Wal-Mart Backs Employer Health Insurance Mandate

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Wal-Mart Backs Employer Health Insurance Mandate stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHARLES BABINGTON | 06/30/09 09:04 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama delivers remarks on Iraq in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, June 30, 2009. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

WASHINGTON — Wal-Mart is the latest in a line of traditionally Republican-leaning businesses to embrace key portions of President Barack Obama's bid to overhaul health care, a trend that could complicate opponents' efforts to build a united front when Congress ramps up its work on the issue this summer.

Wal-Mart, the nation's largest private employer, on Tuesday endorsed the idea of requiring large companies to offer health insurance to their workers. The proposal is central to Obama's hopes of covering the nation's nearly 50 million uninsured and is disliked by some business groups.

Wal-Mart was joined by a major labor union that sometimes has criticized the company's relatively stingy employee benefits.

The big retailer is not the only one-time opponent of health care revisions to embrace at least some aspects of Obama's proposals. The major group representing pharmaceutical makers recently said it would reduce senior citizens' costs for prescription drugs by $80 billion over 10 years. And major groups representing doctors, hospitals and other providers have pledged to reduce health care costs by large amounts.

Nearly all these groups, by varying degrees, opposed efforts to overhaul the nation's health care system during the Clinton administration in 1993-94. Moreover, Wal-Mart and its officials have given far more in political contributions over the past decade to Republicans than to Democrats. The same is true of the pharmaceutical industry and several other health-related groups.

But with better prospects for a health care bill this time _ and the public favoring overhaul, many businesses and industries want to be part of the final legislation rather than left out.

"We are for an employer mandate which is fair and broad in its coverage," Wal-Mart said in a letter to congressional and administration officials. "Any alternative to an employer mandate should not create barriers to hiring entry-level employees."

That was a reference to some proposals in Congress to have employers pay the Medicaid costs of new hires. Critics say that would discourage the hiring of low-income people.

Story continues below
advertisement

The letter was also signed by Andrew L. Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union, which has more than a million members and counts more U.S. health workers than any other union. Also signing it was John Podesta, who headed Obama's transition team and is president of the Center for American Progress.

As recently as 2006, Wal-Mart fiercely fought Maryland's efforts to force it to contribute more toward its employees' health care coverage.

The Wal-Mart and SEIU letter could build momentum on two fronts: Wal-Mart's bid to improve its image regarding worker treatment, and Obama's health care agenda.

In recent years, SEIU and other unions or liberal groups have criticized Wal-Mart for charging relatively high premiums to its employees for health insurance, and forcing them to wait up to two years for coverage.

Last May, the Federal Election Commission dismissed a complaint by labor groups that accused Wal-Mart Stores Inc. of pressuring employees to vote against Democrats in November's election, though FEC staffers warned the case was a "close call."

Wal-Mart lately has tried to improve employee relations, and has hired some prominent Democrats to broaden its political base. One of them, executive vice president Leslie Dach, said Wal-Mart feels the current U.S. health care system is unsustainable, and an employer insurance mandate is a cost that businesses should accept.

SEIU's Stern praised Wal-Mart and said: "Everyone, including employers, must share responsibility in guaranteeing every working American quality, affordable insurance."

Nancy-Ann DeParle, director of the White House Office of Health Reform, said the Wal-Mart and SEIU move was significant as Congress prepares to debate competing health plans this month. "The rising cost of health care is hurting employers and employees alike," she said, "restricting businesses' ability to grow and keeping workers' wages flat."

Obama will hold a town-hall forum on health care Wednesday in Virginia. On Tuesday, he phoned Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, a moderate Republican whom Democrats hope to draw into a bipartisan fold on health care.

Tuesday's letter suggested that Wal-Mart's and SEIU's enthusiasm for an employer mandate might wane if the final legislation does not also include a mechanism to ensure cuts in the cost of delivering health care.

"Support for a mandate also requires the strongest possible commitment to rein in health care costs," it said.

Former Senate Democratic Leader Thomas Daschle and others have proposed a federal commission with powers to impose Medicare cost reductions, among other things, if overall health delivery costs do not reach certain targets in a given time. The letter endorsed Daschle's efforts.

WASHINGTON — Wal-Mart is the latest in a line of traditionally Republican-leaning businesses to embrace key portions of President Barack Obama's bid to overhaul health care, a trend that could c...
WASHINGTON — Wal-Mart is the latest in a line of traditionally Republican-leaning businesses to embrace key portions of President Barack Obama's bid to overhaul health care, a trend that could c...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
66
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

It's so funny all these naysayer blasting wal-mart and they never worked a day with this good company. My question to you is how much are your health care premiums at the company you work for, how many people are employed and how many have opted for health care coverage at your job. Wal-Mart is a good company to work for and a great place for a community to generate tax dollars needed to a city to sustain a police dept, fire dept and the various other gov't projects.

When disaster hits in a community city, county, state and federal agencies call on Wal-Mart to help provide relief and supplies for logistic support to route goods to local areas for free.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 07/01/2009
photo

I also work in retail. All retailers follow Wal Mart's lead, because if they don't their shareholders fire top management for not taking advantage of cutting wages and benefits like Wal Mart does. That is why when Wal Mart does it everybody else in the industry follows to the detriment of employees. The prevailing ethic is that 'if Wal Mart can do it and save money, why can't we do the same thing'.

The way Wal Mart goes into a small town is to demand property tax breaks on their building. If they don't get it, they build outside of the city limits where the township will give them tax breaks. If that doesn't work, they start again in the next town. None of their small business competitors get these property tax breaks.

Practically every large department store does the same type of thing in a disaster, especially in smaller towns.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

The only reason Wal Mart is for it is that they already provide health insurance for their people. Except that it is at such a high cost that most of the people working in their stores at low wages can't afford it.

So, Wal Mart, as they are doing now, will pawn their employees off on the state and federal government welfare plans. In most states, Wal Mart leads the way on employers whose employees are still on some sort of state health plan. Your taxes help subsidize Wal Mart's profits once again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 07/01/2009
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

This is huge and against the retail lobby who hire many workers lower on the economic scale or undocumented workers without insurance only to be subsidized by everyone else who pays. This is a major hidden cost that has not been fairly born by those employers for decades.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 07/01/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 212 fans permalink
photo

Walmart wants to stop paying for employee benefits altogether, of course they are for this plan, thier profit margin goes up a few cents!

Walmart employee break rooms have forms to apply for public assistance, because they know and understand that they pay slave wages.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 07/01/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 68 fans permalink

so let us cancel welfare...­....walmar­t will not be able to do that then.....put any system in place .......after the rules are understood......the rules will be played by or played with.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 07/01/2009
- yakmeat I'm a Fan of yakmeat 9 fans permalink

If insurance manages risk by pooling that risk, then the best way to decrease the risk is to get the biggest pool possible. Can we find a bigger pool than EVERYONE?

Continuing to tie insurance to employment will only continue to discourage people from starting new small businesses. Requiring everyone to buy insurance (either as employers or employees) just amounts to another taxpayer funded bail-out, this time for the insurance industry. Come on, Congress and President O, the rest of the world knows the answer to this and so do you. Single Payer!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 07/01/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 68 fans permalink

no thanks

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 07/01/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 212 fans permalink
photo

Why?

Oh that's right, you support the Insurance industry's profit methods because it has not adversely effected you yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 07/01/2009
photo

The only way employers can eliminate the risk by not covering people at all.

They try to do this by cancelling their health benefits, making them so expensive their employees can't afford it or shoving them off onto the government,. The last two are what Wal Mart does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 07/01/2009
- rxvette I'm a Fan of rxvette 34 fans permalink

The key to reducing costs in the healthcare system lies with us individually mostly - http://rxvette.blogspot.com/2009/06/biggest-key-to-health-care-reform-in-us.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 07/01/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 212 fans permalink
photo

I would add the removal of High Fructose Corn Syrup from anything we eat or drink, and go back to cane sugar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 AM on 07/01/2009

This gives Sen. Blanche Lincoln, Reps. Marion Berry and Mike Ross the political cover they need to vote for HC reform.

www.twitter.com/the20515

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

Wal-Mart already has a good number of employees on Government Assistance

They aren't for this out of a sense of loyalty to the country
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3836296181471292925

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 PM on 06/30/2009
- RofWH I'm a Fan of RofWH 3 fans permalink

Did I just wake up on Mars? Where am I? Has Wal-Mart changed ownership? Where are the bad guys (besides on the right side of the aisle in Congress and the management of the health insurance companies)?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 06/30/2009
- LouStool I'm a Fan of LouStool 2 fans permalink

They need a public relations boost...They also were for the raise in minimum wage. And after the $4 prescriptions, they might be turning the tide of opinion about the company.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

"Trust me," said the Fox to the Hen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 06/30/2009
- JuliaRain I'm a Fan of JuliaRain 70 fans permalink

o_0

"As recently as 2006, Wal-Mart fiercely fought Maryland's efforts to force it to contribute more toward its employees' health care coverage."

Maryland?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 06/30/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 212 fans permalink
photo

They paid fines and settlements for forcing employees to work off the clock, and unpaid overtime.......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 07/01/2009
photo

Maryland tried to implement a law that was specifically drafted for Wal-Mart to require them to pay more for health care coverage. The reason was that the state ended up insuring thousands of Wal-Mart employees through welfare programs when they were full time employees of Wal-Mart. These employees did not make enough to be able to afford Wal-Mart's plan and they made below the limits for state programs. So, Maryland taxpayers were supplementing Wal-Mart's profits because Wal-Mart required their employees to pay a major percentage of their income in health insurance premiums in order to get coverage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 07/01/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 193 fans permalink
photo

The GOP can no longer blame business for their political decision to oppose health care. They simply want the economy to get worse in order to make their "leadership" into a Second Great Depression look good... somehow... and they are also in the pocket of the Health Insurance industry, who stands to lose all their free and easy money should a public plan be created.

The Conservative Agenda: anti-American at any speed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

What I have never gotten with the right wing opposing health care reform is that they claim to be so pro business. Employee health insurance costs are one of the biggest drains there is on business. It makes American companies less competitive with countires that have public plans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

Well they're not anti healthcare they're pro big insurance companies. (They don't always tell the truth) shhhhhhh don't tell anybody.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

Whoa- Really? -Would any sane and sober American trust WALMART Corp as their employer with something as important as their health? I think not?

I believe that the US model of employer based health care has outlived its usefulness to both employees and employers.

It's time to move on.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 06/30/2009
- efmo I'm a Fan of efmo 7 fans permalink

I agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 06/30/2009
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 212 fans permalink
photo

Co-sign!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 07/01/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect