North Korea Threatens Attack If Ships Searched

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - North Korea Threatens Attack If Ships Searched stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HYUNG-JIN KIM | May 27, 2009 11:48 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
South Korean researchers check air samples for radioactive material at the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety following North Korea's second nuclear test Monday in Daejeon, South Korea, Wednesday, May 27, 2009.(AP Photo/Yonhap, Lim Hun-jung)

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean and U.S. troops facing North Korea boosted their alert level Thursday to the highest category since 2006, after the communist regime threatened military strikes on allied troops in escalating tensions over its nuclear test.

North Korea threatened Wednesday to attack any U.S. and South Korean ships that try to intercept its vessels and renounced a 1953 truce halting the Korean War fighting, raising the prospect of a naval clash off the Korean peninsula's west coast.

The North was responding to Seoul's decision to join a U.S.-led anti-proliferation program aimed at stopping and inspecting ships suspected of transporting banned weapons, including nuclear technology. South Korea announced it was joining after the North's underground test blast of a nuclear bomb.

On Thursday, the South Korea-U.S. combined forces command increased the surveillance to level 2 from the present level 3, Defense Ministry spokesman Won Tae-jae said. He said that was the highest level since 2006, when the North conducted its first-ever nuclear test.

The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea as a deterrent against North Korea.

Won said the bolstered level means more aviation surveillance assets, intelligence analysts and other intelligence-collecting measures would be deployed to watch North Korea. He refused to disclose further details.

The North has long warned it would consider the South's participation in the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative as a declaration of war against North Korea.

The North would "deal a decisive and merciless retaliatory blow" to anyone trying to inspect its vessels, according to a North Korean military statement, carried by the official Korean Central News Agency on Wednesday.

Story continues below
advertisement

Key world powers, meanwhile, have proposed a range of expanded U.N. sanctions against North Korea in response to its nuclear as well as measures to give teeth to existing bans and ship searches against the reclusive country, a U.N. diplomat said Wednesday.

The five permanent veto-wielding council members _ the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France _ and the two countries most closely affected by the nuclear test, Japan and South Korea, discussed possible U.N. sanctions and other measures for a new Security Council resolution on Tuesday.

The diplomat, who is familiar with the talks but spoke on condition of anonymity because they were closed, said there was a clear commitment to go for sanctions in the new resolution and no reluctance from North Korea's allies, China and Russia. But what measures the 15-member council ultimately agrees to remains to be seen.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton also said that North Korea faces consequences for its nuclear and missile tests and denouncing its "provocative and belligerent" threats. She also underscored the firmness of the U.S. treaty commitment to defend South Korea and Japan, which are in easy range of North Korean missiles.

Pyongyang lashed out at both the U.S. and South Korea, calling Seoul's move to join the Proliferation Security Initiative tantamount to a declaration of war and a violation of the truce keeping the peace between the two Koreas.

"Full participation in the PSI by a side on the Korean Peninsula where the state of military confrontation is growing acute and there is constant danger of military conflict itself means igniting a war," North Korea's Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea said in a statement carried on state media.

North Korea's army said it would be "illogical" to honor the 1953 armistice between the two Koreas, given the violations by the U.S. and South Korea, and said it could no longer promise the safety of U.S. and South Korean warships and civilian vessels in the waters near the maritime border.

Clinton said North Korea has made a choice to violate U.N. Security Council resolutions, ignore international warnings and abrogate commitments made during six-nation nuclear disarmament talks.

"There are consequences to such actions," she said, referring to discussions in the United Nations about punishing North Korea for its nuclear and missile tests.

She did not provide specifics, saying only that the intent of diplomats was to "try to rein in the North Koreans" and get them to fulfill commitments made in the nuclear talks.

Clinton said she was pleased by a unified international condemnation of North Korea that included Russia and China, North Korea's closest major ally and the host of the currently stalled disarmament talks.

Despite her tough words, Clinton held out hope that North Korea would return to nuclear disarmament talks and that "we can begin once again to see results from working with the North Koreans toward denuclearization that will benefit, we believe, the people of North Korea, the region and the world."

At the White House, spokesman Robert Gibbs played down North Korea's angry rhetoric, saying the threats will only add to its isolation.

He said North Korea has threatened to end the armistice many times in the past but the peace has held.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said it voiced "serious concern" about the nuclear test to the North Korean ambassador and urged Pyongyang to respect the U.N. resolutions and return to the disarmament talks.

The truce signed in 1953 and subsequent military agreements call for both sides to refrain from warfare, but don't cover waters off the west coast. North Korea has used the maritime border dispute to provoke two deadly naval skirmishes _ in 1999 and 2002.

North Korea now is believed to have enough plutonium for at least a half-dozen weapons, but experts say it still has not mastered the miniaturization technology required to mount a nuclear warhead on a long-range missile.

After firing a long-range missile on July 4, 2006, and carrying out its first nuclear test three months later, North Korea agreed in February 2007 to start disabling Yongbyon in exchange for 1 million tons of fuel oil and other concessions. Disablement began in November 2007.

The process halted last summer in a dispute with Washington over verifying past atomic activities, and Pyongyang said last month it was quitting the talks altogether.

___

Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim in Seoul, and Foster Klug, Pamela Hess in Washington and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean and U.S. troops facing North Korea boosted their alert level Thursday to the highest category since 2006, after the communist regime threatened military strikes...
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean and U.S. troops facing North Korea boosted their alert level Thursday to the highest category since 2006, after the communist regime threatened military strikes...
Filed by Marcus Baram
 
Comments
805
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

Wait, The IiberaIs here are telling us that Pakistan with its lsIamists is not dangerous and that we should give them $30 Billion (Sen John Kerry/Obama) but N.Korea is dangerous!

ROFLMAO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 05/28/2009
- BryantG I'm a Fan of BryantG 41 fans permalink
photo

Ok so I'm somewhat conflicted on this. Should we stop and search DPRK ships or not?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 05/28/2009
- steamboat I'm a Fan of steamboat 44 fans permalink

BREAKING NEWS: Ladies and gentlemen, I have the solution. Tell me if you agree?

All we have to do is send HuffPo contributor, Robert Scheer, to NKorea to talk to Kim Jong Il. Afterall, he's on record as saying NKorea is paradise, the world's greatest country. Don't believe me, see below and read his bio. Then tell me if I'm on to something.

http://www.nndb.com/people/098/000049948/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 05/27/2009

North Korea Is not going to nuke anyone. It would be like smacking someone with a gun. Do you really think they don't realize what would happen if they nuked anyone let alone us. Also all the people who talk about China backing North Korea are crazy. China would never go to war with us unless we were trying to destroy them. They do have more people but this is not ww2 and the next big war will not be fought nor won by the sheer number of men you have to storm a beach. It will be fought with all things that go boom and no one compares to us in that department. Besides we owe them tons of money and we buy all their crap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 05/27/2009
- BryantG I'm a Fan of BryantG 41 fans permalink
photo

"They do have more people but...". They also have more factories and can build more of just about anything. ...just a thought.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 05/28/2009

You see. If Iraq actually had WMDs ,there would have never been any attack on Iraq.

Lets see if anyone dares attack North Korea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 05/27/2009

Yes, that is what North and South Korea and NATO have agreed upon. North Korea wants to end over 50 years of cold war, but in a face-saving manner. The North and South will then reunite according to a previously agreed upon timetable.

You see, in this world of ours, with Internet and Mass media and WMD and an increasingly skeptical population and trillions of euros at stake, nothing is left to chance. Nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 05/27/2009
- Dailykook I'm a Fan of Dailykook 14 fans permalink
photo

I thought under super O we were heralded into a world of soft power and world wide diplomacy! N. Korea never mentioned nuclear strikes under Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 05/27/2009
- jwredd I'm a Fan of jwredd 45 fans permalink

Ready for another war there toughguy?

And...um....... weren't they working on their nukes while we were stuck under Bush? You really don't remember any mention of nuclear weapons? W T F

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 05/27/2009

So what is a great savior (Obama) will do? Call another meeting at UN?

Since everyone on these boards was complaining about Bush and Co. I am waiting for the Great Leader of US to come up with solution...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 PM on 05/27/2009

He wont start A WAR for sure and Korea wont be attacking anyone since they wont get attacked. I dont know about you,but thats fine with me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 05/27/2009

This is so scary! During the campaign, Joe Biden said, "It won't be 6 months before the mettle of this guy is tested, and the world's gonna find out just how tough he really is". Probably just Joe running off at the mouth again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 05/27/2009
- katooom I'm a Fan of katooom 18 fans permalink
photo

Let him say all he wants. Just ignore the guy. Narcissism at its worst.

I was disappointed to hear Clinton say 'we will defend SKorea'.

Why is it our business to defend SK?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 05/27/2009

Because they are our allies?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 05/27/2009
- katooom I'm a Fan of katooom 18 fans permalink
photo

Is there a treaty? What do we get from SK?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 05/27/2009
- fallout4U I'm a Fan of fallout4U 30 fans permalink
photo

Clinton spoke in Washington after North Korea’s official news agency said Kim’s government would no longer abide by the 1953 armistice that ended the Korean War and may respond militarily to South Korea’s participation in a U.S.-led program that would block ships suspected of carrying nuclear weapons or material for export.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=awBTCPe7S2gw&refer=worldwide

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 05/27/2009

Send a note to KIM JUNG ILL testing His History The note will have two names NAGASAKI and HIROSHIMA see if He understands

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 05/27/2009

Big talk but do you really understand the ramifications of such an action. You need to come here to Japan and go to the memorial each year (my wife and I take our son every year) and hear the survivors speak about what it as like. We as Americans have never really lost anything in battle so were quick to spout nationalistic nonsense. In WW2 the British and other european countries saw hard times, we sat comfortably until it was almost over and fly in clean up and take all the credit. The generation who did the majority of the fighting and dying in the last 2 major wars are almost all gone now. And unfortunately what we are left with is a bunch of armchair quarterbacks who think dropping nukes is something to be taken lightly. Well since we have a track record of doing this to people be prepared for the possibility someone will return the favor next time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 05/27/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 557 fans permalink
photo

Right on.

WWII casualties among major belligerents (approx. figures) :

USSR 23,000,000+ (moderately conservative estimate)
Germany 7,500,000
Japan 3,000,000
UK (Commonwealth) 650,000
France 550,000
Italy 450,000
US 400,000

Notice that, with the only exception of the USSR, the US was by far the most populous country (something like Germany, Britain and France combined. Or twice Japan.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 05/27/2009

We have always been too afraid of China to forge an intelligent policy to deal with NK. If that doesn't change NK has no reason to change. Our policies have been pretty consistent no matter party the President is from. This issue is bigger than people making Bush or Obama jokes. There is really no reason to make this a conservative versus liberal issue.

This is a world's greatest nation verus danger issue. The ball is in our court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 05/27/2009
- booboo111 I'm a Fan of booboo111 75 fans permalink
photo

Dear leader is a big Elvis fan. Apparently, he loves doing karioke to Elvis. Maybe Priscilla could take a trip over there with some genuine Elvis memorabilia and talk him out of his nuclear ambitions.­..........­..You have a better plan? This could work!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 05/27/2009
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

Prisceilla can blow Dear leader of South Korea while Nancy Pelosi blows Dear leader of China.

Thats the least those two can do for our country!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 05/27/2009
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

Prisceilla can bIow Dear leader of South Korea while Nancy Pelosi bIows Dear leader of China.

Thats the least those two can do for our country!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 05/27/2009

Everyone calm down - the bottom line is North Korea is running a scam. They always puff up when Kim San needs money. The truth is he does not have the balls to nuke anyone. Remember the only one's to ever do that to anyone is US. You see once you do something like that to a civilization (just ask Japanese survivors at the memorials held here every year) people want to take precautions to make sure the crazy people who actually did this will think twice before doing it to them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 05/27/2009
- PCMinistry I'm a Fan of PCMinistry 25 fans permalink
photo

I don't blame them. Great paternal U.S. decides who in the world can have nukes and who can't? I would be indignant if I was a country being harrassed for my nuke program by a country that has plenty o' nukes. We will continue to try and control them and may pay with a nuclear disaster. Maybe we'll learn that we aren't the parents after that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

Then their violation of the nuke non-proliferation treaty is meaningless?

You aren't concerned with the Norks clandestinely shipping nuke technology to regimes such as Iran?

Foolish lefty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

Well, you know how to think rationally. Does the leader of North Korea (or Iran for that matter)? What if they don't think like you?

That's as much a valid statement as yours.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 05/27/2009
- PCMinistry I'm a Fan of PCMinistry 25 fans permalink
photo

What if the leader of OUR country doesn't think rationally. Either no one can have them or everyone can have them. But one country can't declare itself the "sanest"" and police everyone else. Especially when that country imprisons and kills more than anyone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 05/27/2009
- BryantG I'm a Fan of BryantG 41 fans permalink
photo

I think the idea is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons to non-nuclear nations while also reducing the numbers of such weapons by those who already possess them, eventually resulting in a non-nuclear world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 05/28/2009
- Fuji I'm a Fan of Fuji 11 fans permalink

I wonder if Obama is making another consultation call to Bush over this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

No

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 05/27/2009
- Fuji I'm a Fan of Fuji 11 fans permalink

And you know how???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 05/27/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect