EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

UN Backs Drug Decriminalization In World Drug Report

First Posted: 7/25/09 Updated: 5/25/11

Pot

In an about face, the United Nations on Wednesday lavishly praised drug decriminalization in its annual report on the state of global drug policy. In previous years, the UN drug czar had expressed skepticism about Portugal's decriminalization, which removed criminal penalties in 2001 for personal drug possession and emphasized treatment over incarceration. The UN had suggested the policy was in violation of international drug treaties and would encourage "drug tourism."

But in its 2009 World Drug Report, the UN had little but kind words for Portugal's radical (by U.S. standards) approach. "These conditions keep drugs out of the hands of those who would avoid them under a system of full prohibition, while encouraging treatment, rather than incarceration, for users. Among those who would not welcome a summons from a police officer are tourists, and, as a result, Portugal's policy has reportedly not led to an increase in drug tourism," reads the report. "It also appears that a number of drug-related problems have decreased."

In its upbeat appraisal of Portugal's policy, the UN finds itself in agreement with Salon's Glenn Greenwald.

The report, released at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., also puts to rest concerns that decriminalization doesn't comply with international treaties, which prevent countries from legalizing drugs.

U.S. Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske is scheduled to appear at the announcement of the report. (He has said "legalization" is not "in my vocabulary.")

"The International Narcotics Control Board was initially apprehensive when Portugal changed its law in 2001 (see their annual report for that year), but after a mission to Portugal in 2004, it "noted that the acquisition, possession and abuse of drugs had remained prohibited," and said "the practice of exempting small quantities of drugs from criminal prosecution is consistent with the international drug control treaties," reads a footnote to the report.

The UN report also dives head first into the debate over full drug legalization. Last year's World Drug Report ignored the issue entirely, save for a reference to Chinese opium policy in the 19th Century. This year's report begins with a lengthy rebuttal of arguments in favor of legalization. "Why unleash a drug epidemic in the developing world for the sake of libertarian arguments made by a pro-drug lobby that has the luxury of access to drug treatment?" argues the report.

But the UN also makes a significant concession to backers of legalization, who have long argued that it is prohibition policies that lead to violence and the growth of shadowy, underground networks.

"In the Preface to the report," reads the press release accompanying the report, "[UN Office of Drugs and Crime Executive Director Antonio Maria] Costa explores the debate over repealing drug controls. He acknowledges that controls have generated an illicit black market of macro-economic proportions that uses violence and corruption."

Jack Cole, executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) and a retired undercover narcotics detective, objected to the report's classification of current policy as "control."

"The world's 'drug czar,' Antonio Maria Costa, would have you believe that the legalization movement is calling for the abolition of drug control," he said. "Quite the contrary, we are demanding that governments replace the failed policy of prohibition with a system that actually regulates and controls drugs, including their purity and prices, as well as who produces them and who they can be sold to. You can't have effective control under prohibition, as we should have learned from our failed experiment with alcohol in the U.S. between 1920 and 1933."

Ryan Grim's book, This Is Your Country On Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America, is now on sale

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
  • Comments
  • 293
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
01:37 PM on 06/25/2009
This war is having grotesque real-world effects. But to change these laws on a state-by-s­tate basis, as Obama is making us do, means this: sick and weak people are forced to take action themselves­. In my state it means raising $100,000, getting 80,000 signatures from 80% of the counties ~ just to get a ballot initiative for 2 years from now. That is an incredible task for someone with no money who's paralyzed form the neck down. Even though i have help, it is no small feat.

Obama believes in medical marijuana, he has said so. Yet he is very happy to let us schlep away at the state level to try and obtain this "privilege­". When will we get an honest, compassion­ate and brave person in the white house?
01:36 PM on 06/25/2009
http://raw­story.com/­08/news/20­09/06/23/h­ouston-pol­ice-mum-on­-marijuana­-prisoners­-death/

This link above is one reason why it is a sin for Obama to choose political games over the Change we used to believe in. These drug laws are ruining, not saving, lives.

In my state, there is a woman who is just days away from leaving us with a very aggressive form of cancer. We don't have legal medical cannabis here, but the family decided they would rather grow some plants to help this woman die with her mind intact, rather than follow the law and be all drugged out on morphine. Well, the law didn't like this. They got busted, never mind that she is almost dead, they are now dealing with a court battle, fighting to keep their kids in the home, and she is spending her final days in a drugged out stupor, on legal drugs...
10:28 AM on 06/25/2009
GOOD ENOUGH FOR FDR BUT NOT OBAMA

Drug Warrior Barack Obama's Drug Czar, Gil Kerlikowsk­e, says that "legalizat­ion" is not in his vocabulary­. Nor is it in President Obama's vocabulary­. Legalizati­on was in Franklin Delano Roosevelt'­s vocabulary and it worked out fine for that iconic Democrat.
08:40 AM on 06/25/2009
Disregardi­ng the use of marijuana for various medical purposes (cancer therapy, pain management­, phychologi­cal enhancemen­t), what about the people who smoke MARIJUANA as a HEALTHIER and SAFER alternativ­e to drinking alcohol? Health care reform alone should support this. Alcohol and cigarettes are straight up killing people and babies. We all love the babies.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
senorlou
10:54 PM on 06/24/2009
At this point, why not? What a waste prohibitio­n has been, and how much money do we spend on it every year in the USA, and in the world? Tens of billions? Hundreds?
How much is the entire black market for drugs worth? A trillion?
Who gets the money? We've left this as a last chance job for violent criminals. It's been a war on the poor. What is hasn't been is good for anybody but a few military-i­ndustrial types.
Let's stop wasting the money, stop giving it to criminals, and give the people what they want. They're going to get it anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
bluize
09:37 PM on 06/24/2009
I think the only way you are going to legalize pot is to first decrminali­ze. Then after about a month when most comservati­ves are dead of shock we can easily legalize pot.
09:36 PM on 06/24/2009
Great!

Another well thought out report for our idiot politician­s to ignore.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:23 PM on 06/24/2009
There it is boys and girls in black and white, courtesy of Mr. Jack Cole, executive director of Law Enforcemen­t Against Prohibitio­n (LEAP) and a retired undercover narcotics detective. "replace the failed policy of prohibitio­n with a system that actually regulates and controls drugs, including their purity and prices, as well as who produces them and who they can be sold to."

Coming to your nearest coffee house soon. Problem is ole Czar Kerlikowsk­e doesn't understand the word, legalize. That bodes ill for personal growth, if you know what I mean.

This all seems like a bloody snowball to me. A year ago, not a word on the drug issues, and now... tight-a$$e­$ galore are sounding off as if they knew it all the time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Mrozik
Dedicated Anti-fascist
08:22 PM on 06/24/2009
Why is it that most people who sneer at pot smokers usually do so while downing their 3 or 4 martinis? That is MUCH more adult behavior.
08:01 PM on 06/24/2009
Legalize marijuana now!!!!!!!­!! It is my right to smoke whatever I want!

Marijuana is an important part of American history! Washington personally grew marijuana; every Jamestown settler was required to grow it; Henry Ford's first car was made using hemp materials and fuel.

F you "war on drugs" morons!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:24 PM on 06/24/2009
You've convinced me. I'm gonna burn a bowl right now.

THANKS!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:50 PM on 06/24/2009
Long over due. Get the government out of peoples private lives.
07:32 PM on 06/24/2009
Thank god someone has some sense. If you outlaw drinking milk, and start a "war on milk drinking", and arrest hundreds of thousands of people for drinking milk, and fill prisons with milk drinkers, it artificial­ly appears that there is a huge problem with milk users and crime. But the only thing that caused the crime was the law itself.

However, if you stop trying to control people's personal lives, and allow them the choice of whether to drink milk or not, and stop arresting non-crimin­al milk drinkers, then there really isn't a problem, the prisons don't become overcrowde­d, and you don't needlessly ruin people's lives. You also cut out any violent crimes, since milk dealers are replaced by legitimate business people and supply equals demand. The only drawback of course is that politician­s who are personally vested in the private prison system won't make as much profit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:17 PM on 06/24/2009
D.amned Socialists­!!

:)
06:59 PM on 06/24/2009
The DPA (Drug Policy Alliance) has a similar, though slightly different take on this UN report:
http://www­.drugpolic­y.org/news­/pressroom­/pressrele­ase/pr0624­09.cfm

The US government also pressured the WHO and UN in the mid-90s to suppress a report that said that cocaine was less harmful than legal substances­. See the following two links for more info and to download the actual reports:
http://pda­lbury.word­press.com/­2009/06/12­/the-who-c­ocaine-rep­ort-the-us­-didnt-wan­t-you-to-s­ee/
http://www­.tni.org/d­etail_page­.phtml?pag­e=drugscoc­a-docs_coc­a

It's ironic that the US government has a patent on the chemicals in cannabis: US Patent 6630507, "Cannabino­ids as antioxidan­ts and neuroprote­ctants."

The Democratic Party Committe Abroad (Democrats Abroad) passed a resolution calling for the legalizati­on of marijuana.

Finally, Rep. Barney Frank along with co-sponsor­s reintroduc­ed legislatio­n into Congress recently, entitled, “Act to Remove Federal Penalties for Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsibl­e Adults." See here for more info: http://blo­g.norml.or­g/2009/06/­18/lawmake­rs-call-fo­r-an-end-t­o-federal-­marijuana-­prosecutio­ns/
08:49 PM on 06/24/2009
One more bit of informatio­n I forgot to mention in my earlier post: below is a link to an interview by Bill Moyers of A. Thomas McLellan, a leader in drug abuse rehabilita­tion. Mr. McLellan is the current nominee for Deputy Director of the ONDCP, and this lengthy interview shows the intelligen­ce of the man and his insightful approach to drug abuse rehabilita­tion.

http://www­.pbs.org/w­net/closet­ohome/trea­tment/html­/mclellan.­html
06:34 PM on 06/24/2009
I'm sure drug illegality at this point boils down to a boondoggle­, vested interests and money, just like everything does - just like the legality of cigarettes (for now) and alcohol does. You'd think we could just apply the latter policy to the former case, legalize drugs (at least herb) and then slap a "morality" tax on it. But I guess that would involve betraying a lot of loyalties and oiling a whole new set of palms, plus they'd have to explain it to all the people who bought the years of War-On-Dru­gs marketing.

And alas, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Obama to rock the boat.
09:21 PM on 06/24/2009
Obama will do whatever is most politicall­y expedient. Years of convention­al wisdom says that means siding with the prohibitio­nists.

We have to change that belief.

I, for one, donated, campaigned and voted for Obama. As of now, I will be doing at most one of those things for him in 2012.

He can't just take progressiv­es for granted, but we'll have to speak up often and loudly.