iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

DHS To End Domestic Satellite Spying Program, Reports AP

EILEEN SULLIVAN   06/22/09 10:09 PM ET   AP

Satellite

WASHINGTON — Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano plans to kill a program begun by the Bush administration that would use U.S. spy satellites for domestic security and law enforcement, a government official said Monday.

Napolitano recently reached her decision after the program was discussed with law enforcement officials, and she was told it was not an urgent issue, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk about it.

The program was announced in 2007 and was to have the Homeland Security Department use overhead and mapping imagery from existing satellites for homeland security and law enforcement purposes.

The program, called the National Applications Office, has been delayed because of privacy and civil liberty concerns.

The program was included in the Obama administration's 2010 budget request, according to Rep. Jane Harman, a California Democrat and House homeland security committee member who was briefed on the department's classified intelligence budget.

Harman said Monday she had not been given final word that the program would be killed. She said she would talk to Napolitano on Tuesday.

Harman has been outspoken about her concerns that the program is unnecessary, far reaching and open-ended.

"I thought this was just an invitation to huge mischief," Harman said. Of killing the program, she said, "It shows real leadership on the part of Janet Napolitano."

Homeland Security spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said Napolitano began looking at the program shortly after she became secretary. Kudwa said the department expects to announce the results of that review soon.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said he hoped the department wasn't canceling the program.

"If it is true, it's a very big mistake," said King, who is the top Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee. "This is definitely a step back in the war on terror."

For years, domestic agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency and Interior Department have had access to this satellite imagery for scientific research, to assist in response to natural disasters like hurricanes and fires, and to map out vulnerabilities during a major public event like the Super Bowl.

Since 1974 the agency's requests satellite imagery have been made through the federal interagency group, the Civil Applications Committee.

The Bush administration, however, decided to funnel the requests through the Homeland Security Department and expand their use for homeland security and law enforcement purposes.

After receiving a letter from Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton, Napolitano decided the program should be canceled.

Bratton, in his role as head of the Major City Chiefs Association, wrote on June 21 that the program, as envisioned by the Bush administration, is not an urgent need for local law enforcement.

Instead, Bratton said, Homeland Security should focus on the fusion centers across the country and improving information-sharing with state and local officials to improve the domestic intelligence picture.

Bratton said he was unaware whether police chiefs has been consulted by Bush administration officials about the satellite program.

"To my knowledge, this is the first opportunity major law enforcement organizations have had to participate in this significant and complex initiative," he said in the letter.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano plans to kill a program begun by the Bush administration that would use U.S. spy satellites for domestic security and law enforcement, a...
WASHINGTON — Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano plans to kill a program begun by the Bush administration that would use U.S. spy satellites for domestic security and law enforcement, a...
Filed by Marcus Baram  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 121
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
05:51 PM on 06/24/2009
Although, I personally am so far to the left that even the democrats appear to me to be "right-wing," I consider myself to be a strict constitutionalist. It is my opinion that since its inception there has been an organized and systematic assault by the conservatives in the United States on the civil liberties written into the US Constitution. The “War on Drugs”; “War on Terror”; “War on Communism” and a host of other wars waged by the right wing are really nothing more than a War on People--an excuse to erode civil rights to the point of non-existence. I invite you to my website devoted to raising awareness on this puritan attack on freedom: http://pltcldscsn.blogspot.com/
05:34 PM on 06/23/2009
Because at the end of the day, if you can never make a decision that makes America “less” safe, then you are only pretending to be making decisions. Anything that differentiated us from any other country in the world is gone once you look past the face of it. In the mean time, lets not give to much credit to OBL for giving Cheney the ability to break statutory law and put any US citizen on a premeditated playbook cause even he would have never expected that. As for the future, lets hope Kim Jong ill never takes away our God given rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because the biggest risk they pose to any US citizen is giving Dick Cheney a reason to jump up and demanding more national security there and giving even more cover to the domestic intellignece agencies here, but he baked that in a long time ago.
04:10 PM on 06/23/2009
Umm, O.K. so Home Land Security isn't going to use the existing military satellites that are in orbit above the country and capable of seeing pretty much anything....question, "what reason(s) do our military/intelligence folks have for watching domestic activities this closely to begin with?"
03:42 PM on 06/23/2009
It’s when the risk to any individual is extremely low that the terror fighters at our sloppy intelligence service get bored and every American should worry. Unlike the very suppressive House of Saud, that offer counseling to “potential’ threats to see what their problem is, our dedicated professionals like to put conveyer belts of informants under people’s feet at the first sign of suspicion of potential, 1% (even though their non potential might be a lot greater) and the imagineers then go to work constructing circumstances for subjects to break the law. Got nothing to hide…If it’s been a really slow month for our terror fighters you may be asked to be a classified informant, tied into the Terrorist Surveillance Program, just so you can make someone else’s life more difficult using the weakest of investigative pretences. Don’t like what extreme and perverted law enforcement asked you to do, oh well , you had dire and grave repercussions dumped on you and you may have the word potential in front of you for the rest of your life somehow becoming the fringe if you do not accept absolute safety at any cost. It does ensure security but it is not in my name and it should not be in yours. The government had a 100% potential of taking away the enjoyment of any and all of your liberties that far exceeds your risk from any misguided terrorist.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Waltfl
Μακάριοι οἱ εἰρηνοποιοί
01:43 PM on 06/23/2009
A lot has been said in the past 5 months about Obama not following through wit his civil liberties promises, but this is a major blow for supporters of a big brother government. Besides their warrant less wiretap efforts, and the Patriot and Mil.Comm. Acts, this program was one of the main components of the Bush Administration's efforts to turn this country into a Gestapo state, with total surveillance of all citizens at all ll times.

Living in a region that was devastated by Hurricane Charley, and seeing the profiteering and mismanagement going on with my own eyes, I can only laugh at their argument of needing this program to manage disasters. Satellite images can still be used in a Hurricane scenario, without big brother following the moves of every American from outer space 24/7.

We cannot thank the Obama Administration enough for doing away with this.
photo
screechingllama
Can You Still Have Fun?
01:28 PM on 06/23/2009
There are many definitions of BIG GOVT. Taking away your 4th amendment right certainly fits that definition.
01:04 PM on 06/23/2009
"Instead, Bratton said, Homeland Security should focus on the fusion centers across the country and improving information-sharing with state and local officials to improve the domestic intelligence picture"

Most of us have no idea what type of data is being monitored & stored by these fusion centers. Allegedly, the two recent Tiller & Museum shooters were being "monitored" by one or more of these. All the good they did in "protecting" us.

With the signal-light beam cameras, cell phones, and monitoring devices in new cars, they pretty much can monitor us without satellites, anyway. I'm sure they will utilize the satellite system when they feel like they need it by special directive.
01:01 PM on 06/23/2009
Meanwhile, the Mark Klien vs the NSA lawsuit was thrown out with FISA... this case involved the NSA setting up listening stations that route 100percent of internet and voice traffic through their own hub INSIDE the ATT facitlity in San Francisco... of course they did not terminate those listening stations and every single email and phone call you make is not only being technically screened and recorded, many of them are being checked by living NSA staffers....
So when the Gov declares that the CIA or the NSA or DHS isn't doing something that we all agree is illegal, rest assured that you are probably being lied to.
12:23 PM on 06/23/2009
When Dick Cheney states he can take any and every action to ensure national security, to include breaking any law, given the fact that is it inherent in his Constitution, you really have to wonder how the FBI keeps these activities secret. The reality is that he attached FBI investigations -based on the legal standard of reasonable suspicion (1% ) and potential -hypothetical-threat (1%)and using this high standard, tethered otherwise criminal activity to another satellite, so there are grave and dire consequences built in from day one acting as a counterweight for each and every use-which are nothing short of repulsive. The FBI passes out non disclosures faster than a waterfall, and every single person a subject may come into contact with can be an informant and part of the super secret and marvelous Terrorist Surveillance Program. It creates an extreme and perverted consensual platform and allows consensual informants to steer and derail anyone’s life on top of any of these consensual platforms using investigative pretences. Each time one of these turn key solutions is thrown up, the severe and dire consequences baked in from day one should that person be one of the lucky ones that realizes the FBI put a conveyer belt of informants under them. With this dangerous and pathetic intelligence service, the best way to hide the truth is to use free speech and silly snitches to make it sound absurd. Their own PR firm so no one know what they are dealing with.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
springsm
12:22 PM on 06/23/2009
And we hear the bleating from Stephen King right off. Fear Fear Fear...gawd..this guy is always first to critisize. I wonder if he has an original thought EVER.
photo
dakotawoman
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill. . .old time Progressive
01:41 PM on 06/23/2009
Um, I admit I'm out of the loop here, but why do you keep referring to Stephen King?

Probably a stupid question, but. . .
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
12:09 PM on 06/23/2009
For eight years the right pushed for an increasingly unaccountable authoritarian government while at the same time inserting the words "liberty" and "freedom" into every third sentence. Why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treetracker
02:00 PM on 06/23/2009
I do believe they use the novel 1984 as their playbook for domination.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brandnewstuff
11:06 AM on 06/23/2009
Need I say more about HOW Horrible some Agents behaved and performed and the Programs work in concert....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxHjWYA50Ds
Ok spying-
These men are in legal turmoil for allowing sadistic abuse of power to occur- James Comey could not even say out loud to the public.. obviously - Check and balances Under the Bush regeim they want Zero counterbalance of counter- terrorism programs for they are filled with corruption.

Jennifer E Elliott
10:26 AM on 06/23/2009
Please don't halt the program until we know what Gov. Sanford was doing in the woods.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brandnewstuff
10:05 AM on 06/23/2009
I often watch the response of those that contribute to the Huff-- Then by deductive reasoning check to see how many comments made- this only had less than 100 comments- WOW_for all that flase feedback

Jennifer E Elliott
photo
dakotawoman
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill. . .old time Progressive
09:59 AM on 06/23/2009
I am relieved to hear that we Americans are more assured of our right to privacy in our own country once again.

And, Progressive that I am, I say that EVEN in light of the recent resurgence of hate-talk and threats of violence from home-grown extremist Right Wing terrorists who WOULD bear watching.

However, since I value liberty, the rule of law UNDER THE CONSTITUTION (versus the rule of religious groups) and civil rights MORE than I value paranoia, fear-mongering and pre-emptive action against those (even those whose political beliefs threaten my well-being) who have not yet committed a crime -- well, we'll just have to have the courage to accept those risks, won't we?

"Freedom ain't free" is it?

How many of my Conservative fellow countrymen and women can stand up and agree with me?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:38 AM on 06/23/2009
well said dakota! Due to the total corruption in Washington and the financial industry, citizens are waking up to the fraud that is American political theater. The only real option is the US Constitution (which all elected officials swear to uphold) which was written exactly for times like we are living presently. We need to start over and rebuild the Republic from the state on up. It is the state that charters the federal government and its powers are clearly stated in the Constitution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treetracker
02:04 PM on 06/23/2009
Agreed. And as stated in the post below our system is so corrupted, we need to rebuild with ethical people.

George Washington, "Lobbyists will be the bane of this country." No truer words were ever spoken.