Drug Companies, White House Reach $80B Prescription Drug Deal

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Drug Companies, White House Reach $80B Prescription Drug Deal stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVID ESPO | June 20, 2009 09:10 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this April 2, 2009 file photo, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., left, and the committee's ranking Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa talk on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, FILE)

WASHINGTON — The pharmaceutical industry agreed Saturday to spend $80 billion over the next decade improving drug benefits for seniors on Medicare and defraying the cost of President Barack Obama's health care legislation, capping secretive negotiations involving key lawmakers and the White House.

"This new coverage means affordable prices on prescription drugs when Medicare benefits don't cover the cost of prescriptions," Sen. Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said in a statement announcing the accord.

The deal marked a major triumph for Baucus as well as the administration. Obama praised the deal.

"The agreement by pharmaceutical companies to contribute to the health reform effort comes on the heels of the landmark pledge many health industry leaders made to me last month, when they offered to do their part to reduce health spending $2 trillion over the next decade," Obama said. "We are at a turning point in America's journey toward health care reform."

Baucus, a Montana Democrat, has been negotiating with numerous industry groups for weeks as he tries to draft legislation that meets Obama's goal of vastly expanding health coverage, has bipartisan support and does not add to the deficit.

Baucus' announcement said drug companies would pay half of the cost of brand-name drugs for seniors in the so-called doughnut hole _ a gap in coverage that is a feature of many of the plans providing prescription coverage under Medicare. Other officials said wealthier Medicare beneficiaries would not receive the same break, but there was no mention of that in the statement.

In addition, the entire cost of the drug would count toward a patient's out-of-pocket costs, meaning their insurance coverage would cover more of their expenses than otherwise.

"The existence of this gap in coverage has been a continuing injustice that has placed a great burden on many seniors," Obama said. "This deal will provide significant relief from that burden for millions of American seniors.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Key sectors of the health care industry acknowledge what American families and businesses already know _ that the status quo is no longer sustainable," the president said.

Billy Tauzin, president and CEO of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), said, "Millions of uninsured and financially struggling Americans are depending on us to accomplish comprehensive health care reform this year. Today, America's pharmaceutical research and biotechnology companies are signaling their strong support for these critically important efforts."

While none of the changes in the prescription drug program would directly lower government costs, several officials also said the industry agreed to measures that would give the Treasury more money under federal health programs. In particular, officials said drug companies would likely wind up paying pay higher rebates for certain drugs under Medicaid, the program that provides health care for the poor.

Those funds would be used to help pay for legislation expanding health insurance for millions who now lack it.

One official said the deal was agreed to late Friday night when Tauzin called Baucus. The senator's statement said the White House was involved in the agreement.

It was not clear what leverage the agreement would give Baucus with other health care providers with whom he is in negotiations.

But at a minimum, the agreement served as an effective counter to impression that the drive to enact health care legislation was sputtering.

The disclosure of negotiations came near the end of an up-and-down week for the administration and its allies on health care.

Congressional Budget Office estimates showed early versions of two major Senate bills were either too costly or failed to make a large enough dent in the ranks of the uninsured. Republicans seized on the reports as evidence that Democrats were losing traction.

They leapt again when it was disclosed that House Democrats were considering a wide array of tax increases to finance their legislation, including an income tax surcharge, a tax on employers based on the size of their payroll and a value-added tax, a form of a national sales tax.

House Democrats on Friday unveiled draft legislation they said would cover virtually all of the nation's nearly 50 million uninsured but it came without a price tag or an indication of how it would be paid for.

Major provisions of the 850-page measure would impose new responsibilities on individuals to obtain coverage and on employers to provided it. It also would end insurance company practices that deny coverage to the sick and create a new government-sponsored plan to compete with private companies.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said she hopes the legislation can clear the House before lawmakers leave for their annual August vacation.

WASHINGTON — The pharmaceutical industry agreed Saturday to spend $80 billion over the next decade improving drug benefits for seniors on Medicare and defraying the cost of President Barack Obam...
WASHINGTON — The pharmaceutical industry agreed Saturday to spend $80 billion over the next decade improving drug benefits for seniors on Medicare and defraying the cost of President Barack Obam...
Filed by Nick Sabloff
 
Comments
228
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- FreddieVee I'm a Fan of FreddieVee 5 fans permalink
photo

The retirement Rx drug plan that I receive from the large company I worked for has much lower Rx prices than Medicare part D and costs my company nothing. By joining a large group of companies and using one Medical company to negotiate with Pharmaceutical companies using the bargaining power of millions of workers, I pay less than 25% of the cost.

Who pays the rest? No one! The drug manufacturers just extent a volume discount which benefits their bottom line.

Why did Congress not allow Medicare the same bargaining power? Could it be, because the Republican controlled Congress wanted to bankrupt Medicare? Could it be that Pharmaceutical companies were more important than seniors to the Republican controlled Congress?

The answers are obvious.

FreddieVee

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 06/23/2009
photo

http://www.examiner.com/x-6180-Birmingham-Science-News-Examiner~y2009m6d20-Marijuana-treatment-for-H1N1-Diabetes-and-MS--it-is-true


Two companies are doing research on the multivariate uses of cannabis sativa -- marijuana. This is serious research, done correctly, and taken seriously by the medical and research community.

Cannabis Science Inc., is studying the potential of the phytocannabanoids in marijuana being a preventative of death by asphyxiation due to inflammation of the lungs in H1N1(swine flu) and other flus. Naturally occurring in the body, endocannabanoids control the inflammation. Phytocannabanoids from marijuana can mimic and enhance that response. The human body does not recognize a difference in the two molecules because they are so structurally similar.

GW Pharmaceuticals entered into an exclusive agreement with Dr. Mike Cawthorne at the University of Buckingham, England, to study the effects of cannabanoids and phytomedicines on type two diabetes and other metabolic diseases. Dr. Cawthorne was instrumental in the development of Avandia for diabetes treatment at SmithKline Beecham.

GW has already passed phase three trials for another drug called Sativex that is used in the treatment of spasticity due to Multiple Sclerosis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 06/21/2009
- MrMike513 I'm a Fan of MrMike513 16 fans permalink
photo

"The agreement by pharmaceutical companies to contribute to the health reform effort comes on the heels of the landmark pledge many health industry leaders made to me last month, when they offered to do their part to reduce health spending $2 trillion over the next decade,"

Would that be the $2 trillion in spending that the health care companies backed away from within days of its announcement? I guess this agreement with Big Pharma is the same thing...a non-binding, unenforceable agreement that they can walk away from whenever they feel like it.

To Mr. Obama: This may be change, but it's not change I can believe in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 06/21/2009
- dagdavid I'm a Fan of dagdavid 10 fans permalink
photo

B S . This leaves the pharma-dictators in charge. Biz as usual.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 06/21/2009

In case you didn't know it, when a Medicare recipient starts using prescriptions big time the drug benefit ends, the fabled donut hole. After a ton more has been spent the benefit kicks back in, if you live that long. Thank an R congress and R resident of the WH for that. It really makes sense, doesn't it? Along with that, I believe there are subsidies for the drug manufacturers in that law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 06/21/2009
- BARRISTER I'm a Fan of BARRISTER 19 fans permalink

We The People of These United States must realize that ultimately WE have the POWER.

Boycotts, demonstrations, strikes and VOTES are our tools. Even the People of Iran know this.

We must stop complaining if We do not use our tools to achieve our aspirations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 AM on 06/21/2009
- mazzetta I'm a Fan of mazzetta 9 fans permalink
photo

it seems the implicitly admitted that BEFORE this agreement they've been charging too much, what about giving back that surplus?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 AM on 06/21/2009
photo

That's exactly what I take from it also. And we are supposed to applaud them? And Washington thinks they are being generous?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 06/21/2009
- linton I'm a Fan of linton 9 fans permalink
photo

How about looking into the possibility of raising some capital/seed money/funds etc to start this venture. Someone responsible should set up this fund and people should send all their campaign donations towards this end. Look at the amount of money politicians raise on a daily basis only for most of them to get up there and deny us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 AM on 06/21/2009
- 1oldlady I'm a Fan of 1oldlady 10 fans permalink
photo

key term - .Agreement with the white House. who's side is who on? The details are again going to be against those who need and for those who don't.

When is the SH*T going to stop sticking to the FU**K*ING Wall. I am fading away because of some JERKs in HIGH places who make the medicine I need so expensive (around the cost of a house payment) even through I have MEDICAID - and I can't get it!

I hate each politician who says they have our best interest at hand. Remember, if it sounds to good to be true, it is!

We are a nation of walking dead!

Hey, why don't countries that have universal health care go and take it away from their people? Now thats a question that should be tested!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 AM on 06/21/2009
- linton I'm a Fan of linton 9 fans permalink
photo

Hopefully, it will all end well one day. This is not an easy fight especially if certain segments of the society refer to universal care as socialism, bad for us and government taking over our health.
Of course, better to have the government on my side than nothing at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 AM on 06/21/2009
- Ohsherri I'm a Fan of Ohsherri 105 fans permalink
photo

Before Universal HealthCare in Canada...t­here was the "fear mongering " too.
The nay-sayers went totally ape-sheet.­...oh ya...we were "comm-ies".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 AM on 06/21/2009
- Ohsherri I'm a Fan of Ohsherri 105 fans permalink
photo

They would never take away Universal Health Care in countries that already have it!!!!
Are you kidding me!!!!
Their not fools!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 AM on 06/21/2009
- mazzetta I'm a Fan of mazzetta 9 fans permalink
photo

right, in Italy nor mr Berlusconi's party, nor the far right, nor the market's fundamentalist dare to speak against the universal health care

someone tries to propose to cuts to the health and to the retirement system, that is public too, but none has ever dared to propose a different system

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 AM on 06/21/2009

When the AMA and the pharmaceutical industry give rounds of applause to Obama during a speech, we KNOW we're in really bad trouble. Obama set all the right wing conservatives in a neat little circle around him in order to NOT get the health care reform through, but he will still claim he tried anyway.... same story since the day he gave his oath of office speech. Everything he has done has been EXACTLY what Bush would have done or worse. . We have billions of funds to keep a war gong that has no hope of ever "winning" and several more billions to keep the bankers in their private jets and yacht clubs.... but we the people are not allowed health care, nutritional food+ and security that insures we will have a bed to call our own at the end of the day. Simple, basic human needs that more and more people are finding difficult to achieve.. Something is very very wrong with this picture. What we do get are small bits of crumbs that slightly benefit a chosen few, there is absolutely nothing for the rest of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 06/21/2009
- emerywood I'm a Fan of emerywood 4 fans permalink

Notice this is only a reduction of prices for MediCare Drug Plan medications, not all medications
on the market. All Big Pharma has to do is to raise prices for all medications annually higher
than inflation and they will recoup all the paper losses and more, much more. And for that,
they expect no more interference and no more bargaining from the government or the public
option ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 06/21/2009
photo

What a crock.

The rhetoric on this issue is so skewed it's disgusting.

All you hear about is the "30% overhead" of the insurance companies. The fact is that major insurance companies that work with large employers have overhead of about 8%. So all this talk about a public option saving 30% of our health care spending is absolutely ludicrous.

No wonder people are skeptical. They think they're being sold a bill of goods, because they ARE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 06/21/2009
- greatscot I'm a Fan of greatscot 32 fans permalink

And that's why U.S. pharma companies sell drugs overseas at 10% of the price they get from Medicare? Because they are humanitarians? That's the crock! They're theives who are gouging the U.S. taxpayer! Get real, they're stealing us blind!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 AM on 06/21/2009
- Gripen I'm a Fan of Gripen 14 fans permalink
photo

I think it is because we in europe make them compete against each other for govermetn contracts and in that way force thme to lower the prices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 06/21/2009

The drug companies get to write off more than 100 percent of these reductions.

Why might they want to do everything possible to ensure people get their medications?

Because the alternative health care industry (herbal remedies, accupuncture, etc) have cut deeply into their profits. That's one potential reason. Better to give people a small break on the price than to have them quit your product all together and go to alternatives.

Another reason: perhaps many Americans are on drugs they don't need or drugs that don't really help them that much. If they can't afford the drugs and stop taking them, they may just fiind out they do not need some of those drugs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 06/21/2009
- GeoLee I'm a Fan of GeoLee 63 fans permalink

I smell a costly quid pro quo for the health plans in general, folks...th­ey will make up thier difference on the drug costs for those under 65. 17 months and 30 days and counting to age 65 doe me, though..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 06/20/2009
- Sandmanj I'm a Fan of Sandmanj 40 fans permalink

I'm been going without any health insurance since April, 2008 and will continue to do so until I reach 65 - in 315 days - because the Blue Cross premiums I was paying for the rest of my family went through the roof in 5 short years. Screw the insurance companies, and screw Obama for sucking up to them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 06/21/2009

How sad, my heart sank when I read this article...­what about ALL of us who gave money to get Obama elected, Millions & millions of us...now he sides with the drug companies!
$80B over 10 years...wh­at a joke no wonder everyone in the pictures look like they're laughing..­.it'll cost more to enforce this agreement (though it probably won't be followed though on or enforced).
Perhaps this is just a start and eventually a single payer system will be pushed through, and negotiations on drugs will become legalized.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 06/20/2009
photo

Keep it in context. Focus on the fact that Obama's plan is more likely to pass if the transition cost can be reduced. This will help. He's not sold out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 06/21/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect