"Planet Money" Reporter Paints Elizabeth Warren As Agenda-Driven

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - "Planet Money" Reporter Paints Elizabeth Warren As Agenda-Driven stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-15-09 12:12 PM   |   Updated: 05-15-09 03:42 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Meltdown Bailout

Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dilly and a half! Chittum calls the interview "cringeworthy," a "disaster," and, most appropriately, a "dismal example of bubble thinking." If that last blast reminds you of comedienne Tina Fey's explication on "the bubble" -- the safe space from which the privileged and coddled project their incompetence without concern for consequences -- you couldn't be more right! Check out some of this nonsense!

As Chittum details (and you may listen to the entire interview here) the entire foundation of Davidson's exchange is that Warren is fueled entirely by populist animus and cannot be considered a fair arbiter from the point of view of bankers. Warren objects to this premise, saying, "I just think you're wrong. I'm somebody who believes in free markets. The American middle class is under assault... basically since the 70's... I'm not an advocate. i don't get paid for anything. I'm an empiricist. I'm data driven."

The "bubble thinking" then starts in earnest:

DAVIDSON: I think you're well known... as someone whose work points to a conclusion that banks and credit-card companies are giving a raw deal to consumers -- I think it would not be terribly hard to find people who would agree with you -- that your work is in opposition to the banks.


WARREN: If you don't have somebody who cares about American families, then they don't have a seat at the table in this debate. I think this point is really important. We have a little tight insider world who understand exactly what synthetic derivatives are. My job in this world is to make sure that when these enormous profound decisions are being made, that the American family is there. That they are part of that process... because the decisions that are made will be different.

And that's exactly right! Ordinary Americans don't understand the world of synthetic derivatives. This is precisely the sort of thing that gets discussed in the business press entirely from the perspective of clucking, cliquish, insiders. This is precisely why Julie Satow and I did a video that started to scratch the surface of what derivatives are. Since we did so, by the way, people have sent us emails, thanking us, but there's no need to do that! The derivatives market exploded and landed on everyone's head, and people are entitled to know why that happened. Ordinary people deserve answers! I believe that journalists are obligated to at least attempt to provide them! And Elizabeth Warren simply agrees with that contention. Bully for her!

But, wow, Adam Davidson? He is simply NOT OF THIS EARTH. Read this nonsense!

DAVIDSON: The American families are not -- These issues of crucial, the essential need for credit intermediation are as close to accepted principles among every serious thinker on this topic. The view that the American family, that you hold very powerfully, is fully under assault and that there is -- and we can get into that -- that is not accepted broad wisdom. I talk to a lot a lot a lot of left, right, center, neutral economists [and] you are the only person I've talked to in a year of covering this crisis who has a view that we have two equally acute crises: a financial crisis and a household debt crisis that is equally acute in the same kind of way. I literally don't know who else I can talk to support that view. I literally don't know anyone other than you who has that view, and you are the person [snicker] who went to Congress to oversee it and you are presenting a very, very narrow view to the American people.


WARREN: I'm sorry. That is not a narrow view. What you are saying is that it is the broad view to think only about trying to save the banks [Davidson sputters] and say "Hey! the American economy will recover at some point and we'll worry about the families [Davidson talking over]." I think that is the narrow view and I think I have the broad view. The broad view is that these two things are connected to each other. And the notion that you can save the banking system while the American economy goes down the tubes is just foolish.

Davidson seriously DOES NOT BELIEVE there is an acute household debt crisis? Isn't household debt at the very root of the subprime mortgage crisis? Isn't the issue of household debt at the very root of the health care crisis? For years, major industries have depended on American consumers being willing to drive themselves deeper and deeper into debt in order to keep spending and spending and spending. And those same inducements were made in the mortgage market, the same false dreams, sold by the same insiders, who can't be bothered to explain what synthetic derivatives are to ordinary people.

But now, those mortgages are resetting, and, unsurprisingly, tons of people are defaulting on them. And those that will avoid default will only do so by vastly curtailing spending. They won't be buying that new car, or that new furniture, or the cool new gadget, or going on vacation. This is going to cause the market to reel. And beyond avoiding future debt, households will start paying down their debt as well. They'll look to get out from under their credit card burden -- and the threat of zeroing those balances is causing the credit card companies to retaliate by lowering credit limits and jacking up interest rates. This is precisely the "assault on the middle class" that Warren describes. All of this ENTIRELY ELUDES Davidson, who is straight up livin' in that bubble!

Planet Money might want to think about returning to our own solar system, maybe!

UPDATE: It has been pointed out that since this interview occurred, Davidson has apologized for the overall tenor of this interview, which seems pretty appropriate!

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dill...
Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dill...
 
Comments
406
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (13 pages total)

The American people cannot afford to sit back and think anyone is going to protect their interests in this. The president, the Treasury, and the Supreme Court and the Senate have sold their souls to the financial markets. You better wake up and learn what this is all about and learn how to fight it. There is no one 'taking care of this for you'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 05/19/2009

Ms. Warren seems like a very nice, very intelligent person, but I get the feeling that her role as TARP "overseer" has no real power. It seems that her main function is to make the public think that someone in Washington, DC has some common sense and will stand up for them. But after she has her say on TV or at some committee meeting, congress and administration officials go right ahead and do what they want to do, making life easier for the rich and greedy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

It would depend on what powers she has as overseer of TARP. Anyone know?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 05/19/2009
photo

great article. this Warren lady is on point. hopefully she will attain more power in the future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 05/18/2009

In this brief excerpt, Davidson does not come across as someone who has ever studied economics. A person who could suggest that there is a credit crisis, but not a debt crisis, does not even know the basics of accounting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 05/18/2009
- AngieMom57 I'm a Fan of AngieMom57 68 fans permalink
photo

Elizabeth Warren is absolutely correct...

Do we, the middle class, want to continue this roller coaster ride of bubble and bust?

REVOLUTION.

Stop working, stop spending.

Let the rich clean their own bathrooms.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 05/18/2009
- RandVictims I'm a Fan of RandVictims 105 fans permalink
photo

This is the reason the rest of the world is turning to Socialism. This country turned into a large debtors prison and those who steal from the poor still have the bully pulpit.

Major, MAJOR reform of electronic news media is badly needed for this country to move on. The bankers who are stealing and oppressing own the major networks and they are still doing a great job of manipulating the ill-informed in this country (and Fox News should be nuked)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 AM on 05/18/2009

Davidson calls himself a report and yet instead of asking questions and listening, he is giving his opinion and all flustered and emotional about it and almost interviewing himself. In no way does he exhibit professionalism. Way to produce whacky reports, NPR.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 AM on 05/18/2009
- sc92705 I'm a Fan of sc92705 5 fans permalink

Obama needs to get his war paint on and declare war on exploding unemployment. If you look at it honestly we're at ~ 20% unemployment. The rest is colored bubbles as far as I'm concerned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 AM on 05/18/2009
photo

The question is: even if Davidson is right - if we can fix the banks without helping the American family - why should we?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 05/17/2009
photo

Good point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 05/19/2009
- mcostello I'm a Fan of mcostello 7 fans permalink

I love Elizibeth Warren.
In my dream about what Obama could have been, he would have been surrounded by such people as Elizibeth Warren with her actual deference to the importance of the middle class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 05/17/2009

I love Elizabeth Warren.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 05/17/2009
photo

1. A TRULY FAIR CAPITALISTIC SYSTEM needs leaders drawn from new soil, NOT People with obligations to Wall St but knowledgeable like WARREN+Kru­gman+Stigl­itz and others, possessing extensive knowledge!

2. Obama has delegated Regulatory Reform to the FED and Treasury who put us in this CRISIS!

3. Define a New and Improved Model of Capitalism that Moves from Leveraged Capitalism to Meritorious Capitalism:

--Stop Current Leveraging Capitalism=Rewards Wrongdoing­=Apocalyps­e in Two Decades
--Create Meritorious Capitalism­=Sustainab­le+Profit Oriented+Clean Environmen­t+Prosperi­ty
--Best Model of Capitalism­=formulate­d to resistant elite manipulati­on+injusti­ce+foster tranquility
--Reward Individuals for Income Appreciati­on=Profits­+Public Good as proper model of capitalism
--Where are True Reformers=­Intellectu­al honesty demands redesign of Corporations
--Redesign of Corporatio­ns=facilit­ate broad populace fair participat­ion+sustai­nably+prof­itability

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 05/17/2009
- elpollo I'm a Fan of elpollo 3 fans permalink

I use to download the Planet Money podcast. But as I have become more knowledgeable about macroeconomics (from other sources I must add), it has become like listening to children playing in a sandbox. They rely so heavily on "conventional wisdom" which is either stupidity or spin, designed to part you with your money. Fortunately, I caught onto this early in the game and was actually able to increase my retirement savings through this crisis. NPR should regard them as an embarrassment. This interview indicates that they seem to be transforming from cute but misguided children to malicious children. Elizabeth Warren is unfortunately the only high visibility appointee the government ( Congress) has made in the economic sphere with any ethical credibility. The rest (Summers, Geithner, et. al.) are moral lepers and Wall Street prostitutes who actually engineered the destruction of our economy. If you want information that can help you from being parted from your savings by the Wall Street oligarchs, check out theautomat­icearth.co­m. They saved my butt and gave me an education.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 05/17/2009

As someone who saw this lady interviewed on Friday by Bill Maher, I would hardly think she has a preconceived agenda. She does, however, have a sense of what is right and what is wrong--and what has been happening for too long has been wrong. I am grateful to her for her service and her dedication to the concept of the ombudsman. She is our ombudsman in every fashion. Thanks should be given to this lady for her work. It is the reporter that appears to have an agenda in this interaction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 05/17/2009
photo

One of her preconceived agendas was bank nationalization. That is why her committee is fractured.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 05/17/2009
- HisPetGoat I'm a Fan of HisPetGoat 56 fans permalink
photo

I'll take academics over politics any day, but that's not our way, is it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 05/17/2009
- HisPetGoat I'm a Fan of HisPetGoat 56 fans permalink
photo

P.S. Maybe the world's nuclear arsenal could be disarmed by a public vote on whether E should =mc^2.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 05/17/2009
- digoweli I'm a Fan of digoweli 4 fans permalink

I just listened to the whole interview. I've also seen her Charley Rose and Bill Maher interviews and read her Frontline interview from 2004. Frankly I enjoyed this interview immensely. I liked that the interviewer gave her an excuse to really dig and answer seriously. Something that I didn't find in the other interviews. I'm sympathetic with their points of view but this man did IMHO a good job of getting serious discussion out of this serious female thinker. Something that should give Larry Summers nightmares.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 05/17/2009

NPP is a tool of big business

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 05/17/2009
- Camel54 I'm a Fan of Camel54 19 fans permalink

Yeah, the way NPR relies on the donations of individuals1000:1 over business underwriters puts them squarely in the back pocket of big business. Do you even know what NPR is?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 05/18/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect