that Al Quida should not have further ammunition to use against our country or our troops.

Do the investigation, show all the existing photographs to the strong, honest men and women we have elected to represent us, and trust (yes, there's that word again) those men and women to do the right thing. But the general population of America and the world has no need nor business putting them on display to the peril of our country and our troops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 AM on 05/14/2009
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

Sound the alarm Obama broke his word he only realeased some of the photos granted they were the worse ones that he released but still its only SOME.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 AM on 05/14/2009
- felisa11 I'm a Fan of felisa11 23 fans permalink

what are you talking about?

The president hasn't nor does he have the right to releases any photos. He has requested that they not be released and the court will decide.

The first photos were sent home by military personnel. try to pay attention ok?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 05/14/2009
- felisa11 I'm a Fan of felisa11 23 fans permalink

No one depises the former Adminstration more than I do, but what is the big deal over additional photos. We already have lots of photos of torture.

Now we need facts. more investigations and war criminal trials! You all are focusing your attention on side issues.

Please stay focused, so the Bush thugs will pay for their crimes!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 AM on 05/14/2009
- Chip W I'm a Fan of Chip W 18 fans permalink

I have no position on this issue, but the ACLU is continuing to play its role, and I'll continue to support them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 AM on 05/14/2009
- talkitreal I'm a Fan of talkitreal 43 fans permalink

President Obama is NEVER going to put Hundreds of thousands of AMERICAN SOLDIERS in harms way for the sake of a few pictures! President Obama's grandfather was an AMERICAN soldier, President Obama who was raised by his grandfather, and spent his childhood hearing his grandfather's military stories, so President Obama knows what it is like to have a family member in a warzone, so President Obama is NEVER going to make a few pictures jeopardize the safety of the US MILITARY!
And I totally agree with President Obama!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 05/14/2009

Thank you Dick Cheney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 AM on 05/14/2009
- hotwire I'm a Fan of hotwire 22 fans permalink

That would be Baracks great uncle who was in the military during WWII, not his grandfather, and I doubt Barack even met the man.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 05/14/2009

How many times are you going to post the same freakin comments? Not just this one, you do it often. Enough already!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 05/14/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 606 fans permalink
photo

I agree with the ACLU. We need the truth and we need justice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 AM on 05/14/2009
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 125 fans permalink
photo

It appears that President Obama reached this decision with advice from the appropriate military experts, so for now, I don't object. I have read some of the torture memos, and I think we can convict Bush, Cheney and all involved legal staffers on the basis of the text only. But I am very concerned about the head of the ACLU's statement on Hardball tonight, that the number of photographs in question is in the thousands, and they are not less offensive than the previous Abu Ghraib photos. Crimes were committed and the description suggests these would have great probative value, demolishing the "few bad apples" myth and establishing that torture was a policy deliberately implemented by order of the Bush/Cheney White House. The United States is still obligated by national law to investigate claims of torture, prosecute those responsible and sentence them to prison -- all of them, not just the soldiers following illegal orders.

quote:
The President would be the last to excuse the actions depicted in these photos. That is why the Department of Defense investigated these cases, and why individuals have been punished through prison sentences, discharges, and a range of other punitive measures. But the President strongly believes that the release of these photos, particularly at this time, would only serve the purpose of inflaming the theaters of war, jeopardizing US forces, and making our job more difficult in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.
/quote

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 AM on 05/14/2009
- Prakosh I'm a Fan of Prakosh 189 fans permalink
photo

As Jonathan Turley said today, "Obama is morphing into his predessor."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 AM on 05/14/2009
- voltage356 I'm a Fan of voltage356 15 fans permalink
photo

As much as i like Turley, he needs to put himself in Iraq when they release their photos instead of sitting in a TV studio.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 AM on 05/14/2009

I love Rachel Maddow, but I must say watching her segment with Jonathan Turley was like watching a classic Fox type interview. Turley parsed the president's words and Rachel apparently agreed. Turley mentioned that president Obama is not releasing the photos because he believes it's embarrassing. Turley mentioned the president's national security reason also but did not expand on the full explanation given regarding the potental harm to our troops. Really thought I was watching a Fox segment on Hannity's show. One thing, I believe, that's sets Rachel and Keith apart from their Fox counterparts is that they present the full story, not chosen soundbites to support their point of view. But, it did not happen on last night's Rachel Maddow show. So sad, too bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 05/14/2009
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 125 fans permalink
photo

I was having the same reaction, until the close of her interview with Turley. Her last words to him are basically speculation that President Obama's *request* to the court to not release the photos has more to do with a political strategy than with a legal stance (what I think that strategy is, I've outlined above) and my take on the whole interview changed. Turley's career is Constitutional law, and I recall from previous interviews that he does not care for the political intrigue of Washington, D.C. His interest, and the only reason he is repeatedly invited to be a guest on the Rachel Maddow Show, is upholding Constitutional law. Rachel, on the other hand, was only speculating, and is not generally eager to take over an interview with her guesses. She only has a hypothesis about President Obama's strategy and she only mentioned it briefly. I almost missed it too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 05/14/2009
- WTF1956 I'm a Fan of WTF1956 3 fans permalink
photo

Hey, at least you're honest. Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 05/14/2009
- Dbos I'm a Fan of Dbos 23 fans permalink

Amen Democrats eating their young .Changing ones mind does not equate breaking your word .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 05/14/2009
- mgloraine I'm a Fan of mgloraine 25 fans permalink

He's not protecting "the troops", that's pure swill. He's protecting Cheney, Bush, and the whole Crime Family in exchange for "favors" from Cheney-Bush's fat-cat corporatist cronies. Truth and Justice don't pay as well as graft and kickbacks. What's right for America, what's right for the most people worldwide never enters into the calculation, only "what will get me money and power TODAY!?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 AM on 05/14/2009
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 88 fans permalink

He is protecting the American people from seeing the face their government shows the rest of the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 AM on 05/14/2009
photo

Oh please. Did the last set of photos get anybody on trial, besides the scapegoats in Abu Ghraib? And do you really think torture photos are going to unprotect the Prescott/C­heney/Bush klan? Silly, silly. Plus America has already proven that it doesn't learn from its mistakes, so what help will it be to publish past mistakes to the world? The world already knows we screwed up royally in Abu Ghraib.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 05/14/2009
- talkitreal I'm a Fan of talkitreal 43 fans permalink

President Obama is NEVER going to put Hundreds of thousands of AMERICAN SOLDIERS in harms way for the sake of a few pictures! President Obama's grandfather was an AMERICAN soldier, President Obama who was raised by his grandfather, and spent his childhood listening to his grandfather's military stories, President Obama knows what it is like to have a family member in a warzone, so he is NEVER going to make a few pictures jeopardize the safety of the US MILITARY!
And I totally agree with President Obama!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 AM on 05/14/2009
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 88 fans permalink

He is already putting hundreds of thousands in harms way by escalating war in Afghanistan.

Do you think 130 dead civilians does not put American soldiers in harms way. ?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 05/14/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect