iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gay US diplomats to receive equal benefits

MATTHEW LEE   05/23/09 08:38 PM ET   AP

Hillary Clinton

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will soon announce that gay American diplomats will be given benefits similar to those that their heterosexual counterparts enjoy, U.S. officials said Saturday.

In a notice to be sent soon to State Department employees, Clinton says regulations that denied same-sex couples and their families the same rights and privileges that straight diplomats enjoyed are "unfair and must end," as they harm U.S. diplomacy.

"Providing training, medical care and other benefits to domestic partners promote the cohesiveness, safety and effectiveness of our posts abroad," she says in the message, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press.

"It will also help the department attract and retain personnel in a competitive environment where domestic partner benefits and allowances are increasingly the norm for world-class employers," she says.

"At bottom, the department will provide these benefits for both opposite-sex and same-sex domestic partners because it is the right thing to do," Clinton says.

Among the benefits that will now be granted gay diplomats: the right of domestic partners to hold diplomatic passports, government-paid travel for their partners and families to and from foreign posts, and the use of U.S. medical facilities abroad.

In addition, gay diplomats' families will now be eligible for U.S. government emergency evacuations and training courses at the Foreign Service Institute, the message says.

The announcement, expected this week, was provided to the AP by a State Department official who is a member of the Gays and Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies organization. Two department officials not affiliated with the organization confirmed its accuracy.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the changes.

Previously, the State Department had withheld some benefits from the families of gay diplomats, citing the Defense of Marriage Law, which had restricted federal recognition of same-sex marriages.

One former ambassador, Michael Guest, resigned from the foreign service in 2007 to protest the restrictions. Guest was a part of the Obama administration's State Department transition team and played a major role in lobbying for the changes.

Clinton told members of Congress last week that she would soon announce the revisions.

(This version CORRECTS typo in 9th graf.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will soon announce that gay American diplomats will be given benefits similar to those that their heterosexual counterparts enjoy, U.S. off...
WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will soon announce that gay American diplomats will be given benefits similar to those that their heterosexual counterparts enjoy, U.S. off...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,074
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Desuka
11:05 PM on 05/25/2009
Unfortunatly it seems that under DOMA this action is illegal, however perhaps that is the point of it. Perhaps Secretary Clinton is trying to get conservative groups to challenge her decision under DOMA, since this would allow the state department to challenge DOMA, Since the court seems to be balanced in the direction of striking down DOMA it is likely that if a challenge reached the Supreme Court that it would be struck down. So maybe that is her strategy here, to see to the end of DOMA. Even if the case did not reach the suprme court, which is likely since the Court seems to have avoided taking cases directly challenging DOMA it is still likely that Clinton's decision would stand. So one way or the other Mrs. Clinton's move is rather shrewd, if regretebly seemingly illegal
02:14 PM on 05/28/2009
You're right, DOMA will likely make this move impossible. Even if it doesn't, it's important to keep in mind that unlike coverage for married opposite sex spouses, same sex partner benefits are taxed as income to the employee under the IRS code. While in the US Senate, President Obama cosponsored bills that would have equalized tax treatment for same-sex couples and provided benefits to domestic partners of federal employees - both went nowhere due to Republican opposition and guaranteed vetoes from the Bush White House. So why the silence and inaction now that Obama's in the White House?
Keep track of the promises he made to the LGBT community. So far, none have been kept. http://obama.3cdn.net/36ddd2f5daac41cb21_rym6bxaax.pdf
03:59 PM on 05/25/2009
another mess Bush neglected.... handed to Pres Obama
another mess Christian Republican Bush did nothing about in 8 years abortion--handed to Pres obama-------what are GOPers screaming about abortion had power for 6 years and did nothing--oh another election game to get votes again..sorry
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
03:23 AM on 05/25/2009
I'm glad the diplomats will get equal benefits.

Step by step...
photo
vandegrasse
Don't Panic
11:33 PM on 05/24/2009
Gays want to embrace the failed institution of marriage. I guess they're as goofy as the rest of us, and I used to think they were special!
02:14 AM on 05/25/2009
Marriage is not a failed institution... where do you get this sort of thing from?
photo
antaeus
Full-Cream Marriage Now
02:22 AM on 05/25/2009
Newt Gingrich.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sepulchre
A neutron walks into a bar...
01:14 PM on 05/25/2009
Divorce statistics, I imagine.
02:34 AM on 05/25/2009
Special. That's exactly what some of us gays are trying to move beyond. Thanks for the consideration but I'd like to live in a world where I'm an individual - not defined as this or that by my sexuality - the world heterosexuals live in.
10:25 PM on 05/24/2009
I love America and it's outrage. It took America 300yrs before they freed the s.l.a.v.e.s. A black man becomes president and now people want him to solve all America's problems in 4 months. President Obama needs to take his time and do it right as oppose to doing it quick to make people happy. With every breath someone mentions what Clinton did with the DADT and in the next breath they blame President Obama because he's not moving fast enough to change someone elses mistake.

Stop reminiscing about whether Hillary Clinton would have changed DADT if she were president. She would have been experiencing the same push back from the Republicans as President Obama by now. I'm doubtful Hillary would have reversed DADT within the first 100 days. President Obama will address and tackle this issue when he's ready. I don't recall him saying during his campaign he was going to change DADT within the first 100 days or the first year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sheaintsayin
Is my micro bio winking at me...? ;-)
10:42 PM on 05/24/2009
Thank you. Sometimes I get so excited and hopeful with what is being corrected, and the effort of President Obama and his team to right wrongs that my thinking about the positive possibilities becomes urgent in that I expect them to be undertaken immediately / simultaneously. It isn't fair and it isn't possible to expect so much so soon. This amazing team deserves our patience to get what needs to be done, done right. So again, thank you, and as I've said in an earlier post, I'm giving him a very generous 39.5 months to correct DADT.
12:08 AM on 05/25/2009
..."It took America 300yrs before they freed the s.l.a.v.e.s. A black man becomes president and now people want him to solve all America's problems in 4 months"...

Should the slaves have been patient for their masters for change?

Would you have suggested patience for the abolition of slavery?

Civil Rights not being recognized by an institution is nothing to be patient about.

That is terrible argument for patience in nullification of DADT .

Think things out before you write them.
01:35 AM on 05/26/2009
You comparing Gays to the struggles of Blacks in American History? Shame on you...
08:55 PM on 05/24/2009
Nice job Hillary! As for the other departments............?
09:28 PM on 05/24/2009
never mind gay marriage. what about this? Consider the case of Abdullah Mehsud, who was captured in Afghanistan and, after hiding his identity as second-in-command of a Pakistani Taliban group, was freed after two years at Gitmo. Once free, he kidnapped two Chinese engineers who were working on a hydroelectric dam and killed one of them.
Obama’s plans will put his kind right in our midst, awaiting either a trial they may win or a federal court ruling that may spring them.
09:48 PM on 05/24/2009
Are you referring to a guy that ' CHeney ' released...?... or approved of releasing?

Cheney must not be very smart then. Glad you pointed THAT out.
01:36 AM on 05/25/2009
Yeah, and what about this? Consider how many shooting rampages there have been in the US so far this year by American born terrorists...

Man with grudge kills 10 in Alabama shooting spree - Samson, Alabama March 11, 2009.

Four police officers were shot and killed in two related gun battles in East Oakland CA.

A 45-year-old man charged with first- degree murder in the deaths of eight people in a North Carolina nursing home.

April 3rd - gunman opened fire on a center where immigrants were taking a citizenship in downtown Binghamton, killing 13 people before apparently committing suicide.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:22 PM on 05/24/2009
Wonder if this had anything to do with the decision:

Berman referenced a quote from Michael Guest, a gay ambassador who finally resigned in 2007 over the State Department’s discriminatory practices, in which Guest said, “Under current practices, we’re kinder to family pets of foreign service officers than we are to gay partners.” That’s true, Berman said, noting that the country pays for the transportation costs of pets to and from foreign posts and provides evacuation services for pets.
06:20 PM on 05/24/2009
Bravo Hillary. I do have to say though, I never imagined that this would be the first issue where Hillary would try to not-so-subtly nudge Obama and put him on the spot, but either way, I am glad she is doing it.
06:51 PM on 05/24/2009
You people are funny...

Nudge Obama? Yeah right. I'm sure Obama and Hillary discussed how appropriate it would be for her to announce this, considering the heat surrounding DADT, which was implemented under her husband.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dustee
FOX 'Jerry Springer' NEWS
07:22 PM on 05/24/2009
LMAO, Can you imagine that? Hillary works at the pleasure of the President. She can't trick him into anything he doesn't want to do.
09:23 PM on 05/24/2009
0bama skillfully put her out to pasture. he has special envoys for the issues that are important.

Meanwhile he is escalating the wwar in afghanistan
06:16 PM on 05/24/2009
Hillary stood by and said nothing when Bill enacted the DADT policy, and she said nothing when Bill signed DOMA into law.

Is she now "showing up" the White House? ..................... Is this an orchestrated move?............. The timing is just too coincidental.................... Has the campaign resumed?
06:39 PM on 05/24/2009
President Clinton himself said he didn't want to sign it, but even if he vetoed it it would just go back through congress.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dustee
FOX 'Jerry Springer' NEWS
07:30 PM on 05/24/2009
So why did he sign it? None of this means nothing coming from Clinton, either one if you/we don't have an inside line to what's really going on within the wall of the whitehouse. The only thing we can do is speculate.
09:24 PM on 05/24/2009
i think she is campaigning again. she is just waiting for HRH to fail which is coming and she knows it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AguynamedWayne
04:39 PM on 05/24/2009
At least one of the Democrats from the last election is keeping their promises. Too bad president Obama has backtracked on his promises. Pathetic really.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dustee
FOX 'Jerry Springer' NEWS
07:32 PM on 05/24/2009
She can do nothing without the Presidents approval.
07:58 PM on 05/24/2009
If Obama is such an initiative person and yet has left DADT untouched, he has really no intention of reversing it in whatsoever way or with whatsoever means.
09:25 PM on 05/24/2009
he has broken more promises than he has kept. i was glad to see no earmarks, transparencies, 5 days notice to publish publicly all details of the budget before signing, doing away with DADT, bipartisanship. what a f**kin lloser
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StillIRise
The past, present and future are one
04:32 PM on 05/24/2009
What I find incredulous is that they weren't getting equal benefits before?
05:07 PM on 05/24/2009
Because of the Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law by President Clinton.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
slaxx
08:35 PM on 05/24/2009
that was used as the excuse anyway..you can still give benefits to unmarried partners if you wanted to.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
slaxx
08:35 PM on 05/24/2009
tell me about it...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
merger
04:26 PM on 05/24/2009
I love Hillary.
04:40 PM on 05/24/2009
I love Obama. If any one thinks that Obama has nothing to do with this is drinking Kool aid. As ammter of fact a previous article said that a former Gay State dept employee pushed this idea..quit the state dept in 2007 and joined the Obama campaign. The official was then rehired to the state dept after Obama was elected.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
05:02 PM on 05/24/2009
It's not state department people though losing their careers because they're Gay. It's Gays in the military. That's where the focus should be, not this really insubstantial attempt to make Obama look good.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dustee
FOX 'Jerry Springer' NEWS
07:37 PM on 05/24/2009
A lot of us still don't care for Hillary. I hope one day I will, but I'm waiting to see what she's going to do to change my mind about her again.

I'm still loving Obama though.
05:14 PM on 05/24/2009
Yeah. She showed every indication during her campaign for the nomination of having more integrity than Bill. Especially during her whiskey-swilling duck-hunting stage when she referred to Obama as having "San Francisco values" and we all know what that means. Hint - it's not a compliment and it has something to do with gays.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
05:38 PM on 05/24/2009
I wouldn't trust either of the Clintons on this issue. Bill Clinton really kicked us hard and Obama for that matter is doing the same thing even when he doesn't have to though by his avoiding doing anything about keeping his word on his "fierce" advocacy of Gay rights.
03:53 PM on 05/24/2009
Pecola said : "I am inspired by the way we always end up choosing fairness, equality, and rationality over bigotry, hate, and zealotry (well, mostly always)."

While I agree that we do usually get it right eventually (Slavery --> Presidency = circa 390 years), I'm constantly dismayed (often in these very pages!) by how many 'bigots, haters and zealots' we're still managing to churn out every generation. The convincing repudiation of this particularly virulent strain of Republicanism last November was certainly encouraging, but those more toxic elements in our national DNA have obviously yet to be over-written, so I reckon it'll be a while before our deeds start to more consistently match our Founders' lofty words -- not that their own deeds always did either! But who ever said that trying to accommodate the entirety of human nature in a single social blueprint was going to be easy?! He!!, they've already had to amend the thing 27 times! So, as you suggest, the US is very much a work in progress; although we slowly -- agonizingly slowly -- seem to be getting there, one formerly demonized and spat-on demographic at a time, may we be forgiven.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redkim
Wounded by beauty, I am one who struggles with God
04:01 PM on 05/24/2009
Don't forget though that most of the bigots, haters, zealots, closed-mindedness and narrow-mindedness on this site comes from the left, not the right.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
04:12 PM on 05/24/2009
Well, no. No it does not. Not even close.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
merger
04:26 PM on 05/24/2009
I would say it is a tie.
photo
Vieux Charles
Educating America, one liberal at a time
04:32 PM on 05/24/2009
As if the election of Obama was a mandate for homosexuals. What planet do you live on?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
klandish
05:17 PM on 05/24/2009
What the h. ell is a mandate on Homosexuals Mr. Ol School?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
03:44 PM on 05/24/2009
Once again our public "servants" get the rights and benefits denied to the populace. How much more of this are you willing to take?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redkim
Wounded by beauty, I am one who struggles with God
03:45 PM on 05/24/2009
Ummmmm......many companies in the private sector already extend such benefits to gay couples.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
04:14 PM on 05/24/2009
Yes and those private companies aren't responsible to the nation as a whole so I don't hold them responsible. The government, who IS responsible I do hold accountable.
photo
Vieux Charles
Educating America, one liberal at a time
04:29 PM on 05/24/2009
Many of those companies couch their benefits to any dependent relationship, gay, straight or neither as to avoid the obvious discrimation issues.
05:06 PM on 05/24/2009
The Defense of Marriage Act (signed into law by President Clinton) has been a major stumbling block to extending benefits to the domestic partners/spouses of gay Federal employees. The Wall Street Journal recently carried an article about the husband of the now deceased congressman Gary Studds. Mr. Hara is claiming spousal pension benefits under the Congressional pension program and has sued the US government to collect. It will be interesting to see where the Obama administration comes out on this lawsuit.
06:05 PM on 05/24/2009
DOMA was also strategic to remove efforts by the GOP to ruin our Constitution back in the 90's when they probably would have been successful.
09:28 PM on 05/24/2009
If Obama is now to reverse field and try these terrorists, the results might be disastrous. It’s unlikely that the prosecutors would be able to use all the evidence against them because it wasn’t gathered with an eye to its admissibility in a criminal trial. The best evidence couldn’t be used against the 20th hijacker, Zacharias Moussaui, so he did not get a death sentence or even life in prison.

If terrorists are acquitted or released by a federal judge’s ruling, the odds are good that they will go right back to fighting against us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MediaCritic75
Retired but not bored
02:42 PM on 05/24/2009
This is the 21st century. Let's stop acting like we are in the middle ages. Sexuality is not a choice, you are born with that gender and that is that. Anyone who thinks it is a perversion to be other than hetero needs to examine their own issues and not try to lay them on others. Haven't we learned yet that people are who they are and should be respected for that, and given equal rights and protections. Unfortanately, because there are sickos in our midst we often have to go overboard to protect the minorities and those who are different.