Debbie Rowe: Michael Is Not Kids' Biological Dad, I Don't Want Them

UPDATE BELOW

MICHAEL Jackson's two eldest kids face a tug-of-love battle after their mum Debbie Rowe confessed he was not their father.

In an astonishing interview Debbie - mother of Prince, 12, and Paris, 11 - said she was artificially inseminated by an anonymous donor.

And she told how, despite Jackson's death, she does not WANT custody of the children and NEVER expects to see them again.

WHOLE STORY WAS HERE, LINK APPEARS BROKEN

EXCERPTS:
Debbie (who lives on a farm surrounded by animals) said, ""I was just the vessel. It wasn't Michael's sperm. Just like I stick the sperm up my horse, this is what they did to me. I was his thoroughbred."....

After Debbie gave birth to second child Paris, she couldn't have kids again, "The delivery was so hard. My insides were all torn up and I was barren. When he knew I couldn't have any more babies he didn't want anything to do with me."

Debbie says she will not fight for custody of Prince Michael or Paris, "I know I will never see them again. I was never cut out to be a mother - I was no good. I don't want these children in my life. My children are my animals now."

UPDATE: Roger Friedman of Showbiz411.com says that the News of the World story refers to a 2004 interview and that the only interview Rowe has done since Jackson's death was with him.

She told me during a brief conversation today: "I lost my best friend."

Rowe was married to Jackson when she had Prince Michael I and Paris Katherine. But it was always understood that they'd part. Now, she is in tears missing her friend.

So far, Rowe has not addressed the issue of the kids or custody despite frantic reports. She wouldn't do that, she says. "Michael hasn't even been buried," she says. Rowe has always had an excellent relationship with Michael's mother, Katherine Jackson, and looks forward to talking to her soon, and possibly even seeing the children when the time is right.

The Jacksons' attorney says the family has not heard from Debbie Rowe about custody.

UPDATE #2:
Rowe filed a defamation lawsuit in 2009, suing the woman who claimed in an interview that Rowe didn't want custody of the Jackson kids.

Comments

[JustMeLe]

11:23 AM on 07/21/2009

Debbie's friend on Larry King live says those kids are 100% michael's kids and that all Debbie wants is a relationsh­ip with her bio kids. What is so strange about that? Surrogate mothers are routinely paid big $$$ for their services..­.

I don't really believe the sensationa­lism of this article... where is the original article anyway???

Can we please remember what we learned about how the media sensationa­lized and lied about Michael's life and made it living hell?

Can we not do that to the people that are left grieving for him? Give Debbie Rowe the benefit of doubt.

[Tugar]

09:22 AM on 07/05/2009

DEBBIE ROWE WAS IN THIS FOR THE MONEY, AND THE MONEY ONLY !

Seeing that (Large horse) behind that high fence, it didn't look too clean ! I just hope the judge investigat­es how this woman lives, and what these kids could actually be going to, by living with her !

Her house shown earlier, with about 10 or 12 dogs swimming in the pool it was nothing suggesting cleanlines­s either !

[aqua0]

10:45 PM on 07/08/2009

She accepted a money making offer and delivered her products. MJ wanted it that way and it made him happy. She was paid well to do her job and go away. He got his white kids because he disliked being black.

[barbwiregrrl]

01:42 AM on 07/09/2009

And you proof he did not like being black is? You have no idea what he liked or didn't...

[rt2000]

09:07 PM on 07/02/2009

Even if this is true, how is it possible that you would print this!!!! Imagine if it were you reading this about the only father you've ever known and he has just been taken away from you? Please have some respect. My heart goes out to those innocent children. I pray that they continue to be surrounded by love and grow up with pride for their incredibly talented father, Michael Jackson. God rest your soul!

[motherforpeace]

03:53 PM on 07/02/2009

I hope the judge in this whole situation does what is best for these kids. Being raised by their 80 year old grandmothe­r with the father he said abused him is not right. Their mother has been out of the picture for the longest time and from appearance­s looked as if it was all a business deal. Either give them to Diana Ross per Michael Jackon's request, their godfather or one of the brothers or sisters who has children. But most importantl­y, they should be kept together.

[LadyBeryl]

08:47 PM on 07/01/2009

Did anyone with an IQ above room temperatur­e believe that MJ was the biological father of those children?

[aqua0]

10:47 PM on 07/08/2009

Yes, those who are blind fans of MJ who idolize him and refuse to see the obvious. Don't want to destroy a fantasy they have.

MJ had serious issues, inspite of his talent and hard work and fame. It's all out there for everyone to see. I'm sure he's a decent person and hope he is in a better place.

[myhomeo]

04:53 PM on 07/01/2009

TMI

[Leper]

02:42 AM on 07/01/2009

Debbie Rowe is not my lover
She just girl who says I am the one
But the kid is not my son.

[jonjon66]

05:07 PM on 07/01/2009

lol

[sexyrexy]

12:47 AM on 07/01/2009

don't know what /why is all a big deal..

that's why MJ did what he did to have tr these kids.. instead of 'adopt'.. so NO one can challenge them.,And MJ's name is on thew birth certificat­es.

the media is just going overboard trying to chase a non-event story ..as usual.Rowe will never challenge this-- why should she?? she signed a contract before she even carried those 2 kids. and why they went through the motions of a wedding.

[moondancer13]

11:36 PM on 06/30/2009

Debbie Rowe a thoroughbr­ed? Oh Puh-leeze!

[kate99]

10:42 PM on 06/30/2009

ok if what she says is right which I don't believe but then why say I don't want them if they are for sure hers she wants more cash is how I read this

plus if she thinks losing MJ is like losing her best friend why come out and say this knowing it would hurt his family kids and legacy

[EarthToZoey]

09:21 PM on 06/30/2009

The song 'Billie Jean' comes to mind...

[jonjon66]

05:08 PM on 07/01/2009

...there just some kids, I'm not the one...that kid is not my son....and neither are the girls.lol

[Knowledgeseeker]

08:58 PM on 06/30/2009

These are MJ biological kids... people need to stop making up these stories

[HuffEurope2]

11:02 PM on 06/30/2009

His white, blond, blue-eyed kids? Yep, sure.

[Talaan77]

10:58 AM on 07/01/2009

I don't know if he is the biological father or not but If the mother has those traits

[danaseilhan]

09:26 PM on 07/01/2009

It does happen. If you don't think so, you never cared enough to find out.

[socalsue]

08:47 PM on 06/30/2009

Oh, my. Gladys. How did you know that he had lupus?
My understand­ing is that he had discoid lupus which features terrible scarring.
As an example, Seal has lupus, but he doesn't hide it.
Good for him!

[socalsue]

08:45 PM on 06/30/2009

News Of the World has absolutely no credibilit­y. Period.

[sansego2000]

07:57 PM on 06/30/2009

No news that Michael was not the biological father and Debbie Rowe was just an incubator. The big news that i hear is that Michael never adopted them, neither did Debbie.

[jobamma2]

09:44 PM on 06/30/2009

the days old story about debbie and michael not being the parents is being denied. she gave her first interview today and none of that was said.