House Condemns Tehran Crackdown On Protesters

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - House Condemns Tehran Crackdown On Protesters stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT BURNS and ANNE FLAHERTY | June 19, 2009 09:21 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Iranian worshippers chant slogans in support of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as they arrive for the Friday prayers, in Tehran, Iran, Friday, June 19, 2009. _ Iran's supreme leader sternly warned of a crackdown if protesters continue days of massive street rallies, escalating the government's showdown with demonstrators demanding a new presidential election. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday stuck to a measured response to the uprising in Iran over a disputed presidential election, even as both houses of Congress voted overwhelmingly to condemn an official crackdown on mostly peaceful demonstrations in the streets of Tehran.

Administration officials said they remained convinced that the wiser U.S. course was caution over confrontation. President Barack Obama is coming under growing domestic political pressure to speak out more forcefully in support of protesters warned by Iran's supreme leader Friday to end their huge street rallies.

In the strongest message yet from the U.S. government, the House voted 405-1 to condemn Tehran's crackdown on protest rallies and the government's interference with Internet and cell phone communications. The Senate followed suit later in the day.

The resolution was initiated by Republicans as a veiled criticism of Obama, who has been reluctant to criticize Tehran's handling of a disputed election that left hard-liner President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power.

The resolution expresses support for "all Iranian citizens who embrace the values of freedom, human rights, civil liberties and rule of law" and affirms "the importance of democratic and fair elections."

It also condemns "the ongoing violence" by the government and pro-government militias against demonstrators, as well as government "suppression of independent electronic communications through interference with the Internet and cell phones."

Obama's chief spokesman, Robert Gibbs, said the White House welcomed the resolution, calling its language consistent with the president's.

"As the president has said, we're not going to be used as political foils and political footballs in a debate that's happening by Iranians in Iran," Gibbs said. He said the administration's view is that Iranian leaders would use fiercer U.S. support for the protesters to paint them as puppets of the Americans.

Story continues below
advertisement

"That's not what we're going to do," Gibbs said.

A long-standing source of Iranian anger at the U.S. is the CIA's role in toppling the elected government of Mohammad Mosaddeq in 1953 and replacing him with the late Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. In the 1979 Islamic revolution that overthrew the Shah, student militants occupied the U.S. Embassy and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. In April 1980, Washington severed diplomatic relations with Iran.

Obama, who hopes to draw Tehran into talks aimed at curtailing its nuclear ambitions and potentially ending the 29-year-old rupture in diplomatic relations, has stayed mostly neutral on the election dispute. He has spoken in measured terms about supporting Iranians' aspirations to have their voices heard.

In Tehran, Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei sternly warned of a crackdown if protesters continue their massive street rallies. In his first response to a week of protests of the disputed election, Khamenei said opposition leaders "will be held accountable for all the violence, bloodshed and rioting" if they do not halt the rallies. Khamenei also said the balloting had not been rigged.

Obama was asked Friday in an interview with CBS News' Harry Smith what he thought about the situation in Iran.

"I'm very concerned based on some of the tenor and tone of the statements that have been made, that the government of Iran recognize that the world is watching," Obama said.

"We stand behind those who are seeking justice in a peaceful way," he said, adding "we stand with those who would look to peaceful resolution of conflict and we believe that the voices of people have to be heard ..."

He said the turmoil in Iran should not be viewed as a confrontation between the U.S. and Iran, but the main focus should be on the Iranian people.

" The fact that they are on the streets, under pretty severe duress, at great risk to themselves, is a sign that there's something in that society that wants to open up," he said.

At the State Department, spokesman Ian Kelly said the administration has not been reluctant to criticize Iran.

"There have been times when demonstrators who peacefully assembled have, of course, suffered at the hands of the authorities. And we condemn any actions like that," Kelly said.

Many lawmakers, however, are calling on the administration to take a tougher approach on Iran.

Rep. Mike Pence, who co-sponsored Friday's resolution, said he disagrees with the administration that it must not meddle in Iran's internal affairs.

"When Ronald Reagan went before the Brandenburg Gate, he did not say Mr. (Mikhail) Gorbachev, that wall is none of our business," said Pence, R-Ind., of former President Ronald Reagan's famous exhortation to the Soviet leader to "tear down that wall" in a divided Berlin.

Rep. Howard Berman, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and co-sponsor of the resolution, said "it is not for us to decide who should run Iran, much less determine the real winner of the June 12 election.

"But we must reaffirm our strong belief that the Iranian people have a fundamental right to express their views about the future of their country freely and without intimidation," added Berman, D-Calif.

Congress _ particularly the 435-member House _ frequently weighs in on foreign policy matters, when a similar message from the State Department or the White House would be considered confrontational. Such resolutions have no practical effect other than to express the opinion of lawmakers and try to influence the administration in power at the time.

Senior administration officials stressed on Friday that Obama intends to stick to his current approach. They said the administration is considering what they might do if Iran's clerical regime does use force to shut down demonstrations. The officials spoke with a small group of reporters about the administration's strategy on condition of anonymity to more freely describe internal White House deliberations.

The administration's view is that a measured U.S. response gives the protesters and their quest for greater freedoms a larger _ rather than smaller _ chance of succeeding, the officials said.

___

Associated Press writer Jennifer Loven contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday stuck to a measured response to the uprising in Iran over a disputed presidential election, even as both houses of Congress voted overwhelmingly t...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday stuck to a measured response to the uprising in Iran over a disputed presidential election, even as both houses of Congress voted overwhelmingly t...
Filed by Lila Shapiro
 
Comments
446
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)

Moussavi is a sore loser

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 06/20/2009
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 82 fans permalink
photo

What sort of wretch does it take to smash a human being with a bataan? A wretch that does NOT deserve to live.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 06/20/2009
- Academic I'm a Fan of Academic 239 fans permalink

Is this the same house that was cheerleading when Israel was bombing the daylights out of the Gazans? If my memory serves me right over 1,400 people were killed, most of them children and women; many thousands more injured; Gaza reduced to a wasteland and thousands of homes were wilfully destroyed, and the same can be said for much of the enclave's infrastructure. Notwithstanding the little matter of a two year old continuous blockade.

By any standards employed I don't think any rational or unbiased person can equate what has gone on in Iran with what happened in Gaza. But, of course, when you have no moral compass and violence is your only raison d’être in terms of your foreign policy and to quote George H. Bush when as President he was told that the US Navy illegally in Iranian Waters had intentionally shot down an Iranian civilian plane with over 200 passengers on board consigning them all to their unwarranted and barbarous deaths stormed – “I don't care what the facts are..."

So why am I and every other prescient-minded person not surprised by this response from a US Congress so off the radar where ethical conduct is concerned?

Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 06/20/2009

And if things go badly for the protesters in Iran, are these US citizens going to vote to "strike" those who will have done them wrong? Are they who cast their votes among the 405 going to take up arms and go to Iran? All of them will not have much to say, and none of them will be able to take action, no matter what happens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 06/19/2009
- joyce628 I'm a Fan of joyce628 24 fans permalink

I would like someone to talk me down on this one. Why is it that the republicans are berating the president for not speaking out more forcefully on the situation in Iran, when I do not hear countries like England and France demanding of their leaders to do the same? They accused the president of doing too much, now they want the president to take sides in such a delacate situation. I often wonder how these brain dead law makers got elected to public office, because some of them behave so petty and childish. I hope that president Obama does not back down form his stance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 PM on 06/19/2009
- Tuckerndfw I'm a Fan of Tuckerndfw 100 fans permalink

Because Congress passed the Iran Freedom & Support Act in 2006 which gave the president $10 million to hire people to try to overthrow Iran's gov't.

And, Congress wants it overthrown!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 06/20/2009
- Yurdelite I'm a Fan of Yurdelite 26 fans permalink

Dear Representative Grayson and Senator Bill Nelson,

Today I am absolutely livid that you sided with the republicans against our President on the issue of the Iranian elections. It amazes me how spineless the Democrats are and it makes me sick to my stomach. How dare you and your fellow Democrats vote with those lying, scheming, conniving Republicans against our President. Your doing so, in my opinion, is a slap in the face to our President AND it serves to embolden republicans who were partly responsible for the WORST foreign relations policies in our history along with their fearless leaders George W Bush, Dick Cheney and the neocon cabal.

In case you forgot, it was these same republicans who went along with their republican dictator in the White House and named Iran as part of the "axis of evil" along with Iraq and North Korea. NOW they are suddenly so concerned about Iranians. THIS IS THE PARTY whose 2008 presidential candidate said "bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran" and you voted with them to advance their own political ambitions.

Disappointed and disgusted are mild words to describe how I am feeling about the spineless, dysfunctional Democrats in congress. We voted you all in office to work with President Obama NOT AGAINST HIM and NOT TO SIDE WITH THE REPUBLICANS.

Sincerely,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 06/19/2009
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 44 fans permalink
photo

please send to kaufman and reid and pence and berman the authors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 AM on 06/20/2009
- joyce628 I'm a Fan of joyce628 24 fans permalink

The republicans are hyprocrates. They want to have their cake and eat it. Some republicans specifically statedthat they wanted Ahmadinejad to win out of spite, because President Obama's speech in Cairo was so successful. Now that the young people have taken heed to President Obama's speech and rise up in opposition to the result of the election, the republicans and the nuckle head democrats passed resolution interfearing in their elections, thus undermining the president's stance.

The right got it wrong with the Iraq war and the majority of the no spine democrats joined with the republicans to vote for the war in Iraq which turned out to be a lie, and bad judgement on the part of the lawmakers, with diseasterous consequences. The republicans are doing the same thing again in Iran which can only help the ruling party if they believe that USA is meddling in their political affairs again. This may just hurt the oppositon in Iran and keep Ahmadinejad in power, which might just be their goal. You know, keep the boogyman in power.

The American people need to rise up for social issues in this country such as universal health care, like the people in Iran.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 06/19/2009
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 44 fans permalink
photo

lets remind them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 AM on 06/20/2009

It is possible that the democrats in congress prefer a republican president. Having a democratic president means they actually have to do some work. Hence the sobatage of a democratic president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 06/19/2009
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 44 fans permalink
photo

only works if we keep silent let's not

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 06/20/2009
- whitehawk I'm a Fan of whitehawk 17 fans permalink

Oh my; look what Congress can do, bipartisanship finally came with such an idiotic, wreckless, irrisponsible action. What a bunch of political hounddogs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 06/19/2009
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 44 fans permalink
photo

add to your email to the buttheads

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 06/20/2009

The Republican candidate lost the Presidential election. It's over. They need to be quiet, give it a rest and let the President and his personnel handle the job they were elected to do. Every day some Republican goes to a microphone and rants and raves. Mr. Pence was horrible today. They diminish our country and they are most certainly diminishing their party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 06/19/2009

I'm in Indiana, and Mike Pence is a perpetual embarrassment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 AM on 06/20/2009
- Jaladeno I'm a Fan of Jaladeno 107 fans permalink
photo

The name is Pence. Rhymes with dense. At least that makes sense.

At this moment he is being interviewed by Chris Matthews, and is making a strong case that the name of the show should be changed from Hardball to Hardhead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 06/19/2009

Too funny. Where was congress when Gazan civilians including children were getting blown up? Where was the vote? Now you have congress enacting legislation on an (non) issue without international law implications. The elections were rigged only insofar as the West wants them to appear that way. The story was breaking out before the ballots were even counted. What a joke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 06/19/2009
- Subterfuge I'm a Fan of Subterfuge 17 fans permalink

True. How many people died in Gaza? How many so far in Iran? How many have died in Darfur?

Who has the most oil?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 06/19/2009

amen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 06/20/2009
- Scorch20 I'm a Fan of Scorch20 4 fans permalink

The last time I looked I.Ran was not on this continent, so these people need to go back to school. This is just bu!!.sch!tt to say the least. They can't even run this ph.ck!ng country let alone med dle in anyone else's. These whyte people are pa thet!c. Bwaahhwwwaahhh, like a bunch of wh!ny, spo!led id!0ts. Time to vote these m0r0ns out of office or drag them out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 06/19/2009
- Subterfuge I'm a Fan of Subterfuge 17 fans permalink

White people. haha.... Alienate half the people on this board that agree with you. Nice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 06/19/2009
- Solja I'm a Fan of Solja 104 fans permalink
photo

Sorry to inform you, but there are more than simply "whyte people" in Congress, at least the last time I looked. Now if you're speaking about the Senate side, there is 1 black man, Sen. Roland Burris.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 06/19/2009

Not only is this a bad idea (as our president's comments indicate), but it's also pretty hypocritical. I wonder what Mike Pence would have said had Gore and Kerry supporters taken to the streets in protest when election results were, at best, "suspicious" and when even the Supreme Court was complicit in subverting efforts to get an accurate vote count.

The courage of these Iranians puts us to shame. Had we gone to the lengths to protest Bush's ill-gotten presidency as they're protesting Ahmadinejad's, there never would have been an Iraq war--and may well have never even been a 9/11. I admire the hell out of these people who take their democracy so seriously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 06/19/2009
photo

Its laughable and insulting that Republicans now claim to stand for the Iranian people, when just a few months ago, they were willing to launch a nuclear strike against the country. I wonder how the protesters feel about all of that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 06/19/2009
- super I'm a Fan of super 13 fans permalink
photo

Its easy - its the missionary principle: convert and be saved or DIE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 06/19/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect