North Korea Restarts Nuclear Plant, Threatens South Korea: Reports

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - North Korea Restarts Nuclear Plant, Threatens South Korea: Reports stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HYUNG-JIN KIM | May 27, 2009 11:48 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
South Korean researchers check air samples for radioactive material at the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety following North Korea's second nuclear test Monday in Daejeon, South Korea, Wednesday, May 27, 2009.(AP Photo/Yonhap, Lim Hun-jung)

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean and U.S. troops facing North Korea boosted their alert level Thursday to the highest category since 2006, after the communist regime threatened military strikes on allied troops in escalating tensions over its nuclear test.

North Korea threatened Wednesday to attack any U.S. and South Korean ships that try to intercept its vessels and renounced a 1953 truce halting the Korean War fighting, raising the prospect of a naval clash off the Korean peninsula's west coast.

The North was responding to Seoul's decision to join a U.S.-led anti-proliferation program aimed at stopping and inspecting ships suspected of transporting banned weapons, including nuclear technology. South Korea announced it was joining after the North's underground test blast of a nuclear bomb.

On Thursday, the South Korea-U.S. combined forces command increased the surveillance to level 2 from the present level 3, Defense Ministry spokesman Won Tae-jae said. He said that was the highest level since 2006, when the North conducted its first-ever nuclear test.

The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea as a deterrent against North Korea.

Won said the bolstered level means more aviation surveillance assets, intelligence analysts and other intelligence-collecting measures would be deployed to watch North Korea. He refused to disclose further details.

The North has long warned it would consider the South's participation in the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative as a declaration of war against North Korea.

The North would "deal a decisive and merciless retaliatory blow" to anyone trying to inspect its vessels, according to a North Korean military statement, carried by the official Korean Central News Agency on Wednesday.

Story continues below
advertisement

Key world powers, meanwhile, have proposed a range of expanded U.N. sanctions against North Korea in response to its nuclear as well as measures to give teeth to existing bans and ship searches against the reclusive country, a U.N. diplomat said Wednesday.

The five permanent veto-wielding council members _ the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France _ and the two countries most closely affected by the nuclear test, Japan and South Korea, discussed possible U.N. sanctions and other measures for a new Security Council resolution on Tuesday.

The diplomat, who is familiar with the talks but spoke on condition of anonymity because they were closed, said there was a clear commitment to go for sanctions in the new resolution and no reluctance from North Korea's allies, China and Russia. But what measures the 15-member council ultimately agrees to remains to be seen.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton also said that North Korea faces consequences for its nuclear and missile tests and denouncing its "provocative and belligerent" threats. She also underscored the firmness of the U.S. treaty commitment to defend South Korea and Japan, which are in easy range of North Korean missiles.

Pyongyang lashed out at both the U.S. and South Korea, calling Seoul's move to join the Proliferation Security Initiative tantamount to a declaration of war and a violation of the truce keeping the peace between the two Koreas.

"Full participation in the PSI by a side on the Korean Peninsula where the state of military confrontation is growing acute and there is constant danger of military conflict itself means igniting a war," North Korea's Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea said in a statement carried on state media.

North Korea's army said it would be "illogical" to honor the 1953 armistice between the two Koreas, given the violations by the U.S. and South Korea, and said it could no longer promise the safety of U.S. and South Korean warships and civilian vessels in the waters near the maritime border.

Clinton said North Korea has made a choice to violate U.N. Security Council resolutions, ignore international warnings and abrogate commitments made during six-nation nuclear disarmament talks.

"There are consequences to such actions," she said, referring to discussions in the United Nations about punishing North Korea for its nuclear and missile tests.

She did not provide specifics, saying only that the intent of diplomats was to "try to rein in the North Koreans" and get them to fulfill commitments made in the nuclear talks.

Clinton said she was pleased by a unified international condemnation of North Korea that included Russia and China, North Korea's closest major ally and the host of the currently stalled disarmament talks.

Despite her tough words, Clinton held out hope that North Korea would return to nuclear disarmament talks and that "we can begin once again to see results from working with the North Koreans toward denuclearization that will benefit, we believe, the people of North Korea, the region and the world."

At the White House, spokesman Robert Gibbs played down North Korea's angry rhetoric, saying the threats will only add to its isolation.

He said North Korea has threatened to end the armistice many times in the past but the peace has held.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said it voiced "serious concern" about the nuclear test to the North Korean ambassador and urged Pyongyang to respect the U.N. resolutions and return to the disarmament talks.

The truce signed in 1953 and subsequent military agreements call for both sides to refrain from warfare, but don't cover waters off the west coast. North Korea has used the maritime border dispute to provoke two deadly naval skirmishes _ in 1999 and 2002.

North Korea now is believed to have enough plutonium for at least a half-dozen weapons, but experts say it still has not mastered the miniaturization technology required to mount a nuclear warhead on a long-range missile.

After firing a long-range missile on July 4, 2006, and carrying out its first nuclear test three months later, North Korea agreed in February 2007 to start disabling Yongbyon in exchange for 1 million tons of fuel oil and other concessions. Disablement began in November 2007.

The process halted last summer in a dispute with Washington over verifying past atomic activities, and Pyongyang said last month it was quitting the talks altogether.

___

Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim in Seoul, and Foster Klug, Pamela Hess in Washington and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean and U.S. troops facing North Korea boosted their alert level Thursday to the highest category since 2006, after the communist regime threatened military strikes...
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean and U.S. troops facing North Korea boosted their alert level Thursday to the highest category since 2006, after the communist regime threatened military strikes...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win
 
Comments
41
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

This should be on the front page.

Im a democrat and I admit that I'm rather liberal and a lover of peace... but while we should never instigate a fight....we should also never run from one.

Kim Jung Il is backing us into a corner he is giving the rest of the world no choice... If he makes a move of hostility...Its time to kill him and his family.

Nuclear if need be. Kim Jung Il must be stone crazy, he is singlehandedly trying to drag the world into a world war

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 05/27/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 261 fans permalink
photo

I agree, but maybe the only way would be to convince China it was in their best interest to topple him and his family for a more obedient client state.

Japan is also talking of constitutional changes to their military's status, which could assist South Korea in another scenario. In the middle is us. Good luck informing China on that latter one, Hillary!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 05/27/2009
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

Why would you not support doing this to Pakistan that has a million crazies?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/29/2009

Yes, Kim Jong Ill does look like a crazy man. Just as Crazy as Bush/Cheney did leading up to the Iraq War.

NK - if we nuke SK we won't feel a thing

USA - the Iraqis will greet us with flowers and consider us liberators

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

WHY IS THIS NOT FRONT-PAGE NEWS???

It seems to be a very important thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 05/27/2009
- producedby I'm a Fan of producedby 4 fans permalink
photo

With Kim Jong feelin ill, he may just wanna do as much damage before he drops off.

just saying, it seems that no matter what, diplomacy is not an option with these fools.

gotta do summtin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 05/27/2009

Hmm, somebody's feeling a lil left out in the drama that is international politics- had to stamp their feet and throw a tantrum to get some attention, eh?


If you think about it, the world is just one great big clique-y high school.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 05/27/2009
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

China sides with the Burmese (Mayanmar) Miltary Junta.

China sides with the Maosts in Nepal.

The Chinese sides with the P0rky Army/ISI instead of the P0rki civilian govt.

China sides with every two bit d!ctators in Africa.

China sides with Sudan dicttat0rs.

China sides with Srilakan Army who just K!lled so many Tamils and vi0lated all kinds of Human rights.

China sides with Iran

China sides with all the nasties around the world.

And now China sides with N.Korea.

CHINA is the father of the Axis of EviI!

YET..you have Oshama and PeI0si sucking Ch!nese Sausage! ARSEHOLES!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 05/27/2009
- PengieP I'm a Fan of PengieP 5 fans permalink
photo

Actually, I think China was probably on the right side with the Sinhalese opposing the Tamil tigers. The Tamil Tigers were BAD guys and deserved their fate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 05/27/2009
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

Its a civil war there.

Look at it this way. The Tamils lost. and yet you will not see them b0mb or terr0rize others now that they have lost the war. They wore uniforms like solders.

Unlike lsIamists. They never go away!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

Nothing will ever happen until China signs on. They apparently are unaware (or have some undisclosed motive for not acting) of the threat DPRK holds on the capitalist ventures in which China is heavily engaged. China seems to look at it as an impotent buzzing fly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

China needs to get its head out of its assets. They're worried about being rushed by thousands of refugees if they impose harsher sanctions and (of course) their business interests. If god-complex guy lets a nuke off, they'll have a much bigger problem than refugees.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 05/27/2009
- vinny I'm a Fan of vinny 72 fans permalink
photo

"The U.S. sanctions policy toward North Korea is like striking a rock with a rotten egg."

i don't get it...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 05/27/2009
- CAP6 I'm a Fan of CAP6 15 fans permalink

It stinks a lttle, but does no harm. Just a wild guess really. :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

I'll throw a rotten egg at him alright

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

Obama's reaction to this development is the rotten egg... It has a thin shell, but the inside is just nasty putrid mess.
The rock is NK's belligerent stand on what they want- they will do it no matter what.

You can't stop the rock by trying to beat it down with a rotten egg (stern words)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

Zzzzzzz


North Korea trying to impress people again huh?


They don't have a pot to piss in, let alone seriously threatening the US and South Korea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 05/27/2009
- yakaria I'm a Fan of yakaria 16 fans permalink
photo

You seem to forget that their "Dear Leader" is crazy and would probably follow through with his threats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 05/27/2009
- cef911f1 I'm a Fan of cef911f1 13 fans permalink
photo

Their military is only slightly smaller than ours. It's the fourth of fifth largest in the world. Their largest missile can reach all of Japan & South Korea. I believe it can reach parts of Hawaii and Alaska. They have nukes. The 5'2" Kim Jong Ill is, IMHO, a bit off center. I would say there is a lot to worry about here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 05/27/2009

Perhaps the USA hopes that N. Korea does fire a shot or two in anger. At that point all excuses to wipe out their military capability go out the window.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

DPRK reminds me of The Mouse That Roared, they have been extorting money from the West for decades by rattling the little box with The Bomb in it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 05/27/2009
- 111 I'm a Fan of 111 33 fans permalink

well, the US and Israel start preventive wars, bomb your enemy before they bomb you, and our governments think that is the wise, prudent thing to do.

why are we surprised that another country is going to do the same thing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 05/27/2009
- rwext I'm a Fan of rwext 8 fans permalink

HMMMMMM , do we recall Pres Bush' axis of evil ?... He took care of one,,, and now look at Iran and Nkorea......Every day , Pres Bush' policies seem to have been the correct way more and more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

The "Axis of Evil" nonsense is the work of Bush speechwriter David Frum. Pick your evils and add an axis. It's easy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 05/27/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 108 fans permalink

If only Al-Qaeda had been on the list, we would all be safe today! ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

Let's see, before Bush, NK had a little dictator with a nuclear reactor and no bomb. After Bush they have detonated 2 nukes and have refined enough uranium for four to six more. Yep, that worked really well
As far as the 'he took care of one' comment ... you need a reality check

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

In case you can't tell, Bush is out of office and Obama has taken over, letting the things you mentioned happen.

There's going to come a point in time where you have to stop blaming Bush for everything...
That was in January.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/27/2009
- 111 I'm a Fan of 111 33 fans permalink

but he didn't protect us from the 9/11 attack after he was told who was going to attack us, how it was going to happen, when it was likely to happen

bush -
good at calling other countries evil, weak on protecting America

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 05/27/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 108 fans permalink

Actually, he "took care of" all three, as only Pres Bush could've done. They are all far more powerful and far more hostile to us than they were when he made that speech. The only exception is that Saddam Hussein is dead.

Let's see ... half a trillion to kill one bad guy ... half a million NEW bad guys, thanks to Cheney and his little in-house terrorist recruitment program ... that means only 250 quadrillion dollars ought to fix our problems once and for all.

I hope you don't mind paying a slightly increased tax rate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 05/27/2009
- Mahi Joe I'm a Fan of Mahi Joe 48 fans permalink

He took care of what? His stupidity and arrogance got us into a real quagmire which has left us so far with over 4,000 American soldiers lives lost as well as countless innocent Iraqis. Oh yeah, forgot Bush flew his "Mission Accomplished" banner so we must have won the war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

Mr Ill seems to be more and more like a James Bond bad guy to me. He seems to be more than a little crazy and appears to have dreams of world domination.

If he does not launch a nuke, he can be stopped. If he start bombing anyone else, I suspect that his nukes will be detonated in their launch bays, for him.

Either way, this is sad,

We still have many repressive regimes around, to me it is a sign that we are not as advanced from our relatives as we want to think. Our tools are just more sophisticated than the rooks use to get the worm out of the trap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 05/27/2009
- outnow I'm a Fan of outnow 173 fans permalink

"A James Bond bad guy" named Dr. No.

Is he crazy, suicidal, or just an extortionist? Maybe he is crazy like a fox. His safety means endangering neighbors. He seems delusional but also has some point is protecting his country from outside aggression.

After what happened in Iraq, he is more threatened.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

My take on Kim Jong-Il is that he's not bent on world domination. Like his father, I suspect he is more interested in keeping absolute control over his own little corner of it.
He, like his father, is looked at as a deity by his people. Unlike his father, I suspect he actually believes it.
He sees the people of North Korea as his personal property. He obviously has no qualms in having them suffer for His greater glory. In some ways he is a god.
I think that what he wants is to be feared, respected and taken seriously by other world leaders. He needs affirmation. Look at the guy - he's short, fat and ugly. He has serious issues.
He uses the bomb to keep sway over his people. He's telling them "look at what I can do (for the glory of NK ... of course)". You need me.
If push comes to shove, I sincerely believe he will use the nukes. But left to his own devices, I don't think he will.
Yet he is a threat to regional stability and the world should continue diplomacy. Isolating this regime would be a mistake.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 05/27/2009
- DLBSR I'm a Fan of DLBSR 13 fans permalink

The North Korean regime is unpredictable and does possess the capabilities to do great harm to not only South Korea, but to other countries in the region as well with respect to her inventory of short and medium range missiles. With approximately 70% of her conventional forces poised in a "forward leaning" posture within 100 miles of the DMZ, NK could quickly overwhelm defensive forces south of the border, with devastating consequences to people and infrastructure.
However, NK's ability to wage sustained combat are limited and she will face devastating retaliation for any attack on SK. At the end of the day, NK will lose the fight, a fact Kim Jong Ill is well aware of. Therefore, I don't believe NK will launch a massive conventional invasion of SK when it is fully aware such an attack would be the end game for the NK regime.
Beginning in the early 1990's, NK re-equipped, and forward deployed the majority of its ground forces. The army places great emphasis on special operations and has the 2nd largest special operations forces in the world. If NK intends to act offensively against SK, it will probably choose a limited approach by employing these special operations units to wreak havoc on SK's infrastructure as opposed to the "end game" approach, that is doing what NK does very well, playing the brinkmanship game. But then, I could be wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 05/27/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect