iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Energy Bill Advances In Senate: Offshore Drilling, Renewables Nearer

H. JOSEF HEBERT   06/17/09 05:16 PM ET   AP

Senate

WASHINGTON — Legislation that would require greater use of renewable energy, make it easier to build power lines and allow oil and gas drilling near the Florida coastline advanced Wednesday in the Senate.

The Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved the bill by a 15-8 bipartisan vote. But both Democrats and Republicans expressed concerns about the bill and hoped to make major changes when it reaches the Senate floor, probably in the fall.

The measure's primary thrust is to expand the use of renewable sources of energy such as wind, solar and geothermal sources as well as deal with growing worries about the inadequacies of the nation's high-voltage power grid.

But the bill also would remove the last congressional barrier to offshore oil and gas development, lifting a ban on drilling across a vast area in the eastern Gulf of Mexico that Congress put off limits three years ago. Drilling would be allowed within 45 miles of most of Florida's coast and as close as 10 miles off the state's Panhandle area.

The Senate bill for the first time would establish a national requirement for utilities to produce 15 percent of their electricity from renewable sources, a contentious issue that is likely to attract heated debate.

Twenty-eight states currently have some renewable energy requirement for utilities, but supporters of the measure argue a national mandate is needed to spur such energy development.

The legislation also would give much wider authority to federal regulators over the nation's electricity grid.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission would be given authority to approve the siting of high voltage power lines if states fail to act and would be given additional powers over cyber security on the grid.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has said he hopes to take up energy legislation after the August recess, although it's uncertain whether it will be merged with separate legislation addressing climate change. The House is working on a climate bill that includes many of the same energy issues addressed by the Senate bill.

While the bill was approved by a safe margin in the committee its prospects in the full Senate are anything but certain. Several senators called it too weak in its support of renewable energy development, while others said it ignored nuclear energy and greater domestic oil and gas production.

"None of us got all we wanted," said Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., the committee's chairman, who was forced to agree to a variety of compromises to give the bill a chance of advancing. Nevertheless, he said the bill would help shift to cleaner, more secure sources of energy.

Bingaman and many of the panel's other Democrats had wanted at least a 20 percent renewable energy requirement. The bill requires 15 percent renewable use by 2021, but also would allow utilities to avoid a fourth of that mandate by showing improvements in efficiency. Renewable energy use could be cut further for utilities that increase their use of nuclear energy either from a new reactor or increased reactor output.

"This is an extraordinary weak bill," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

But Sanders voted to advance the bill, as did Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn. Both senators said they hoped the bill will be strengthened.

"I suspect their definition of strengthening might be somewhat different," quipped Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., whose own support of the bill came despite strong opposition to the federal renewable energy requirements on utilities.

Sanders wants the renewable energy requirement to be much higher, at 25 percent. Corker said the bill needs more to promote nuclear energy and domestic oil and gas production.

"We simply must do more to increase our domestic (oil and gas) production and use of nuclear energy," said Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, the committee's ranking Republican. Still, she voted for the bill which includes a commitment to increase loan guarantees for a natural gas pipeline in her state from $18 billion to $30 billion.

The bill also calls for establishing a new office to steer grants and loan guarantees to clean energy projects, including nuclear and those using technology to capture carbon dioxide; creating an oil products reserve to be used if there are supply problems; and creating federal standards for efficiency standards for new building.

The Chamber of Commerce said the bill shows progress toward crafting a comprehensive energy policy, but some environmentalists said it falls short of shifting the country away from fossil fuels. With its new offshore drilling, support for coal and nuclear energy "this bill fails to live up to the vision of a clean energy future," complained Brent Blackwelder, president of Friends of the Earth.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Legislation that would require greater use of renewable energy, make it easier to build power lines and allow oil and gas drilling near the Florida coastline advanced Wednesday in t...
WASHINGTON — Legislation that would require greater use of renewable energy, make it easier to build power lines and allow oil and gas drilling near the Florida coastline advanced Wednesday in t...
Filed by Dave Burdick  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justmeinAz
01:25 AM on 06/18/2009
Pathetic. The difference between this bill and business as usual is the difference between steeping your tea for 58 seconds and steeping your tea for 59 seconds. And it hasn't even gone through the Senate yet. Clearly Congress is not going to lead on environmental or energy issues. At this rate, we'll be off fossil fuel based energy in two to three hundred years. What could possibly go wrong by then?
05:36 AM on 06/18/2009
come up with an alternative first
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justmeinAz
12:19 PM on 06/18/2009
I don't have to go to med school to question my doctor, I don't have to be an NFL coach to disagree with plays on the field, I don't have to be a chef to know that I don't like my dinner, so why I should have to be able to do my Congressmen's jobs in order to have an opinion on them is beyond me.
Off the cuff, I'd like t see much more aggressive targets for renewable energy use, and I'd get rid of that provision that lets them wiggle out of actually doing it by just improving efficiency. I also don't think drilling within 4 miles of the shoreline is a good idea if there are any other alternatives, and I'd be willing to bet that there are. I'll leave the details to the policy wonks, but generally speaking, I'd like to see people acting from a desire to transfer from fossil fuels to renewable energy as fast as possible, and that is clearly not the driving impulse of too many policy makers in this area.
05:35 PM on 06/17/2009
How nice. Hooray for more drilling and lifting previous bans on drilling. Oh, and nuclear too!

This is the part that disturbs me- "The bill requires 15 percent renewable use by 2021, but also would allow utilities to avoid a fourth of that mandate by showing improvements in efficiency. Renewable energy use could be cut further for utilities that increase their use of nuclear energy either from a new reactor or increased reactor output."

Renewables closer? Right.
06:44 PM on 06/17/2009
Of course this bill does not go far enough. But that could not be expected. Washington hasn't changed enough (if at all) to make any but snail pace progress.

Nuclear wouldn't be the worst of options... if only we could get signed up for fuel reprocessing and if only it would actually displace coal. But in all likelihood it won't. When they are talking about nuclear they mean more cost inefficient plants, more energy use, still no solution to the spent fuel problem. More of the same is the name of the game.
07:40 PM on 06/17/2009
This isn't though the Senate yet. I expect it to get weaker.

I know nuclear isn't the boogey-man it is played out to be, but it isn't ideal either.

Yes...snail pace and more of the same... you are right about that.
04:41 PM on 06/17/2009
Polywell fusion. It's been successfully protyped with reduplicated results. Relatively cheap (millions versus billions to construct and operate). Decades ahead of ITER and other tokamak fusion reactors. 2 years away (versus decades away) from producing megawatts of energy with ZERO pollution (because there is no radioactive waste because water is the fuel) or green house gases. And once this happens, ADIOS fossil fuels. Period. No offshore drilling which worked our sooo well for Santa Barbara. Or oil transport which has proven to be safe (as in safe as the Exxon Valdez). No C02 sequestration (what about leaks, and is anything that stores gas inside of caves never going to fail??). Duh... what happens when ya' run out of room? Unfortunately, it is a threat to the established power brokers. Never mind. Howdy drilling...
05:18 PM on 06/17/2009
Please give us the citations from peer reviewed journals. Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorkosan
PhD Chem E, HBS
12:39 PM on 06/18/2009
Sounds like you found the flux capacitor from Back to the Future.
Really - have you put all your money into this concept?