iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Administration Seeks To Join U.N. Rights Of The Child Convention

JOHN HEILPRIN   06/22/09 07:09 PM ET   AP

Kids

UNITED NATIONS — The Obama administration is reviving efforts to have the United States sign onto a global children's rights treaty ratified by every U.N. member except the U.S. and Somalia, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, said Monday.

Administration officials are actively discussing "when and how it might be possible to join," Rice, a Cabinet-level official, said while visiting a school in Harlem and fielding a teenager's specific question about the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child.

She did not provide a specific timetable for the decision and has said previously only that the administration would conduct a legal review of the treaty.

But during her a brief question-and-answer session with 120 junior high school students at Harlem Children's Zone, a nonprofit educational facility, Rice acknowledged that the effort was long overdue given that "the only two countries" that are not part of the treaty are the United States and the lawless Horn of Africa nation.

"It's a long story," she said of the nearly 20-year-old treaty that has become a point of contention in the United States, not to mention Somalia.

The treaty says children have basic rights to education, health care and protection from abuse. Its supporters have used it to improve child protection laws for schools and courts in places like Lebanon, South Korea, South Africa and Sri Lanka.

Democrats from Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to California Sen. Barbara Boxer, chair of a Senate subcommittee on human rights, have advocated pushing for Senate ratification of the treaty, which requires two-thirds approval in the 100-seat chamber.

But opponents in the U.S. have long argued that it could open the door to outside interference from government and U.N. officials in what they say are parents' rights to raise a child as they see fit. Republicans in Congress also have put forward a measure that has gained limited support but is aimed at blocking such a treaty.

Since the treaty took effect in 1990, it has been ratified by 193 nations. The Clinton administration signed it in 1995 but never submitted the treaty for Senate approval, bowing to opposition from some senators.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

UNITED NATIONS — The Obama administration is reviving efforts to have the United States sign onto a global children's rights treaty ratified by every U.N. member except the U.S. and Somalia, the...
UNITED NATIONS — The Obama administration is reviving efforts to have the United States sign onto a global children's rights treaty ratified by every U.N. member except the U.S. and Somalia, the...
Filed by Susan Crile  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:57 AM on 06/24/2009
Good Evening,
I beg everyone who reads this to take an hour or two and study this issue before making statements in support or in opposition to the treaty. Those who claim this is a simple issue have obviously not spent any real time reading both sides of the issue. I have spent at least 20 hours studying both sides.
---First, the USA should not apologize for its record on human rights. While not perfect, I will bet on it against any other country in the world head to head. Instead, Amercian parents should investigate what is a clear danger to their rights as parents to decide what values are handed down to their own children. This treaty will overturn the fundamental rights parents have enjoyed in America for over 200 years. It provides absolutely no benefit to American children as we already protect every reasonably good right claimed in the treaty. Finally, I would be thrilled to dialogue with anyone and help them understand this issue in order to make an educated decision rather than a mindless leap based on one or two internet articles. Please post a request that I can respond to.
06:47 PM on 06/23/2009
How will this help the children of the United States? We seem so concerned about all the children in other countries while there are starving children, uneducated children, children being tried as adults here in our great country. Obama needs to focus on this country & it's citizens; even the youngest ones!
05:36 PM on 06/23/2009
What would signing the treaty actually affect in the USA?
05:08 PM on 06/23/2009
What a shame that the US has not felt it could sign a treaty like this that is so basic to human rights.
02:02 PM on 06/23/2009
There's your avg right winger who doesn't want the US engaged in International Treaties. That's fine and understandable. Washington didn't either.

What's more frightening are the extreme right who believe this treaty, once signed, will allow a foreign agent or agency to personally come into their home and force a parent to take their child to a hospital instead of just praying over them. Will force a parent to give their child public social interactions if home-schooled. Force parents to teach their children things like equality, fairness, civil rights and all that other stuff that violates their biblical worldview.
04:32 PM on 06/23/2009
Which in turn wouldn't be quite as much of a problem (and yes, danger) if those people were not constanty being catered to as the core voters of one of our two big parties.
09:48 PM on 06/24/2009
Jaywalker begans with ad hominem Then sarcasm.
Then Jaywalker presents a straw man emotional appeal.
Then the unsupported and false statement about homeschooling is added.
Finally, Jaywalker returns to ad hominem against anyone who holds a Biblical worldview.

Let me clear the record somewhat:
Those on the right do not abhor international treaties, just those that are harmful to American citizens.
--I am assuming that "Washington" is referring to George, our first president. Please explain your purpose in this pointless analogy. Are you bashing George Washington. Of note, President Washington was against political parties.
--Most christians in my experience take their children to the doctor. As a pediatrician, it was more often the "alternative" worldviews that refused vaccines, refused traditional medicine, and wanted "natural" therapies.
Besides, legislation and judicial processes are in place to address the RARE problems.
--Jaywalker should attend a home school Rally Day to see the reality about home schooler's socialization. That rumor is just a myth. Please read:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_socialization_a_problem_for_homeschoolers ---for further proof.
--I wish more parents would teach their children Biblical worldviews like love for neighbor, patience, servanthood, perseverance, respect for others, respect for life, stewardship of nature, among others. Exactly what Bible are you reading to make your accusations, because it is not the NIV, ESV, KJB, NKJB, or NASB that I have read.

Sincerely,
Dr. Potter
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
01:48 PM on 06/23/2009
We're number one! In not signing international treaties, that is.* It's about time that we sign this treaty. I can hardly believe that a few right-wingers still act as if signing treaties constitutes "UN interference".

*Not to mention prison population and military spending.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hangdogit
Progressive with some Libertarian (abolish DEA).
01:58 PM on 06/23/2009
How about gun crimes? Capital punishment? Torture? Gulags? "American Exceptionalism?"
04:17 PM on 06/23/2009
Not to mention things like the most expensive *and* most inefficient health care system in the world, and that we are still the world record holders in air pollution.

Not to mention seemingly minor insanities, like c-sections, infant circumcision, plastic surgery etc etc etc etc etc.

You know, between the Reps and the Dems, I think I like the idea of SOMEONE actually governing us and protecting us from ourselves where we have proved beyond reasonable doubt that we Americans really are *that* stupid.
09:58 PM on 06/24/2009
In this string of arguments, I want to inject some reality.
If you think another country is better than America, please go there and start complaining about that government to see how long you last.

Despite the apology tour of the world by our President, America is a unique country founded on the ideals of freedom, not just our own freedom, but protecting that freedom around the globe. We do not need a treaty to prove our worth. We already go far beyond the treaty - signers in protecting child rights. If those countries' horrendous actions and our own history doesn't prove anything to you, then consider a recent study in Lancet, a premier medical journal. The researchrs found that countries who sign international treaties do not have better health outcomes than those that don't sign.

Finally, please research those World Health Organization studies showing how far behind America is in Health. You will find some interesting uses of statistics. In short, the formula for rating countries is biased against America. America is not the worst when truth is actually discovered.

Sincerely,
Dr. Potter
01:17 PM on 06/23/2009
What a continuing embarrassment to the USA - and a stain on its perception as a beacon of fundamental rights. Let's hope that the US Senate has the moral rectitude to get the USA to sign the Convention.
10:00 PM on 06/24/2009
Dear Laughable,
Our country deserves more credit and respect than you give it. It is not perfect, but compared to any other country in the world is the best. And I hope the US Senate has enough common sense to see the dangers of this treaty.
12:29 PM on 06/23/2009
It is a grand scale disaster for the children who were caught up in the Sri Lankan, Sudanese conflicts. Children were continuously displaced and were deprived of education and basic needs.

In these countries, there are no relief plans for the affected children. War crimes are on top of the agenda with the denials of aid reaching the children.

As UNICEF put it, the mono-ethnic military was relentless attacking civilian huts and was responsible for mentally harming over 60,000 children in the Sri Lankan conflict.

Hopefully, Ms. Hillary Clinton who has been a champion for the childrens in conflict, will bring justice to the sufferings of these children in post-conflict period.
03:29 PM on 06/23/2009
Very well said. I think it's way too easy to overlook the plight of youngsters when we look at the global tragedies that we are faced with today.

I'm an OB nurse, so I have a bit of a soft spot for young folks :)
10:02 PM on 06/24/2009
Please explain to me exactly how our ratification of the treaty makes any difference to the atrocities cited above??? If it does make a difference, then our country is so powerful that it is more important than all 193 other signers combined. I do not see any evidence to prove either.
Sincerely,
Dr. Potter