Iraq Elections Pushed To January, Complicating US Withdrawal Plans

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Iraq Elections Pushed To January, Complicating US Withdrawal Plans stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT H. REID | May 18, 2009 02:26 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

BAGHDAD — National parliamentary elections will be held Jan. 30, Iraqi officials announced Monday, sliding the date into next year in a move that could complicate the U.S. timetable for drawing down its forces.

The new parliament will choose a prime minister and Cabinet, a process that could take months. A long and turbulent delay in setting up a new government could force President Barack Obama to revise his goal of removing most of American troops from Iraq by the end of August 2010.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki will be hoping to build on his success in last January's provincial balloting to form a strong government capable of dealing with the security and economic challenges facing this country as the American role fades.

But a recent spate of deadly bombings in Baghdad has tarnished his image, and the threat of more violence could rise as U.S. forces redeploy outside of urban areas by June 30 as scheduled.

The election for the 275-member parliament had been expected in December, four years after the current assembly was chosen. But the current parliament did not hold its first session until March 2006, or about three months after the December 2005 election.

Deputy parliament speaker Khalid al-Attiyah said the Federal Court ruled that the current mandate lasts until March 2010 and selected a date 45 days before the expiration.

Some Iraqi politicians had suggested delaying the election for up to a year, giving the prime minister's Shiite and Sunni rivals who did not fare as well in the provincial elections more time to regroup. Al-Maliki opposed a lengthy delay.

Timing of the election is critical to Obama's plan to end the American combat role in Iraq next year and withdraw most of the 135,000 U.S. troops by September 2010.

Story continues below
advertisement

Obama accepted a recommendation by U.S. officials in Baghdad to maintain substantial military forces in Iraq until after the election to help guarantee a safe ballot.

Once the vote is over, the U.S. expects to speed up the troop withdrawal, leaving between 30,000 and 50,000 soldiers here after September 2010 to train Iraqi forces and provide logistical and other support.

All U.S. troops are due to leave Iraq by the end of 2011 under terms of the U.S.-Iraq security agreement that took effect this year.

But Iraq's political parties are deeply fragmented. An inconclusive election outcome, with no party winning a commanding number of seats, could lead to protracted negotiations where the makeup of the new government remains unclear.

Following the December 2005 election, Iraq's sectarian and ethnic-based parties took more than five months to agree on a prime minister and Cabinet.

If the process is delayed again and punctuated by violence, it could force the Obama administration to slow the drawdown to help keep order and maintain leverage with the Iraqis to make political compromises.

Al-Maliki, a Shiite who completes three years in office this week, is hoping for a stronger mandate to forge ahead with what he says would be a unity government that includes all of Iraq's ethnic and religious groups.

But the provincial elections showed the lingering sectarian character of Iraqi politics, with many Shiites and Sunnis voting for candidates based on religion.

Voters in the three-province Kurdish self-ruled region did not take part in the January balloting and instead will choose provincial officials in July.

The provincial election had to be postponed indefinitely in the Kirkuk area because of tension among rival ethnic groups.

Overcoming sectarian rivalries and maintaining the improved security of the past two years will be the two most significant challenges for al-Maliki as he seeks to strengthen his power.

Although al-Maliki emerged from the provincial election stronger, his re-election as prime minister is by no means assured.

The broad Shiite political alliance has virtually ceased to exist following the withdrawal of major blocs and because of the sharp differences between al-Maliki and the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council over numerous security and political issues.

The council fared poorly in the provincial elections, and al-Maliki has not responded to its call for a new coalition to run in the national balloting.

In other developments Monday, Iraqi television aired partial footage of the interrogation of a man it says is Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, leader of the al-Qaida front group, the Islamic State of Iraq. The government says it arrested al-Baghdadi on April 23.

A speaker who identified himself as al-Baghdadi denied the arrest in an audio message posted last week on a militant Web site.

The man on the grainy video shown Monday said his real name was Ahmed Abed Ahmed Khamees al-Mujamaie, born in 1969 in Diyala province north of Baghdad. He said al-Qaida in Iraq relied for funding on money sent by charities in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Syria as well as from robberies carried out inside Iraq.

He said the group was responsible for the 2006 bombing of a revered Shiite shrine in Samarra north of Baghdad that sparked sectarian Shiite-Sunni killings that claimed thousands of lives. He also suggested the group cooperated with Saddam Hussein's now-banned Baath party.

The U.S. military has not confirmed al-Baghdadi's arrest. Past Iraqi claims to have captured or killed al-Baghdadi turned out to be wrong. The U.S. has even said al-Baghdadi was simply an actor used by the terror movement to give an Iraqi face to an organization dominated by foreign al-Qaida fighters.

___

Associated Press Writer Qassim Abdul-Zahra contributed to this report.

BAGHDAD — National parliamentary elections will be held Jan. 30, Iraqi officials announced Monday, sliding the date into next year in a move that could complicate the U.S. timetable for drawing ...
BAGHDAD — National parliamentary elections will be held Jan. 30, Iraqi officials announced Monday, sliding the date into next year in a move that could complicate the U.S. timetable for drawing ...
Filed by Jessica Gusman
 
Comments
7
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- KCFreedom I'm a Fan of KCFreedom 18 fans permalink

We don't really ever plan to leave there. This is all a ruse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 AM on 05/19/2009

This is Iraq, everything happens late. The parliamentary elections were supposed to happen in July 08, didn't happen until Jan. 09. I don't think violence will go up as the elections near. If things follow the pattern of the provincial elections, attacks and deaths will actually drop down dramatically as Sunnis will come out in large numbers and the insurgents will accomodate them by holding off. The delay of course, will prolong the U.S. withdrawal, but not by much. The real issue is what will Maliki do. He wants to forge a new ruling coalition but has failed to pull it together after the parliamentary elections. He may actually be deposed or be forced to compromise with them in the end. That's what people should look out for. musingsoni­raq.blogsp­ot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 05/18/2009
- gevan I'm a Fan of gevan 18 fans permalink

Just why our withdrawal has to be tied to the Iraqi's election plans is beyond me. As long as we act as the crutch for the security in Iraq we have failed in our objective. We should get out by January 31 and not putz around with all the locals' nonsense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 05/18/2009
- MikeDu I'm a Fan of MikeDu 147 fans permalink
photo

"...Complicating U.S. withdrawal plans"' my aunt fanny.
All you have to do to get out of Iraq is gas-up your humvees and get on the road to Kuwait.

I'm somehow reminded of a firebrand anti-globalization speech given by then-candidate Edwards. As he leaves the stage an aide is overheard asking him how he could make such a speech when he's got a 100% open trade voting record. Edwards is reported to have answered " THEY don't know that!"
I'm getting the sinking feeling we've been played for a fool by Obama on Iraq. He's going to have to do SOMETHING to prove he isn't Bush-2 on Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 05/18/2009
- zaz33 I'm a Fan of zaz33 32 fans permalink

1. Elections being pushed back.

2. Agenda serving bombs (suspicious)

3. Our Grand Daughter's husband shipped out to Iraq 2 weeks ago.

This has the odor of a permanent occupation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 05/18/2009
- Ergon I'm a Fan of Ergon 76 fans permalink
photo

Pray that your grand daughter's husband returns home safely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 05/18/2009
- murphy80 I'm a Fan of murphy80 9 fans permalink

this is the third failure today for Obama and his plans

no elections

no pay caps for crooks

no mid east progress

three up, three down......­..........­....send him back to the minor leagues

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 05/18/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect