White House Plans First-Ever Emission Limits For Cars, Trucks

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - White House Plans First-Ever Emission Limits For Cars, Trucks stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

KEN THOMAS and PHILIP ELLIOTT | May 18, 2009 09:51 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Dr. Shelley Jones removes the nozzle from her car after getting gas at a Valero station in Sacramento, Calif., Tuesday, May 12, 2009. Retail gas prices rose again overnight and are now up nearly 40 percent from the start of the year, while the price for crude on Tuesday topped $60 a barrel for the first time since early November.(AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to propose the first-ever national emission limits for cars and trucks as well as average mileage requirements of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016 _ all costing consumers an extra $1,300 per vehicle. Obama's plan couples for the first time pollution reduction from vehicle tailpipes with increased efficiency on the road. It would save 1.8 billion barrels of oil through 2016 and would be the environmental equivalent to taking 177 million cars off the road, senior administration officials said Monday night.

The plan also would effectively end a feud between automakers and statehouses over emission standards _ with the states coming out on top but the automakers getting a single national standard and more time to make the changes.

The plan still must clear regulatory hurdles at the Environmental Protection Agency and the Transportation Department. The administration officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because the formal announcement by Obama was scheduled for Tuesday.

New vehicles would be 30 percent cleaner and more fuel efficient by the end of the program, according to officials familiar with the administration's discussions. The officials also spoke on condition of anonymity because the formal announcement had not been made.

Administration officials said consumers were going to pay an extra $700 for mileage standards that had already been approved. The comprehensive Obama plan would add another $600 to the price of a vehicle, a senior administration official said.

The extra miles would come at roughly a 5 percent increase each year. By the time the plan takes full effect, at the end of 2016, new vehicles would cost an extra $1,300.

The cost would be recovered through savings at the pump for consumers who choose a standard 60-month car loan if gas prices follow government projections, according to one official.

In a battle over emission standards, California, 13 other states and the District of Columbia have urged the federal government to let them enact more stringent standards than the federal government's requirements. The states' regulations would cut greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent in new cars and trucks by 2016 _ the benchmark Obama planned to unveil for vehicles built in model years 2012 and beyond.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Obama plan gives the states essentially what they sought and more, although the buildup is slower than the states sought. In exchange, though, cash-strapped states such as California would not have to develop their own standards and enforcement plan. Instead, they can rely on federal tax dollars to monitor the environment.

A 2007 energy law requires carmakers to meet at least 35 mpg by 2020, a 40 percent increase over the current standard of about 25 mpg. Passenger car requirements have remained unchanged at 27.5 mpg since 1985, drawing complaints from environmental groups that the government has been slow to push automakers to produce more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The auto industry will be required to ramp up production of more fuel efficient vehicles on a much tighter timeline than originally envisioned. It will be costly; the Transportation Department last year estimated that requiring the industry to meet 31.6 mpg by 2015 would cost nearly $47 billion.

But industry officials _ many of whom are running companies on emergency taxpayer dollars _ said Obama's plan would help them because they would not face multiple emissions requirements and would have more certainty as they develop their vehicles for the next decade.

"For us, that clarity, not having to address a patchwork of conflicting laws and regulations across our country, is a significant win," said David McCurdy, a former Oklahoma congressman who leads the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group which represents 11 vehicle manufacturers.

Auto executives, including General Motors Corps. CEO Fritz Henderson, and executives from Ford Motor Co., Toyota Motor Corp., Honda Motor Co., Daimler AG and others planned to attend the White House event. United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger also planned to attend.

Henderson said the automaker, which faces a June 1 deadline by which it may be forced to file bankruptcy, was "fully committed" to the administration's approach. His company and Chrysler LLC have received billions in government loans during a dramatic downturn in car sales and weakened economy.

Toyota Motor Sales USA President James Lentz also issued a statement in support of the single benchmark.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, praised the move, which allows him to declare victory on policy and dodge a tricky budget question on how to pay for it.

"Today, we're seeing what happens when California leads on energy and the environment and doesn't waiver, doesn't get bogged down, doesn't let obstacles get in the way," Schwarzenegger said.

It also provides a reason for Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat who is being considered for the Supreme Court vacancy, to visit the White House. Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs said Granholm's visit was primarily for the autos event but wouldn't comment if she would meet with Obama about the soon-to-be-vacant court position.

A March 2008 decision prevents states from setting their own limits on greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles, but Obama has ordered the EPA to reconsider the ruling.

The EPA was already working toward establishing federal greenhouse gas emissions standards for new motor vehicles when it made a preliminary determination in April that six greenhouse gases _ four of which are released from automobiles _ endanger human health and welfare.

Before the new Obama proposals would even have a chance at being implemented, the EPA would have to approve those findings. Hearings began on Monday.

___

Associated Press writers Ben Feller and Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to propose the first-ever national emission limits for cars and trucks as well as average mileage requirements of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016 _ all co...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to propose the first-ever national emission limits for cars and trucks as well as average mileage requirements of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016 _ all co...
Filed by Marcus Baram
 
Comments
124
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Isn't it great? Obama now is going to tax the little guy he said he wasn't going to tax by 1300 dollars a vehicle. Take a look at my blog to see what your next vehicle might look like.

http://mark24609.blogspot.com/2009/05/lets-just-finish-off-auto-industry-once.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 AM on 05/20/2009
- bannorhill I'm a Fan of bannorhill 29 fans permalink

Right now there are only (2) cars available that meet the 35.5 MPG requirement. The Prius and the Civic. Not one American car.

It takes 5-6 years to bring a car from concept to production IF THE TECHNOLOGY is available. The technology is not currently available to build a 6 passenger car that meets those milage standards.

While the35.5 MPG milage standard sounds good and will reduce our dependance on oil it is not acheivable in the timeframe required especially with the lack of money in Detroit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 05/19/2009
- burt2009 I'm a Fan of burt2009 16 fans permalink

Here's some late news. Obama to announce auto mileage, emissions rules that end up costing consumers and extra $1,300 per vehicle, and as usual that is probably a low estimate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 AM on 05/19/2009

Late? As in "in the first 2 paragraphs of the article" kind of late? As in "they've been talking about it for months" kind of late?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 05/19/2009

Look at the bright side of fuel efficiency and clean air, how about $1500. , You have to pay the price for the prioity of energy-independent. I am glad President Obama pioneers the move and take us into better future . Good for the younger geenerations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 05/19/2009
- bannorhill I'm a Fan of bannorhill 29 fans permalink

Look at the realistic side. There is NO 6 passenger car on the market that meets the new standards. The technology to economically produce it if it is even designed.

To meet the 2016 deadline GM will have to redesign 30-40 models from the ground up in the nex 2 years. The remaining 4 years will be required ti get EPA and government testing and approval, followed by retooling, and retraining.

All that from a US automobile industry that is almost bankrupt and has little money for R & D.

Who will pay the $billions it will cost to develop these cars?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 05/20/2009
photo

The "$1,300" extra you will ultimately save on gas. Just wait until gas hits $4.00/gallon again (it will)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 05/20/2009

Now the real question is. Will youeconutjobs now make anyone driving a car with lower mileage ratings go and buy a new one?

What about those who drive a car made in the 70's or 60's? Shouldn't they be made to give up their cars and forced to buy something newer?

How about muscle cars that have been restored?

Are big rigs going to be required to get 20 mpg?

where does it end? It ends when they force you to buy what they want you to drive. Yes boys and girls barryandtheboys are the new bigbrother

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Paranoid much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 05/19/2009

Just like the non smoking section in a restaurant. It was one or two tables, then 1/4th of the restaurant, the the whole building, and now entire cities are smoke free. They will stop at nothing until they control everything you eat drive, how much you can make. Just ask a few bankers and CEO's.

This is suicide and the taxpayer is about to getscrewedonce again by the leftwingtaxcrazy

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 05/19/2009

ah thehuffercenosors at work early

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Man you wingers are big babies

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 05/19/2009
- burt2009 I'm a Fan of burt2009 16 fans permalink

How sad it is when Obama invites Gov. Arnold to the WH to assist him in reading a few lines off his teleprompter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Isn't it amazing? Bush used a teleprompter, too, but he still couldn't speak coherently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Better than the last guy who couldn't read at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 05/19/2009
- burt2009 I'm a Fan of burt2009 16 fans permalink

Ah, the Bush syndrome. So rapt up with Bush some of you can't even write a sentence without using his name. Maybe down deep you really like Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 AM on 05/19/2009

*waits for rush and beck today*

THEY ARE GOING TO RAISE PRICES ON CARS THAT NO ONE BUYS THEY WANT TO KILL THE BLUE COLLAR WORKER EVEN THOUGH WE HATE THE UNIONS THEY BELONG TO, BUT WE CARE ABOUT THEM, I SWEAR!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 05/19/2009
- YewNeekId I'm a Fan of YewNeekId 26 fans permalink

Were the autors of this piece just born?

Does the Clean Air Act of 1970 mean anything to you guys?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Sic semper tyrannis.

Thus will automobiles cost more, and this will be a HUGE TAX ON ANYONE WHO BUYS AN AUTOMOBILE. But Obama was right--the taxpayer won't SEE HIS TAXES GO UP ONE PENNY!

Parsing it Clintonially, he'll either be completely blind to the de facto taxation, thus "not seeing it," or he'll see his taxes go up by hundreds of dollars--and that's not one penny!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Yeah, cleaner air is just a liberal conspiracy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

The tyranny of selfishness is on the wane pal. Your "right" to by a cheaper suv or truck that pollutes more than my car is not greater than the right for Americans to have cleaner air. Besides, more fuel efficient trucks means less money spent on oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 05/19/2009

The priority of the ultimate goal is energy saving and clean air. There is a price for that. Tax is irrelevent in this topic.

It is a long way to go go for fuel efficiency and clean air, but it is the right way President Obama leads us to go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Now, lets force all auto companies to build the green dream machine. No matter that no one wants it. No matter that all industries are suffering under the biggest downturn in 80 years.

Next comes cap and trade-jam this down our throats with no real imput from what the consequences might be-full speed ahead
Scotty.

Oh yes, lets not forget health care.

Our country has been proven to be the greatest in the history of the earth. We created the most jobs. Have the best standard of living. The most opportunity for all. We have had growth that is the envy of the rest of the world. Obama states that our system is broken and needs to be fixed. He is planting the seeds of its destruction. These seeds will sprout after he is long gone-and spread misery. We will be forced to deal with these forever.

If you get up in the morning and try to provide for your family-you have been targeted. You will pay more for everything because-well just because someone hates that you have more. If everyone took care of their own family instead of relying on bigger and bigger government we would all be better off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 05/19/2009

gotta look to the future, not cry about todays problems, it will balance out.

Tough consequences, we wont need as much gas and cars will pollute less, THE HORROR!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 05/19/2009

Right on. Taihateshirts. Majority of Americans agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Yeah, damn libs! I remember when they forced light bulbs on us and killed the massive gaslight industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 05/19/2009
- Dynamohum I'm a Fan of Dynamohum 57 fans permalink

When is it time to make the BIG changes? We need to let go of the chokehold of oil on this situation. Why not go ahead boldly with 1) hybrids for the transition 2) electric, battery and solar for a more permanent solution? Increasing gas mileage standards is archaic and outdated at this point. A few more years of dickering and the rest of the world will be decades ahead of us and LAUGHING at the laughing stock that America has become.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 AM on 05/19/2009
- NPA I'm a Fan of NPA 5 fans permalink
photo

President Bush once stated that "America is ADDICTED to oil". Addicted is a very strong word, so what was the GOP solution to this "addiction", why more oil of course! Drill idiots! Drill!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 AM on 05/19/2009
- katooom I'm a Fan of katooom 18 fans permalink
photo

Very true. In a similar fashion, American government is addicted to money/spending - the solution - print more money of course. Print idiots! Print!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 AM on 05/19/2009
- vesaversa1 I'm a Fan of vesaversa1 12 fans permalink
photo

Enough said ,LMAO

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Nuclear power plants would be reasonable, but who obstructs that? Switching more to natural gas would help--for a while. But that's somewhat costly and the autos would have less performance.

The short-term energy problem could be ameliorated by drilling where known reserves are located, but the Democrats wanted oil companies to drill where studies show there ain't no oil! Now that was a sensible plan!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 05/19/2009
- murphy80 I'm a Fan of murphy80 9 fans permalink

let me get this straight

the Big O lays down some emission standards for 2016 for the auto industry

smart money says there will not be a US auto industry in 2016

you can't make this stuff up........­..........­.....and i voted for him

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 AM on 05/19/2009
- teron678 I'm a Fan of teron678 117 fans permalink
photo

who is smart money .... your crystal ball?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

One of those people who thought they would "teach the Republican Party a lesson?" Those people forgot that, after putting Dems in charge of everything, there might not be a salvageable country left even if Republicans did learn anything!

And, from all indications, Republicans DIDN'T learn anything! They persist in trying to be Democrats--which doesn't attract REPUBLICAN VOTERS AT ALL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Yeah. The old school Republicans are really bringing in the voters, aren't they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 05/19/2009
- Tomoto I'm a Fan of Tomoto 2 fans permalink
photo

In it's current incarnation, there certainly won't be a US auto industry in 2016...if we reinvent it, there's a good chance it'll be there for a long time after 2016.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 AM on 05/19/2009
- lezlie I'm a Fan of lezlie 3 fans permalink

Yea!!! maybe we can breathe soon!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 AM on 05/19/2009
- Pquilson I'm a Fan of Pquilson 9 fans permalink

You aren't breathing now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 05/19/2009
- katooom I'm a Fan of katooom 18 fans permalink
photo

Will never happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

Blegh!

Who would have guessed regulations for greater fuel economy would make some people so angry? Well, I admit I don't much know what to think of this. On the upside, people who cherish their SUVs and Pickups might have more of a reason to buy one now before these regulations take effect. Also, Six years with the way innovations to fuel economy have been going lately is a long time to figure things out. This doesn't mean the death of cars as we know them so settle down people.

As far as safety goes, old people drive Prius' ... how dangerous can they be?!

Also. I'd wager (even if we explored all domestic sources of oil, which would only make a marginal difference in America's foreign oil dependency) 4$+ gas isn't gone forever. As soon as they smell a hint of recovery, OPEC is going to start gouging our eyes out again. It's probably best to try and address the problem when gas is a little cheaper than wait till everyone is clamoring for the government to do something. Hurricane Season also seems to always mean high gas prices. The fluctuations are no good.

Full Disclosure: I only care that a car gets me from point a. to point b, and also that it doesn't explode. All other information is immaterial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 AM on 05/19/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect