House GOP's Energy Bill Calls For 100 Nuclear Plants

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - House GOP's Energy Bill Calls For 100 Nuclear Plants stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DINA CAPPIELLO | 06/10/09 03:48 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — House Republicans are calling for a hundred new nuclear power plants to be built in the next two decades as part of an energy plan they say is a better alternative than one championed by Democrats.

The legislation unveiled by the GOP Wednesday would also increase production of oil and gas offshore, open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling and spur refinery construction. The money from the new drilling would go into a trust fund that would pay for the development of renewable energy.

"You have a conflict of visions between the Democratic approach and the Republican alternative. It is a difference between the carrot and the stick," said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., who chaired the Republican task force charged with developing the legislation, which will be introduced this week.

The Democratic bill has the support of the White House and is on course to reach the House floor as early as the end of the month. It sets mandatory targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and for producing electricity from renewable sources.

Democrats believe that limits on global warming pollution _ which will require companies to spend money to reduce emissions _ are needed to encourage conservation and the development of cleaner forms of energy, including nuclear.

Republicans on Wednesday said that approach amounted to a national energy tax that would result in job losses and increase energy costs.

"The winter of our discontent comes not from the environmental climate, it comes from the economic climate," said Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-Mich. "Why at this point in time...would you come forward with a bill the premise of which is this: The government will control the weather by raising your taxes, taking you job and telling you how to live."

Republican leaders said their bill provides incentives to switch to cleaner energy sources, by extending tax credits for renewable energy and streamlining the permit process for nuclear power plants and refineries.

But it was unclear whether that would be enough to drive a transition on the scale needed to reduce emissions to avert the worst consequences of global warming.

House Democrats, in a memo handed out by aides after the Republican news conference, called the Republican plan "a rehash of failed energy policies."

___

On the Net:

Republicans in Congress: http://www.gop.gov

House Energy and Commerce Committee: http://energycommerce.house.gov

WASHINGTON — House Republicans are calling for a hundred new nuclear power plants to be built in the next two decades as part of an energy plan they say is a better alternative than one champion...
WASHINGTON — House Republicans are calling for a hundred new nuclear power plants to be built in the next two decades as part of an energy plan they say is a better alternative than one champion...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
133
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- research I'm a Fan of research 281 fans permalink

D@mn Socialist GOP!

Who is going to INSURE those plants?

The Government, that's who.

More Nuke power leads to proliferation leads to the end of the world. Really. India, Pakistan, etc...

Nuclear Apocalypse

For energy we can get cheaper, safe, faster and FOREVER from rooftop solar and BioChar.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 06/12/2009
- TexasDem0 I'm a Fan of TexasDem0 36 fans permalink

If they agree to build them in their home town,
and to store the nuclear waste in their basement,
then let's consider it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 06/12/2009
- SworldPeas I'm a Fan of SworldPeas 5 fans permalink

Like I said in an earlier post on this thread, the concrete used to build Nuclear power plants is dissolving and cracking. My post was met with opposition and 3 days later heres a story about a nuclear power plant that had a leak due to WHAT ELSE? cracks in the concrete. Like I said it's a serious problem that is not being addressed. These plants are all dissolving ticking time bombs.

The burden of liability has been removed from the industry, if there is an accident TAXPAYERS PAY. Give the industry back their liability and you won't see one built.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 06/12/2009
- elmerfude I'm a Fan of elmerfude 37 fans permalink

I can read. The story is about a crack in a pipe in a plant in the UK that wasn't operating because it was scheduled for decommissioning. I could not find the word concrete anywhere in the article. There was also a faulty monitoring device. This is a long way from raising the specter that all nuclear power plants in the US are "dissolving ticking time bombs." I think your credibility as a reporter is seriously damaged.

You are also wrong about the liability. Per the Price-Anderson Act all utilities with reactors have to pay if there is a serious accident requiring indemnification.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 06/12/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 160 fans permalink

Republicans want to "drill, baby, drill!" I wish they would "think, baby, think!" How long can they keep denying global warming and ignoring the fact they we have minimum petroleum reserves in America. They should get their collective heads out of the sand and consider alternative fuel sources.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 AM on 06/12/2009
- 1Eco I'm a Fan of 1Eco permalink

Best Movie Documentary of 2008! First found this amazing video on Sundance Channel.

The Nuclear Comeback..

http://1eco.com/

Movie trailer...

& link to the Sundance profile page.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 06/12/2009
photo

We have great opportunities to take advantage of our natural source of wind and geothermal and solar radiation. That should be our priority rather then importing all this highly priced foreign hardware. No solutions for waste disposal here:
http://republican.senate.gov/public/_files/100-new-nuclear-plants.pdf

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 06/11/2009
- SworldPeas I'm a Fan of SworldPeas 5 fans permalink

Solar first!!! I have solar but I don't have electric bills. If every house were solar enhanced we could shut down some power plants. I also have an electric car that I charge with my solar, it's zero emissions and free to drive. We really don't nuclear power it needs us.

btw The car uses lead acid batteries that are 100% recyclable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 06/11/2009
- WmC I'm a Fan of WmC 16 fans permalink

If Repubs are really in favor of the free market, why are they calling for 100 new nuclear power plants? Why not simply tax CO2 emissions at the rate of environmental damage they do, and the let the free market decide what is the best/cheapest/most efficient way of generating electricity?
Don't they believe the free market is up to the task? Oh ye of little faith. . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 06/11/2009
- cayuse I'm a Fan of cayuse 15 fans permalink
photo

That being the case we would have to throw away all the 'FUSSY MATH", MARK THE MARKET and the two timing fairness attach on the MIDDLE CLASS paying it all

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 06/11/2009

HINT: Private companies aren't allowed to build them either. And it isn't the free market holding them back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 06/11/2009
- whillice I'm a Fan of whillice 21 fans permalink
photo

Let's do the math:

New cost of a nuclear reactor: $20 billion + (a conservative estimate according to Florida Power and Light)
Time it take to construct a plant: 20 years (not including finding 100 usable sites, esp. given people's reasonable Not In My Backyard approach to nuclear, and the fact that since we haven't built a new one in over 30 years, we really don't know how long it will take)

So, the GOP wants to spend 2 trillion dollars to build plants that won't give us any new energy until the 2030s. Very nice.

And then the question becomes of what to do with all that lovely nuclear waste......my solution is to bury it in the backyards of the grandchildren of every official who advocates for nuclear energy. Then it will either make people think twice about nuclear power as a "solution" or limit the ability of their DNA to be passed down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 06/11/2009
- cayuse I'm a Fan of cayuse 15 fans permalink
photo

The truth hurts and you speak the truth. Nice to hear the truth once in awhile

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 06/11/2009
- Chaucea I'm a Fan of Chaucea 8 fans permalink
photo

Not to mention those plants would be 100 new terrorist targets spread throughout the US. Yetch!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 06/11/2009
- Servility I'm a Fan of Servility 12 fans permalink

We can make nice with Iran and ask them to build the nuclear plants for us. They just got the green light from Obama on Nuclear power plants.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 06/11/2009

Funny how you're judging how long it takes to build a nuke plant, then note that no one really knows, but logically, it'll take less time than it did with 1970's construction technology.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 06/11/2009
- elmerfude I'm a Fan of elmerfude 37 fans permalink

Part math and part nonsense. The economics of building nuclear power plants is not particularly favorable although a few utilities are starting new ones through the permitting process. There are of course engineered solutions to reactor nuclear waste but your statements on that issue are just juvenile.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 06/11/2009
- Chubbster I'm a Fan of Chubbster 36 fans permalink

People in Santa Monica are conditioned by their environment to be irrationally terrified of nuclear power.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

The GOP is as joke

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1869224,00.html

please read that article

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 06/11/2009
- elmerfude I'm a Fan of elmerfude 37 fans permalink

The GOP isn't really serious about nuclear. They know nuclear is a non starter because of political opposition most of it hysterical and high construction cost, but this is a way to get under the skin of the Dems to provoke a knee jerk reaction. They can then point to the Dems as being impractical and reactionary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 06/11/2009
- econ1 I'm a Fan of econ1 7 fans permalink

Nuclear power provides nearly half of the energy in the EU with zero CO2.

It needs to be part of the energy policy if we really are serious about reducing the need for coal and oil. I don't know whether it is 25 or 200 plants, but any program that doesn't include it is just feel good legislation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 06/11/2009

I would be FINE with the US subsidizing/sponsoring/rewarding a solution to recycle/dispose of nuke waste. We should concentrate on that instead of just trying to ban nuclear sites...sites that power so much of the rest of the modern world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 06/11/2009
- mioffe I'm a Fan of mioffe 10 fans permalink

Sun is only one nuclear power plant, which will work for millions years and mankind no need to worry about its waste, or proliferation, or others form of disasters. Energy from sun is more than enough for earth population. Growing trees as source of energy is the cheapest way to produce energy compare with others today solutions.
Without any doubt it will be as environmentally as production friendly direction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 06/11/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 160 fans permalink

Planting trees is a good idea!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 06/12/2009

We dont need Solar Farms we need solar panels on farms.
we need decentralized eenrgy.
The TVA ratepayers owe 25 BILLION for nuke plants not built.
NH PSNH ratepayers owe 5 BILLION for seabrook and 300 million for scrubbers for Bow Station coal plant.
get off the grid and your not a "RATEPAYER!"
bail out on failed utilitys
http://www.solarnavigator.net/lead_acid_batteries.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

Is that really true?
to bild 100 more power plants?

What will happen to solar power if all money goes to the nuclear power?

http://matsrg.net
MatsRG

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 06/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect