Geithner And Summers Make Case For Regulatory Reform In Op-Ed

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Geithner And Summers Make Case For Regulatory Reform In Op-Ed stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JIM KUHNHENN and MARTIN CRUTSINGER | June 15, 2009 06:27 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner speaks at Time Warner headquarters in New York, Monday, June 15, 2009. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

WASHINGTON — Aiming for greater limits and more clarity in the nation's financial system, the Obama administration on Monday proposed adding muscle to the Federal Reserve and new restrictions on complex securities whose collapse choked lending and hit millions of American households.

At the same time, the administration gingerly sidestepped some regulatory changes, leaving aspects of the politically charged work for Congress, which must approve the proposed blueprint.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said the regulatory overhaul will eliminate "gaps" in the financial system that encouraged risky behavior leading up to the meltdown.

Under the administration's plan, all large institutions whose failure could threaten the stability of the financial system would be supervised by the Fed. That sets up a potential clash with some key lawmakers who believe the Fed is overtaxed and unaccountable to Congress.

"I just think we're heaping too much on the Federal Reserve," said Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., a member of the House Financial Services Committee.

Obama's plan would create a council of regulators responsible for broad coordination across the financial system. Administration officials said it also would offer a stronger framework for investor protection. Industry officials expect the administration to propose a consumer protection entity to oversee products ranging from credit cards to annuities.

"We had a financial system that was fundamentally too unstable and fragile, and it did a bad job of basic protection of consumers and investors," Geithner said during an economic conference in New York hosted by Time Warner Inc. "Those are things we have to change."

The administration's regulatory proposals were previewed in an opinion piece by Geithner and Lawrence Summers, director of the president's National Economic Council, in Monday's Washington Post. Further details were obtained from Treasury and industry officials who have been discussing the regulatory overhaul with the administration. President Barack Obama will unveil the proposals in a speech Wednesday and Geithner will testify Thursday before Congress.

Story continues below
advertisement

Obama appears to have backed away from a more extensive overhaul that would have consolidated all banking regulation into one agency. Supporters of this approach, including Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., have argued that the current system is inefficient.

Likewise, the Geithner-Summer's essay did not address regulation of the insurance sector. Insurance companies now are governed by state insurance commissions, and large insurance companies and some lawmakers have argued they need the option of a federal overseer to avoid the threat posed by insurance conglomerate American International Group Inc.

While several disputes over the proposal are likely to emerge as the legislation moves through Congress, the most high profile debate will center on the role of the Federal Reserve.

Kanjorski said the role of a risk regulator should be given to the Treasury Department. He said it would be a mistake to give the responsibility to an entity that isn't accountable to Congress or the president.

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., has opposed giving the Fed such authority and has called for stripping some of the central bank's regulatory authority. Under Dodd's plan, the Fed would focus instead on its existing mission of setting monetary policy, establishing a payment system and being the "lender of last resort" if a bank fails.

The administration will propose tougher rules on transactions outside the banking system. Specifically targeted are mortgage- and other asset-backed securities that contributed to the credit crisis and now plague bank balance sheets.

For instance, the administration would require banks and other underwriters who sell bundled mortgages to Wall Street to retain 5 percent of a stake in the loans _ an idea also contained in House-passed mortgage legislation.

Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., who sponsored the House proposal, said the 5 percent figure may not sound like much. But the requirement can add up quickly and become a "powerful disincentive" to lenders to issue risky loans, eliminating many of the "fly-by-night" loan operators.

Geithner said the administration would urge other countries to adopt similar financial regulatory changes. He said U.S. changes "will have little effect if we fail to raise international standards along with our own."

The concern is that without tougher international rules governing financial firms, U.S. banks with operations overseas could shift some of their riskier businesses to countries with weaker regulations, said Simon Johnson, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund.

___

Associated Press writers Stevenson Jacobs in New York and Anne Flaherty contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Aiming for greater limits and more clarity in the nation's financial system, the Obama administration on Monday proposed adding muscle to the Federal Reserve and new restrictions on...
WASHINGTON — Aiming for greater limits and more clarity in the nation's financial system, the Obama administration on Monday proposed adding muscle to the Federal Reserve and new restrictions on...
Filed by Rachel Weiner
 
Comments
183
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
photo

Executive Order 11110
Wikipedia

Executive Order 11110 was issued by President John F. Kennedy on June 4, 1963.

This executive order allows the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury to issue $4.29 billion in silver certificates ($2 and $5 Notes) against silver bullion based on authority delegated by the President to the Secretary under the Thomas Amendment to the Agricultural Adjustment Act.

The thrust of the Order returned the authority to issue new silver certificates (and specify denominations) back to the U.S. Treasury from the FEDERAL RESERVE.

Audit the FED!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 AM on 06/16/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 426 fans permalink
photo

The article skips over Simon Johnson's comments. They were VERY critical of Geithner's and Summer's plan.

Today’s Foundation, Tomorrow’s Crisis: The Geithner-Summers Proposals

Writing in the Washington Post this morning, Tim Geithner and Larry Summers outline a five point plan for dealing with the underlying problems in our financial system, entitled A New Financial Foundation.

The authors are not completely clear on what they think caused the current crisis, but you can back out some points from their reasoning – and the implicit view seems quite at odds with reality.
(He provides 5 key points - please click the link and read them, especially #3):

Overall, there are no surprises here. Brick by brick, we are building the foundation for the next financial crisis; by all indications, it will be more disruptive and a great deal more damaging than the crisis of 2008-09. But presumably by then the authors will be out of office.

http://baselinescenario.com/2009/06/15/todays-foundation-tomorrows-crisis-the-geithner-summers-proposals/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 AM on 06/16/2009
- sosi I'm a Fan of sosi 8 fans permalink
photo

Latest ploy from a government of, by and for Goldman Sachs: http://www.goldmansachs666.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 06/15/2009

Larry Summers admires the Milton Friedman school of economics. So yeah..we have a confidence problem in america.

Confidence in Obama's financial advisors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 06/15/2009
photo

Why did he hire such a bunch of Wall Street mongers when he promised to reform Wall Street and Washington?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 AM on 06/16/2009

Where is the "regulatory reform" on the largest institution which is in terrible fiscal shape and threatens to bring us down with it? Oh I forgot, the government is unregulated, they do with our money as they please. As Madison observed the danger of democracy (vs republic) is the inherent tendency of the majority to vote for their own money, not even elections will cure this as the livelihood of each politician is public money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 06/15/2009
- hardrain77 I'm a Fan of hardrain77 18 fans permalink
photo

The only thing I want these two cronies making a case for is whether they should go to a maximum or minimum security prisons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 06/15/2009

Some organizations are trying to get the public opinion out there, one is
http://www.anewwayforward.org/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 06/15/2009
- Javani I'm a Fan of Javani 6 fans permalink

"The administration plan will give federal regulators greater powers to deal with any large financial holding company whose failure could disrupt the entire system."

All I see here is bigger bailout authority, rather than dealing with the system in the first place, the derivative markets, no return to Glass Steagall.

More oversight, more monitoring, on an on...no substantive rule changes except more ability to bail out Wall Street friends more quickly.

Geithner is doing the usual, talk about procedural bureaucratic shake ups rather than substantive rules, and pretends that is reform.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 06/15/2009
- gmr I'm a Fan of gmr permalink

Lawrence Summers, isn't he one of the anti-regulation idiologs who created the current problem. Why does Obama trust those who created the problem to fix the problem? These are the guys who said that government regulation was the problem.

If a company is too big to fail, it should be broken up until it is no longer too big to fail.

To say that this is a " crisis of confidence and trust " is to say that it's not a real problem, but a psychological problem. We should believe and trust them. If you trust someone you don't have to look over their shoulder to make sure they're doing what they should. Just trust them. Just trust them. Just trust them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 06/15/2009
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

"Like all financial crises, the current crisis is a crisis of confidence and trust"

IMHO this is symptom not a cause. I think this crisis started with the globalization of labor and the ensuing migration of U.S. jobs to places with no worker rights or environmental protection laws.

This allowed the opression of wages while prices increased. The only way to fill the increasing gap in wages and prices was to make credit more accesible. Obviously this strategy is effective for short term discrepancies in wages and prices, however, when we have a 10+ year growing gap, an economic house of cards is created.

When there was no more blood left in the American wage earner, the casino started to wage bets on when the house of cards would collapse(i.e. credit default swaps)

As far as a consolidation of regulatory agencies goes, I would be very reluctant to put all the regulatory authority under a single entity. For example, the previous administration employed this tactic to insulate banks from scrutiny/regulation by preempting state lending laws. In the name of checks and balances, I think there should always be at least two regulatory agencies, with each agency answering to different authority(i.e. one to congress and the other to the administration).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 06/15/2009
- knosiswar I'm a Fan of knosiswar 31 fans permalink

What we need is for President Obama to bring back

Executive Order 11110

thereby eliminating the profit motive for the FED to milk the American taxpayer.

Ask your Senator and Congressman next time you see them or speak to them, why does the Federal Reserve skim money off of the taxpayers contributions to Democratically Representative government with no Democratically represented oversight and Audit.

Contact your red-blooded Representatives or Senators this week and ask for their support of HR 1207 and S 604. Blue-Blooded lawmakers like Shelby, Schumer, Frank and Dodd have already shown their loyalty to the Oligarchy taking hold of the American Financial System.

Iranians are in the streets risking beatings and imprisonment, wanting peace from tyranny,

what will you do today, support peace through your actions, or tyranny through your apathy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 06/15/2009
- acudoc I'm a Fan of acudoc 30 fans permalink
photo

How is money created in the modern world?

Unless you can answer that question, you will accept unquestioningly these efforts by the so-called "experts" to plug the holes in the crumbling financial dike. Unfortunately for our constitutional republic (or what is left of it) the experts are the ones who got us into this mess and they prefer to tinker with the details rather than undertake an analysis of the flaws of the system which rewards them so generously with wealth, prestige, and power.

Without a doubt, my favorite metaphor for the whole situation is: re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

Will the American populace please muster the curiosity to look into the mechanics of money creation? Trust me, you will not like what you see!

Expose the system itself. Strike at the root.....It may be too late.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 06/15/2009

vTake back the trillions of $$$ given to the banks, who just sit on it and make it totally ineffective then start government incentive to create realistic industries that give employment and generate real productive income, some of which would hopefully be from exports.

Every other country, especially China and most of Europe have goverment incentives to protect it's industries. No matter what you call it it's a form of protectionism and its inevitable. We should stop being naive and take care of our own house. The only ones who win if we don't are the multinational corporations who don't care where they get their hand out.

good articles for a slow news day: http://www.bit.ly/12NCJR/12NCJR>Econ & Finance Articles Updated Daily

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 06/15/2009

So the man (Geithner) who was appointed by Obama to lead the IRS and who admittedly CHEATED ON HIS TAXES is now lecturing others on "reform"?

The world is indeed coming to an end.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 06/15/2009
- ToddlerJ I'm a Fan of ToddlerJ 5 fans permalink
photo

Geithner says, "Reassuring the American people that our financial system will be better controlled is critical to our economic recovery."

How about some assurance before we get some "reassurance?" Failing to break up those too big to fail and now proposing the fox watch the hen house sure doesn't give me much assurance!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 06/15/2009
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

I think by "American people" he meant the banking industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 06/15/2009
- lastams I'm a Fan of lastams 55 fans permalink

Now just to make sure I’ve got this straight,

The fiancial crisis was caused by “the widespread use of poorly understood financial instruments”
which created a “global imbalance in saving and consumption”
(quotes from the origonal Washington Post op-ed)

Now we have these toxic assets, er, wait a minute, they don’t mention those at all, do they?
Lucky us; I guess they just went away.

And this part you’ve got to love, “Like all financial crises, the current crisis is a crisis of confidence and trust.”

In other words the bank failures, unemployment, foreclosures and all the rest are JUST IN OUR HEADS.
If only those folks in the bread lines would go out and buy another car!

Here's a thought; How about turning over our economic policies to people actually living on this planet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 06/15/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect