Obama Administration Refuses To Clamp Down On Cow Burps

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Administration Refuses To Clamp Down On Cow Burps stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DINA CAPPIELLO | June 20, 2009 09:07 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this March 11, 2009 file photo, a line of Holstein dairy cows feed through a fence at a farm outside Jerome, Idaho. Belching from the nation's 170 million cattle, sheep and pigs produces about one-quarter of the methane released in the U.S. each year, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. (AP Photo/Charlie Litchfield, FILE)

WASHINGTON — One contributor to global warming _ bigger than coal mines, landfills and sewage treatment plants _ is being left out of efforts by the Obama administration and House Democrats to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

Cow burps.

Belching from the nation's 170 million cattle, sheep and pigs produces about one-quarter of the methane released in the U.S. each year, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. That makes the hoofed critters the largest source of the heat-trapping gas.

In part because of an adept farm lobby campaign that equates government regulation with a cow tax, the gas that farm animals pass is exempt from legislation being considered by Congress to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

The EPA under President Barack Obama has said it has no plans to regulate the gas, even though the agency recently included methane among six greenhouse gases it believes are endangering human health and welfare.

The message circulating in Internet chat rooms, the halls of Congress and farm co-ops had America's farms facing financial ruin if the EPA required them to purchase air-pollution permits like power plants and factories do. The cost of those permits amounted to a cow tax, farm groups argued.

"It really has taken on a life of its own," said Rick Krause, a lobbyist with the American Farm Bureau Federation, which coined the term cow tax and spread it to farmers across the country. "This is something that people understand. All that we have to say is that (cows) are the next step with these proposed permit fees. And people are still talking about it."

Administration officials and House Democratic leaders have tried to assure farm groups that they have no intention of regulating cows. That effort, however, has done little to ease the concern of farmers and their advocates in Congress about the toll that regulating greenhouse gases will have on agriculture.

Story continues below
advertisement

Lawmakers and farm groups are now pressing for the climate legislation to guarantee that farmers will be compensated for taking steps to reduce greenhouse gases. That could lead to farmers getting paid if their cows pass less gas.

Research has shown that changing cattle diet and boosting efficiency _ such as producing the same amount of milk and beef from a smaller herd _ can result in less gas, according Frank M. Mitloehner, an associate professor at the University of California at Davis, who has studied livestock gas for 15 years.

"I don't think livestock should be ignored. Every industry has to play their role," Mitloehner said. But laws designed to reduce emissions from smokestacks and tailpipes won't work with cattle, which can't be fitted with pollution control devices, Mitloehner said.

"The belching is very hard to collect," he said. "You cannot capture these gases."

The climate bill specifically excludes enteric fermentation _ the fancy term for the gas created by digestion and expelled largely by burping _ from the limit it would place on greenhouse gas emissions. The legislation directs the EPA not to include it among the various sources that could be subject to new performance standards.

EPA administrator Lisa Jackson has called rumors of the cow tax "ridiculous notions" and a "distraction."

On Thursday, Rep. Todd Tihart, R-Kan., successfully added an amendment to the spending bill that covers the EPA to block the agency from including biological processes of livestock _ including the release of methane _ as part of regulating greenhouse gases.

House aides and EPA officials say that controlling such emissions is unworkable. Cow burps make up about 2 percent of all the climate-altering pollution in the U.S.

But allies of farmers in Congress say the reluctance to step in the cow tax debate has a lot to do with the outcry from the agriculture industry and moderate Democrats from rural states whose votes are needed to pass the bill.

"I think they realized that if you are a Democrat in an agricultural state, a red state, that this is radioactive and I think that is why they have tried scrupulously to reaffirm that they don't have any intention of doing this," said Sen. John Thune, R-S.D. He is sponsoring a bill that would bar the EPA from requiring farmers to get permits for cattle burps.

Thune, whose state is home to a half-million cattle, first heard about the cow tax at a South Dakota Cattlemen Association's conference in early December. Within weeks he introduced his bill and recruited support from New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, whose state boasts three times more cows.

The origins of the cow tax can be traced to last July, when President George W. Bush's EPA released documents outlining how the Clean Air Act could regulate greenhouse gases.

Even though the Bush administration had no intention of using the law, farm groups seized on a single paragraph deep in the comments from various federal agencies. The Agriculture Department warned that if EPA decided to regulate agricultural sources of greenhouse gases, numerous farms would face costly and time-consuming process to acquire permits for barnyard burping.

The Farm Bureau quickly did the math and figured farms would have to pay about $175 for each dairy cow, $87.50 per head of beef cattle and $20 for each hog to purchase permits for emissions.

The cow tax was born.

___

On the Net:

Environmental Protection Agency: http://www.epa.gov/

Agriculture Department: http://www.usda.gov

American Farm Bureau Federation: http://www.fb.org/

Sen. Thune's release: http://tinyurl.com/n6z52s

WASHINGTON — One contributor to global warming _ bigger than coal mines, landfills and sewage treatment plants _ is being left out of efforts by the Obama administration and House Democrats to l...
WASHINGTON — One contributor to global warming _ bigger than coal mines, landfills and sewage treatment plants _ is being left out of efforts by the Obama administration and House Democrats to l...
Filed by Alex Leo
 
Comments
30
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Why do cows hate Earth?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

if the gases are affecting humans then we should do all that we can to combat this new scrouge! All farm animals raised for food such as cows, pigs... should be kept indoors at all times and the barn that holds them should have a means of capturing the gases these animals produce so that it can be converted to energy.
Furthermore, the animals should be restrained in a manner that keeps their rumps over a conveyor belt that will catch the animal waste and transport it to a bin until it can be used as fertilizer. For the animals own health it would need to be kept in a position that prevents it from moving around and stepping in it's own waste. Food would be presented in a bin in front of the animal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 06/22/2009
- skatoolaki I'm a Fan of skatoolaki 71 fans permalink
photo

So you are proposing putting these animals into an extremely confined space - one so small that they cannot even turn around -or sit day in and day out (indoors, no less, which is not their natural habitat) so that their poop can be turned into fertilizer and their bodily "gases" contained?

Seriously? I re-read your comment a few times and apologize if I am missing the joke because it does not appear that you are attempting to make one. If this is tongue-in-cheek, then I am sorry for not seeing it as so. If it was meant in all seriousness, then I do hope you see the fatal flaws in this line of thinking.

I do see what you're getting at but surely there is a much more efficient (and blatantly more humane) way of dealing with the problems that are present on farms that affect our environment.

Chickens are raised in ways similar to what you describe and it is horrifically devastating to the animals. We cannot, as a humane society, abuse animals so callously just for their meat or produce. I would hate to see cows being treated similarly as that would be a step backwards and not forward (a forward step would be to see the elimination of these chicken/egg death camps and an even stronger surge towards free-range birds and eggs).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 06/22/2009
- SteveMI I'm a Fan of SteveMI 2 fans permalink
photo

I think the joke is that this is more or less how it is done on non-organic farms.
Organic farms are less efficient and more wasteful, and I'm sure create more methane or whatever it is we are scared of now.

But they do give us a nicer image of happy farm animals chatting casually in the farm yard-and I like that , so it's worth the trade off for those of us who can afford to spend more for the nice image.

But if we have learned anything from George Orwell's Animal Farm, It is that they eventually plot against and overthrow the humans if given to much freedom. So I think we should heed his warning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 06/22/2009

A lot of the methane gas being released is by the ocean.
The supposed NG gas leak in NYC last year
was really methane from the Hudson River.
As our planet warms from the sun cycle this will happen more.
"THE METHANE CYCLE" methane a natural gas rises in the atmosphere
and is converted back into its elements by ultra-violet light.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 06/22/2009
- SteveMI I'm a Fan of SteveMI 2 fans permalink
photo

Makes the relevant point that most 'greenhouse gas' (after water vapor) is produced naturally, by respiration. 440 gigatons of Co2 annually V .a handful from all human fossil fuel use. Cows are a tiny fraction of this respiration. Ants alone probably constitute the greatest.

I've got it -tax ant farms!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 06/22/2009
- melmoid I'm a Fan of melmoid 12 fans permalink

If he clamped down on cows in this regard, he would also be obliged to close down the Senate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 PM on 06/21/2009

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/21/farmers-cut-cow-emissions_n_218540.html

Perhaps some goverment incentives could help....
Take it from the corn subsidies. I think these things are supposed to move with need, not stagnate into some permanent stipend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 06/21/2009
- BlackYowe I'm a Fan of BlackYowe 53 fans permalink
photo

Glad to hear it. First lets get the trucking companies, the coal burners and the huge corperatations that spew CO2.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 06/21/2009
- Roguer I'm a Fan of Roguer 25 fans permalink
photo

Latest EPA study says: US cattle product only 2.5% of the world's greenhouse gases.

Grass fed cattle have proven to produce very little methane.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 06/21/2009
- BlackYowe I'm a Fan of BlackYowe 53 fans permalink
photo

Exactly. At one time millions of bison were burping and far-ting on the great plains in their full glory! Bring them back and can the cows eating silage and grain!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 06/21/2009
- lvogt I'm a Fan of lvogt 25 fans permalink

Seriously folks... corn is bad for cows which is bad for us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 06/21/2009
- julia23 I'm a Fan of julia23 27 fans permalink
photo

And its seriously bad to have corn present in all processed foods.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 06/21/2009
- skatoolaki I'm a Fan of skatoolaki 71 fans permalink
photo

So are you guys saying that the elimination of 'corn' in the diet of cows (and humans, but that's another debate) is the main cause of this problem? If cows grazed on grass rather than being fed corn and corn-based products, could this eliminate the amount of gases they produce and, therefore, eliminate the amount of methane in the environment for them?

It seems to me that farmers would welcome this. I am ignorant in the ways of farming so if anyone could enlighten me, I would appreciate it, but it seems that allowing cattle to graze is much cheaper than purchasing feed for them or even processing the feed themselves (which still takes time, machinery, and effort = $$). Why aren't more farmers willing to return to grazing cattle? Can anyone help me out?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 06/22/2009

If they feed the cows the proper diet, you know, what cows should eat, they wouldn't burp as much. Grass fed cows burp much less than grain feed cows.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 AM on 06/21/2009
- JoshuaLudd I'm a Fan of JoshuaLudd 2 fans permalink

If we didn't cram thousands of cows into feedlots and instead have a more natural, smaller scale, and local meat industry... more humane as well... then we would have less of a problem with this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 06/21/2009
- Tags I'm a Fan of Tags 11 fans permalink

Factory farm consolidated cows = less jobs

Local farms spread nationally = exponentially more jobs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 AM on 06/21/2009
- Kalarchis I'm a Fan of Kalarchis 4 fans permalink
photo

And less cost transporting food around! And fresher food available locally. Decentralization only makes sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

We don't need to tax, just get rid of their subsidies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 06/21/2009
- Roguer I'm a Fan of Roguer 25 fans permalink
photo

I raise pastured grass fed cattle. I do not see a dime of government subsidies. Would not accept it if it were offered.

Corn, soy, sugar (Sugar Act) receive the bulk of farm subsidies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 06/21/2009
- Roguer I'm a Fan of Roguer 25 fans permalink
photo

Most of the subsidies actually go to corn for ethanol production to power you polluting automobile ways.

Also, they exist in the first place to make sure you can go and buy cheap food at the grocery store... If you had to pay what food products are worth, your grocery bill would double in the very least.

Stop global warming, get rid of half the human population.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 06/21/2009

which half?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 06/22/2009
- skatoolaki I'm a Fan of skatoolaki 71 fans permalink
photo

I think - with all of the "natural", "locally grown", and "free range" products becoming so popular, as well as places like Whole Foods - a lot of people are willing to pay more for more healthy, natural, and humanely created food.

While I agree with you that eliminating half the population would work, unfortunately that isn't exactly a viable option. ;P Though, the way we're headed, some days that may end up just be the solution that plays out; whether we want it to or not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 06/22/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

Let them eat grass. Less gas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 06/20/2009

Didn't see your post, lol agreed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 AM on 06/21/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect