Obama Names Supreme Court Nominee: Sonia Sotomayor

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Names Supreme Court Nominee: Sonia Sotomayor stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FELLER | May 26, 2009 08:43 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama introduces federal appeals court Judge Sonia Sotomayor, right, as his nominee for the Supreme Court, Tuesday, May 26, 2009, in an East Room ceremony of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais )

WASHINGTON — Reaching for history, President Barack Obama on Tuesday chose federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court, championing her as a compassionate, seasoned jurist whose against-the-odds life journey affirms the American dream. Republicans who will decide whether to make a fight of her confirmation said they want thorough hearings.

However, defeating Sotomayor would be difficult in the heavily Democratic Senate, and even a major effort to block her confirmation could be risky for a party still reeling from last year's elections. Hispanics are the fastest-growing part of the population and increasingly active politically.

Obama, eager to begin putting his imprint on the court, beamed as he introduced Sotomayor as a judge who displays both an impressive mind and heart, a jurist who takes on cases with "an understanding of how the world works and how ordinary people live." He raved about her credentials, saying she would start on the job with more experience on the bench than any of the current nine justices had when they began.

The White House tableau itself was history: A black president and his white vice president, Joe Biden, striding onto a stage in the ornate East Room with the nominee who grew up in a New York housing project where her parents had moved from Puerto Rico.

At 54, Sotomayor (pronounced soh-toh-my-YOR'), would join Ruth Bader Ginsburg as the second woman on the court and just the third in its history. She would replace liberal Justice David Souter, thereby maintaining the court's ideological divide. A number of important cases have been divided by 5-4 majorities, with conservative- and liberal-leaning justices split 4-4 and Justice Anthony Kennedy providing the decisive vote.

Senate Republicans pledged to give her a fair hearing but cautioned they would question her rigorously and not be rushed. The president, whose approval ratings trump those of Congress, challenged the Senate to move swiftly and confirm her before Congress' August break. The Supreme Court begins its new term in October.

Democrats hold 59 votes in the Senate, more than enough to confirm Sotomayor but not quite enough to stop a vote-blocking filibuster if Republicans should attempt one.

The top Senate Republican, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said: "We will thoroughly examine her record to ensure she understands that the role of a jurist in our democracy is to apply the law evenhandedly, despite their own feelings or personal or political preferences."

Story continues below
advertisement

In one of her most notable decisions as an appellate judge, she sided last year with the city of New Haven, Conn., in a discrimination case brought by white firefighters. The city threw out results of a promotion exam because too few minorities scored high enough. Coincidentally, that case is now before the Supreme Court.

Her ruling had already drawn criticism from conservatives and is likely to play a role in her confirmation hearing.

Still, seven of the Senate's current Republicans voted to confirm her for the appeals court in 1998, and she was first nominated to be a federal judge by Republican President George H.W. Bush.

Born in the South Bronx, Sotomayor lost her father at a young age and watched her mother work two jobs to provide for her and her brother. Her path has soared ever since: Princeton University and Yale Law School, then positions as a commercial litigator, federal district judge and appellate judge.

"What you've shown in your life is that it doesn't matter where you come from, what you look like or what challenges life throws your way," Obama said Sotomayor stood at his side at a packed White House event. "No dream is beyond reach in the United States of America."

Said the nominee: "I am an ordinary person who has been blessed with extraordinary opportunities and experiences."

Obama's selection was not just about the next justice but also the new president.

He had not met Sotomayor until he interviewed her last Thursday at the White House. She was the only one of the four finalists he did not know. But in addition to her other qualifications, she offered a politically attractive background and appealing narrative.

Justices on the nine-member court receive lifetime appointments and can have a profound influence on daily life. Sotomayor would be a new voice on the cases that often reflect divisions in the broader society, including national security, abortion, gay rights and privacy.

Even before she was nominated, conservative activists were describing her as a judicial activist who would put feelings above the Constitution.

Sotomayor seemed to take the matter head on. She said the rule of law is the foundation of all basic rights and the principles set forth by the Founding Fathers endure. "Those principles," she said at the White House, "are as meaningful and relevant in each generation as the generation before."

The nomination of the woman who would be the first Hispanic justice comes with the United States on a population path that will see minorities become the majority, and Hispanic leaders saw Tuesday's nomination as significant.

"We are reaching a certain level politically and socially, and this is being recognized by the administration," said Gabriela Lemus of the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement.

As a kid in New York's South Bronx, Sotomayor had to deal with diabetes but dreamed of a career in law, inspired by reading Nancy Drew books and watching "Perry Mason" on TV.

"Although I grew up in very modest and challenging circumstances, I consider my life to be immeasurably rich," said Sotomayor, who smiled broadly as she introduced her mother, Celina, in the front row. The nominee is divorced with no children.

Yet it is her written and spoken opinions, not her compelling life story, that are likely to shape the tone of her confirmation consideration in the Senate.

Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said he had talked with Obama and Sotomayor Tuesday and assured them she would be treated fairly. "I'd like it to be a hearing that people can be proud of," he said.

In one of her most memorable rulings as federal district judge, in 1995, Sotomayor ruled with Major League Baseball players over owners in a labor strike that had led to the cancellation of the World Series. "Some say that Judge Sotomayor saved baseball," Obama said.

She became a federal judge for the Southern District of New York in 1992, then an appeals judge in 1998 for the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers New York, Vermont and Connecticut.

Obama chose her over three other finalists: federal appellate judge Diane Wood, Solicitor General Elena Kagan and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. Obama interviewed all of them, too, last week. He decided on Sotomayor at about 8 p.m. Monday and telephoned her with the good news.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Obama never questioned Sotomayor specifically about abortion, often a flash-point topic for court nominees.

Obama came to office at a time when several potential vacancies loomed on the high court. Justice John Paul Stevens is 89, and Ginsburg recently underwent surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Sotomayor has spoken about her pride in her ethnic background and has said that personal experiences "affect the facts that judges choose to see."

"I simply do not know exactly what the difference will be in my judging," she said in a speech in 2001. "But I accept there will be some based on my gender and my Latina heritage."

___

Associated Press writers David Espo, Darlene Superville, Ben Evans, Jesse J. Holland and Julie Hirschfeld Davis contributed to this story.

WASHINGTON — Reaching for history, President Barack Obama on Tuesday chose federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court, championing her as a compa...
WASHINGTON — Reaching for history, President Barack Obama on Tuesday chose federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court, championing her as a compa...
Filed by Rachel Weiner
 
Comments
4782
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
photo

Benjamin Cardozo was actually the first hispanic on the Supreme Court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 PM on 05/27/2009
- Bronxdude I'm a Fan of Bronxdude 298 fans permalink

Carl Rove has repeatedly stated that Judge Sonia Sotomayor lacks the intellectual ability to sit on the Supreme Court. What makes Carl Rove (high school graduate and Bush’s minion/hand puppet) competent to critique Judge Sotomayor’s intellectual attributes? Let’s review the facts. After graduating valedictorian from New York’s prestigious Cardinal Spellman High School, Judge Sotomayor went on to graduate summa cum laude from Princeton, and later received a law degree from Yale, where she was also elected Editor of the influential Yale Law Journal. In comparison, Bush was a legacy admission to Yale and graduated “thank-you-laude” with a paltry C average. Why is it that every minority candidate (Thurgood Marshall, Clarence Thomas, and Sonia Sotomayor) nominated to the Supreme Court has been criticized by White (male) pundits as being intellectually incompetent? Even though Judge Alito was affiliated with a racist organization (he denied knowing the group was racist) while at Princeton and had an unremarkable tenure as a student while attending law school at Yale, no one ever questioned his intellectual ability before and during his confirmation hearing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 05/27/2009

Why would Ashcroft ask her about whether prisoners have a right to homosexual conduct? What case law is he referring to?

What do prisoner's sexual rights have to do with a judicial appointment?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 05/27/2009
- Renee27 I'm a Fan of Renee27 13 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 05/27/2009
- AngieMom57 I'm a Fan of AngieMom57 68 fans permalink
photo

Again, our POTUS Obama gets things done in record time; this man must love what he does cuz it shows! :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 PM on 05/26/2009
- mudshark12 I'm a Fan of mudshark12 5 fans permalink

The right lady at the right time as far as I'm concerned. However I expect the the GOP to squawk but, then again they've been doing nothing else since Barrack took office five months ago. The Repugs may, sooner of later, come to the realization that this behavior makes them look like a gang of idiots.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 05/26/2009
- Renee27 I'm a Fan of Renee27 13 fans permalink

I am happy for the Ms Sotomayor but unfortunately some individuals are labeling her an Affirmative Action pick. I think that its sad that in 2009 we still have people who will question someone's intellect and qualifications based on their ethnic background or gender. The fact that she came from the school of hard knocks and she has been able to accomplish more than all of our current Supreme Court justices when they started makes her one of the most qualified people ever.

Some people are born on 3rd base, but think they have hit a home run. But she has proven that she is not one of those people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 05/26/2009
- Bronxdude I'm a Fan of Bronxdude 298 fans permalink

As a fellow South Bronxite, Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s Supreme Court nomination fills my heart with ecstasy and anticipation. Regardless of one’s beginning or circumstance, the sky can be the limit, with hard work and focus. Princeton and Yale…can’t do much better than that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 05/27/2009
- AhnAmuru I'm a Fan of AhnAmuru 11 fans permalink
photo

It's their moment guys, let's all join in & celebrate!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 05/26/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 214 fans permalink

For hispanics of this nation it is a very proud moment ... and, we should all celebrate & welcome more fairness and diversity ... ALAS !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 05/26/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 214 fans permalink

I'm really starting to feel sorry for repubs ... most seem to be suffering from this very awful, incurable disease ... it's really badddd ! They "publicly" question the IQ of a woman clearly worthy of any HIGH position in the world !!! These (repubs) are very ill people !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 05/26/2009
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
photo

Maybe there should be an entrance exam before one is seated in the Senate?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 05/26/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 214 fans permalink

Too late ... the nutbuckets seem firmly dug in already !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 05/26/2009
- rockyb26 I'm a Fan of rockyb26 131 fans permalink
photo

Quick Vote
Do you agree with President Obama's selection of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the next U.S. Supreme Court justice?
Yes 68% 165064
No 32% 76162
Total Votes: 241226

www.cnn.com

the usual split

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 05/26/2009

So it's all tied up LOL!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 05/26/2009
photo

I wish senators would ask nominees if corporations should qualify as a "natural person" under the Constitution

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 05/26/2009
- BLBass I'm a Fan of BLBass 30 fans permalink

That would be extremely interesting...an actual discussion of constitutional interpretation during proceedings to decide whether someone is good enough to do that for life on the Supreme Court. On the other hand, it is probably inappropriate to ask this question outright, as it seems reasonable to assume this question might reach the SC within the new justice's tenure. Legislatio­n/Constitu­tional Amendment is probably the best way to advance the issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 05/26/2009
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
photo

Good point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 05/26/2009
- dianhow I'm a Fan of dianhow 71 fans permalink

Ecom Yes A corporation UNDER OUR LAWS HAS PERSON HOOD.
How can that be ? That is patently ridiculous ! How is it that this is not common knowledge ?
Once more- the overpaid corp news media fails to keep us properly informed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 05/26/2009
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 05/26/2009
photo

I am curious to hear about her decisions. So far, I have to say, I have "empathy" for those white guys who sued for discrimination and whose case she apparently dismissed. That's not fair. A fair use of justice. That was strictly a political application of justice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 05/26/2009
- shivadas I'm a Fan of shivadas 9 fans permalink

I'm sure that the down-trodden white race will survive, somehow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 PM on 05/26/2009
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
photo

I know what you mean. I have empathy for the white guys on the USSC, also!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 05/26/2009
- dianhow I'm a Fan of dianhow 71 fans permalink

You will find she is highly qualified. and She was originally appointed by Bush SR !
SO how can the Repubs disagree ? This should be quite interesting..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 05/26/2009
- loveu2 I'm a Fan of loveu2 6 fans permalink

the GOP is just afraid of smart!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 05/26/2009
photo

Personally I think this woman will make a great judge, but I am curious about her views on religion. Is she religious? If so, will this be a problem when making a decision on, like, Roe v. Wade? I'm NOT saying she should be singled out...I think this is a valid question to ask of any potential nominee to the Supreme Court. Why shouldn't we know about their religious persuasions? Or, lack of them? We act like there is some imaginary plateau, an ideal, on the exercise of justice, a superhuman power, if such a thing like that is possible. But as anyone who has had to deal with the justice system in one way or the other will note, laws are NOT perfect. Like the Bible, they're man-made, prone to mistakes...simply because we are human.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 05/26/2009
- oldguru I'm a Fan of oldguru 24 fans permalink
photo

She is, apparently ,another Roman Catholic. That makes 6 of the 9. I would hope someone would ask her if she is willing to face the threat of excommunication if she stands up for a woman's right to choose. If the "church" is going to deny communion to Kerry because he is a Democrat, they will go all out to force a decision against Roe v Wade. I want to hear,at least, her views on the separation of church and state.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 05/26/2009
- dianhow I'm a Fan of dianhow 71 fans permalink

As a judge / attorney - she will uphold the law.. Roe v Wade etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 05/26/2009
- dianhow I'm a Fan of dianhow 71 fans permalink

She is Catholic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 05/26/2009
photo

¡Fantástico! ¡Éste es un día de la celebración!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 05/26/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect