iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mexico Anti-Abortion Laws On The Rise

First Posted: 06/22/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:25 PM ET

Mexico Abortion


MEXICO CITY, May 22 (IPS) - In the last 13 months, 12 of Mexico's 32 states have approved amendments to their state constitutions defining a fertilised human egg as a person with a right to legal protection, and seven other state parliaments are taking steps in the same direction.

Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) say it is a massive conservative reaction to a law decriminalising abortion up to 12 weeks' gestation that went into force in the Mexican capital in April 2007.

The law was upheld in August 2008 by the Supreme Court, which ruled that it did not violate the Mexican constitution.

Behind the wave of reforms of state constitutions, according to critics, is a pact between the hierarchy of the Mexican Catholic Church and the leadership of the most traditional political parties to curb social movements advocating the legalisation of abortion.

"I have no direct evidence, but we have repeatedly heard allegations" that such a pact exists, MarĂ­a MejĂ­a, head of Catholics for the Right to Decide (CDD), told IPS.

According to María Luisa Sánchez, director of the Information Group on Reproductive Choice (GIRE), what is happening is a kind of "revenge" on the part of conservative groups. "These reforms are absurd and put women at risk," she told IPS.

The states where constitutions have been reformed are governed by President Felipe CalderĂłn's conservative National Action Party (PAN) or by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which ruled Mexico for seven decades.

The amendments of the state constitutions have not, so far, been accompanied by changes to the regional criminal codes, which for the most part allow abortion in the case of rape or danger to the mother's life.

But the possibility remains that the criminal codes will be brought into line with the constitutional reforms, MejĂ­a said.

Mexico is a federal nation in which each state has its own constitution and criminal code, although these cannot run counter to the national constitution and criminal code.

In this country of over 107 million people, an estimated 880,000 abortions are carried out annually, according to a study presented in 2008 by the Colegio de México, the Mexico office of the Population Council and the Guttmacher Institute in the United States.

The study found that an average of 33 abortions a year are performed for every 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44. This figure is higher than the average reported for developing countries, which is 29 abortions a year per 1,000 women of reproductive age.

Most abortions are performed clandestinely, even in cases where they are legal, because the authorities and public health centres put up such barriers that the right to therapeutic abortion under certain circumstances becomes non-existent.

A PAN lawmaker for the central state of Querétaro, Fernando Urbiola, told IPS that the recent reforms of the state constitutions "are simply due to the need to be consistent with the principle of defending human life, which begins at conception."

In Querétaro, which is governed by the PAN, Urbiola chairs the Commission on the Family in the state parliament, and is promoting a modification of the state constitution so that it will protect the fertilised egg from the time of conception. The change could be approved before the end of the year.

Urbiola argues that "unborn children" urgently need legal protection, on a par with any other person, until death. In his view, the wave of reforms will also close the door to euthanasia and recognise men's right to keep alive the eggs they fertilise.

GIRE's Sánchez said that her group is coordinating a series of demonstrations with women's movements in the various states, to urge the Supreme Court to rule on the wave of constitutional changes in the states.

"We hope that the Supreme Court will take up the issue again and give more weight to the right of women to decide about their lives and bodies. The Court must hold another debate and ratify its earlier ruling," said Sánchez.

In the August 2008 ruling, in response to a lawsuit arguing that the decriminalisation of abortion in the capital, governed by the leftwing Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled that the law did not violate the constitution.

The Supreme Court verdict was repudiated by the hierarchy of the Catholic Church and other conservative sectors.

However, the CalderĂłn administration accepted the decision, although it had previously demanded, through the Attorney-General's Office, that the Mexico City law be repealed.

Now GIRE is asking the Attorney-General's Office to take up the issue again, this time to bring a suit before the Supreme Court alleging the unconstitutionality of the reforms against abortion approved by the states.

According to Mexican law, the Supreme Court deals with cases at the request of the Attorney-General's Office or the state National Human Rights Commission, or on its own initiative.

MejĂ­a, of Catholics for the Right to Decide, also wants the Supreme Court to deal with the issue, but she recognised that this is very unlikely to happen in the short or medium term.

Since April 2007, when abortion in the first three months of pregnancy was decriminalised in Mexico City, just over 20,000 women have exercised this right in public health centres. Nearly 80 percent of them were from the capital.

According to official statistics, 47 percent of the women who requested an abortion in Mexico City were between the ages of 18 and 24, and 21 percent were aged 25 to 29. Nearly seven percent were under 18, and the remainder were over 30.

The great majority of the women who had abortions said they were Catholic, like 90 percent of Mexicans.

Mejía and Sánchez both said that it is illogical for only some women in Mexico to have the right to an abortion, and called for the same rights to be available for all women.

Furthermore, they both said that abortion should be removed from the criminal codes and should be dealt with instead as a public health issue.

No woman is happy to make the decision to have an abortion and no woman seeks an abortion for pleasure, which is "something conservatives just don't understand," and that is why they close the doors to women and their rights, and even worse, threaten them with imprisonment, MejĂ­a said.

The state criminal codes lay down different penalties for women who have abortions, except for victims of rape or when the mother's life is endangered. In some cases, foetal malformation is also accepted as a legal reason for abortion.

In the state of Veracruz, for example, abortion carries a prison sentence of six months to four years; in Jalisco it is four months to one year, in Guanajuato from six months to three years, and in Baja California Sur from two months to two years.

Studies indicate that clandestine abortions are the fourth or fifth cause of death among Mexican women, and that obtaining permission for an abortion is complicated and, in many cases, impossible.

After the August 2008 Supreme Court resolution, GIRE legal adviser Pedro Morales called on state legislators to move from "prohibitive and punitive regimes on abortion to permissive laws compatible with the fundamental rights of women."

Instead, 12 states moved in the opposite direction and made it even more difficult to get a legal abortion, and another seven states may soon follow suit.

Read more from Inter Press Service.



Get HuffPost World On Facebook and Twitter!


FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

MEXICO CITY, May 22 (IPS) - In the last 13 months, 12 of Mexico's 32 states have approved amendments to their state constitutions defining a fertilised human egg as a person with a right to legal p...
MEXICO CITY, May 22 (IPS) - In the last 13 months, 12 of Mexico's 32 states have approved amendments to their state constitutions defining a fertilised human egg as a person with a right to legal p...
Filed by Stuart Whatley  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SonnyBono
Cogito ergo sum ​​liberalis
02:54 AM on 05/24/2009
Terrific - another step backward for a country that can not provide enough jobs in a good global economy for the number of people entering the work force every year. So the Church opposes birth control and abortion - maybe if they took some of the money they collect from the sheep - excuse me, flock - and provided financial help for all the poor children being born every year, the rest of us might overlook their stupid position on this matter.

Every individual's position on abortion should be very simple - if you don't believe in it , don't get one and let the rest of humanity decide for themselves.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:14 PM on 05/23/2009
"In the last 13 months, 12 of Mexico's 32 states have approved amendments to their state constitutions defining a fertilised human egg as a person with a right to legal protection, and seven other state parliaments are taking steps in the same direction."

Oh, what a can of worms this opens up. The US had better pay attention to how this law is enforced (if there is any way it even can be) and see if we really want that sort of legislation here.

So far, enforcement hasn't even been talked about here when the right is pushing bills like this. Now we will get to see how it works out when many many women are in prison and men are having to take care of the other children. (Or will they be putting the sperm donors in prison as well, seeing as how the women would not have to be in that position if not for the men.)

It's going to get messy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
07:23 PM on 05/23/2009
Oh great........................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mohanna
07:19 PM on 05/23/2009
Where are Mexico's gun laws? They support life until you are born, then you are on your own and if you die of, disease, hunger, drugs, that's not their business. I don't mind people supporting anti-abortion laws but for the LOVE OF GOD do something about everything else that is killing you first or else you saving a fetus might be in vain.
photo
Marlyn
If I'm wrong, let me know.
04:29 PM on 05/23/2009
From bad to worse.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
k6007
03:22 PM on 05/23/2009
I hope free contraceptives come with these new laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
02:00 PM on 05/23/2009
effective birth control = fewer abortions
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
01:59 PM on 05/23/2009
I have always found it amazing ("humorous" were it not for the seriousness of the matter) that the Catholic Church is against birth control of any kind, yet doesn't allow its clergy or officials to marry and have children--legitimate ones, at any rate. If they really care about the well-being of their adherents who exist in poverty or over-populated areas, they should promote responsible birth control. Over-population cheapens the value of live. It is as ridiculous as the view that sex should only be performed in the "missionary" position, and then ONLY for procreation as prescribed by St. Augustine
10:42 AM on 05/23/2009
Always found it interesting that its the MEN wielding power who believe they have the right to decide for all women.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
02:03 PM on 05/23/2009
still a "bunch" of them in the Ozarks
photo
peterg76
Freelance medical transcriptionist
02:31 PM on 05/23/2009
If only it were that simple. Women have the vote in Mexico.
Upcoming
Think outside of outside of the box.
05:01 AM on 05/23/2009
This is why the church is evil. 880000 abortions means 880000 more unwanted children weren’t foisted on the already overpopulated country of Mexico in one year! What are the church and the conservatives thinking? That this is going to stop unprotected sex? This policy affects everyone’s future around the world. Over population is the root of our impending environmental crises of climate warming and lack of water. There will be a population correction. Our environment simply won’t support this many humans for much longer, and certainly not the extra 3 billion coming in the next 40 years. We can do it ourselves or nature will do it for us. I, and anyone sane, would prefer the former. Conservatives and the church appear to want mass starvation to be our fate. A fertilized egg does not have the right to degrade the future of humanity by it’s simple existence.

Further, a woman should not be forced to be host to another set of cells any more than she should be forced to donate an organ. Until it leaves her body, it is her egg to do with as she pleases, fertilized or not. Everyone else should just f-off. If I were a woman I would be outraged that the law requires me to be an organ donor against my will.
10:21 AM on 05/23/2009
Same old Malthusian and anti-Catholic propaganda, like Ehrlich's "Population Bomb". The fact is that it is not the birth rate that is growing, it is the average life span-longer lives, brought to the world courtesy of better nutrition, better sanitation and increased access to health care by the populations of the lesser developed nations. Most European nations aren't even at replacement levels of fertility-ergo, guess what happens-immigration! Now most of the immigrants are from the Muslim nations, who have not bought into the West's genocidal malthusianism.
These blanket, obscurantist and ill informed attacks on Catholicism are simply masks for anti-third world racism-but the good thing is that many members of the intelligentsia in these countries-Africa in particular-are on to the the propaganda game, and know for a fact that there is a concerted effort by Western nations and the transnational oligarchy to use the ruse of environmentalist hysteria and Malthusian eugenics to keep these nations and their inhabitants in a constant state of poverty (no industrialization or economic growth), disease, and backwardness.
10:43 AM on 05/23/2009
The first question to ask is "Can I afford this child and will I be able to take care of it for 18 years? Mexico's overpopulation and irresponsibility is a root cause of so much illegal immigrantion, an expensive burden to the US. If you can not afford or take care of your own children, don't burden others with your problem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
joeyfoto
“Écraser l'infamie!”
03:39 AM on 05/23/2009
In the early 1960s when abortion was illegal in America, we (several friends in Los Angeles & I) used to drive to Mexico, in an informal underground railroad, to make clinic-based and therefore relatively safe abortion available, to women with unintended and unwanted pregnancies. Two Mexican medical clinics operated quite openly at the time. While abortion was also illegal in Mexico then, legality has a different meaning south of the border.

As to the Catholic Church, why should the Church want to control the population of Latin America, when they see over-population as as way to pressure the United States with the overflow and thus extend their pernicious influence north. That is called: "demographic warfare." It is one of the most effective and also one of the cruelest forms of political subversion ever practiced by a self-serving bureaucracy. We must strip this political move from its moral pretenses and recognize this Catholic-Church-driven legislation for what it is, an assault upon America.
12:20 AM on 05/23/2009
Mexico has always fretted about being dominated by the USA, yet it happily bends over for the RCC. Go figure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
01:33 PM on 05/23/2009
Maybe it's their way of being anti-US, but it's cutting off their collective nose to spite their collective face. Or maybe they intend to flood up here when the resources get to tight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RachelMc
12:11 AM on 05/23/2009
ahhh just what mexico needs...a higher birth rate
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
123dee
The best is yet to come...
11:59 PM on 05/22/2009
Italy legalized abortion in 1978 and upheld the ruling again in 1983.
This Pope is taking advantage of poorer and less educated countries to
extort. Christianity is growing at a very fast pace in Africa.(Glad Carla Bruni
spoke out)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
incognito-ergo-sum
ProgLibFemHumanist. Thanks tax payers for paying
11:28 PM on 05/22/2009
Does the Mormon church allow abortion or birth control?
09:02 AM on 05/23/2009
are you kidding--they don't even let you breathe
09:45 AM on 05/23/2009
The Mormon church does not take as strong as a position as the Catholic Church. Their public statements always stress the principles of the sanctity of life, love as a guiding principle, and the autonomy of the individual to decide. Here is their official position on abortion, http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/public-issues/abortion, and a general statement on birth control- http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=bbd508f54922d010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD&locale=0&sourceId=579639b439c98010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____.