Oscars DOUBLING Number Of Best-Picture Nominees To 10

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Oscars DOUBLING Number Of Best-Picture Nominees To 10 stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVID GERMAIN | 06/24/09 06:45 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Slumdog

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — The Academy Awards will have 10 best-picture nominees instead of the usual five starting next year, improving the odds for films such as "The Dark Knight," a fan and critic favorite that was snubbed last time.

Doubling the field for Hollywood's top prize will make room for more worthy films and potentially give a jolt to the Oscar TV ratings, Sid Ganis, president of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, said Wednesday.

The change takes effect with the 82nd Oscar show March 7.

The academy board of governors decided there were more than five films last year that deserved best-picture consideration, Ganis said.

Among those that "were part of the conversation" were the Batman blockbuster "The Dark Knight," along with fellow superhero flick "Iron Man," the animated "WALL-E" and the comedy "Tropic Thunder," Ganis said.

All were huge box-office successes but the sort of movies that rarely make the best-picture cut.

"It's going to give the public the possibility of being more interested in the show this year, just because it might very well include more populist movies," Ganis said. "And because it's 10, not five, there will be a larger group of people who will be interested."

The change caught studio executives and others in Hollywood by surprise. Some said it was a good idea to open the main prize up to more films.

Story continues below
advertisement

Academy voters often have overlooked "big box-office successes that also were really big artistic successes," said Christine Birch, an academy member and head of marketing for DreamWorks. "Those weren't deemed quote-unquote `academy' movies. This gives those movies an opportunity to not have to fall by the wayside."

Two of this year's best-reviewed movies, Paramount's sci-fi adventure "Star Trek" and Disney and Pixar Animation's animated tale "Up," now have better odds of best-picture nominations, Birch said.

Publicist Tony Angelotti, who has worked on awards campaigns for such studios as Miramax and Universal, said Oscar voters might stick largely to the sober dramas that typically dominate the best-picture category.

"Academy members vote for the films they like," Angelotti said. "This doesn't change their taste, so the kinds of nominations we've seen the past are probably what we'll see in the future. There's just going to be more of them."

Others said it was impossible to say how it might affect the Oscars, which are awarded by the academy's 5,800 members.

"With a voting body that large, you just can't predict what this means," said Disney spokeswoman Jasmine Madatian, an academy member who oversees the studio's awards campaigns.

Along with animated films, comedies and other blockbusters, Ganis said academy board members hoped the new rules might open the best-picture category to documentaries and foreign-language movies. Animated films, documentaries and foreign-language movies already have their own categories, but they also will be eligible to compete for best picture.

The kinds of films academy members include in the expanded nominations could have a huge effect on the Oscar ratings, which generally have declined over the last decade. The show tends to draw more TV viewers in years when blockbusters are serious contenders for best picture.

The biggest audience ever, 55.2 million viewers, tuned in when "Titanic" won best picture for 1997, according to Nielsen Media Research. The 2003 Oscars, when "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" won, drew 43.5 million viewers, the most in recent years.

Two years ago, when "No Country for Old Men" took top honors, the Oscars had their worst ratings on record, with just 32 million viewers. Ratings rose last February, when "Slumdog Millionaire" won, but the audience of 36.3 million still was modest compared to the show's glory years.

Had there been 10 nominees for last year's films, "The Dark Knight" easily could have made the cut. That likely would have stoked audience interest in the ceremony and could have made the best-picture category more of a horse race, since "The Dark Knight" was one of the year's most acclaimed films.

That could hold true in future years with 10 films in the mix.

"I think it makes the race much more exciting and offers a broader showcase to celebrate and honor the year's most outstanding films," said Sony Pictures spokesman Steve Elzer, an academy member. "Folks who really didn't have a chance to get into the top five will now really rethink whether they can be competitive in that environment."

Studios spend millions on advertising, screenings, DVD mailings and other expenses to position films for awards consideration. Expanding the main event will force studios to decide whether to boost their awards budgets or spread the money among more movies, potentially diluting their investments in the films with the best prospects of winning.

But studios also could ring up more theater and DVD sales, since nominations _ and particularly a best-picture win _ prompt more people to see Oscar contenders.

"It gives the potential Oscar bounce to five additional films. The fact that they were a best-picture nominee, whether they win or not, that can be a very powerful marketing tool," said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com. "There's still only going to be one winner, though. That's the bottom line."

___

On the Net:

http://www.oscars.org

___

Universal Pictures and Focus Features are owned by NBC Universal, a unit of General Electric Co.; Sony Pictures, Sony Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Classics are units of Sony Corp.; Paramount and Paramount Vantage are divisions of Viacom Inc.; Disney's parent is The Walt Disney Co.; Miramax is a division of The Walt Disney Co.; 20th Century Fox, Fox Searchlight Pictures and Fox Atomic are owned by News Corp.; Warner Bros. and New Line are units of Time Warner Inc.; MGM is owned by a consortium of Providence Equity Partners, Texas Pacific Group, Sony Corp., Comcast Corp., DLJ Merchant Banking Partners and Quadrangle Group; Lionsgate is owned by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.; IFC Films is owned by Rainbow Media Holdings, a subsidiary of Cablevision Systems Corp.; Rogue Pictures is owned by Relativity Media LLC; Overture Films is a subsidiary of Liberty Media Corp.

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — The Academy Awards will have 10 best-picture nominees instead of the usual five starting next year, improving the odds for films such as "The Dark Knight," a fan and crit...
BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — The Academy Awards will have 10 best-picture nominees instead of the usual five starting next year, improving the odds for films such as "The Dark Knight," a fan and crit...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
246
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- factotem I'm a Fan of factotem 120 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, like Hollywood makes ten decent movies a year.
Um, no!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 06/25/2009
- rharris513 I'm a Fan of rharris513 3 fans permalink

Now the Oscars will be the new "America Choice Award."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 06/25/2009
- LMPE I'm a Fan of LMPE 59 fans permalink

As long as movies containing explosions and/or car chases every minute don't get nominations, it'll be just fine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 06/25/2009
photo

This is nothing more than a marketing ploy for a failing industry. Movies that are nominated generate a lot of buzz and people tend to see them more. Next they will do this with other cash generating nominations such as actor and actress. Instead of this stupidlity why not produce better movies? Do we really need another Kate Hudson or Owen Wilson movie?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 06/25/2009
- Cogs I'm a Fan of Cogs 25 fans permalink

This is going to mean that clips from 10 movies will be shown. What are the show's producers going to cut from the telecast to keep it from running more than 3 hours?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 06/25/2009
photo

True. The Oscar will run around 5 hours now.

I like epic movies, not epic award shows, though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 06/25/2009
- raven119 I'm a Fan of raven119 23 fans permalink

Change the rules for better ratings. Brilliant...and so very Hollywood. Does that mean that there will be twice as many films worth seeing this year than there were last year? Now if a film doesn't make the cut, it's not because there were only five nomination slots, it'll be because it must have been a really crap film. Talk about a ego buster.

Well, I hope they are holding a bumper crop of gold for fall release, because I doubt whether I could shortlist three worthy movies so far this year. And if broadcast ratings stay as low as they have, will they have to nominate 20 films next time?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 06/25/2009

This is just another gimmick, a lame attempt to get people to watch a bloated, boring awards show. That thing last year where five former winners came out to blow smoke up the cans of the nominees was BORING.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 06/25/2009
- AlexNYC I'm a Fan of AlexNYC 11 fans permalink
photo

There were many years were there were best film nominations that I strongly felt didn't deserve to even be there. This will allow for more films with questionable quality to be nominated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 06/25/2009
photo

This move is just to appease the nerds who thought that 'The Dark Knight' should have been nominated for best picture. Hate to break this to Bat fans, but while the film was entertaining ... it wasn't in the same league as the films that were nominated last year. Not even close. Dark Knight didn't deserve a nomination because it wasn't good enough to make the cut. Expanding best picture to 10 is a enormous mistake. Seriously, epic fail on the academy's part.

I would have preferred if the Academy made new categories rather than expand the best award of the night. We already have a Best award for animated feature films, why not a category for best action film or another for best comedy. I would rather watch films get recognition for being the best of their genre rather than widen the class of the best award. But that's just me...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 AM on 06/25/2009
- jjgg5 I'm a Fan of jjgg5 26 fans permalink

Obviously, the reason is financial. Hasn't it been difficult enough just to nominate 5 movies a year in this category? Adam Sandler will be able to say, "My movie was nominated for an Oscar". UGH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 06/25/2009
photo

Now Michael Bay will have a legitimate shot of having one of his films nominated.

Actually, that comment started out as a joke, but upon further reflection, it could possibly come true.

Nice going, Academy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 06/25/2009
photo

This is not going to go well.

10 nominees is too many.

Seven might have been a better number, but 10 is excessive.

Considering some of the highly questionable Best Picture winners of recent years, is this really going to help anything, other than getting some news in the current news cycle?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 06/24/2009
- lynettema I'm a Fan of lynettema 53 fans permalink

Mistake.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 06/24/2009
- jeanrenoir I'm a Fan of jeanrenoir 92 fans permalink

Obviously something had to be done about the recent tendency for the Academy to nominate movies like a bunch of real film critics, instead of using the old studio formula of how much did the movie cost and how many tickets did it sell. With luck, the result will be that the producers get what they want to build more box office for their megahits, and the Academy will still actually vote for good movies when giving the Oscar. It's obviously stupid to nominate ten, but in a culture as corrupted by money as ours, what does anyone expect? Money is to us what Islamic lunacy is to Iran.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 06/24/2009
photo

Meh! Why don't they turn it into a reality show where the public can call in and vote by phone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 06/24/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect