iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lebanon Election Results: Pro-Western Majority Declares Victory

SAM F. GHATTAS   06/ 7/09 08:51 PM ET   AP

Mideast Lebanon Elections

BEIRUT — Lebanon's pro-Western coalition declared victory early Monday, as local television stations reported the faction had successfully fended off a serious challenge by the Shiite militant group Hezbollah and its allies to grab the majority in parliament.

Official results for Sunday's election were not expected until later Monday, but the winners were already celebrating by shooting in the air, setting off fireworks and driving around in honking motorcades.

The election was an early test of President Barack Obama's efforts to forge Middle East peace. A win by Hezbollah would have boosted the influence of its backers Iran and Syria and risked pushing one of the region's most volatile nations into international isolation and possibly into more conflict with Israel.

"I present this victory to Lebanon," Prime Minister Fuad Saniora said on television after stations projected his pro-Western coalition was winning. "It is an exceptional day for democracy in Lebanon."

OTV, the television station of one of Hezbollah's key Christian allies, former army chief Michel Aoun, conceded that the party's candidates who challenged pro-Western competitors in several Christian districts had been defeated, preventing a victory for the Hezbollah coalition. But Aoun was able to hang on to his representation in other districts.

Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation, a leading private Christian TV station, projected the pro-Western coalition to win 68 seats in the next parliament, with 57 for Hezbollah and its allies and three for independents.

That would almost replicate the deadlock that existed in the outgoing parliament, in which the pro-Western bloc had 70 seats and an alliance of Hezbollah and other Shiite and Christian factions had 58.

The leader of the largest bloc in the pro-Western coalition, Saad Hariri, said early Monday in a televised speech that he extends his hand to the losing side "to work together and seriously for the sake of Lebanon." He urged supporters to celebrate without provoking opponents.

But despite the conciliatory tone, Lebanon was at risk of sliding again into a political crisis over formation of the next government similar to the one that buffeted the country for most of the last four years.

Hezbollah had veto power in Saniora's Cabinet for the last year, which it won after provoking the worst street clashes since the 1975-1990 civil war. The pro-Western coalition had vowed not to give Hezbollah and its allies a blocking minority in the new government if they won.

The battle in Christian districts was the decisive factor. Lebanese generally vote along sectarian and family loyalties, with seats for Sunnis and Shiites in the half-Christian, half-Muslim, 128-member parliament already locked up even before the voting started.

Christians in the pro-Western coalition warned that Hezbollah would bring the influence of Shiite Iran to Lebanon. The Maronite Catholic Church made a last-minute appeal, warning that Lebanon as a state and its Arab identity were threatened, a clear reference to Hezbollah and its Persian backer, Iran.

Sunnis were also driven to vote for the pro-Western coalition to get back at Shiite Hezbollah gunmen for seizing the streets a year ago in Beirut from pro-government supporters.

Some 3.2 million people out of a population of 4 million were eligible to vote, and the interior minister said after polls closed that the turnout nationwide was about 52.3 percent, an increase over the 2005 figure of 45.8 percent.

Saniora won his first parliamentary seat in the southern port city of Sidon, defeating a pro-Hezbollah Sunni incumbent, according to TV projections.

The race for the parliament is the first major event in the Middle East since Obama reached out to the Arab and Islamic worlds last week in his speech in Cairo in which he called for a "new beginning between the United States and Muslims." Obama challenged Muslims to confront violent extremism across the globe and urged Israel and the Palestinians along with Arab states to find common ground on which to forge peace.

Hezbollah, which the U.S. considers a terrorist organization, has been one of the staunchest opponents of U.S. policy in the Middle East and a sworn enemy of Israel. It fought the Jewish state in southern Lebanon in 2006 in a devastating war and has tried to smuggle weapons to the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza through Egypt.

Obama's speech did not resonate in the election campaign. But warnings by the United States that it could reconsider aid depending on the election's outcome have sparked Hezbollah accusations of U.S. interference. The U.S. has given around $1 billion to Lebanon's pro-Western government since 2006.

In his Cairo speech, Obama said the United States "will welcome elected, peaceful governments, provided they govern with respect for all their people."

Former President Jimmy Carter, in Beirut to monitor the elections, expressed hope that the United States, Iran and other countries will recognize the results "and not try to interfere in the process."

Hezbollah's coalition includes the Shiite movement Amal and Aoun's Christian faction. Opposing it are the overwhelmingly Sunni Muslim supporters of current majority leader Hariri, allied with several Christian and Druse factions.

Hezbollah tried to strike a moderate tone in the election campaign. The group only fielded 11 candidates and must work with its various political allies.

The group's Christian allies argue that involving Hezbollah more deeply in the political process _ rather than shunning it _ is the only way to bridge the country's sectarian divides.

Their opponents counter that the heavily armed Hezbollah would be driving Lebanon into the arms of Iran, which could use it as a front in the Islamic republic's confrontation with Israel.

In Israel, government officials were concerned about gains by Hezbollah.

Israeli Vice Prime Minister Silvan Shalom said last week a victory by Hezbollah would be "very dangerous for the stability of the Middle East, and by that, the stability of the entire world."

The voting was largely peaceful, with complaints of long waits at polling stations from voters, many of whom had to travel across the country to cast their ballots. Army troops in armored personnel carriers and trucks took up positions on major highways, part of a 50,000-strong security force deployed for voting day.

President Michel Suleiman, among the early voters, cast his ballot in his hometown of Amchit on the coast north of Beirut. He set the political tone for the post-election period irrespective of who won, hoping for a national unity government, a prospect both sides have already raised.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BEIRUT — Lebanon's pro-Western coalition declared victory early Monday, as local television stations reported the faction had successfully fended off a serious challenge by the Shiite militant g...
BEIRUT — Lebanon's pro-Western coalition declared victory early Monday, as local television stations reported the faction had successfully fended off a serious challenge by the Shiite militant g...
Filed by Marcus Baram  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,791
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
11:10 PM on 06/22/2009
Such biased reporting!

Just because one coalition is 'pro-Western' -- what does that mean, by the way? -- we are to consider them as the good guys, our guys, whatever their policy prescriptions for the Lebanese people. And, because one Christian majority party sided with Hizbollah, it is now a Christian faction.

If Hizbollah are the stooges of Syria/Iran ... what are we to call the so-called pro-Western coalition?
08:26 AM on 06/10/2009
Now its time to get rid of Hezbollah's illegal army.
10:10 PM on 06/09/2009
Although billionaire Hariri's party won, it was "projected the pro-Western coalition to win 68 seats in the next parliament, with 57 for Hezbollah and its allies and three for independents.

That would almost replicate the deadlock that existed in the outgoing parliament, in which the pro-Western bloc had 70 seats and an alliance of Hezbollah and other Shiite and Christian factions had 58."

It seems to me Hezbollah is steadily increasing their numbers in democratic elections. This kind of increase in always better than a one-time win.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myarmsaregreen
10:49 AM on 06/09/2009
The outcome in Lebanon is another good reason for the Obama Administration to make democracy a priority of its so-called new relationship with the Muslim world -- even if George W. Bush also happened to think it was a good idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
03:30 PM on 06/08/2009
The history of the middle east is tragic on so many levels. Beirut was once a truly beautiful city...but extremist in their own society destroyed much of it. Imperialism created so many problems and while the US was not imperialistic in the most rigid sense, we did help oust an elected president and replaced him with the pro West Shah of Iran. Not being content with that, when the shah was himself overthrown, we gave him political asylum here. Then to add insult to injury, during the 10-year war between Iraq and Iran, we back Iraq and Hussein...go figure that one if you can (actually the cold war was partly the problem) Then because he wouldn't become a US puppet (after Desert Storm) we bombed Iraq all to hell, killed unknown thousands of Iraqi citizens and handed Hussein over to a government that executed him.
I can only hope we learn once and for all, to stay out of the "politics" of other nations.
09:32 AM on 06/09/2009
Second that, StJames. And Americans are wondering why they are distasted so much...The general sentiment is that Americans are not sincere. They always want something from other countries even though that is not always the case. I've talked to American troops stationed in Asia who helped build houses and schools for kids. They did that out of their kind hearts, on their own time. But when it was reported in the press, even though many people appreciated it, a lot did not trust that these soldiers were sincere. They believed the Americans were there in their country with an agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CherokeeGirl
one pissed off Indian.
01:42 PM on 06/08/2009
Obama is setting the tone and providing a "good" example of how to behave.

And this is the first example of the voters calling for change.

HURRAY! :)
photo
redsongia
is not Chicago
01:11 PM on 06/08/2009
It's a little disingenous to attribute this party's hard won success to a speech a few days ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CherokeeGirl
one pissed off Indian.
01:43 PM on 06/08/2009
I dunno, maybe, but I think it does matter what obama said a few days ago.

Voters are very fickle, and can change their minds days before or even while casting their votes.
01:04 AM on 06/09/2009
Yeah, a few words from your President of the world is all it took, Bush gave the same (why can't we all just get along?) speech including the quotes from the Koran but minus the apologies.
01:08 PM on 06/08/2009
so let me get this straight - The Obama Effect - maintains status quo in lebanon elections and causes massive shift to the right in European elections - is that kinda how it is?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
montecarlo408
01:16 PM on 06/08/2009
You have really poor understanding. You don't read anything before you post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IcedTee63
This train of thought have a caboose?
01:33 PM on 06/08/2009
So you think that the Adminstration's efforts have done nothing to influence the direction of the Lebanese elections?
01:07 PM on 06/08/2009
I wonder what the "OVER/UNDER is in days before Hezbollah and its Syrian and Iranian allies assasinate the new leader??
01:18 PM on 06/08/2009
Hariri had many Lebanese enemies as well. It's *not* clearcut Damascus or Tehran were involved at all. On the contrary, the Hariri family dealings would have eventually undermined him in the end and all his enemies had to do was simply get out of the way.
01:23 PM on 06/08/2009
What does THAT have to do with THIS election NOW??? Wake up!Pay attention!!
photo
Kache
Citizens, Unite!
12:40 PM on 06/08/2009
The poll counts in Lebanon do not show a decrease in support for Hezbollah, but rather an increase in turnout by Maronite Christians suuporting the March 14 coalition.

Any Obama effect, among Muslims, has yet to show itself at a polling booth. Iran votes on Friday. A defeat for Hezbollah in Lebanon could effect Iranian sentiments either way, but probably not significantly. The Obama effect, if there is one this early, may have direct effect on Iran's elections but measuring it will be difficult. That wont keep pundits from making the case - both ways - regardless of the outcome.
12:07 PM on 06/08/2009
Oh no, no, no these are the seeds President Bush planted.

Obama is going to have to do much more appologizing to get results like that.
12:56 PM on 06/08/2009
because of B.U.S.H we have to apologize...B.U.S.H does not have the smarts to oull anything off except give us mess to clean up after him.
photo
gditty
My micro-bio is updated and pending approval
01:42 PM on 06/08/2009
Bombs are not seeds!!!
12:05 PM on 06/08/2009
if Bush and the conservatives were still in power the terrorists would of won.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bcasey11
go veg
11:46 AM on 06/08/2009
then America quickly funded and trained more Islamic extremist in the area
11:50 AM on 06/08/2009
What on EARTH are you blathering about???
12:49 PM on 06/08/2009
The US government has been funding the MEK for terrorist operations inside of Iran for a while now. Begun by Bush, there have been no indications that it has stopped. It's ironic that the US State department is funding the MEK despite it being on its own terrorist list....
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
11:25 AM on 06/08/2009
Extremists on the right tend to increase the ranks of extremist groups, while humane American thinking of the left and middle works better to diminish the ranks of extremist groups.

When people like us and are not afraid we are going to invade them, we do better in the world.

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2009/06/letter-from-white-house.html
12:34 PM on 06/08/2009
did Obamas buddy bill ayers approve this message?
12:57 PM on 06/08/2009
they do not know each other...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ToniaB
01:11 PM on 06/08/2009
When you can't think of anything intelligent to contribute to the discussion; bring up Bill Ayers! It worked so well for Palin and Mcain right...?
12:53 PM on 06/08/2009
But it was the same "liberal" policies in the 1960s and 1970s that saddled Middle Eastern countries like Egypt with unsustainable levels of international debt, which was then used to extract benefits and enforce compliance.

Once the "Western" approach failed, it was only natural for those left outside the corridors of power to begin searching for alternatives. Enter Salafism... it may have started roughly at the same time as other ideologies like European nationalism or Zionism, but it only took off midway through the Cold War.

Today, it's still a potent force. The people of the region have been witness to the hypocrisy of the West firsthand for decades.
01:03 PM on 06/08/2009
"1960s and 1970s"???? That would be who, Nixion/Agnew/Ford?????
11:00 AM on 06/08/2009
say, isn't it rather strange how the story about Europe's elections swinging to the right has virtually disappered from this site - probably because we astute observers were noting the Obama Effect
11:08 AM on 06/08/2009
You've been SCHOOLED on that ad nauseam, lightweight.. & your incessant PRATTLE is BORING.. to say the LEAST.

I LOVE how your BITTERNESS at President Obama's INTERNATIONAL SUCCESSES are eating away at your sanity.

PLEASE keep it up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HoneyRyder
New York City Web Designer
11:08 AM on 06/08/2009
I am not sure if you realise this, but in Europe, the conservative movement isn't the same type of lunatic conservative movement we have here in this country. Their idea of of conservativism is not as repressed and religious based. It's more about ideas, than values and religion.
11:09 AM on 06/08/2009
He realizes it, all right....

He's just too much of a COWARD to admit it.