ANOTHER 'Slumdog' Star's Home Torn Down, Her Father Beaten

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - ANOTHER 'Slumdog' Star's Home Torn Down, Her Father Beaten stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ERIKA KINETZ | 05/20/09 04:59 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Rubina Ali

MUMBAI — The 9-year-old girl who starred in "Slumdog Millionaire" dodged pieces of falling debris Wednesday as she tried to salvage twisted metal and splintered wood _ all that remained of her bubble-gum pink home after authorities demolished part of a city slum where she lived.

Months after their movie swept the Oscars, Rubina Ali and Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail, 10, are both sleeping on hard dirt, wondering when they too might go from slumdog to millionaire. Azharuddin's home was demolished last week.

"I'm feeling bad," Rubina told The Associated Press. "I'm thinking about where to sleep."

Wednesday's demolitions took place because the slum houses were in the way of a planned pedestrian overpass, said a railway official who refused to be named. Such demolitions are common in India's chaotic cities.

Around 11 a.m. Wednesday, demolition crews began working their way down the shanties on Rubina's lane, as dozens of police with bamboo batons and guns patrolled the area.

Ten policemen beat Rubina's father with their sticks for 15 minutes shortly before the demolition began, sending him to the hospital, family members said.

Rubina and her stepmother salvaged what they could, as men with sledgehammers and metal bars pried apart the flimsy walls of their home.

At 1:35 p.m., there was a great creaking sound, and the last wall fell.

Story continues below

Rubina stood, bewildered, inside the frame of the house she grew up in, ringed by eager television cameras.

For once, she had nothing to say.

Her stepmother Munni Qureshi, who says she is four months pregnant, began shouting at the police.

"How can the police barge in anytime without giving us notice," she hollered, then sank to the ground, weeping. Neighbors poured water over her to keep her cool as she sat in the scorching summer sun.

Nearby, a neighbor fainted. Women rushed over, grabbing the woman's arms and legs, and tried to carry her out of the sun. "Water," they cried. But there was no shade nearby. The houses were gone.

Rubina's father, carpenter Rafiq Qureshi, returned from the hospital with his right arm in a clean white sling. He stepped across the threshold of the home he built seven years ago with $2,000. Above him was open sky. He rubbed his forehead with his good hand.

"It's best that I move," he said, adding that the filmmakers are helping find the family a new home. "They are doing what they promised," he said.

"Slumdog" director Danny Boyle and producer Christian Colson set up a trust to ensure the children get proper homes, a decent education and a nest egg when they finish high school. They have also donated $747,500 to a charity to help slum kids in Mumbai.

Colson has described the trust as substantial, but won't tell anyone how much it contains _ not even the children's parents _ for fear of making the youngsters vulnerable to exploitation.

The trust offered to rent the families apartments while they search for permanent homes, but both refused, saying they'd rather stay where they are than move to a temporary space.

Destroyed shanties often resurface. By Wednesday temporary homes had already sprung up around Azhar's house. Some neighbors had taken out fresh loans from local moneylenders to rebuild, at 20 percent interest a month. Azhar's family tied blankets and blue and yellow tarpaulins to a wooden frame for shelter.

Dinaz Stafford, a clinical psychologist who helps run Salaam Baalak Trust, which works with street children in India, is not surprised that eight Oscars and over $326 million in box office receipts haven't done more to change the lives of the two child stars.

A film cannot change a life, she says. That takes time.

"You cannot help disadvantaged children by making a film or giving them vast quantities of money," said Stafford, who helped direct 22 street kids in the 1988 Oscar-nominated film "Salaam Bombay." "They'll just spend it. The money is a nightmare. It throws them off."

She said the biggest problem facing the "Slumdog" child stars is the distorting power of the media. "The kid thinks he's a celebrity, then it all comes crashing down," she said.

She said Boyle has done a good job. "He's stood by his children and his commitment," she said. "There is no law that says filmmakers should create social welfare organizations to change the world. By making a successful film, they've raised an issue. That's a way to change society."

___

Associated Press writer Rajesh Shah contributed to this report.

MUMBAI — The 9-year-old girl who starred in "Slumdog Millionaire" dodged pieces of falling debris Wednesday as she tried to salvage twisted metal and splintered wood _ all that remained of her b...
MUMBAI — The 9-year-old girl who starred in "Slumdog Millionaire" dodged pieces of falling debris Wednesday as she tried to salvage twisted metal and splintered wood _ all that remained of her b...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
134
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

I am an Indian from Mumbai, who has had contact with slum people who came into my home as domestic workers or skilled artisans, and delivery boys,

It is my experience that the people who live in the slums have the same mentality as the poor have all over the world. What would a poor American, below the poverty line, or any other world citizen in the same condition, do with so much wealth and fame? You feel the actress and her family's dreams have been realized, but our their dreams the same as yours? The same as society's norms?

Who will find out their desires and their needs and convince them that the money they have earned should fulfill both? Who will tell them money has the power to disappear very quickly, and that it should be used to earn more money, to buy a life out of the slums?

Who is going to do this? Who is going to eradicate poverty from a country if we cannot even raise one human being from below the poverty line? Most people don't want to leave their homes, their environment, because that is their protection. For the poor, the outside world is a bad wicked place of demolitions and beatings, so they find safety in their slum. Why should they move? And why should we make such a ruckus about the demolitions, if we have been unable to move this rich, famous family out of their slum home?
Bubloosen.sulehka.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 05/21/2009
- Solja I'm a Fan of Solja 117 fans permalink
photo

There is a such thing as Financial Planners. People who suddenly hit the lottery for millions of dollars get them so they invest wisely. It would have benefited the children had their trustee provided this basic financial training to avert them from spending it all on frivolous things. It still can be done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 05/23/2009
- marred I'm a Fan of marred 6 fans permalink

Um... she lives in a slum. Is this not the order of the day in a slum? So since these kids appeared in a hollywood movie we're supposed to be watching after them constantly? It was called SLUMDOG millionaire for a reason. A millionaire madde a film about slumdogs. He stays a millionaire and they stay slumdogs :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

that was mean.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 05/20/2009

Yes, but very true. Apparently the slumdog actors served as cheap labor actors. If they were even given a decent small amount of compensation, they could have moved somewhere better. Never underestimate the power of profit, err I mean greed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 05/20/2009

The demolitions are retaliation against the filmmakers for outing these poor people. Since the filmmakers cannot be beaten, the authorities beat and displace whoever else was responsible for the film. They are being dealt with one by one. You can almost predict who will be next.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 05/20/2009
- Idablu I'm a Fan of Idablu 3 fans permalink
photo

Her expression in this photo kills me. How sad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 05/20/2009

Can we say that the British Producers/Directors of Slumdog Millionaire used Underpaid Child Labor. I wonder if they would make a film titled Tent City Millionaire? So they would invite children from tent city to be in the movie, wins the oscar, then get kicked out of their Tent houses by Arnold Shwarzznegger. Some questions here: 1) Where is Angelina Jolie when we need her most? 2) Don't you think that either the Academy or the Producer and Director of Slumdog must give a house to the kids? After all they profited from them. Finally, The Congress Party of Sonia Ghandi, Raul Ghandi and Manmohan Singh aren't proud of these gracious and talented children? Why the silent?...I just wanna say the kids and their's family deserves a lot of respect and dignity. Shame on those who take advantage of Underpaid Child Labor. Where is the United Nations anyway?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 05/20/2009
- llisa I'm a Fan of llisa 33 fans permalink

Did you not read the whole thing? Families of both kids had been offered apartments and turned them down.

They also have substantial trust funds and scholarships set up.

If these people refuse to accept the help that is offered, what can be done? If they are just given money (which they were) they throw it away to some con man (which they did). They won't accept housing and can't use money to better themselves.

The kids were paid the going rate for the work they did on the movie, PLUS. . .

You have to understand that these kids and their families were in this situation before the movie. The movie people tried to help. They failed because the people refuse to be helped in any way that will actually make their lives better (moving to a better home, seeing that the kids go to school).

How can you help people who won't do what needs to be done to make their own lives better?

My daughter (a social worker) works with people like this time and time again. They keep suffering from the same problems because they refuse to follow through on anything that will better their situation. Their kids are the ones who really suffer--and they will most likely grow up to be just like their parents. There are not enough social workers to save kids like this in the US, either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 05/20/2009
- jajenkins I'm a Fan of jajenkins 11 fans permalink

"These people" as you call them, are part of a closely-knit community. Moving away to a rented apartment would take them away from their neighbours and friends. The slums may be illegal, but they are home to alot of people for years on end before they are abolished.

This is not a case of "suffering...because they refuse to follow through on anything that will better their situation" this is a situation of valuing their friends and community more than a transitory apartment.

If I lived in a community like that, and everyone had just suffered a terrible trauma, I would want to stay with my friends and relatives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 05/20/2009

This has nothing to do with caste system. Most slums in bombay are illegal colonies. The crux of the problem is this: Big cities attract lots of people from the villages...however because of limited real estate, many of these people cannot afford rent. So illegal slums crop up from time to time.

Poverty is painful to see, but there are no quick fixes. Americans believe they can change everything...all it needs is a "solution"...unfortunately there are no band-aid solutions. India is making progress..but despite best efforts these things take time.

The solution to the problem is not western style consumption driven economy - but in increasing productivity...especially agricultural productivity...as that is the basis of indian economy. With increasing productivity will come increased social surplus, and the country can grow as a whole. Since liberalization successive governments have invested in infrastrucuture and continue to do so...bombay will always have slums, but in the next 10 years people will not have to migrate to metros in search of jobs....and that is india's success. It's not very visible, but it is already happening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Ghalf ive these parents some of the money to give these kids hope. My God, how can you exploit people like this and watch them floundering in the winds of chance or survival. They earned it, give them half to take care of themselves or suffer at future box office receipts.

This is rediculous to think they will end up high schoolers when they have NO home to go to.

Stop being so "I know whats best for them and give them their money, damnit!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 05/20/2009
- llisa I'm a Fan of llisa 33 fans permalink

They were given money. The parents blew it. A large sum of money is not helpful to these people. They don't know how to use if effectively and are taken by con artists, ending up back where they started.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

India is not making progress. The slums are a testament to India's priorities and yes the caste system inform these priorities on a day to day basis. The problem of the poor in India is widespread and not limited to slum housing in the cities; also aide to farmers, healthcare for its citizens who face an AIDS epidemic and providing education for the poor.

India is a mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 05/20/2009
- emariejon I'm a Fan of emariejon 3 fans permalink

Illegal slums crop up from time to time??? Everything I've read leads me to believe they're endemic in this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

LOL. Socialist Hollywood is so funny. Sure, they want to tell 'humanist' stories that explore other peoples and their cultures, but then when push comes to shove -- when Commie-wood must solve the socio-economic problems of said countries -- they're off counting box office receipts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 05/20/2009
- shivadas I'm a Fan of shivadas 9 fans permalink

Your rhetoric is insane.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Why is it insane to suggest that if Hollyweird makes a film about the Mumbai slums that they're greedy slackers to not resolve the country's socio-economic situation? Isn't that the point of movies? To change the world for the better?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 05/20/2009
- Pgrace I'm a Fan of Pgrace 3 fans permalink

This was not a Hollywood film. It was developed, funded, and largely crewed in the UK. The Hollywood bit came with the distribution deal.
The actors were paid above Bollywood rates and on the face of it, the trust fund appears capable of ensuring the welfare of the actors and their families.
The article states that prior to the demolition, the trust fund encouraged the family to move to rented accommodation until a house could be found and purchased but the family chose not to take this option.
The actions of the producers of this motion picture seem considered and ethical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 05/20/2009

WHY IS THE POVERTY STRICKEN STEP-MOTHER PREGNANT?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 05/20/2009
- LinLin16 I'm a Fan of LinLin16 3 fans permalink

because dirt poor people dont have easy access to condoms or contraception. playing the population police card is so passe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Because it's apparently God's holy work to travel to India and preach to the locals about the evils of contraception.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Anybody still think that after thousands of years of a virulent caste system India is a functioning democracy?

I hear Gandhi's howls of rage from the afterlife loud and clear...

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Wow...unintended consequences are a bitch. These kids lose no matter which way they turn...they might be exploited by the media and/or by their parents, who may or may not have their best interests in mind. I sincerely doubt that the producers of "Slumdog Millionaire" could ever have dreamed of the chaos they have brought on these children. What happens now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 05/20/2009
- shivadas I'm a Fan of shivadas 9 fans permalink

What did the producers of a movie have to do with that slum being razed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 05/20/2009
- llisa I'm a Fan of llisa 33 fans permalink

Or with the parents being too stubborn to accept an apartment? Or with their abject poverty in the first place?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 05/20/2009
- voltage356 I'm a Fan of voltage356 20 fans permalink
photo

Yeah right,

They've been to the Oscars, they've been to Disneyland, and now the two main child actors from the Oscar-laden Slumdog Millionaire are heading to brand new homes.

Indian government authorities are providing new residences in Mumbai for Rubina Ali and Azhar Ismail, who portrayed the younger versions of the movie's central characters, Latika and Jamal, Reuters reports.

"These two children have brought laurels to the country, and we have been told that they live in slums, which cannot even be classified as housing," said Gautam Chatterjee, head of the state-run Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority.

There have been protests in some quarters over the fact that the while the movie was earning millions around the world – nearly $100 million in North America alone – its young actors were living in squalor.

The movie's Academy Award-winning director Danny Boyle and producer Christian Colson have denied claims that children were exploited to make their movie – saying that the youngsters were paid above local Indian wages.

The children, say the filmmakers, were also enrolled in school for the first time with a fund established to provide for their education, medical emergencies and "basic living costs."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 05/20/2009
- voltage356 I'm a Fan of voltage356 20 fans permalink
photo

Well, somebody lied they said the families of the two childrern were living in an apt building somewhere in Mumbai. Only to find out that they return from where they came from, after the filming had stop. This is shocking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 05/20/2009

Its not Danny Boyle's fault.. its the fault of the Indian govt. which refuses to provide land for homeless families. Thousands of other slums besides the one these young Slumdog child actors live in exist in India, and they always are at threat of being destroyed at a moment's notice..I've worked in slum areas in South Asia many years. once the slums are destroyed, new slums emerge.Danny Boyle is correct in creating a trust for the children. The film company doesn't own the children and can't legally take them away from their parents just because they are poor To those who say, why not adopt them, I remind them, these children have parents they love. Instead of adoption, why not use that money to build schools, provide sturdy, safe housing with sanitation,clean water and schools. help many children in the slums have a better life, not just one Rubina.. Rubina is Muslim. Probably many of the slum dwellers in Dharavi were also Muslim. They have community, amidst the poverty, something perhaps hard for Americans to understand. Even If you give them a fancy apartment , they often will return to live in the slum, because that's where the people they know and love are, people o f the same caste, religion, tribe. Help provide land for the the families to create communities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 05/20/2009
- Chubbster I'm a Fan of Chubbster 36 fans permalink

That the Indian Government would provide land for homeless families is a quaint and deluded fantasy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 05/20/2009
- Adam Barr I'm a Fan of Adam Barr 75 fans permalink
photo

Join the effort to get the studios, producers, and director to adequately compensate these kids at http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=174673855161&ref=mf.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 05/20/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect