More

Diane Wood, Obama Met For Supreme Court Spot

Diane Wood

BEN FELLER and MARK SHERMAN   05/20/09 09:21 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama has interviewed federal appeals court judge Diane Wood for the Supreme Court, one of the face-to-face meetings he's holding with finalists, officials said Wednesday. The move signals Obama is getting closer to one of the most far-reaching decisions of his presidency.

Wood, who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago, is among a small number of people being seriously considered for the high court. She was in Washington on Wednesday for a conference at Georgetown University. Wood declined to answer questions about the Supreme Court position at the event.

Four months into his presidency, Obama has the opportunity to nominate someone who could serve on the high court for decades. The Democratic president's choice is not expected to shake up the ideological makeup of the court; Justice David Souter, who is retiring, has been a reliably liberal vote.

The White House is not commenting on whom Obama is interviewing.

Officials familiar with Obama's deliberations spoke on condition of anonymity because the White House has kept details of the process private.

Wood, 58, was nominated for the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals by then-President Bill Clinton in 1995 and confirmed by the Senate. Her career includes teaching at the University of Chicago law school, where she also served as associate dean.

Another contender under serious review, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, was at the White House on Tuesday for an event about auto fuel efficiency.

Wood took part in the Washington conference along with another of Obama's candidates for the Supreme Court, Solicitor General Elena Kagan.

The lunchtime speaker was Souter himself.

Also attending the day's panel discussions at Georgetown University Law Center were Justice Stephen Breyer and retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has led the annual event since her retirement from the court in 2006.

She noted that Souter is "going to join me in that now very exclusive group of retired Supreme Court justices. His presence will double the membership."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Rachel Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 224
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
01:55 AM on 05/22/2009
There are qualified people of both genders and all nationalities - with that in mind, the court needs diversity so that it truly represents a diverse nation and to that end a Latino woman would be the best pick for the job.
03:54 AM on 05/22/2009
Ethnicities, not nationalities.
08:06 PM on 05/21/2009
she is so "taupe" down to the teeth
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HC4BO
Far-Left Socialist
05:41 PM on 05/21/2009
Not to sound ageist BUT how old is this woman again ... ?

Is there a shortage of 20 year old supreme court nominees ... ? lol
05:27 PM on 05/21/2009
Dear people, 'her or 'she'?

Either is acceptable.

According to 'Dr. Grammar's - Frequently Asked Questions'

http://www.drgrammar.org/faqs/#104

(Obviously, 'Dr. Grammar' would know.)

It's her or It's she?
"In all but the most formal circumstances, it's OK to use It is me, That's him, It's her, and similar constructions, instead of the technically correct but stuffier It is I, That's he, and It's she" (O'Conner,
Woe Is I 186).

It is I or It is me?
"Instead of the old choice between right and wrong we are now choosing a style; it is a choice that is much closer to the reality of usage than the old one way. [. . .] Clearly, both the it is I and it's me patterns are in reputable use and have been for a considerable time. It is I tends to be used in more formal or more stuffy situations; it's me predominates in real and fictional speech and in a more relaxed writing style" (Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage).
07:52 PM on 05/21/2009
So, That's why over 100 comments were about the incorrect use of grammar. Huh...
photo
Imzadi
Proud Progressive for decades
07:57 PM on 05/21/2009
And based in "Idiocracy", it just doesn't matter.


The dumbing down of this country is just too sad - must be a product of no child left behind...
04:38 PM on 05/21/2009
She may be the best qualified, but I will prefer someone 8-10 years younger...
09:20 PM on 05/21/2009
Yeah, baby! Beyoncé Knowles, Heather Graham, Sharon Stone even. Pick one!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlackYowe
I am a classical- liberal woman and a Jeweler.
04:32 PM on 05/21/2009
OMG she has normal teeth and is not covered with creepy makeup and she is not sun baked! I love her already! Imagine no botox! Amazing!
07:53 PM on 05/21/2009
Love that!!
04:23 PM on 05/21/2009
Id do her!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
03:10 PM on 05/21/2009
"Is it her?" is BAD GRAMMAR. Correct: "Is it she?".
02:50 PM on 05/21/2009
clerking for Blackmun is goood. Especially as Blackmun transitioned to liberal.
02:38 PM on 05/21/2009
Her decisions look good.
03:01 PM on 05/21/2009
Blackmun authored Roe v. Wade, I forgot that one. She's a libbie. Good.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
henrywolff
02:14 PM on 05/21/2009
Taking an awful long time to make this pick. Must be vetting problems.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
03:10 PM on 05/21/2009
What are you talking about? This is not an unusual amount of time at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RonNYC
Ecommerce Professional
04:32 PM on 05/21/2009
probably tax issues again. turbo tax wil get you every time.
photo
jweider
I know where my towel is
02:02 PM on 05/21/2009
Why hasn't she taken full advantage of her Federal dental benefits?
02:02 PM on 05/21/2009
I have to admit I'd really like to see a female, if only because Ginsberg is so terribly old, and that creates a very real possiblity of a supreme court without any females on it at all. I mean, we are 50% of the population after all.

Of course, I'm all for Caroline Kennedy.. that'd shake 'em up!

But I do think we need a raving liberal constitutionalist. Why is it OK to appoint a raving conservative (Scalia) but just too outrageous to appoint an actual liberal? I'd say with Scalia on there we need one just for balance.

I'd like to see a liberal female with a great record against business fraud.
06:06 PM on 05/21/2009
51%, I believe!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StarDagger
The Welfare of the People is the Supreme Law
01:34 PM on 05/21/2009
Michelle Obama for Justice!!!
Then she can resign when her husband is done, and appoint her own replacement when she becomes president!!

Michelle in 2016!!!!!

Oh yeah, i went THERE!
Is BE HER!
09:42 PM on 05/21/2009
I agree with you 100%. Mrs. Obama would make
a wonderful judge.
12:56 PM on 05/21/2009
We need a left-handed albino lesbian Eskimo midget. No one else will fully be able to understand what is important to normal 'merkins.

BTW the headline on the front page should have read "Is It She?." But good grammar is probably elitist.
01:45 PM on 05/21/2009
I was put off by the headline, too.